THIRD ANNUAL MESSAGE.

WASHINGTON, _December 7, 1819_.

_Fellow-Citizens of the Senate and of the House of Representatives_:

The public buildings being advanced to a stage to afford accommodation

for Congress, I offer you my sincere congratulations on the

recommencement of your duties in the Capitol.

In bringing to view the incidents most deserving attention which have

occurred since your last session, I regret to have to state that several

of our principal cities have suffered by sickness, that an unusual

drought has prevailed in the Middle and Western States, and that a

derangement has been felt in some of our moneyed institutions which has

proportionably affected their credit. I am happy, however, to have it in

my power to assure you that the health of our cities is now completely

restored; that the produce of the year, though less abundant than usual,

will not only be amply sufficient for home consumption, but afford a

large surplus for the supply of the wants of other nations, and that the

derangement in the circulating paper medium, by being left to those

remedies which its obvious causes suggested and the good sense and

virtue of our fellow-citizens supplied, has diminished.

Having informed Congress, on the 27th of February last, that a treaty of

amity, settlement, and limits had been concluded in this city between

the United States and Spain, and ratified by the competent authorities

of the former, full confidence was entertained that it would have been

ratified by His Catholic Majesty with equal promptitude and a like

earnest desire to terminate on the conditions of that treaty the

differences which had so long existed between the two countries. Every

view which the subject admitted of was thought to have justified this

conclusion. Great losses had been sustained by citizens of the United

States from Spanish cruisers more than twenty years before, which had

not been redressed. These losses had been acknowledged and provided for

by a treaty as far back as the year 1802, which, although concluded at

Madrid, was not then ratified by the Government of Spain, nor since,

until the last year, when it was suspended by the late treaty, a more

satisfactory provision to both parties, as was presumed, having been

made for them. Other differences had arisen in this long interval,

affecting their highest interests, which were likewise provided for by

this last treaty. The treaty itself was formed on great consideration

and a thorough knowledge of all circumstances, the subject-matter of

every article having been for years under discussion and repeated

references having been made by the minister of Spain to his Government

on the points respecting which the greatest difference of opinion

prevailed. It was formed by a minister duly authorized for the purpose,

who had represented his Government in the United States and been

employed in this long-protracted negotiation several years, and who, it

is not denied, kept strictly within the letter of his instructions. The

faith of Spain was therefore pledged, under circumstances of peculiar

force and solemnity, for its ratification. On the part of the United

States this treaty was evidently acceded to in a spirit of conciliation

and concession. The indemnity for injuries and losses so long before

sustained, and now again acknowledged and provided for, was to be

paid by them without becoming a charge on the treasury of Spain. For

territory ceded by Spain other territory of great value, to which our

claim was believed to be well founded, was ceded by the United States,

and in a quarter more interesting to her. This cession was nevertheless

received as the means of indemnifying our citizens in a considerable

sum, the presumed amount of their losses. Other considerations of great

weight urged the cession of this territory by Spain. It was surrounded

by the Territories of the United States on every side except on that of

the ocean. Spain had lost her authority over it, and, falling into the

hands of adventurers connected with the savages, it was made the means

of unceasing annoyance and injury to our Union in many of its most

essential interests. By this cession, then, Spain ceded a territory

in reality of no value to her and obtained concessions of the highest

importance by the settlement of long-standing differences with the

United States affecting their respective claims and limits, and likewise

relieved herself from the obligation of a treaty relating to it which

she had failed to fulfill, and also from the responsibility incident to

the most flagrant and pernicious abuses of her rights where she could

not support her authority.

It being known that the treaty was formed under these circumstances, not

a doubt was entertained that His Catholic Majesty would have ratified

it without delay. I regret to have to state that this reasonable

expectation has been disappointed; that the treaty was not ratified

within the time stipulated and has not since been ratified. As it is

important that the nature and character of this unexpected occurrence

should be distinctly understood, I think it my duty to communicate to

you all the facts and circumstances in my possession relating to it.

