EPILOGUE

MY DEAR "MAURICE"--I was often in France before you were born or when you

were but a little child. When I went for the first or second time Mallarme

had just written: "All our age is full of the trembling of the veil of the

temple." One met everywhere young men of letters who talked of magic. A

distinguished English man of letters asked me to call with him on

Stanislas de Gaeta because he did not dare go alone to that mysterious

house. I met from time to time with the German poet Doukenday, a grave

Swede whom I only discovered after years to have been Strindberg, then

looking for the philosopher's stone in a lodging near the Luxembourg; and

one day in the chambers of Stuart Merrill the poet, I spoke with a young

Arabic scholar who displayed a large, roughly-made gold ring which had

grown to the shape of his finger. Its gold had no hardening alloy, he

said, because it was made by his master, a Jewish Rabbi, of alchemical

gold. My critical mind--was it friend or enemy?--mocked, and yet I was

delighted. Paris was as legendary as Connaught. This new pride, that of

the adept, was added to the pride of the artist. Villiers de L'Isle Adam,

the haughtiest of men, had but lately died. I had read his _Axel_ slowly

and laboriously as one reads a sacred book--my French was very bad--and

had applauded it upon the stage. As I could not follow the spoken words, I

was not bored even where Axel and the Commander discussed philosophy for a

half-hour instead of beginning their duel. If I felt impatient it was only

that they delayed the coming of the adept Janus, for I hoped to recognise

the moment when Axel cries: "I know that lamp, it was burning before

Solomon"; or that other when he cries: "As for living, our servants will

do that for us."

The movement of letters had been haughty even before Magic had touched it.

Rimbaud had sung: "Am I an old maid that I should fear the embrace of

death?" And everywhere in Paris and in London young men boasted of the

garret, and claimed to have no need of what the crowd values.

Last summer you, who were at the age I was when first I heard of Mallarme

and of Verlaine, spoke much of the French poets young men and women read

to-day. Claudel I already somewhat knew, but you read to me for the first

time from Jammes a dialogue between a poet and a bird, that made us cry,

and a whole volume of Peguy's _Mystere de la Charite de Jeanne d'Arc_.

Nothing remained the same but the preoccupation with religion, for these

poets submitted everything to the Pope, and all, even Claudel, a proud

oratorical man, affirmed that they saw the world with the eyes of

vine-dressers and charcoal-burners. It was no longer the soul, self-moving

and self-teaching--the magical soul--but Mother France and Mother Church.

Have not my thoughts run through a like round, though I have not found my

tradition in the Catholic Church, which was not the church of my

childhood, but where the tradition is, as I believe, more universal and

more ancient?

Per Amica Silentia Lunae · 第 62 / 77 题