Art. 21. The stipulations of the Sino-Russian declaration and the

Notes exchanged between China and Russia of the 5th day of the

11th month of the 2nd year of the Republic of China, 23rd October,

1913, as well as those of the Russo-Mongolian Commercial Protocol

of the 2lst October, 1912, remain in full force.

Art. 22. The present Agreement, drawn up in triplicate in Chinese,

Russian, Mongolian and French languages, comes into force from the

day of its signature. Of the four texts which have been duly

compared and found to agree, the French text shall be

authoritative in the interpretation of the Present Agreement.

Done at Kiachta the 7th day of the Sixth Month of the Fourth year

of the Republic of China, corresponding to the Twenty-fifth of

May, Seventh of June, One Thousand Nine Hundred Fifteen.

CHINO-JAPANESE TREATIES AND ANNEXES

COMPLETE ENGLISH TEXT OF THE DOCUMENTS

The following is an authoritative translation of the two Treaties

and thirteen Notes exchanged between His Excellency the President

of the Republic of China and His Majesty the Emperor of Japan

through their respective plenipotentiaries:

TREATY RESPECTING THE PROVINCE OP SHANTUNG

His Excellency the President of the Republic of China and His

Majesty the Emperor of Japan, having resolved to conclude a Treaty

with a view to the maintenance of general peace in the Extreme

East and the further strengthening of the relations of friendship

and good neighbourhood now existing between the two nations, have

for that purpose named as their Plenipotentiaries, that is to say:

His Excellency the President of the Republic of China, Lou Tseng-

tsiang, Chung-ching, First Class Chia Ho Decoration, Minister of

Foreign Affairs.

And His Majesty the Emperor of Japan, Hioki Eki, Jushii, Second

Class of the Imperial Order of the Sacred Treasure, Minister

Plenipotentiary, and Envoy Extraordinary:

Who, after having communicated to each other their full powers and

found them to be in good and due form, have agreed upon and

concluded the following Articles:--

Article 1. The Chinese Government agrees to give full assent to

all matters upon which the Japanese Government may hereafter agree

with the German Government relating to the disposition of all

rights, interests and concessions which Germany, by virtue of

treaties or otherwise, possesses in relation to the Province of

Shantung.

Art. 2. The Chinese Government agrees that as regards the railway

to be built by China herself from Chefoo or Lungkow to connect

with the Kiaochow-Tsinanfu railway, if Germany abandons the

privilege of financing the Chefoo-Weihsien line, China will

approach Japanese capitalists to negotiate for a loan.

Art. 3. The Chinese Government agrees in the interest of trade and

for the residence of foreigners, to open by China herself as soon

as possible certain suitable places in the Province of Shantung as

Commercial Ports.

Art. 4. The present treaty shall come into force on the day of its

signature.

The present treaty shall be ratified by His Excellency the

President of the Republic of China and His Majesty the Emperor of

Japan, and the ratification thereof shall be exchanged at Tokio as

soon as possible.

In witness whereof the respective Plenipotentiaries of the High

Contracting Parties have signed and sealed the present Treaty, two

copies in the Chinese language and two in Japanese.

Done at Peking this twenty-fifth day of the fifth month of the

fourth year of the Republic of China, corresponding to the same

day of the same month of the fourth year of Taisho.

EXCHANGE OF NOTES RESPECTING SHANTUNG

--Note--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th years of the

Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre.

In the name of the Chinese Government I have the honour to make

the following declaration to your Government:--"Within the

Province of Shantung or along its coast no territory or island

will be leased or ceded to any foreign Power under any pretext."

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) LOU TSENG-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki,

Japanese Minister.

--Reply--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of Taisho.

Excellency,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's

note of this day's date in which you made the following

declaration in the name of the Chinese Government:--"Within the

Province of Shantung or along its coast no territory or island

will be leased or ceded to any foreign Power under any pretext."

In reply I beg to state that I have taken note of this

declaration.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI EKI.

His Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang, Minister of Foreign Affairs.

EXCHANGE OF NOTES RESPECTING THE OPENING OF PORTS IN SHANTUNG

--Note--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of the

Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre.

I have the honour to state that the places which ought to be

opened as Commercial Ports by China herself, as provided in

Article 3 of the Treaty respecting the Province of Shantung signed

this day, will be selected and the regulations therefor, will be

drawn up, by the Chinese Government itself, a decision concerning

which will be made after consulting the Minister of Japan.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) LOU TSENG-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki, Japanese Minister.

--Reply--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of Taisho.

Excellency,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's

note of this day's date in which you stated "that the places which

ought to be opened as Commercial Ports by China herself, as

provided in Article 3 of the Treaty respecting the province of

Shantung signed this day, will be selected and the regulations

therefor, will be drawn up by the Chinese Government itself, a

decision concerning which will be made after consulting the

Minister of Japan."

In reply, I beg to state that I have taken note of the same,

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI KEI.

His Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang, Minister of Foreign Affairs.

EXCHANGE OF NOTES RESPECTING THE RESTORATION OF THE LEASED

TERRITORY OF KIAOCHOW BAY

--Note--Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of

Taisho.

Excellency,

In the name of my Government I have the honour to make the

following declaration to the Chinese Government:--

When, after the termination of the present war, the leased

territory of Kiaochow Bay is completely left to the free disposal

of Japan, the Japanese Government will restore the said leased

territory to China under the following conditions:--

1. The whole of Kiaochow Bay to be opened as a Commercial Port.

2. A concession under the exclusive jurisdiction of Japan to be

established at a place designated by the Japanese Government.

3. If the foreign Powers desire it, an international concession

may be established.

4. As regards the disposal to be made of the buildings and

properties of Germany and the conditions and procedure relating

thereto, the Japanese Government and the Chinese Government shall

arrange the matter by mutual agreement before the restoration.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI EKI.

His Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang,

Minister of Foreign Affairs.

--Reply--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of the

Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your Excellency's

note of this day's date in which you made the following

declaration in the name of your Government:--

"When, after the termination of the present war the leased

territory of Kiaochow Bay is completely left to the free disposal

of Japan, the Japanese Government will restore the said leased

territory to China under the following conditions:--

1. The whole of Kiaochow Bay to be opened as a Commercial Port.

2. A concession under the exclusive jurisdiction of Japan to be

established at a place designated by the Japanese Government.

3. If the foreign Powers desire it, an international concession

may be established.

4. As regards the disposal to be made of the buildings and

properties of Germany and the conditions and procedure relating

thereto, the Japanese Government and the Chinese Government shall

arrange the matter by mutual agreement before the restoration."

In reply, I beg to state that I have taken note of this

declaration.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) Lou TSENG-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki, Japanese Minister.

TREATY RESPECTING SOUTH MANCHURIA AND EASTERN INNER MONGOLIA

His Excellency the President of the Republic of China and His

Majesty the Emperor of Japan, having resolved to conclude a Treaty

with a view to developing their economic relations in South

Manchuria and Eastern Inner Mongolia, have for that purpose named

as their Plenipotentiaries, that is to say;

His Excellency the President of the Republic of China, Lou Tseng-

tsiang, Chung-ching, First Class Chia-ho Decoration, and Minister

of Foreign Affairs; And His Majesty the Emperor of Japan, Hioki

Eki, Jushii, Second Class of the Imperial Order of the Sacred

Treasure, Minister Plenipotentiary and Envoy Extraordinary;

Who, after having communicated to each other their full powers,

and found them to be in good and due form, have agreed upon and

concluded the following Articles:--

Article 1. The two High Contracting Parties agree that the term of

lease of Port Arthur and Dalny and the terms of the South

Manchuria Railway and the Antung-Mukden Railway, shall be extended

to 99 years.

Art. 2. Japanese subjects in South Manchuria may, by negotiation,

lease land necessary for erecting suitable buildings for trade and

manufacture or for prosecuting agricultural enterprises.

Art. 3. Japanese subjects shall be free to reside and travel in

South Manchuria and to engage in business and manufacture of any

kind whatsoever.

Art. 4. In the event of Japanese and Chinese desiring jointly to

undertake agricultural enterprises and industries incidental

thereto, the Chinese Government may give its permission.

Art. 5. The Japanese subjects referred to in the preceding three

articles, besides being required to register with the local

Authorities passports which they must procure under the existing

regulations, shall also submit to the police laws and ordinances

and taxation of China.

Civil and criminal cases in which the defendants are Japanese

shall be tried and adjudicated by the Japanese Consul: those in

which the defendants are Chinese shall be tried and adjudicated by

Chinese Authorities. In either case an officer may be deputed to

the court to attend the proceedings. But mixed civil cases between

Chinese and Japanese relating to land shall be tried and

adjudicated by delegates of both nations conjointly in accordance

with Chinese law and local usage.

When, in future, the judicial system in the said region is

completely reformed, all civil and criminal cases concerning

Japanese subjects shall be tried and adjudicated entirely by

Chinese law courts.

Art. 6. The Chinese Government agrees, in the interest of trade

and for the residence of foreigners, to open by China herself, as

soon as possible, certain suitable places in Eastern Inner

Mongolia as Commercial Ports.

Art. 7. The Chinese Government agrees speedily to make a

fundamental revision of the Kirin-Changchun Railway Loan

Agreement, taking as a standard the provisions in railway loan

agreements made heretofore between China and foreign financiers.

When in future, more advantageous terms than those in existing

railway loan agreements are granted to foreign financiers in

connection with railway loans, the above agreement shall again be

revised in accordance with Japan's wishes.

Art. 8. All existing treaties between China and Japan relating to

Manchuria shall, except where otherwise provided for by this

Treaty, remain in force.

Art. 9. The present Treaty shall come into force on the date of

its signature. The present Treaty shall be ratified by His

Excellency the President of the Republic of China and His Majesty

the Emperor of Japan, and the ratifications thereof shall be

exchanged at Tokio as soon as possible.