Anxious to prevent all future disagreement with Spain by giving the

most prompt effect to the treaty which had been thus concluded, and

particularly by the establishment of a government in Florida which

should preserve order there, the minister of the United States who

had been recently appointed to His Catholic Majesty, and to whom the

ratification by his Government had been committed to be exchanged for

that of Spain, was instructed to transmit the latter to the Department

of State as soon as obtained, by a public ship subjected to his order

for the purpose. Unexpected delay occurring in the ratification by

Spain, he requested to be informed of the cause. It was stated in

reply that the great importance of the subject, and a desire to obtain

explanations on certain points which were not specified, had produced

the delay, and that an envoy would be dispatched to the United States to

obtain such explanations of this Government. The minister of the United

States offered to give full explanation on any point on which it might

be desired, which proposal was declined. Having communicated this

result to the Department of State in August last, he was instructed,

notwithstanding the disappointment and surprise which it produced, to

inform the Government of Spain that if the treaty should be ratified and

transmitted here at any time before the meeting of Congress it would

be received and have the same effect as if it had been ratified in due

time. This order was executed, the authorized communication was made

to the Government of Spain, and by its answer, which has just been

received, we are officially made acquainted for the first time with

the causes which have prevented the ratification of the treaty by His

Catholic Majesty. It is alleged by the minister of Spain that this

Government had attempted to alter one of the principal articles of the

treaty by a declaration which the minister of the United States had

been ordered to present when he should deliver the ratification by his

Government in exchange for that of Spain, and of which he gave notice,

explanatory of the sense in which that article was understood. It is

further alleged that this Government had recently tolerated or protected

an expedition from the United States against the Province of Texas,

These two imputed acts are stated as the reasons which have induced His

Catholic Majesty to withhold his ratification from the treaty, to obtain

explanations respecting which it is repeated that an envoy would be

forthwith dispatched to the United States. How far these allegations

will justify the conduct of the Government of Spain will appear on

a view of the following facts and the evidence which supports them:

It will be seen by the documents transmitted herewith that the

declaration mentioned relates to a clause in the eighth article

concerning certain grants of land recently made by His Catholic Majesty

in Florida, which it was understood had conveyed all the lands which

till then had been ungranted; it was the intention of the parties to

annul these latter grants, and that clause was drawn for that express

purpose and for none other. The date of these grants was unknown, but it

was understood to be posterior to that inserted in the article; indeed,

it must be obvious to all that if that provision in the treaty had not

the effect of annulling these grants, it would be altogether nugatory.

Immediately after the treaty was concluded and ratified by this

Government an intimation was received that these grants were of anterior

date to that fixed on by the treaty and that they would not, of course,

be affected by it. The mere possibility of such a case, so inconsistent

with the intention of the parties and the meaning of the article,

induced this Government to demand an explanation on the subject, which

was immediately granted, and which corresponds with this statement. With

respect to the other act alleged, that this Government had tolerated or

protected an expedition against Texas, it is utterly without foundation.

Every discountenance has invariably been given to any such attempt from

within the limits of the United States, as is fully evinced by the acts

of the Government and the proceedings of the courts. There being cause,

however, to apprehend, in the course of the last summer, that some

adventurers entertained views of the kind suggested, the attention of

the constituted authorities in that quarter was immediately drawn to

them, and it is known that the project, whatever it might be, has

utterly failed.

These facts will, it is presumed, satisfy every impartial mind that the

Government of Spain had no justifiable cause for declining to ratify

the treaty. A treaty concluded in conformity with instructions is

obligatory, in good faith, in all its stipulations, according to the

true intent and meaning of the parties. Each party is bound to ratify

it. If either could set it aside without the consent of the other, there

would be no longer any rules applicable to such transactions between

nations. By this proceeding the Government of Spain has rendered to the

United States a new and very serious injury. It has been stated that a

minister would be sent to ask certain explanations of this Government;

but if such were desired, why were they not asked within the time

limited for the ratification? Is it contemplated to open a new

negotiation respecting any of the articles or conditions of the treaty?

If that were done, to what consequences might it not lead? At what time

and in what manner would a new negotiation terminate? By this proceeding

Spain has formed a relation between the two countries which will justify

any measures on the part of the United States which a strong sense of

injury and a proper regard for the rights and interests of the nation

may dictate.

