I am charged with trying to take the consolation

209

of this doctrine from the world. I am a criminal

because I am endeavoring to convince the mother

that her child does not deserve eternal punishment.

I stand by the graves of those who "died in their

"sins," by the tombs of the "unregenerate," over the

ashes of men who have spent their lives working for

their wives and children, and over the sacred dust of

soldiers who died in defence of flag and country,

and I say to their friends--I say to the living who

loved them, I say to the men and women for whom

they worked, I say to the children whom they edu-

cated, I say to the country for which they died:

These fathers, these mothers, these wives, these

husbands, these soldiers are not in hell.

_Question_. Mr. Talmage insists that the Bible is

scientific, and that the real scientific man sees no

contradiction between revelation and science; that,

on the contrary, they are in harmony. What is your

understanding of this matter?

_Answer_. I do not believe the Bible to be a sci-

entific book. In fact, most of the ministers now admit

that it was not written to teach any science. They

admit that the first chapter of Genesis is not geo-

logically true. They admit that Joshua knew nothing

210

of science. They admit that four-footed birds did

not exist in the days of Moses. In fact, the only

way they can avoid the unscientific statements of the

Bible, is to assert that the writers simply used the

common language of their day, and used it, not with

the intention of teaching any scientific truth, but for

the purpose of teaching some moral truth. As a

matter of fact, we find that moral truths have been

taught in all parts of this world. They were taught

in India long before Moses lived; in Egypt long be-

fore Abraham was born; in China thousands of

years before the flood. They were taught by hundreds

and thousands and millions before the Garden of

Eden was planted.

It would be impossible to prove the truth of a

revelation simply because it contained moral truths.

If it taught immorality, it would be absolutely certain

that it was not a revelation from an infinitely good

being. If it taught morality, it would be no reason

for even suspecting that it had a divine origin. But

if the Bible had given us scientific truths; if the

ignorant Jews had given us the true theory of our

solar system; if from Moses we had learned the

nature of light and heat; if from Joshua we had

learned something of electricity; if the minor pro-

211

phets had given us the distances to other planets;

if the orbits of the stars had been marked by the

barbarians of that day, we might have admitted that

they must have been inspired. If they had said any-

thing in advance of their day; if they had plucked

from the night of ignorance one star of truth, we

might have admitted the claim of inspiration; but

the Scriptures did not rise above their source, did

not rise above their ignorant authors--above the

people who believed in wars of extermination, in

polygamy, in concubinage, in slavery, and who taught

these things in their "sacred Scriptures."

The greatest men in the scientific world have not

been, and are not, believers in the inspiration of the

Scriptures. There has been no greater astronomer

than Laplace. There is no greater name than

Humboldt. There is no living scientist who stands

higher than Charles Darwin. All the professors in

all the religious colleges in this country rolled into

one, would not equal Charles Darwin. All the cow-

ardly apologists for the cosmogony of Moses do not

amount to as much in the world of thought as Ernst

Haeckel. There is no orthodox scientist the equal

of Tyndall or Huxley. There is not one in this

country the equal of John Fiske. I insist, that the

212

foremost men to-day in the scientific world reject the

dogma of inspiration. They reject the science of the

Bible, and hold in utter contempt the astronomy of

Joshua, and the geology of Moses.

Mr. Talmage tells us "that Science is a boy and

"Revelation is a man." Of course, like the most he

says, it is substantially the other way. Revelation,

so-called, was the boy. Religion was the lullaby of

the cradle, the ghost-story told by the old woman,

Superstition. Science is the man. Science asks for

demonstration. Science impels us to investigation,

and to verify everything for ourselves. Most pro-

fessors of American colleges, if they were not afraid

of losing their places, if they did not know that

Christians were bad enough now to take the bread

from their mouths, would tell their students that the

Bible is not a scientific book.

The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 05 (of 12) Dresden Edition—Discussions · 第 43 / 68 题