In witness whereof the respective Plenipotentiaries of the two

High Contracting Parties have signed and sealed the present

Treaty, two copies in the Chinese language and two in Japanese.

Done at Peking this twenty-fifth day of the fifth month of the

fourth year of the Republic of China, corresponding to the same

day of the same month of the fourth year of Taisho.

EXCHANGE OF NOTES

Respecting the Terms of Lease of Port Arthur and Dalny and the

Terms of South Manchurian and Antung-Mukden Railways.

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of the

Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre,

I have the honour to state that, respecting the provisions

contained in Article 1 of the Treaty relating to South Manchuria

and Eastern Inner Mongolia, signed this day, the term of lease of

Port Arthur and Dalny shall expire in the 86th year of the

Republic or 1997. The date for restoring the South Manchuria

Railway to China shall fall due in the 9lst year of the Republic

or 2002. Article 12 in the original South Manchurian Railway

Agreement providing that it may be redeemed by China after 36

years from the day on which the traffic is opened is hereby

cancelled. The term of the Antung-Mukden Railway shall expire in

the 96th year of the Republic or 2007.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) Lou TSENG-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki,

Japanese Minister.

--Reply--Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of

Taisho.

Excellency,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's

note of this day's date, in which you stated that respecting the

provisions contained in Article 1 of the Treaty relating to South

Manchuria and Eastern Inner Mongolia, signed this day, the term of

lease of Port Arthur and Dalny shall expire in the 86th year of

the Republic or 1997. The date for restoring the South Manchurian

Railway to China shall fall due in the 91st year of the Republic

or 2002. Article 12 in the original South Manchurian Railway

Agreement providing that it may be redeemed by China after 36

years from the day on which the traffic is opened, is hereby

cancelled. The term of the Antung-Mukden Railway shall expire in

the 96th year of the Republic or 2007.

In reply I beg to state that I have taken note of the same.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI EKI.

His Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang, Minister of Foreign Affairs.

EXCHANGE OF NOTES RESPECTING THE OPENING OF PORTS IN EASTERN

INNER MONGOLIA

--Note--Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of

the Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre,

I have the honour to state that the places which ought to be

opened as Commercial Ports by China herself, as provided in

Article 6 of the Treaty respecting South Manchuria and Eastern

Inner Mongolia signed this day, will be selected, and the

regulations therefor, will be drawn up, by the Chinese Government

itself, a decision concerning which will be made after consulting

the Minister of Japan.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) LOU TSENG-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki, Japanese Minister.

--Reply--Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of

Taisho.

Excellency,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's

note of this day's date in which you stated "that the places which

ought to be opened as Commercial Ports by China herself, as

provided in Article 6 of the Treaty respecting South Manchuria and

Eastern Inner Mongolia signed this day, will be selected, and the

regulations therefor, will be drawn up, by the Chinese Government

itself, a decision concerning which will be made after consulting

the Minister of Japan."

In reply, I beg to state that I have taken note of the same.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI EKI.

His Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang, Minister of Foreign Affairs.

SOUTH MANCHURIA

--Note--Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of

the Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre,

I have the honour to state that Japanese subjects shall, as soon

as possible, investigate and select mines in the mining areas in

South Manchuria specified hereinunder, except those being

prospected for or worked, and the Chinese Government will then

permit them to prospect or work the same; but before the Mining

regulations are definitely settled, the practice at present in

force shall be followed. Provinces Fengtien:--

Locality District Mineral

Niu Hsin T'ai Pen-hsi Coal

Tien Shih Fu Kou Pen-hsi Coal

Sha Sung Kang Hai-lung Coal

T'ieh Ch'ang Tung-hua Coal

Nuan Ti T'ang Chin Coal

An Shan Chan region From Liaoyang

to Pen-hsi Iron

KIRIN (Southern portion)

Locality District Mineral

Sha Sung Kang Ho-lung C. & I.

Kang Yao Chi-lin (Kirin) Coal

Chia P'i Kou Hua-tien Gold

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) LOU TSENG-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki, Japanese Minister.

--Reply--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of Taisho.

Excellency,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's

note of this day respecting the opening of mines in South

Manchuria, stating; "Japanese subjects shall, as soon as possible,

investigate and select mines in the mining areas in South

Manchuria specified hereinunder, except those being prospected for

or worked, and the Chinese Government will then permit them to

prospect and or work the same; but before the Mining regulations

are definitely settled, the practice at present in force shall be

followed.

1 Provinces Fengtien.

Locality District Mineral

1. Niu Hsin T'ai Pen-hsi Coal

2. Tien Shih Fu Kou Pen-hsi Coal

3. Sha Sung Kang Hai-lung Coal

4. T'ieh Ch'ang Tung-hua Coal

5. Nuan Ti T'ang Chin Coal

6. An Shan Chan region From Liaoyang

to Pen-hsi Iron

KIRIN (Southern portion)

1. Sha Sung Kang Ho-lung Coal & Iron

2. Kang Yao Chi-lin (Kirin) Coal

3. Chia P'i Kou Hua-tien Gold

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI EKI.

His Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang, Minister of Foreign Affairs of

the Republic of China.

EXCHANGE OF NOTES RESPECTING RAILWAYS AND TAXES IN SOUTH MANCHURIA

AND EASTERN INNER MONGOLIA

--Note--Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of

the Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre,

In the name of my Government.

I have the honour to make the following declaration to your

Government:--

China will hereafter provide funds for building necessary railways

in South Manchuria and Eastern Inner Mongolia; if foreign capital

is required China may negotiate for a loan with Japanese

capitalists first; and further, the Chinese Government, when

making a loan in future on the security of the taxes in the above-

mentioned places (excluding the salt and customs revenue which

have already been pledged by the Chinese Central Government) may

negotiate for it with Japanese capitalists first.

I avail, etc.

(Signed) LOU TSENG-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki, Japanese Minister.

--Reply--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of Taisho.

Excellency,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's

note of this day's date respecting railways and taxes in South

Manchuria and Eastern Inner Mongolia in which you stated:

"China will hereafter provide funds for building necessary

railways in South Manchuria and Eastern Inner Mongolia; if foreign

capital is required China may negotiate for a loan with Japanese

capitalists first; and further, the Chinese Government, when

making a loan in future on the security of taxes in the above

mentioned places (excluding the salt and customs revenue which has

already been pledged by the Chinese Central Government) may

negotiate for it with Japanese capitalists first.

In reply I beg to state that I have taken note of the same.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI EKI.

His Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang, Minister of Foreign Affairs.

EXCHANGE OF NOTES RESPECTING THE EMPLOYMENT OF ADVISERS IN SOUTH

MANCHURIA

--Note--Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of

the Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre,

In the name of the Chinese Government, I have the honour to make

the following declaration to your Government:--

"Hereafter, if foreign advisers or instructors on political,

financial, military or police matters are to be employed in South

Manchuria, Japanese may be employed first."

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) LOU TSENG-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki, Japanese Minister.

--Reply--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of Taisho.

Excellency,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's

note of this day's date in which you made the following

declaration in the name of your Government:--

"Hereafter if foreign advisers or instructors in political,

financial, military or police matters are to be employed in South

Manchuria, Japanese may be employed first."

In reply, I beg to state that I have taken note of the same.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI EKI.

Hia Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang, Minister of Foreign Affairs.

EXCHANGE OF NOTES RESPECTING THE EXPLANATION OF "LEASE BY

NEGOTIATION" IN SOUTH MANCHURIA

--Note--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of Taisho.

Excellency,

I have the honour to state that the term lease by negotiation

contained in Article 2 of the Treaty respecting South Manchuria

and Eastern Inner Mongolia signed this day shall be understood to

imply a long-term lease of not more than thirty years and also the

possibility of its unconditional renewal.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI EKI.

His Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang, Minister of Foreign Affairs.

--Reply--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of the

Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's

note of this day's date in which you state.

"The term lease by negotiation contained in Article 2 of the

Treaty respecting South Manchuria and Eastern Inner Mongolia

signed this day shall be understood to imply a long-term lease of

not more than thirty years and also the possibility of its

unconditional renewal."

In reply I beg to state that I have taken note of the same.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) LOU TSENG-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki, Japanese Minister.

EXCHANGE OF NOTES RESPECTING THE ARRANGEMENT FOR POLICE LAWS AND

ORDINANCES AND TAXATION IN SOUTH MANCHURIA AND EASTERN INNER

MONGOLIA

--Note--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of the

Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre,

I have the honour to state that the Chinese Authorities will

notify the Japanese Consul of the police laws and ordinances and

the taxation to which Japanese subjects shall submit according to

Article 5 of the Treaty respecting South Manchuria and Eastern

Inner Mongolia signed this day so as to come to an understanding

with him before their enforcement.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) Lou TSENO-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki, Japanese Minister.

--Reply--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of Taisho.

Excellency,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's

note of this day's date in which you state:

"The Chinese Authorities will notify the Japanese Consul of the

Police laws and ordinances and the taxation to which Japanese

subjects shall submit according to Article 5 of the Treaty

respecting South Manchuria and Eastern Inner Mongolia signed this

day so as to come to an understanding with him before their

enforcement."

In reply, I beg to state that I have taken note of the same.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI EKI.

His Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang Minister of Foreign Affairs.

--Note--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of the

Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre,

I have the honour to state that, inasmuch as preparations have to

be made regarding Articles 2, 3, 4 & 5 of the Treaty respecting

South Manchuria and Eastern Inner Mongolia signed this day, the

Chinese Government proposes that the operation of the said

Articles be postponed for a period of three months beginning from

the date of the signing of the said Treaty.

I hope your Government will agree to this proposal.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) LOU TSENG-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki, Japanese Minister.

--Reply--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of Taisho.