In the course to be pursued these objects should be constantly held in

view and have their due weight. Our national honor must be maintained,

and a new and a distinguished proof be afforded of that regard for

justice and moderation which has invariably governed the councils of

this free people. It must be obvious to all that if the United States

had been desirous of making conquests, or had been even willing to

aggrandize themselves in that way, they could have had no inducement

to form this treaty. They would have much cause for gratulation at the

course which has been pursued by Spain. An ample field for ambition

is open before them, but such a career is not consistent with the

principles of their Government nor the interests of the nation.

From a full view of all circumstances, it is submitted to the

consideration of Congress whether it will not be proper for the United

States to carry the conditions of the treaty into effect in the same

manner as if it had been ratified by Spain, claiming on their part all

its advantages and yielding to Spain those secured to her. By pursuing

this course we shall rest on the sacred ground of right, sanctioned in

the most solemn manner by Spain herself by a treaty which she was bound

to ratify, for refusing to do which she must incur the censure of other

nations, even those most friendly to her, while by confining ourselves

within that limit we can not fail to obtain their well-merited

approbation. We must have peace on a frontier where we have been so long

disturbed; our citizens must be indemnified for losses so long since

sustained, and for which indemnity has been so unjustly withheld from

them. Accomplishing these great objects, we obtain all that is

desirable.

But His Catholic Majesty has twice declared his determination to send a

minister to the United States to ask explanations on certain points and

to give them respecting his delay to ratify the treaty. Shall we act by

taking the ceded territory and proceeding to execute the other

conditions of the treaty before this minister arrives and is heard? This

is a case which forms a strong appeal to the candor, the magnanimity,

and the honor of this people. Much is due to courtesy between nations.

By a short delay we shall lose nothing, for, resting on the ground of

immutable truth and justice, we can not be diverted from our purpose.

It ought to be presumed that the explanations which may be given to the

minister of Spain will be satisfactory, and produce the desired result.

In any event, the delay for the purpose mentioned, being a further

manifestation of the sincere desire to terminate in the most friendly

manner all differences with Spain, can not fail to be duly appreciated

by His Catholic Majesty as well as by other powers. It is submitted,

therefore, whether it will not be proper to make the law proposed for

carrying the conditions of the treaty into effect, should it be adopted,

contingent; to suspend its operation, upon the responsibility of the

Executive, in such manner as to afford an opportunity for such friendly

explanations as may be desired during the present session of Congress.

I communicate to Congress a copy of the treaty and of the instructions

to the minister of the United States at Madrid respecting it; of his

correspondence with the minister of Spain, and of such other documents

as may be necessary to give a full view of the subject.

In the course which the Spanish Government have on this occasion thought

proper to pursue it is satisfactory to know that they have not been

countenanced by any other European power. On the contrary, the opinion

and wishes both of France and Great Britain have not been withheld

either from the United States or from Spain, and have been unequivocal

in favor of the ratification. There is also reason to believe that the

sentiments of the Imperial Government of Russia have been the same, and

that they have also been made known to the cabinet of Madrid.

In the civil war existing between Spain and the Spanish Provinces in

this hemisphere the greatest care has been taken to enforce the laws

intended to preserve an impartial neutrality. Our ports have continued

to be equally open to both parties and on the same conditions, and our

citizens have been equally restrained from interfering in favor of

either to the prejudice of the other. The progress of the war, however,

has operated manifestly in favor of the colonies. Buenos Ayres still

maintains unshaken the independence which it declared in 1816, and has

enjoyed since 1810. Like success has also lately attended Chili and the

Provinces north of the La Plata bordering on it, and likewise Venezuela.

This contest has from its commencement been very interesting to other

powers, and to none more so than to the United States. A virtuous people

may and will confine themselves within the limit of a strict neutrality;

but it is not in their power to behold a conflict so vitally important

to their neighbors without the sensibility and sympathy which naturally

belong to such a case. It has been the steady purpose of this Government

to prevent that feeling leading to excess, and it is very gratifying

to have it in my power to state that so strong has been the sense

throughout the whole community of what was due to the character and

obligations of the nation that very few examples of a contrary kind

have occurred.

