The direct aim of the instruction in college is to give the student

access to vital and formative knowledge by studying man and his

works, and nature and her works. He is thus led to know himself and to

know the world, and the laws which govern nature, and man as a part of

nature. He comes to see things as they are and to understand the laws

of things, and thus he thinks and acts on more perfect knowledge. If

the student is to be trained to independent thought and action, he

must have a sounder basis of knowledge than the teachings of those

whose ideas and opinions are shaped by current, ephemeral literature.

The majority of men act on too imperfect knowledge, because they will

not take the time and exercise the patience to study the facts and

principles relating to any given subject, and to do their own

thinking. Goethe says: "To act is easy, to think is hard." The remedy

is found in the college courses of study which involve the study of

ourselves through psychology, logic, and mental, moral, political and

social philosophy, and the study of nature through the sciences and

the laws of the world about us.

Another method, aside from the nature and scope of the studies

pursued, to attain the end, is through the strong personality of the

college professor. Alexander the Great said: "Philip gave me life,

Aristotle taught me how to live well," and Emerson's judgment was that

"it is little matter what you learn; the question is, with whom you

learn." It is within the power of the college professor to help

enlighten the understanding, strengthen and guide the intuitions and

reasoning faculties, and to awaken within the student a consciousness

of his new powers and capacities, and incite him to mental activity.

The highest scholastic training demands that the professor studiously

avoid all those methods of instruction which tend to mechanical habits

of thought, and which check the mind's spontaneity of growth and

repress the individuality so essential to true scholarship.

Incidental to intellectual culture in college is the ability to find

promptly the information we want. "Next to knowing a thing," says Dr.

Johnson, "is to know where to find it." No student can become a

walking encyclopaedia, but he should learn while in college how to

avail himself advantageously of reference books, libraries and other

sources of information.

A college education likewise implies the ability to express one's

ideas in a clear, appropriate style. The student should be able to

tell what he knows. This clearness of thought and precision of

expression is best acquired in the class room, in the literary

societies, and in the classes devoted especially to the study of

expression.

The intellectual aim of a college should be not only to awaken and

develop independent thinking power as an abiding impulse which will

prompt to effective intellectual work, but withal the will, the

imagination, and emotive nature should be so trained that the student

will have a mental taste and moral appreciation for the best and

noblest thought. Mental discipline and the dull routine of study will

become cold and insipid unless the student is inducted into those

fields of science and literature where he will find the richest

sources of refined and elevating pleasures, and through them be

incited to noble action. It is on these lines of study that the

student acquires that spirit of study which becomes spontaneous,

attractive, and joyous. He loves culture for culture's sake, and does

not abandon its acquisition on leaving college.

A symmetrically developed manhood or womanhood involves _physical

culture_. The ascetic idea of college life no longer prevails. The

body, as well as the mind, is trained. The value to a student of good

health and an alert and vigorous body cannot be overestimated.

Educators are coming to realize more fully than in the past that the

physical and psychical factors of life are inseparable. The body and

mind are mutually related and affected. Systematic exercise

stimulates quickness of mental processes and promotes brain power.

The leading American colleges are conducted on better physiological

and hygienic principles than in the past. The student, on entering

college, is subject to a careful physical examination by a competent

physician, and a course of systematic physical training is prescribed.

Any organic defect or incipient disease is discovered, and, if

possible, corrected. Physical training has become an integral part of

a good college course. Exercise is largely compulsory, because

studious and ambitious students are likely to sacrifice physical for

intellectual training.

A well-equipped gymnasium is essential for the most thorough physical

culture. Bath-rooms, with facilities for plunge and shower baths, are

an important adjunct in promoting that healthy condition of the skin

which follows from frequent bathing. An athletic field for outdoor

sports is, likewise, a valuable accessory to develop a lithe and

active body.

The master of the gymnasium is generally a vigorous and enthusiastic

instructor, who is able to conduct skillfully daily gymnastic class

work, and relieve monotony and evoke interest by introducing a variety

of exercises for the different college classes. He is also the

hygienic adviser in all matters relating to study and recreation. The

students are taught that regular exercise, sufficient sleep, personal

cleanliness, and proper diet will correct most of the so-called

pernicious effects of over-study.

Outdoor sports, under proper restrictions, promote health and foster

mental qualities. Foot-ball and base-ball have gained an undue

prominence in some colleges. It is questionable whether they are the

most desirable forms of exercise for physical development, since only

a very small portion of the students at any one time can engage in

them.

The evil features of inter-collegiate games, especially as practiced,

offset their advantages. The undue excitement and spirit of rivalry

fostered is foreign to the true idea of an earnest student life. The

college is no monastery to make the student a recluse, but it should

be a place of solitude, a modern cloister, where the student may be

kept in partial isolation and away from the turbulent stream of public

life and distracting social influences. The student may keep in the

midst of the current of actual modern thought and life without

sacrificing the quiet seclusion which is an essential requirement for

the best scholarship.