Excellency,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's

note of this day's date in which you stated that "inasmuch as

preparations have to be made regarding Articles 2, 3, 4 & 5 the

Treaty respecting South Manchuria and Eastern Inner Mongolia

signed this day, the Chinese Government proposes that the

operation of the said Articles be postponed for a period of three

months beginning from the date of the signing of the said Treaty."

In reply, I beg to state that I have taken note of the same.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI EKI.

His Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang, Minister of Foreign Affairs.

EXCHANGE OF NOTES RESPECTING THE MATTER OF HANYEHPING

--Note--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of the

Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre,

I have the honour to state that if in future the Hanyehping

Company and the Japanese capitalists agree upon co-operation, the

Chinese Government, in view of the intimate relations subsisting

between the Japanese capitalists and the said Company, will

forthwith give its permission. The Chinese Government further

agrees not to confiscate the said Company, nor, without the

consent of the Japanese capitalists to convert it into a state

enterprise, nor cause it to borrow and use foreign capital other

than Japanese.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) LOU TSENG-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki, Japanese Minister.

--Reply--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of Taisho.

Excellency,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's

note of this day's date in which you state:

"If in future the Hanyehping Company and the Japanese capitalists

agree upon co-operation, the Chinese Government, in view of the

intimate relations subsisting between the Japanese capitalists and

the said Company, will forthwith give its permission. The Chinese

Government further agrees not to confiscate the said Company, nor,

without the consent of the Japanese capitalists to convert it into

a state enterprise, nor cause it to borrow and use foreign capital

other than Japanese."

In reply, I beg to state that I have taken note of the same.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI EKI.

His Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang, Minister of Foreign Affairs.

EXCHANGE OF NOTES RESPECTING THE FUKIEN QUESTION

--Note--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of the

Republic of China.

Excellency,

A report has reached me to the effect that the Chinese Government

has the intention of permitting foreign nations to establish, on

the coast of Fukien Province, dock-yards, coaling stations for

military use, naval bases, or to set up other military

establishments; and also of borrowing foreign capital for the

purpose of setting up the above-mentioned establishments. I have

the honour to request that Your Excellency will be good enough to

give me reply stating whether or not the Chinese Government really

entertains such an intention.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) HIOKI EKI.

His Excellency, Lou Tseng-tsiang, Minister of Foreign Affairs.

--Reply--

Peking, the 25th day of the 5th month of the 4th year of the

Republic of China.

Monsieur le Ministre,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's

note of this day's date which I have noted.

In reply I beg to inform you that the Chinese Government hereby

declares that it has given no permission to foreign nations to

construct, on the coast of Fukien Province, dock-yards, coaling

stations for military use, naval bases, or to set up other

military establishment; nor does it entertain an intention of

borrowing foreign capital for the purpose of setting up the above-

mentioned establishmments.

I avail, etc.,

(Signed) LOU TSENG-TSIANG.

His Excellency, Hioki Eki, Japanese Minister.

DOCUMENTS IN GROUP IV

(1) The Draft of the Permanent Constitution completed in May,

1917.

(2) The proposed Provincial System, i.e., the local government

law.

(3) Memorandum by the Ministry of Commerce on Tariff Revision,

illustrating the anomalies of present trade taxation.

(4) The leading outstanding cases between China and the Foreign

Powers.

DRAFT OF THE NATIONAL CONSTITUTION OF CHINA

(As it stood on May 28th, 1917, in its second reading at the

Constitutional Conference.)

The Constitutional Conference of the Republic of China, in order

to enhance the national dignity, to unite the national dominion,

to advance the interest of society and to uphold the sacredness of

humanity, hereby adopt the following constitution which shall be

promulgated to the whole country, to be universally observed, and

handed down unto the end of time.

CHAPTER I. THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT

Article 1. The Republic of China shall forever be a consolidated

Republic.

CHAPTER II. NATIONAL TERRITORY

Art. 2. The National Territory of the Republic of China shall be

in accordance with the dominion hithertofore existing.

No change in National Territory and its divisions can be made save

in accordance with the law.

CHAPTER ... GOVERNING AUTHORITY

Art. ... The power of Government of the Republic of China shall

be derived from the entire body of citizens.

CHAPTER III. THE CITIZENS

Art. 3. Those who are of Chinese nationality according to law

shall be called the citizens of the Republic of China.

Art. 4. Among the citizens of the Republic of China, there shall

be, in the eyes of the law, no racial, class, or religious

distinctions, but all shall be equal.

Art. 5. No citizens of the Republic of China shall be arrested,

detained, tried, or punished save in accordance with the law.

Whoever happens to be detained in custody shall be entitled, on

application therefore, to the immediate benefit of the writ of

habeas corpus, bringing him before a judicial court of competent

jurisdiction for an investigation of the case and appropriate

action according to law.

Art. 6. The private habitations of the citizens of the Republic of

China shall not be entered or searched except in accordance with

the law.

Art. 7. The citizens of the Republic of China shall have the right

of secrecy of correspondence, which may not be violated except as

provided by law.

Art. 8. The citizens of the Republic of China shall have liberty

of choice of residence and of profession which shall be

unrestricted except in accordance with law.

Art. 9. The citizens of the Republic of China shall have liberty

to call meetings or to organize societies which shall be

unrestricted except in accordance with the law.

Art. 10. The citizens of the Republic of China shall have freedom

of speech, writing and publication which shall be unrestricted

except in accordance with the law.

Art. 11. The citizens of the Republic of China shall be entitled

to honour Confucius and shall enjoy freedom of religious belief

which shall be unrestricted except in accordance with the law.

Art. 12. The citizens of the Republic of China shall enjoy the

inviolable right to the security of their property and any measure

to the contrary necessitated by public interest shall be

determined by law.

Art. ... . The citizens of the Republic of China shall enjoy all

other forms of freedom aside from those hithertofore mentioned,

provided they are not contrary to the spirit of the Constitution.

Art. 13. The citizens of the Republic of China shall have the

right to appeal to the Judicial Courts according to law.

Art. 14. The citizens of the Republic of China shall have the

right to submit petitions or make complaints according to law.

Art. 15. The citizens of the Republic of China shall have the

right to vote and to be voted for according to law.

Art. 16. The citizens of the Republic of China shall have the

right to hold official posts according to law.

Art. 17. The citizens of the Republic of China shall perform the

obligation of paying taxes according to law.

Art. 18. The citizens of the Republic of China shall perform the

obligation of military service according to law.

Art. 19. The citizens of the Republic of China shall be under the

obligation to receive primary education according to law.

CHAPTER IV. THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

Art. 20. The legislative power of the Republic of China shall be

exercised by the National Assembly exclusively.

Art. 21. The National Assembly shall consist of a Senate and House

of Representatives.

Art. 22. The Senate shall be composed of the Senators elected by

the highest local legislative assemblies and other electoral

bodies.

Art. 23. The House of Representatives shall be composed of the

representatives elected by the various electoral districts in

proportion to the population.

Art. 24. The members of both Houses shall be elected according to

law.

Art. 25. In no case shall one person be a member of both Houses

simultaneously.

Art. 26. No member of either House shall hold any official post,

civil or military during his term.

Art. 27. The qualifications of the members of either House shall

be determined by the respective Houses.

Art. 28. The term of office for a member of the Senate shall be

six years. One-third of the members shall retire and new ones be

elected every two years.

Art. 29. The term of office for a member of the House of

Representatives shall be three years.

Art. 30. Each House shall have a President and a Vice-President

who shall be elected from among its members.

Art. 31. The National Assembly shall itself convene, open and

close its sessions, but as to extraordinary sessions, they shall

be called under one of the following circumstances:

(1) A signed request of more than one-third of the members of each

House.

(2) A mandate of the President.

Art. 32. The ordinary sessions of the National Assembly shall

begin on the first day of the eighth month in each year.

Art. 33. The period for the ordinary session of the National

Assembly shall be four months which may be prolonged, but the

prolonged period shall not exceed the length of the ordinary

session.

Art. 34. (Eliminated.)

Art. 35. Both Houses shall meet in joint session at the opening

and closing of the National Assembly.

If one House suspends its session, the other House shall do

likewise during the same period.

When the House of Representatives is dissolved, the Senate shall

adjourn during the same period.

Art. 36. The work of the National Assembly shall be conducted in

the Houses separately. No bill shall be introduced in both Houses

simultaneously.

Art. 37. Unless there be an attendance of over half of the total

number of members of either House, no sitting shall be held.

Art. 38. Any subject discussed in either House shall be decided by

the votes of the majority of members attending the sitting. The

President of each House shall have a deciding vote in case of a

tie.

Art. 39. A decision of the National Assembly shall require the

decision of both Houses.

Art. 40. The sessions of both Houses shall be held in public,

except on request of the government, or decision of the Houses

when secret sessions may be held.

Art. 41. Should the House of Representatives consider either the

President or the Vice-President of the Republic of China has

committed treason, he may be impeached by the decision of a

majority of over two-thirds of the members present, there being a

quorum of over two-thirds of the total membership of the House.

Art. 43. Should the House of Representatives consider that the

Cabinet Ministers have violated the law, an impeachment may be

instituted with the approval of over two-thirds of the members

present.

Art. 43. The House of Representatives may pass a vote of want of

Confidence in the Cabinet Ministers.

Art. 44. The Senate shall try the impeached President, Vice-

President and Cabinet Ministers.

With regard to the above-mentioned trial, no judgment of guilt or

violation of the law shall be passed without the approval of over

two-thirds of the members present.

When a verdict of "Guilty" is pronounced on the President or Vice-

President, he shall be deprived of his post, but the infliction of

punishment shall be determined by the Supreme Court of Justice.

When the verdict of "Guilty" is pronounced upon a Cabinet

Minister, he shall be deprived of his office and may forfeit his

public rights. Should the above penalty be insufficient for his

offence, he shall be tried by the Judicial Court.