The distance of the colonies from the parent country and the great

extent of their population and resources gave them advantages which it

was anticipated at a very early period would be difficult for Spain to

surmount. The steadiness, consistency, and success with which they have

pursued their object, as evinced more particularly by the undisturbed

sovereignty which Buenos Ayres has so long enjoyed, evidently give them

a strong claim to the favorable consideration of other nations. These

sentiments on the part of the United States have not been withheld

from other powers, with whom it is desirable to act in concert. Should

it become manifest to the world that the efforts of Spain to subdue

these Provinces will be fruitless, it may be presumed that the Spanish

Government itself will give up the contest. In producing such a

determination it can not be doubted that the opinion of friendly powers

who have taken no part in the controversy will have their merited

influence.

It is of the highest importance to our national character and

indispensable to the morality of our citizens that all violations of

our neutrality should be prevented. No door should be left open for the

evasion of our laws, no opportunity afforded to any who may be disposed

to take advantage of it to compromit the interest or the honor of the

nation. It is submitted, therefore, to the consideration of Congress

whether it may not be advisable to revise the laws with a view to this

desirable result.

It is submitted also whether it may not be proper to designate by law

the several ports or places along the coast at which only foreign ships

of war and privateers may be admitted. The difficulty of sustaining the

regulations of our commerce and of other important interests from abuse

without such designation furnishes a strong motive for this measure.

At the time of the negotiation for the renewal of the commercial

convention between the United States and Great Britain a hope had been

entertained that an article might have been agreed upon mutually

satisfactory to both countries, regulating upon principles of justice

and reciprocity the commercial intercourse between the United States and

the British possessions as well in the West Indies as upon the continent

of North America. The plenipotentiaries of the two Governments not

having been able to come to an agreement on this important interest,

those of the United States reserved for the consideration of this

Government the proposals which had been presented to them as the

ultimate offer on the part of the British Government, and which they

were not authorized to accept. On their transmission here they were

examined with due deliberation, the result of which was a new effort to

meet the views of the British Government. The minister of the United

States was instructed to make a further proposal, which has not been

accepted. It was, however, declined in an amicable manner. I recommend

to the consideration of Congress whether further prohibitory provisions

in the laws relating to this intercourse may not be expedient. It is

seen with interest that although it has not been practicable as yet

to agree in any arrangement of this important branch of their commerce,

such is the disposition of the parties that each will view any

regulations which the other may make respecting it in the most friendly

light.

By the fifth article of the convention concluded on the 20th of October,

1818, it was stipulated that the differences which have arisen between

the two Governments with regard to the true intent and meaning of the

fifth article of the treaty of Ghent, in relation to the carrying away

by British officers of slaves from the United States after the exchange

of the ratifications of the treaty of peace, should be referred to

the decision of some friendly sovereign or state to be named for that

purpose. The minister of the United States has been instructed to name

to the British Government a foreign sovereign, the common friend to

both parties, for the decision of this question. The answer of that

Government to the proposal when received will indicate the further

measures to be pursued on the part of the United States.

Although the pecuniary embarrassments which affected various parts of

the Union during the latter part of the preceding year have during the

present been considerably augmented, and still continue to exist, the

receipts into the Treasury to the 30th of September last have amounted

to $19,000,000. After defraying the current expenses of the Government,

including the interest and reimbursement of the public debt payable to

that period, amounting to $18,200,000, there remained in the Treasury on

that day more than $2,500,000, which, with the sums receivable during

the remainder of the year, will exceed the current demands upon the

Treasury for the same period.

The causes which have tended to diminish the public receipts could not

fail to have a corresponding effect upon the revenue which has accrued

upon imposts and tonnage during the three first quarters of the present

year. It is, however, ascertained that the duties which have been secured

during that period exceed $18,000,000, and those of the whole year will

probably amount to $23,000,000.

For the probable receipts of the next year I refer you to the statements

which will be transmitted from the Treasury, which will enable you to

judge whether further provision be necessary.

The great reduction in the price of the principal articles of domestic

growth which has occurred during the present year, and the consequent

fall in the price of labor, apparently so favorable to the success of

domestic manufactures, have not shielded them against other causes

adverse to their prosperity. The pecuniary embarrassments which have so

deeply affected the commercial interests of the nation have been no less

adverse to our manufacturing establishments in several sections of the

Union.