These inter-collegiate games have been attended with temptations

perilous to character. Abundant testimony is not wanting to show that

their tendency has been toward rowdyism, gambling, debauchery, and

other disgraceful conduct. Some of the games scarcely rise above the

brutality of the prize fight. They have no elevating tendency, and no

apology can be made for their roughness and bad moral effects.

The fine natural instincts of the majority of American people are

repelled at such physical prowess. It is not necessary to introduce

the element of pugilism in order to give vent to the superabundance of

youthful animal spirits.

The abuse of these outdoor sports should not make us blind to the fact

that they have a legitimate use. It is wiser to control and direct

them than to curb the exuberance of good feeling which they call

forth, and which might find expression in less appropriate channels.

It should be borne in mind that all physical training is a failure

unless the aim is to maintain and develop health, to make the student

symmetrical, strong, graceful and better fitted for the duties of

living.

A symmetrical development involves, likewise, _the cultivation of the

moral and spiritual nature_.

The Christian religion affords the broadest educational basis,

because it presents the most exalted notion of personality and its

development. It takes account of the deepest facts of our nature, and

teaches philosophical principles that are true for all created

intelligences. Hence it is that Christianity is essential to the best

educational system. It precedes and governs true education. A narrow

and false conception of man leads to building only one side of his

nature. The will, the conscience, the emotional and spiritual natures

demand a share in the broadest culture. We cannot divide these

essential elements against themselves. The religious sentiment is so

interwoven with our being that it cannot be eliminated or dethroned.

It takes no subordinate place, because it is supreme. There is no true

theory of life without the spiritual element. All theories of

education and principles of action that do not recognize the relations

of the human soul to the supernatural are out of harmony with the laws

governing human life.

These truths have been impressed on the noblest minds. "The greatest

thought," said Daniel Webster, "that ever entered my mind, is the

thought of my personal accountability to God." And Channing says that

"man's relation to God is the great quickening truth, throwing all

other truths into insignificance, and a truth which, however obscured

and paralyzed by the many errors which ignorance and fraud have

hitherto linked with it, has ever been a chief spring of human

improvement. We look to it as the true life of the intellect. No man

can be just to himself, can comprehend his own existence, can put

forth all his powers with an heroic confidence, can deserve to be the

guide and inspirer of other minds, till he has risen to communion with

the Supreme Mind; till he feels his filial connection with the

Universal Parent; till he regards himself as the recipient and

minister of the Infinite Spirit; till he feels his consecration to the

ends which religion unfolds; till he rises above human opinion, and

is moved by a higher impulse than fame."

The Christian religion is in harmony with intellectual activity,

because it favors application to study, and enjoins the duty of

seeking truth, as well as awakens and intensifies the love of the good

and beautiful. In fact, the human intellect owes its greatest triumphs

to Christianity. From the beginning, the Christian religion has

assimilated and employed human learning, and has become a great

formative force in modern intellectual movements. It favors a broad

catholic spirit, and is the counterpoise and remedy of a narrow range

of intellectual activity. History teaches that it has been a strong

incentive in the search after truth, and the chief factor in training

the race to a higher civilized life. The changes in the progress in

modern civilization are stimulated and guided by Christian knowledge.

The whole trend of modern thought and instruction in the higher

intellectual circles is to apply Christian principles to the problems

of life. In every age it has stimulated and invigorated the human

mind. It has introduced nobler and better ideas of life, given impetus

to self-development, and has produced the highest types of manhood and

of womanhood. The inspiration and encouragement in advancing general

intelligence and founding the higher institutions of learning is

principally due to the Christian religion.

"From the days of the Apologists onwards," says Prof. John De Witt,

"learning has always advanced under the fostering care of our

religion. In the schools of Antioch and of Alexandria, in Carthage and

Hippo, in the old Rome on the Tiber, and in the new Rome on the

Bosphorus, throughout the period of the ancient church, religion is

the great inspiration of intellectual labor. How true this is of the

Middle Age I need not stop to say. Religion in Anselm assimilates the

philosophy of Plato. In the Anglican doctor it employs the dialectic

and metaphysics of Aristotle. And the true father of the inductive

philosophy, who anticipated the Organon and the very Idola of his

great namesake, is Roger Bacon, the Franciscan brother. It was to this

wonderful and unique power of Christianity to assimilate and employ

all the triumphs of the human intellect, that the Western World is

indebted for the universities by which, most of all, learning was

increased and transmitted from generation to generation. Bologna and

Naples, the school of Egbert at York, the schools of Charlemagne in

the New Christian Empire, with Alcuin as minister of education; the

later universities, with their tens of thousands of eager

students--Paris, Cologne, and Oxford--sprang into being obedient,

indeed, to a thirst for knowledge, but a thirst for knowledge which,

in turn, owed its existence and intensity to the unique fact that

Christianity alone among religions can assimilate and employ all the

truths of human philosophy, of science, and of literature."