Art. ... Either of the two Houses shall have power to request the

government to inquire into any case of delinquency or unlawful act

on the part of any official and to punish him accordingly.

Art. 45. Both Houses shall have the right to offer suggestions to

the Government.

Art. 46. Both Houses shall receive and consider the petitions of

the citizens.

Art. 47. Members of either House may introduce interpellations to

the members of the Cabinet and demand their attendance in the

House to reply thereto.

Art. 48. Members of either House shall not be responsible to those

outside the House for opinions expressed and votes cast in the

House.

Art. 49. No member of either House during session shall be

arrested or detained in custody without the permission of his

respective House, unless he be arrested in the commission of the

offence or act.

When any member of either House has been so arrested, the

government should report the cause to his respective House. Such

member's House, during session, may with the approval of its

members demand for the release of the arrested member and for

temporary suspension of the legal proceedings.

Art. 50. The annual allowances and other expenses of the members

of both Houses shall be fixed by law.

(CHAPTER V on Resident Committee of the National Assembly with 4

articles has been eliminated.)

CHAPTER VI. THE PRESIDENT

Art. 55. The administrative power of the Republic of China shall

be vested in the President with the assistance of the Cabinet

Ministers.

Art 56. A person of the Republic of China in the full enjoyment of

public rights, of the age of forty years or more, and resident in

China for at least ten years, is eligible for election as

President.

Art. 57. The President shall be elected by a Presidential Election

Convention, composed of the members of the National Assembly.

For the above election, an attendance of at least two-thirds of

the number of electors shall be required, and the voting shall be

performed by secret ballot. The person obtaining three-fourths of

the total votes cast shall be elected; but should no definite

result be obtained after the second ballot, the two candidates

obtaining the most votes in the second ballot shall be voted for

and the candidate receiving the majority vote shall be elected.

Art. 58. The period of office of the President shall be five

years, and if re-elected, he may hold office for another term,

Three months previous to the expiration of the term, the members

of the National Assembly of the Republic shall themselves convene

and organize the President Election Convention to elect a

President for the next term.

[*] Art. 59. When the President is being inaugurated, he shall

make an oath as follows: "I hereby solemnly swear that I will most

faithfully obey the Constitution and discharge the duties of the

President."

[*] Art. 60. Should the post of the President become vacant, the

Vice-President shall succeed him until the expiration of the term

of office of the President. Should the President be unable to

discharge his duties for any cause, the Vice-President shall act

for him.

Should the Vice-President vacate his post at the same time, the

Cabinet shall officiate for the President, but at the same time,

the members of the National Assembly shall within three months

convene themselves and organize the Presidential Election

Convention to elect a new President.

[*] Art. 61. The President shall be relieved of his office at the

expiration of his term of his office. If, at the end of the

period, the new President has not been elected, or, having been

elected, be unable to assure office and when the Vice-President is

also unable to act as President, the Cabinet shall officiate for

the President.

[*] Art. 62. The election of the Vice-President shall be in

accordance with the regulations fixed for the election of the

President; and the election of the Vice-President shall take place

simultaneously with the election of the President. Should the post

of the Vice-President become vacant, a new Vice-President shall be

elected.

Art. 63. The President shall promulgate all laws and supervise and

secure their enforcement.

Art. 64. The President may issue and publish mandates for the

execution of laws in accordance with the powers delegated to him

by the law.

Art. 65. (Eliminated.)

Art. 66. The President shall appoint and remove all civil and

military officials, with the exception of those specially provided

for by the Constitution or laws.

Art. 67. The President shall be the Commander-in-Chief of the Army

and Navy of the Republic.

The organization of the Army and Navy shall be fixed by law.

Art. 68. Intercourse with foreign countries, the President shall

be the representative of the Republic.

Art. 69. The President may, with the concurrence of the National

Assembly, declare war, but, in case of defence against foreign

invasion, he may request recognition of the National Assembly

after the declaration of the war.

Art. 70. The President may conclude treaties; but with regards to

treaties of peace, and those effecting legislation, they shall not

be valid, if the consent of the National Assembly is not obtained.

Art. 71. The President may proclaim martial law according to law;

but if the National Assembly should consider that there is no such

necessity, he should declare the withdrawal of the martial law.

Art. 72. (Eliminated.)

Art. 73. The President may, with the concurrence of the Supreme

Court of Justice, grant pardons, commute punishment, and restore

rights; but with regard to a verdict of impeachment, unless with

the concurrence of the National Assembly, he shall not make any

announcement of the restoration of rights.

Art. 74. The President may suspend the session of either the

Senate or the House of Representatives for a period not exceeding

ten days, but during any one session, he may not exercise this

right more than once.

Art. 75. With the concurrence of two-thirds or more of the members

of the Senate present, the President may dissolve the House of

Representatives, but there must not be a second dissolution during

the period of the same session.

When the House of Representatives is dissolved by the President,

another election shall take place immediately, and the convocation

of the House at a fixed date within five months should be effected

to continue the session.

Art. 76. With the exception of high treason, no criminal charges

shall be brought against the President before he has vacated his

office.

Art. 77. The salaries of the President and Vice-President shall be

fixed by law.

CHAPTER VII. THE CABINET

Art. 78. The Cabinet shall be composed of the Cabinet Ministers.

Art. 79. The Premier and the Ministers of the various ministries

shall be called the Cabinet Ministers.

Art. 80. The appointment of the Premier shall be approved by the

House of Representatives.

Should a vacancy in the Premiership occur during the time of

adjournment of the National Assembly, the President may appoint an

Acting-Premier, but it shall be required that the appointment must

be submitted to the House of Representatives for approval within

seven days after the convening of the next session.

Art. 81. Cabinet Ministers shall assist the President and shall be

responsible to the House of Representatives.

Without the counter-signature of the Cabinet Minister to whose

Ministry the Mandate or dispatch applies, the mandate or dispatch

of the President in connection with State affairs shall not be

valid; but this shall not apply to the appointment or dismissal of

the Premier.

Art. 82. When a vote of want of confidence in the Cabinet

Ministers is passed, if the President does not dissolve the House

of Representatives according to the provisions made in Art. 75, he

should remove the Cabinet Ministers.

Art. 83. The Cabinet Ministers shall be allowed to attend both

Houses and make speeches, but in case of introducing bills for the

Executive Department, their delegates may act for them.

CHAPTER VIII. COURTS OF JUSTICE

Art. 84. The Judicial authority of the Republic of China shall be

exercised by the Courts of Justice exclusively.

Art. 85. The organization of the Courts of Justice and the

qualifications of the Judges shall be fixed by law.

The appointment of the Chief-Justice of the Supreme Court should

have the approval of the Senate. Art. 86. The Judiciary shall

attend to and settle all civil, criminal administrative and other

cases, but this does not include those cases which have been

specially provided for by the Constitution or law.

Art. 87. The trial of cases in the law courts shall be conducted

publicly, but those affecting public peace and order or propriety

may be held in camera.

Art. 88. The Judges shall be independent in the conducting of

trials and none shall be allowed to interfere.

Art. 89. Except in accordance with law, judges, during their

continuation of office shall not have their emoluments decreased,

nor be transferred to other offices, nor shall they be removed

from office.

During his tenure of office, no judge shall be deprived of his

office unless he is convicted of crime, or for offences punishable

by law. But the above does not include cases of reorganization of

Judicial Courts and when the qualification of the Judges are

modified. The punishments and fines of the Judicial Officials

shall be fixed by law.

CHAPTER IX. LEGISLATION

Art. 90. The members of both Houses and the Executive Department

may introduce bills of law, but if any bill of law is rejected by

the House it shall not be re-introduced during the same session.

Art. 91. Any bill of law which has been passed by the National

Assembly shall be promulgated by the President within 15 days

after receipt of the same.

Art. 92. Should the President disapprove of any bill of law passed

by the National Assembly, he shall within the period allowed for

promulgation, state the reason of his disapproval and request the

re-consideration of the same by the National Assembly.

If a bill of law has not yet been submitted with a request for

consideration and the period for promulgation has passed; it shall

become law. But the above shall not apply to the case when the

session of the National Assembly is adjourned, or, the House of

Representatives dissolved before the period for the promulgation

is ended.

Art. 93. The law shall not be altered or repealed except in

accordance with the law.

Art. 94. Any law that is in conflict with the Constitution shall

not be valid.

CHAPTER X. NATIONAL FINANCE

Art. 95. The introductions of new taxes and alterations in the

rate of taxation shall be fixed by law.

Art. 96. (Eliminated.)

Art. 97. The approval of the National Assembly must be obtained

for National loans, or the conclusion of agreements which tend to

increase the burden of the National Treasury.

Art. ... Financial bills involving direct obligation on the part

of the citizens shall first be submitted to the House of

Representatives.

Art. 98. The Executive Department of the Government shall prepare

a budget setting forth expenditures and receipts of the Nation for

the fiscal year which shall be submitted to the House of

Representatives within 15 days after the opening of the session of

the National Assembly.

Should the Senate amend or reject the budget passed by the House

of Representatives, it shall request the concurrence of the House

of Representatives in its amendment or rejection, and, if such

concurrence is not obtained, the budget shall be considered as

passed.

Art. 99. In case of special provisions, the Executive Department

may fix in advance in the budget the period over which the

appropriations are to be spread and may provide for the successive

appropriations continuing over this period.

Art. 100. In order to provide for a safe margin for under-

estimates or for items left out of the budget, the Executive

Department may include contingent items in the budget under the

heading of Reserve Fund. The sum expended under the above

provision shall be submitted to the House of Representatives at

the next session for recognition. Art. 101. Unless approved by the

Executive Department, the National Assembly shall have no right to

abolish or curtail any of the following items:

(1) Items in connection with obligations of the Government

according to law.

(2) Items necessitated by the observance of treaties.

(3) Items legally fixed.