The great reduction of the currency which the banks have been

constrained to make in order to continue specie payments, and the

vitiated character of it where such reductions have not been attempted,

instead of placing within the reach of these establishments the

pecuniary aid necessary to avail themselves of the advantages resulting

from the reduction in the prices of the raw materials and of labor, have

compelled the banks to withdraw from them a portion of the capital

heretofore advanced to them. That aid which has been refused by the

banks has not been obtained from other sources, owing to the loss of

individual confidence from the frequent failures which have recently

occurred in some of our principal commercial cities.

An additional cause for the depression of these establishments may

probably be found in the pecuniary embarrassments which have recently

affected those countries with which our commerce has been principally

prosecuted. Their manufactures, for the want of a ready or profitable

market at home, have been shipped by the manufacturers to the United

States, and in many instances sold at a price below their current value

at the place of manufacture. Although this practice may from its nature

be considered temporary or contingent, it is not on that account less

injurious in its effects. Uniformity in the demand and price of an

article is highly desirable to the domestic manufacturer.

It is deemed of great importance to give encouragement to our domestic

manufacturers. In what manner the evils which have been adverted to may

be remedied, and how far it may be practicable in other respects to

afford to them further encouragement, paying due regard to the other

great interests of the nation, is submitted to the wisdom of Congress.

The survey of the coast for the establishment of fortifications is

now nearly completed, and considerable progress has been made in the

collection of materials for the construction of fortifications in the

Gulf of Mexico and in the Chesapeake Bay. The works on the eastern bank

of the Potomac below Alexandria and on the Pea Patch, in the Delaware,

are much advanced, and it is expected that the fortifications at the

Narrows, in the harbor of New York, will be completed the present year.

To derive all the advantages contemplated from these fortifications it

was necessary that they should be judiciously posted, and constructed

with a view to permanence, The progress hitherto has therefore been

slow; but as the difficulties in parts heretofore the least explored

and known are surmounted, it will in future be more rapid. As soon as

the survey of the coast is completed, which it is expected will be done

early in the next spring, the engineers employed in it will proceed to

examine for like purposes the northern and northwestern frontiers.

The troops intended to occupy a station at the mouth of the St. Peters,

on the Mississippi, have established themselves there, and those who

were ordered to the mouth of the Yellow Stone, on the Missouri, have

ascended that river to the Council Bluff, where they will remain

until the next spring, when they will proceed to the place of their

destination. I have the satisfaction to state that this measure has

been executed in amity with the Indian tribes, and that it promises to

produce, in regard to them, all the advantages which were contemplated

by it.

Much progress has likewise been made in the construction of ships of war

and in the collection of timber and other materials for shipbuilding. It

is not doubted that our Navy will soon be augmented to the number and

placed in all respects on the footing provided for by law.

The Board, consisting of engineers and naval officers, have not yet

made their final report of sites for two naval depots, as instructed

according to the resolutions of March 18 and April 20, 1818, but they

have examined the coast therein designated, and their report is expected

in the next month.

For the protection of our commerce in the Mediterranean, along the

southern Atlantic coast, in the Pacific and Indian oceans, it has been

found necessary to maintain a strong naval force, which it seems proper

for the present to continue. There is much reason to believe that if any

portion of the squadron heretofore stationed in the Mediterranean should

be withdrawn our intercourse with the powers bordering on that sea would

be much interrupted, if not altogether destroyed. Such, too, has been

the growth of a spirit of piracy in the other quarters mentioned, by

adventurers from every country, in abuse of the friendly flags which

they have assumed, that not to protect our commerce there would be to

abandon it as a prey to their rapacity. Due attention has likewise been

paid to the suppression of the slave trade, in compliance with a law of

the last session. Orders have been given to the commanders of all our

public ships to seize all vessels navigated under our flag engaged in

that trade, and to bring them in to be proceeded against in the manner

prescribed by that law. It is hoped that these vigorous measures,

supported by like acts by other nations, will soon terminate a commerce

so disgraceful to the civilized world.

In the execution of the duty imposed by these acts, and of a high trust

connected with it, it is with deep regret I have to state the loss which

has been sustained by the death of Commodore Perry. His gallantry in a

brilliant exploit in the late war added to the renown of his country.

His death is deplored as a national misfortune.

A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents. Volume 2, part 1: James Monroe · 第 126 / 442 题