The importance of promoting religious culture in our colleges cannot

be overestimated. Dr. Thomas Arnold has spoken words that should be

preserved in letters of gold. "Consider," he says, "what a religious

education, in the true sense of the word, is: It is no other than a

training our children to life eternal; no other than the making them

know and love God, know and abhor evil; no other than the fashioning

all the parts of our nature for the very ends which God designed for

them; the teaching our understandings to know the highest truth; the

teaching our affections to _love_ the highest good!" One of the

greatest teachers, Mark Hopkins, on the fiftieth anniversary of his

connection with Williams College, said: "Christianity is the greatest

civilizing, molding, uplifting power on this globe, and it is a sad

defect in any institution of higher learning if it does not bring

those under its care into the closest possible relation to it." The

profound French philosopher, Victor Cousin, declares that "any system

of school training which sharpens and strengthens the intellectual

powers without supplying moral culture and religious principle is a

curse rather than a blessing." And President M. E. Gates says: "In

place of the fermenting despair of nihilism, the reckless immoralities

of atheism, and the suicidal negations of agnosticism which have

cursed liberally-educated Europe, if we are to have here in America an

influence strong, binding and beneficient in our social system, as the

result of collegiate education, it must be, it can be only by

retaining in that system a clear faith in God, and by making

prominent, as the highest aim of life, the service of God in serving

the best interests of one's fellow-men."

The goal of all education is fulness of stature of men and women in

Christ. Art and science are a vain show without this aim. A man may

have a brain as keen as a Damascus scimiter, and yet he is wanting

without piety. This moral and religious equipment is necessary for

right conduct which, Matthew Arnold says, is three-fourths of life.

Other things being equal, the student that is touched and saturated

with the religious life will be under the strongest motives and attain

the highest culture and efficiency in life. A pure heart and a clear

brain are closely related. "Our education will never be perfect

unless, like the ancient temples, it is lighted from above." Martin

Luther said: "To have prayed well is to have studied well," which

accords with the idea of the best scholars in former days at

Cambridge: _Bene orasse est bene studisse_.

The Christian spirit is eminently favorable to culture and to the

promotion of literary productivity. It helps to make brilliant and

earnest teachers, and lends zest to professional ambition. "Other

things being equal," says Noah Porter, "that institution of learning

which is earnestly religious is certain to make the largest and most

valuable achievements in science and learning, as well as in literary

tastes and capacities."

President Gates forcibly expresses the thought in these words: "Man is

not, and was not meant to be, pure disembodied intellect. True

philosophy, as well as common sense, teaches that the heart and the

will have their rightful domain in every man's life. If the

understanding becomes arrogant and spurns the aid of the other powers

of the mind, not only does the man become an incomplete man, but his

intellect itself inevitably loses poise and clearness. The man ceases

to be a man, and becomes a calculating machine, and his intellect

becomes subject to those sudden reversals of legitimate processes and

results which the law of construction for calculating machines renders

inevitable in them, but from which _life_ saves the living man, the

feeling, worshiping soul."

There is nothing more important to equip the complete scholar and

gentleman than the Christian religion. Tennyson's poetic

interpretation of this truth is thus beautifully expressed:

"Let knowledge grow from more to more,

But more of reverence in us dwell,

That mind and soul, according well,

May make one music, as before,

But vaster."

The _methods of promoting religious life in college_ are widely

varied. One of the most effective means is the positive Christian

faith and the personal religious influence of the college professors.

The student enters college at a vital and perilous period of life. The

judgment is often immature and the life principles unsettled. In this

speculative period the student may be blindly endeavoring to adjust

his faith to his reason. Especially at this time he needs professors

of superior reason, strength of faith and spiritual discernment to

unveil the divine mysteries and aid in dispelling doubt. Ex-President

Seelye, of Amherst, once said: "We should no more think of appointing

to a post of instruction here an irreligious man than we should an

immoral man, or one ignorant of the topics he would have to teach." It

is certainly no narrow bigotry that leads the Christian public to

demand that the colleges select professors loyal to the truth and the

Christian Church. United with their scientific culture and

professional ability as teachers they should embody Christian

earnestness and purity of life, and aim to send out students with a

positive and rational faith.

The parent who realizes that the moral character of his children will

be fixed, in a large measure, while in college, believes that it would

be moral suicide to permit them to come under the influence of a

professor whose religious indifference, or unfavorable remarks about

Christianity, might infuse the poison of skepticism, doubt, or

indifference, and perhaps unsettle their early religious convictions,

and "send them forth confused and adrift on the endless sea of

conflicting notions."