(4) Successive appropriations continuing over a period.

Art. 102. The National Assembly shall not increase the annual

expenditures as set down in the budget.

Art. 103. In case the budget is not yet passed, when the fiscal

year begins, the Executive Department may, during this period,

follow the budget for the preceding year by limiting its

expenditures and receipts by one-twelfth of the total amount for

each month.

Art. 104. Should there be a defensive war against foreign

invasion, or should there be a suppression of internal rebellion,

or provide against extraordinary calamity, when it is impossible

to issue writs for summoning the National Assembly, the Executive

Department may adopt financial measures for the emergency, but it

should request the recognition thereof by the House of

Representatives within seven days after the convening of the next

session of the National Assembly.

Art. 105. Orders on the Treasury for payments on account of the

annual expenditures of the Government shall first be passed by the

Auditing Department.

Art. 106. Accounts of the annual expenditures and annual receipts

for each year should first be referred to the Auditing Department

for investigation and then the Executive Department shall report

the same to the National Assembly.

If the account be rejected by the House of Representatives, the

Cabinet shall be held responsible.

Art. 107. The method of organization of the Auditing Department

and the qualification of the Auditors shall be fixed by law.

During his tenure of office, the auditor shall not be dismissed or

transferred to any other duty or his salary be reduced except in

accordance with the law.

The manner of punishment of Auditors shall be fixed by law.

Art. 108. The Chief of the Auditing Department shall be elected by

the Senate. The Chief of the Auditing Department may attend

sittings of both Houses and report on the Audit with explanatory

statements.

CHAPTER XI. AMENDMENTS, INTERPRETATION AND INVIOLABILITY OF THE

CONSTITUTION

Art. 109. The National Assembly may bring up bills for the

amendment of the National Constitution.

Bills of this nature shall not take effect unless approved by two-

thirds of the members of each House present.

No bill for the amendment of the Constitution shall be introduced

unless signed by one-fourth of the members of each House.

Art. 110. The amendment of the National Constitution shall be

discussed and decided by the National Constitutional Conference.

Art. 111. No proposal for a change of the form of Government shall

be allowed as a subject for amendment.

Art. 112. Should there be any doubt as to the meaning of the text

of the Constitution, it shall be interpreted by the National

Constitutional Conference.

Art. 113. The National Constitutional Conference shall be composed

of the members of the National Assembly.

Unless there be a quorum of two-thirds of the total number of the

members of the National Assembly, no Constitutional Conference

shall be held, and unless three-fourths of the members present

vote in favour, no amendment shall be passed. But with regard to

the interpretation of the Constitution, only two-thirds of the

members present is required to decide an issue.

Art. ... The National Constitution shall be the Supreme Law of

the land and shall be inviolable under any circumstances unless

duly amended in accordance with the procedure specified in this

Constitution.

[V] A Chapter on Provincial or local organization is to be

inserted under Chapter ... providing for certain powers and rights

to be given to local governments with the residual power left in

the hands of the central government. The exact text is not yet

settled.

Note: The Mark (*) indicated that the article has already been

formally adopted as a part of the finished Constitution.

The mark (V) indicates that the article has not yet passed through

the second reading.

Those without marks have passed through the second reading on May

28th, 1917. Articles bearing no number are additions to the

original draft as presented to the Conference by the Drafting

Committee.

THE LOCAL SYSTEM

DRAFT SUBMITTED TO PARLIAMENT

The following Regulations on the Local System have been referred

to the Parliamentary Committee for consideration:--

Article 1. The Local System shall embrace provinces and hsien

districts.

Any change for the existing division of provinces and hsien

districts shall be decided by the Senate. As to Mongolia, Tibet,

Chinghai and other places where no provinces and hsien districts

have been fixed, Parliament shall enforce these regulations there

in future.

Art. 2. A province shall have the following duties and rights: (a)

To fix local laws. (b) To manage provincial properties, (c) To

attend to the affairs in connexion with police organization,

sanitation, conservancy, roads, and public works, (d) To develop

education and industry in accordance with the order and mandates

of the Central Government. (e) To improve its navigation and

telegraphic lines, or to undertake such enterprises with the co-

operation of other provinces, (f) To organize precautionary troops

for the protection of local interests, the method of whose

organization, uniforms and arms shall be similar to those of the

National Army. With the exception of the matter of declaring war

against foreign countries, the President shall have no power to

transfer these troops to other provinces: and unless the province

is unable to suppress its own internal troubles, it shall not ask

the Central Government for the service of the National Army, (g)

The province shall defray its own expenses for the administration

and the maintenance of precautionary troops; but the provinces

which have hitherto received subsidies, shall continue to receive

same from the National Treasury with the approval of Parliament.

(h) Land, Title Deed, License, Mortgage, Tobacco and Wine,

Butchery, Fishery and all other principal and additional taxes

shall be considered as local revenues, (i) The province may fix

rates for local tax or levy additional tax on the National Taxes.

(j) The province shall have a provincial treasury. (k) It may

raise provincial public loans. (l) It shall elect a certain number

of Senators, (m) It shall fix regulations for the smaller local

Self-Governing Bodies.

Art. 3. Besides the above rights and privileges, a province shall

bear the following responsibilities:

(a) In case of financial difficulties of the Central Government,

it shall share the burden according to the proportion of its

revenue, (b) It shall enforce the laws and mandates promulgated by

the Central Government, (c) It shall enforce the measures

entrusted by the Central Government, but the latter shall bear the

expenses. (d) In case the local laws and regulations are in

conflict with those of the Central Government the latter may with

the approval of Parliament cancel or modify the same. (e) In case

of great necessity the provincial telegraph, railway, etc., may be

utilized by the Central Government. (f) In case of negligence, or

blunder made by the provincial authorities, which injures the

interests of the nation, the Central Government, with the approval

of Parliament, may reprimand and rectify same, (g) It shall not

make laws on the grant of monopoly and of copyrights; neither

issue bank notes, manufacture coins, make implements of weights

and measures; neither grant the right to local banks to manage the

Government Treasury; nor sign contracts with foreigners on the

purchase or sale of lands and, mines, or mortgage land tax to them

or construct naval harbours or arsenals, (h) All local laws,

budgets, and other important matters shall be reported to the

President from time to time, (i) The Central Government may

transfer to itself the ownership of enterprises or rights which

Parliament has decided should become national, (j) In case of a

quarrel arising between the Central Government and the province,

or between provinces, it shall be decided by Parliament, (k) In

case of refusal to obey the orders of the Central Government, the

President with the approval of Parliament may change the Shenchang

(Governor) or dissolve the Provincial Assembly. (l) The President

with the approval of Parliament may suppress by force any province

which defies the Central Authorities.

Art. 4. A Shenchang shall be appointed for each province to

represent the Central Government in the supervision of the local

administration. The appointment shall be made with the approval of

the Senate, the term of office for the Shenchang shall be four

years, and his annual salary shall be $24,000, which shall be paid

out of the National Treasury.

Art. 5. The administration measures entrusted by the Government to

the Shenchang shall be enforced by the administrative organs under

his supervision, and he shall be responsible for same.

Art. 6. In the enforcement of the laws and mandates of the Central

Government, or of the laws and regulations of his province, he may

issue orders.

Art. 7. The province shall establish the following five

Departments, namely Interior, Police, Finance, Education and

Industry. There shall be one Department Chief for each Department,

to be appointed by the Shenchang.

Art. 8. A Provincial Council shall be organized to assist the

Shenchang to enforce the administrative measures, and it shall be

responsible to the Provincial Assembly for same.

This Council shall be composed of all the Departmental Chiefs, and

five members elected out of the Provincial Assembly. It shall

discuss the Bills on Budget, on administration, and on the

organization, of police forces, submitted by the Shenchang.

Art. 9. If one member of the Council be impeached by the

Provincial Assembly, the Shenchang shall replace him, but if the

whole body of the Council be impeached, the Shenchang shall either

dissolve the Assembly or dismiss all his Departmental Chiefs. In

one session the Assembly shall not be dissolved twice, and after

two months of the dissolution, it shall be convened again.

Art. 10. The organization and election of the Provincial Assembly

shall be fixed by law.

Art. 11. The Provincial Assembly shall have the following duties

and powers: (a) It may pass such laws as allowed by the

Constitution, (b) It may pass the bills on the provincial Budget

and Accounts, (c) It may impeach the members of the Provincial

Council. (d) It may address interpellations or give suggestions to

the Provincial Council. (e) It may elect Members for the

Provincial Council. (f) It may attend to the petitions submitted

by the public.

Art. 12. A Magistrate shall be appointed for each hsien district

to enforce administrative measures. He shall be appointed directly

by the Shenchang, and his term of office shall be three years.

Art. 13. The Central Government shall hold examinations in the

provinces for candidates for the Magistracy. In a province half of

the total number of magistrates shall be natives of the province

and the other half of other provinces; but a native shall hold

office of Magistrate 300 li away from his home.

Art. 14. The organization for the legislative organ of the hsien

district shall be fixed by law.

TARIFF REVISION IN CHINA

The following is a translation of a memorandum prepared by the

Ministry of Agriculture and Commerce regarding abolition of likin

and an increase of the Customs duties:--

THE MEMORANDUM

"Disproportionate taxation on commodities at inland towns and

cities tends to cripple the productive power of a country. Acting

upon this principle, France in the 17th, England, America, Germany

and Austria in the 18th Century abolished such kind of taxation,

the Customs tariff remaining, which is a levy on imports at the

first port of entry. Its purpose is to increase the cost of

production of imported goods and to serve as a protection of

native products (sic). Raw materials from abroad are, however,

exempt from Customs duty in order to provide cheap material for

home manufactures. An altogether different state of affairs,

however, exists in this country. Likin stations are found

throughout the country, while raw materials are taxed. Take the

Hangchow silk for instance. When transported to the Capital for

sale, it has to pay a tax on raw material of 18 per cent. Foreign

imported goods on the other hand, are only taxed at the rate of

five per cent, ad valorem Customs duty at the first port of entry

with another 2.5 per cent, transit duty at one of the other ports

through which the goods pass. Besides these only landing duty is

imposed upon imported goods at the port of destination. Upon

timber being shipped from Fengtien and Antung to Peking, it has to

pay duties at five different places, the total amount of which

aggregates 20 per cent, of its market value, while timber from

American is taxed only ten per cent. Timber from Jueichow to

Hankow and Shanghai is taxed at six different places, the total

amount of duty paid aggregating 17.5 per cent., while timber

imported from abroad to these ports is required to pay Customs

duty only one-third thereof. The above-mentioned rates on native

goods are the minimum. Not every merchant can, however, obtain

such special "exemption," without a long negotiation and special

arrangements with the authorities. Otherwise, a merchant must pay

25 per cent, of the market value of his goods as duty. For this

reason the import of timber into this country has greatly

increased within the last few years, the total amount of which

being valued at $13,000,000 a year. Is this not a great injustice

to native merchants?

THE CHINESE METHOD

"Respecting the improvement of the economic condition of the

people, a country can hardly attain this object without developing

its foreign commerce. The United States of America, Germany and

Japan have one by one abolished their export duty as well as made

appropriations for subsidies to encourage the export of certain

kinds of commodities. We, on the other hand, impose likin all

along the line upon native commodities destined for foreign market

in addition to export duty. Goods for foreign market are more

heavily taxed than for home consumption. Take the Chekiang silk

for instance. Silk for export is more heavily taxed than that for

home use. Different rates of taxation are imposed upon tea for

foreign and home market. Other kinds of native products for export

are also heavily taxed with the result that, within the last two

decades, the annual exports of this country are exceeded by

imports by over Tls. 640,000,000,000. From the 32nd year of the

reign of Kuang Hsu to the 4th year of the Republic, imports exceed

exports on the average by Tls. 120,000,000. These figures speak

for themselves.

LIKIN

"Likin stations have been established at places where railway

communication is available. This has done a good deal of harm to

transportation and the railway traffic. Lately a proposal has been

made in certain quarters that likin stations along the railways be

abolished; and the measure has been adopted by the Peking-Tientsin

and Tientsin-Pukow Railways at certain places. When the towns and

cities throughout the country are connected by railways, there

will be no place for likin stations. With the increase in the

number of treaty ports, the "likin zone" will be gradually

diminished. Thencefrom the proceeds from likin will be decreased

year by year.

"Owing to the collection of likin the development of both home and

foreign trade has been arrested and the people are working under

great disadvantages. Hence in order to develop foreign and home

trade, the Government must do away with likin, which will bring

back business prosperity, and in time the same will enable the

Government to obtain new sources of revenues.

"From the above-mentioned considerations, the Government can

hardly develop and encourage trade without the abolition of likin.

By treaty with Great Britain, America and Japan, the Government

can increase the rate of Customs tariff to cover losses due to the

abolition of likin. The question under consideration is not a new

one. But the cause which has prevented the Government from

reaching a prompt decision upon this question is the fear that,

after the abolition of likin, the proceeds from the increased

Customs tariff would not be sufficient to cover the shortage

caused by the abolition of likin.

COST OF ABOLITION OF LIKIN

But such a fear should disappear when the Authorities remember the

following facts:--

(a) The loss as the result of the abolition of likin: $38,900,000.

(b) The loss as the result of the abolition of a part of duty

collected by the native Customs houses: $7,300,000.

(c) Annual proceeds from different kinds of principal and

miscellaneous taxes which shall be done away with the abolition of

likin $11,800,000.

The above figures are determined by comparing the actual amount of

proceeds collected by the Government in the 3rd and 4th years of

the Republic with the estimated amount in the Budget of the fifth

year. The total amount of loss caused by the abolition of likin

will be $58,000,000.

INCREASE OF CUSTOMS TARIFF

The amount of increase in the Customs tariff which the Government

expects to collect is as follows:--

(a) The increase in import duties $29,000,000.

(b) The increase in export duties Tls. 6,560,000.

The above figures are determined according to the Customs returns

of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th years of the Republic. By deducting Tls.

2,200,000 of transit duty, the net increase will be Tls.

33,600,000 taels, which is equal to $48,500,000. For the sake of

prudence, allowance of five per cent, of the total amount is made

against any incidental shortage. The net revenue thus increased

would amount to $46,100,000. Against the loss of $58,000,000,

there will be a shortage of some $11,900,000. This, however, will

not be difficult to make good by new sources of revenue as the

result of a tariff revision:--

(a) Tax on goods at the time of manufacture $800,000.

(b) Tax on goods at the time of sale $8,000,000.

(c) Tax on cattle and slaughtering houses $2,000,000.

(d) Tax on foodstuffs $4,000,000.

"Under (a) and (b) are the taxes to be collected on native made

foreign imitation goods and various kinds of luxurious articles.

Under (c) and (d) are taxes which are already enforced in the

provinces but which can be increased to that much by reorganizing

the method of collection. The total sum of the proceeds set forth

under above items will amount to $14,800,000. These will be quite

sufficient to cover the loss caused by the abolition of likin.

A VITAL INTEREST

"As the abolition of likin concerns the vital interest of the

merchants and manufacturers, it should be carried out without

delay. The commercial and industrial enterprises of the country

can only thrive after likin is abolished and only then can new

sources of revenue be obtained. This measure will form the

fundamental factor of our industrial and economical development.

But one thing to which we should like to call the special

attention of the Government is the procedure to be adopted to

negotiate with the Foreign countries respecting the adoption of

this measure. The first step in this connexion should be the

increase of the present Customs tariff to the actual five per

cent, ad valorem rate. When this is done, proposal should be made

to the Powers having treaty relations with us concerning the

abolition of likin and revision of Customs tariff. The transit

destination duties on imported goods should at the same time be

done away with. This would not entail any disadvantage to the

importers of foreign goods and any diplomatic question would not

be difficult of solution. Meantime preparatory measures should be

devised for reorganizing the method of collecting duties set forth

above so that the abolition of likin can take place as soon as the

Government obtains the consent of the foreign Powers respecting

the increase of Customs tariff."

MEMORANDUM

THE LEADING OUTSTANDING CASES BETWEEN CHINA AND THE FOREIGN POWERS

(Author's note. The following memorandum was drawn up by Dr. C. C.

Wu, Councillor at the Chinese Foreign Office and son of Dr. Wu

Ting-fang, the Foreign Minister, and is a most competent and

precise statement. It is a noteworthy fact that not only is Dr. C.

C. Wu a British barrister but he distinguished himself above all

his fellows in the year he was called to the Bar. It is also

noteworthy that the Lao Hsi-kai case does not figure in this

summary, China taking the view that French action throughout was

ultra vires, and beyond discussion.)

BY DR. C. C. WU

Republican China inherited from imperial China the vast and rich

territory of China Proper and its Dependencies, but the

inheritance was by no means free from incumbrances as in the case

of Outer Mongolia, Tibet and Manchuria, and other impediments in

the form of unfavourable treaty obligations and a long list of

outstanding foreign cases affecting sovereign and territorial

rights.

I have been asked by the Editor of the North-China Daily News to

contribute an article on some of the outstanding questions between

China and foreign powers, instancing Tibet, Manchuria, Mongolia,

and to give the Chinese point of view on these questions. Although

the subject is a delicate one to handle, particularly in the

press, being as it is one in which international susceptibilities

are apt to be aroused, I have yet accepted the invitation in the

belief that a calm and temperate statement of the Chinese case

will hurt no one whose case will bear public discussion but will

perhaps do some good by bringing about a clear understanding of

the points at issue between China and the foreign Powers

concerned, and thus facilitating an early settlement which is so

earnestly desired by China. I may say that I have appreciated the

British sense of justice and fairplay displayed by the "North-

China Daily News" in inviting a statement of the Chinese case in

its own columns on questions one of which concerns British

interests in no small degree, and the discussion cannot be

conducted under a better spirit than that expressed in the motto

of the senior British journal in the Far East: "Impartial not

Neutral."

1 DEGREE MANCHURIA

The treaty between China and Japan of 1915 respecting South

Manchuria and Eastern Inner Mongolia giving that power special

rights and privileges in those regions has given rise to many

knotty problems for the diplomatists of the two countries to

solve. Two of such problems are mentioned here.

JAPANESE POLICE BOXES IN MANCHURIA AND MONGOLIA

Since the last days of the Tsings, the Japanese have been

establishing police boxes in different parts of South Manchuria

and Eastern Inner Mongolia always under protest of the local and

Peking authorities. Since the treaty of 1915, a new reason has

become available in the right of mixed residence given to Japanese

in these regions. It is said that for the protection and control

of their subjects, and indeed for the interest of the Chinese

themselves, it is best that this measure should be taken. It is

further contended that the stationing of police officers is but a

corollary to the right of exterritoriality, and that it is in no

way a derogation of Chinese sovereignty.

It is pointed out by the Chinese Government that in the treaty of

1915, express provision is made for Japanese in South Manchuria

and Eastern Inner Mongolia to submit to the police laws and

ordinances and taxation of China (Article 5). This leaves the

matter in no doubt. If the Japanese wish to facilitate the Chinese

police in their duty of protection and control of the Japanese,

they have many means at their command for so doing. It is

unnecessary to point out that the establishment of foreign police

on Chinese soil (except in foreign settlements and concessions

where it is by the permission of the Chinese Government) is, to

our thinking, at any rate, a very grave derogation to China's

sovereign rights. Furthermore, from actual experience, we know

that the activities of these foreign police will not be confined

to their countrymen; in a dispute between a Chinese and a Japanese

both will be taken to the Japanese station by the Japanese

policeman. This existence of an imperium in imperio, so far from

accomplishing its avowed object of "improving the relations of the

countries and bringing about the development of economic interests

to no small degree," will, it is feared, be the cause of continual

friction between the officials and people of the two countries.

As to the legal contention that the right of police control is a

natural corollary to the right of exterritoriality, it must be

said that ever since the grant of consular jurisdiction to

foreigners by China in her first treaties, this is the first time

that such a claim has been seriously put forward. We can only say

that if this interpretation of exterritoriality is correct the

other nations enjoying exteriorality in China have been very

neglectful in the assertion of their just rights.

In the Chengchiatun case, the claim of establishing police boxes

wherever the Japanese think necessary was made one of the demands.

The Chinese Government in its final reply which settled the case

took the stand as above outlined.

It may be mentioned in passing that in Amoy the Japanese have also

endeavoured to establish similar police rights. The people of that

city and province, and indeed of the whole country, as evidenced

by the protests received from all over China, have been very much

exercised over the matter. It is sincerely hoped that with the

undoubted improvement of relations between the two countries

within the last several months, the matter will be smoothly and

equitably settled.

LEGAL STATUS OF KOREANS IN CHIENTAO

The region which goes by the name of Chientao, a Japanese

denomination, comprises several districts in the Yenchi Circuit of

Kirin Province north of the Tumen Kiang (or the Tiumen River)

which here forms the boundary between China and Korea. For over

thirty years Koreans have been allowed here to cultivate the waste

lands and acquire ownership therein, a privilege which has not

been permitted to any other foreigners in China and which has been

granted to these Koreans on account of the peculiar local

conditions. According to reliable sources, the Korean population

now amounts to over 200,000 which is more than the Chinese

population itself. In 1909 an Agreement, known as the Tumen Kiang

Boundary Agreement, was arrived at between China and Japan, who

was then the acknowledged suzerain of Korea, dealing, inter alia,

with the status of these Koreans. It was provided that while

Koreans were to continue to enjoy protection of their landed

property, they were to be subject to Chinese laws and to the

jurisdiction of Chinese courts. The subsequent annexation of Korea

did not affect this agreement in point of international law, and

as a matter of practice Japan has adhered to it until September,

1915. Then the Japanese Consul suddenly interfered in the

administration of justice by the local authorities over the

Koreans and claimed that he should have jurisdiction.

The Japanese claim is based on the Treaty Respecting South

Manchuria and Eastern Inner Mongolia signed in May, 1915, article

5 of which provides that civil and criminal cases in which the

defendants are Japanese shall be tried and adjudicated by the

Japanese consul.

The Chinese view is that this article is inapplicable to Koreans

in this region and that the Tumen Kiang Agreement continues in

force. This view is based on a saving clause in article 8 of the

Treaty of 1915 which says that "all existing treaties between

China and Japan relating to Manchuria shall, except where

otherwise provided for by treaty, remain in force."

In the first place, the origin of the Tumen Kiang Agreement

supports this view. When the Japanese assumed suzerainty over

Korea they raised certain questions as to the boundary between

China and Korea. There were also outstanding several questions

regarding railways and mines between China and Japan. Japan

insisted that the boundary question and the railway and mining

questions be settled at the same time. As a result, two agreements

were concluded in 1909 one respecting the boundary question, the

Tumen Kiang Agreement, and the other respecting railways and mines

whereby Japan obtained many new and valuable privileges and

concessions, such as the extension of the Kirin-Changchun Railway

to the Korean frontier, the option on the Hsinminfu-Fakumen line,

and the working of the Fushun and Yentai mines, while in return

China obtained a bare recognition of existing rights, namely the

boundary between China and Korea and the jurisdiction over the

Koreans in the Yenchi region. The two settlements were in the

nature of quid pro quo though it is clear that the Japanese side

of the scale heavily outweighed that of the Chinese. Now Japan

endeavours to repudiate, for no apparent reason so far as we can

see, the agreement which formed the consideration whereby she

obtained so many valuable concessions.

Secondly, while Koreans are now Japanese subjects, it is contended

by the Chinese that the particular Koreans inhabiting the Yenchi

region are, as regards China, in a different position from

Japanese subjects elsewhere. These Koreans enjoy the rights of

free residence and of cultivating and owning land in the interior

of China, rights denied to other foreigners, including Japanese

who, even by the new treaty, may only lease land in South

Manchuria. For this exceptional privilege, they are subject to the

jurisdiction of Chinese laws and Chinese courts, a duty not

imposed on other foreigners. It would be "blowing hot and cold at

the same time" in the language of English lawyers if it is sought

to enjoy the special privileges without performing the duties.

Thirdly, Japanese under the Treaty of 1915 are required to

register their passports with the local authorities. On the other

hand, Koreans in Yenchi have never been nor are they now required

to procure passports. This would seem to be conclusive proof that

Koreans in that region are not within the provisions of the treaty

of 1915 but are still governed by the Tumen Kiang Agreement.

The question is something more than one of academic or even merely

judicial importance. As has been stated, the Koreans in Yenchi

outnumber the Chinese and the only thing that has kept the region

Chinese territory in fact as well as in name is the possession by

the Chinese of jurisdiction over every inhabitant, whether Chinese

or Korean. Were China to surrender that jurisdiction over a

majority of those inhabitants, it would be tantamount to a cession

of territory.

2 DEGREES MACAO

The dispute between China and Portugal over the Macao question has

been one of long standing. The first treaty of commerce signed

between them on August 13,1862, at Tientsin, was not ratified in

consequence of a dispute respecting the Sovereignty of Macao. By a

Protocol signed at Lisbon on March 26, 1887, China formally

recognized the perpetual occupation and government of Macao and

its dependencies by Portugal, as any other Portuguese possession;

and in December of the same year, when the formal treaty was

signed, provision was made for the appointment of a Commission to

delimit the boundaries of Macao; "but as long as the delimitation

of the boundaries is not concluded, everything in respect to them

shall continue as at present without addition, diminution, or

alteration by either of the Parties."

In the beginning of 1908, a Japanese steamer, the Tatsu Maru,

engaged in gun-running was captured by a Chinese customs cruiser

near the Kau-chau archipelago (Nove Ilhas). The Portuguese

authorities demanded her release on the ground that she was seized

in Portuguese territorial waters thus raising the question of the

status of the waters surrounding Macao.

In the same year the Portuguese authorities of Macao attempted the

imposition of land tax in Maliaoho, and proposed to dredge the

waterways in the vicinity of Macao. The Chinese Government

thereupon instructed its Minister in France, who was also

accredited to Portugal, to make personal representations to the

Portuguese Foreign Office in regard to the unwarrantable action of

the local Portuguese authorities. The Portuguese Government

requested the withdrawal of Chinese troops on the Island of Lappa

as a quid pro quo for the appointment of a new Demarcation

Commissioner, reserving to itself the right to refer to the Hague

Tribunal any dispute that may arise between the Commissioners

appointed by the respective Governments.

After protracted negotiations it was agreed between the Chinese

Minister and the Portuguese Government by an exchange of notes

that the respective Governments should each appoint a Demarcation

Commissioner to delimit the boundaries of Macao and its

dependencies in pursuance of the Lisbon Protocol and Article 2 of

the Sino-Portuguese Treaty of 1887, subject to the decision of

their respective Governments.

THE PORTUGUESE CLAIM

In February, 1909, Portugal appointed General Jaoquim Machado and

China Mr. Kao Erh-chien as their respective Commissioners and they

met at Hongkong in June of the same year.

The Portuguese claim consisted of the whole of the Peninsula of

Macao as far north as Portas do Cerco, the Island of Lappa, Green

Island (Ilha Yerde), Ilhas de Taipa, Ilha de Coloane, Ilha

Macarira, Ilha da Tai-Vong-Cam, other small islands, and the

waters of Porto Interior. The Portuguese Commissioner also

demanded that the portion of Chinese territory between Portas do

Cerco and Peishanling be neutralized.

In the absence of evidence, documentary or otherwise, China could

not admit Portugal's title to half the territory claimed, but was

prepared to concede all that part of the Peninsula of Macao south

of Portas do Cerco which was already beyond the limits of the

original Portuguese Possession of Macao, and also to grant the

developed parts of Ilhas de Coloane as Portuguese settlements. The

ownership of territorial waters was to remain vested in China.

The negotiations having proved fruitless were transferred to

Lisbon but on the outbreak of the Revolution in Portugal they were

suspended. No material progress has been made since.

3 DEGREES TIBET

In November, 1911, the Chinese garrison in Lhassa, in sympathy

with the revolutionary cause in China, mutinied against Amban

Lien-yu, a Chinese Bannerman, and a few months later the Tibetans,

by order of the Dalai Lama, revolted and besieged the Chinese

forces in Lhassa till they were starved out and eventually

evacuated Tibet. Chinese troops in Kham were also ejected. An

expedition was sent from Szechuan and Yunnan to Tibet, but Great

Britain protested and caused its withdrawal.

In August, 1912, the British Minister in Peking presented a

Memorandum to the Chinese Government outlining the attitude of

Great Britain towards the Tibetan question. China was asked to

refrain from dispatching a military expedition into Tibet, as the

re-establishment of Chinese authority would, it is stated,

constitute a violation of the Anglo-Chinese Treaty of 1906.

Chinese suzerainty in regard to Tibet was recognized. But Great

Britain could not consent to the assertion of Chinese sovereignty

over a State enjoying independent treaty relations with her. In

conclusion, China was invited to come to an agreement regarding

Tibet on the lines indicated in the Memorandum, such agreement to

be antecedent to Great Britain's recognition of the Republic.

Great Britain also imposed an embargo on the communications

between China and Tibet via India.

In deference to the wishes of the British Government, China at

once issued orders that the expeditionary force should not proceed

beyond Giamda. In her reply she declared that the Chinese

Government had no intention of converting Tibet into another

province of China and that the preservation of the traditional

system of Tibetan government was as much the desire of China as of

Great Britain. The dispatch of troops into Tibet was, however,

necessary for the fulfilment of the responsibilities attaching to

China's treaty obligations with Great Britain, which required her

to preserve peace and order throughout that vast territory, but

she did not contemplate the idea of stationing an unlimited number

of soldiers in Tibet. China considered that the existing treaties

defined the status of Tibet with sufficient clearness, and

therefore there was no need to negotiate a new treaty. She

expressed the regret that the Indian Government had placed an

embargo on the communications between China and Tibet via India,

as China was at peace with Great Britain and regretted that Great

Britain should threaten to withhold recognition of the Republic,

such recognition being of mutual advantage to both countries.

Finally, the Chinese Government hoped that the British Government

would reconsider its attitude.

THE SIMLA CONFERENCE

In May, 1913, the British Minister renewed his suggestion of the

previous year that China should come to an agreement on the

Tibetan question, and ultimately a Tripartite Conference was

opened on October 13, at Simla with Mr. Ivan Chen, Sir Henry

McMahon, and Lonchen Shatra as plemipotentiaries representing

China, Great Britain, and Tibet, respectively.

The following is the substance of the Tibetan proposals:--

1. Tibet shall be an independent State, repudiating the Anglo-

Chinese Convention of 1906.

2. The boundary of Tibet in regard to China includes that portion

of Sinkiang south of Kuenlun Range and Altyn Tagh, the whole

territory of Chinghai, the western portion of Kansuh and Szechuan,

including Tachienlu, and the northwestern portion of Yunnan,

including Atuntzu.

3. Great Britain and Tibet to negotiate, independent of China, new

trade regulations.

4. No Chinese officials and troops to be stationed in Tibet.

5. China to recognize Dalai Lama as the head of the Buddhist

Religion and institutions in Mongolia and China.

6. China to compensate Tibet for forcible exactions of money or

property taken from the Tibetan Government.

The Chinese Plenipotentiary made the following counter-proposals:--

1. Tibet forms an integral part of Chinese territory and Chinese

rights of every description which have existed in consequence of

this integrity shall be respected by Tibet and recognized by Great

Britan. China engages not to convert Tibet into a province and

Great Britain not to annex Tibet or any portion of it.

2. China to appoint a Resident at Lhassa with an escort of 3,600

soldiers.

3. Tibet undertakes to be guided by China in her foreign and

military affairs and not to enter into negotiations with any

foreign Power except through the intermediary of China but this

engagement does not exclude direct relations between British Trade

Agents and Tibetan authorities as provided in the Anglo-Chinese

Convention of 1906.

4. Tibet to grant amnesty to those Tibetans known for their pro-

Chinese inclinations and to restore to them their property.

5. Clause 5 of Tibetan claims can be discussed.

6. Revision of Trade Regulations of 1893 and 1908, if found

necessary, must be made by all the parties concerned.

7. In regard to the limits of Tibet China claims Giamda and all

the places east of it.

THE BOUNDARY DEADLOCK

The British plenipotentiary sustained in the main the Tibetan view

concerning the limits of Tibet. He suggested the creation of Inner

and Outer Tibet by a line drawn along the Kuenlun Range to the

9eth longitude, turning south reaching a point south of the 34th

latitude, then in south-easterly direction to Niarong, passing

Hokow, Litang, Batang in a western and then southern and

southwestern direction to Rima, thus involving the inclusion of

Chiamdo in Outer Tibet and the withdrawal of the Chinese garrison

stationed there. He proposed that recognition should be accorded

to the autonomy of Outer Tibet whilst admitting the right of the

Chinese to re-establish such a measure of control in Inner Tibet

as would restore and safeguard their historic position there,

without in any way infringing the integrity of Tibet as a

geographical and political entity. Sir Henry McMahon also

submitted to the Conference a draft proposal of the Convention to

the plenipotentiaries. After some modification this draft was

initialled by the British and Tibetan delegates but the Chinese

delegate did not consider himself authorized to do so. Thereupon

the British member after making slight concessions in regard to

representation in the Chinese Parliament and the boundary in the

neighbourhood of Lake Kokonor threatened, in the event of his

persisting in his refusal, to eliminate the clause recognizing the

suzerainty of China, and ipso facto the privileges appertaining

thereto from the draft Convention already initialled by the

British and Tibetan plenipotentiaries. In order to save the

situation, the Chinese delegate initialled the documents, but on

the clear understanding that to initial and to sign were two

different things and that to sign he must obtain instructions from

his Government.

China, dissatisfied with the suggested division into an Inner and

Outer Tibet the boundaries of which would involve the evacuation

of those districts actually in Chinese effective occupation and

under its administration, though otherwise in accord with the

general principles of the draft Convention, declared that the

initialled draft was in no way binding upon her and took up the

matter with the British Government in London and with its

representative in Peking. Protracted negotiations took place

thereafter, but, in spite of repeated concessions from the Chinese

side in regard to the Chinese side in regard to the boundary

question, the British Government would not negotiate on any basis

other than the initialled convention. On July 3 an Agreement based

on the terms of the draft Convention but providing special

safeguards for the interests of Great Britain and Tibet in the

event of China continuing to withhold her adherence, was signed

between Great Britain and Tibet, not, however, before Mr. Ivan

Chen had declared that the Chinese Government would recognize any

treaty or similar document that might then or thereafter be signed

between Great Britain and Tibet.

CHINA'S STANDPOINT

With the same spirit of compromise and a readiness to meet the

wishes of the British Government and even to the extent of making

considerable sacrifices in so far as they were compatible with her

dignity, China has more than once offered to renew negotiations

with the British Government but the latter has up to the present

declined to do so. China wants nothing more than the re-

establishment of Chinese suzerainty over Tibet, with recognition

of the autonomy of the territory immediately under the control of

the Lhassa Government; she is agreeable to the British idea of

forming an effective buffer territory in so far as it is

consistent with equity and justice; she is anxious that her trade

interest should be looked after by her trade agents as do the

British, a point which is agreeable even to the Tibetans though

apparently not to the British; in other words, she expects that

Great Britain would at least make with her an arrangement

regarding Tibet which should not be any less disadvantageous to

her than that made with Russia respecting Outer Mongolia.

Considering that China has claimed and exercised sovereign rights

over Tibet, commanded the Tibetan army, supervised Tibetan

internal administration, and confirmed the appointments of Tibetan

officials, high and low, secular and even ecclesiastical, such

expectations are modest enough, surely. At the present moment,

with communication via India closed, with no official

representative or agent present, with relations unsettled and

unregulated, the position of China vis-a-vis Tibet is far from

satisfactory and altogether anomalous, while as between China and

Great Britain there is always this important question outstanding.

An early settlement in a reciprocal spirit of give and take and

giving reasonable satisfaction to the legitimate aspirations and

claims of all parties is extremely desirable.

4 DEGREES OUTER MONGOLIA

The world is more or less acquainted with the events in Urga in

December, 1911, and the proclamation of independence of Outer

Mongolia with Jetsun Dampa Hutukhtu as its ruler. By the Russo-

Chinese Declaration of November 5, 1913, and the Tripartite

Convention of Kiakhta of 1914 China has re-established her

suzerainty over Outer Mongolia and obtained the acknowledgement

that it forms a part of the Chinese territory. There remains the

demarcation of boundary between Inner and Outer Mongolia which

will take place shortly, and the outstanding question of the

status of Tannu Uriankhai where Russia is lately reported to be

subjecting the inhabitants to Russian jurisdiction and expelling

Chinese traders.

The Tannu Uriankhai lands, according to the Imperial Institutes of

the Tsing Dynasty, were under the control of the Tartar General of

Uliasutai, the Sain Noin Aimak, the Jasaktu Khan Aimak and the

Jetsun Dampa Hutkhta, and divided into forty-eight somons

(tsoling). Geographically, according to the same authority, Tannu

Uriankhai is bounded on the north by Russia, east by Tushetu Khan

Aimak, west by the various aimks of Kobdo, and south by Jasaktu

Khan Aimak. By a Joint Demarcation Commission in 1868 the Russo

Chinese boundary in respect to Uriankhai was denmited and eight

wooden boundary posts were erected to mark their respective

frontiers.

In 1910, however, a Russian officer removed and burnt the boundary

post at Chapuchi Yalodapa. The matter was taken up by the then

Waiwupu with the Russian Minister. He replied to the effect that

the limits of Uriankhai were an unsettled question and the Russian

Government would not entertain the Chinese idea of taking

independent steps to remark the boundary or to replace the post

and expressed dissatisfaction with the work of the Joint

Demarcation Commission of 1868, a dissatisfaction which would seem

to be somewhat tardily expressed, to say the least. The case was

temporarily dropped on account of the secession of Uliasutai from

China in the following year.

While Uriankhai forms part of Autonomous Outer Mongolia, yet since

Outer Mongolia is under China's suzerainty, and its territory is

expressly recognized to form part of that of China, China cannot

look on with indifference to any possible cession of territory by

Outer Mongolia to Russia. Article 3 of the Kiakhta Agreement,

1915, prohibiting Outer Mongolia from concluding treaties with

foreign powers respecting political and territorial question

acknowledges China's right to negotiate and make such treaties. It

is the firm intention of the Chinese Government to maintain its

territorial integrity basing its case on historical records, on

treaty rights and finally on the principle of nationality. It is

notorious that the Mongols will be extremely unwilling to see

Uriankhai incorporated into the Russian Empire. While Russia is

spending countless lives and incalculable treasure in fighting for

the sacred principle of nationality in Europe, we cannot believe

The Fight for the Republic in China(#4522) · 第 13 / 13 章