The courses of study in college should be arranged so as to favor the

study of the essential facts and truths of the Christian religion, and

through them promote practical piety. There is no valid reason why the

Christian religion, which is the chief energy and force in all

intellectual culture, should not be distinctly and permanently

recognized in the college curriculum. The well-established and

accepted facts of the Christian religion should be gathered and

studied with as much painstaking care, freedom of spirit, and loyalty

to truth as the scientist studies his facts and constructs his

theories. This method implies that the teacher and pupil hold in

abeyance all those probable theories, speculations, and conjectures

which are not established, as irrelevant to the work in hand. When

this scientific spirit is more effectively introduced into the study

of the Christian religion in our colleges, it will prepare the way

for the restatement of doctrine so as to commend it with increasing

force to every intelligent student. Christian truth is capable of

being built up into a system as scientific as any other. The

professor, in leading the earnest student in search of spiritual

truth, will exercise tolerance and tact, so that he will not awaken

suspicions of being actuated by a narrow bigotry, or appear as a lover

of dogmatic teachings.

Again, it is better to select text-books that have been written by

capable men who are in sympathy with the Christian religion. The

student with an immature mind, who seeks to build his faith and

theories of life on the teachings of those whose predilections are

away from Christianity, will find it fatal to his lofty ideals and

aspirations, while instruction based on Christian theism tends to lift

the mind upward, and to foster a hopeful and earnest moral and

intellectual life.

We grant that Christian character can only be incidentally produced

through the subjects studied. The same study may be taught in

different ways, and with entirely different results. The intellectual

processes involved in study do not necessarily exert a spiritual

influence. The aim and spirit of the professor and student will

determine whether the study pursued shall contribute to the

cultivation of greater reverence and exaltation of the soul. The charm

of scientific study may so occupy the student's attention as to

exclude all thoughts of the spiritual and eternal, or he may "look

through nature up to nature's God." The student may be so absorbed

with the human events and material conditions of history as to

overlook the light of God's presence and guiding hand in it all.

To be liberally educated in Christian America, one should have a

knowledge of the English Bible. It is the fountain and conservator of

pure English and the storehouse of the most inspiring thought. Its

classic beauty and lofty speculations and sublime morality are

essential to a liberal education. "Froude calls the Bible the best of

all literatures. Daniel Webster read the Bible through every year for

its effect upon his mind. Charles Sumner kept the Bible at his elbow

on his desk, and could find any passage without a concordance. Great

men have found the Bible a great inspiration. But not this alone--as a

great and inspiring literature,--but as a source of spiritual life and

power, the Bible is the basis of true collegiate growth."

The study of the English Bible in colleges is important in developing

the will and the conscience, and in evoking religious feelings which

have a practical influence on conduct. It certainly imparts a vigorous

character to education, and brings men face to face with the facts of

sin and its remedy. The presence of Christianity in the intellectual

life of the student is corrective of selfishness and other vices which

enslave the intellect and render life a disastrous failure.

It is encouraging to note that the study of the Bible is finding a

place in the American college curriculum on a level with other

studies, and time is allotted to attain a certain intellectual mastery

of it. The active class instruction is as exacting and exhausting as

any part of the college course. The student is led to trace the

historic movements and to perceive the organic character, the literary

forms and personal factors in its composition. The inductive method

adopted develops original and independent students of the Word. The

intellectual, devotional, and practical ends attained by this study

are a powerful factor in upholding and maintaining the moral and

spiritual character of the students.

Another method is that of _religious worship_. Students living in a

community with a separate intellectual and social life should be

required to meet daily for religious worship and instruction. The

sacred moments spent in the college chapel by the whole college

community are an appropriate recognition of the worth and power of the

Christian religion, and do something to meet the spiritual needs and

aspirations of the human soul. The daily gathering of the academic

body to listen to a brief but suggestive exposition of scripture, and

to unite in praise and prayer, cultivates reverence and devotion in

the student, and will be regarded by many of them in after years as

among the most delightful experiences in college life. If the

religious services are not made perfunctory, but attractive and

inspiring, in college, the students may pass to the university in

their maturer years with devotional habits, and, likely, to avail

themselves of its voluntary system of daily religious exercises.

The colleges should ever keep in view the original aim of the founders

to make them centers of evangelical power. Piety, however, should not

be a substitute for honest scholarly work. They should never permit

their enthusiasm for an intellectual training and the growth of the

sciences to obscure or conceal Him who is the Light and Life of all

men. Their immediate and primary aim should be to promote intellectual

culture, but this in nowise involves a departure from the spirit of

the forefathers who made them agencies for defending and propagating

the gospel, and for leading the youth to remember that "the fear of

the Lord is the beginning of wisdom."

It is evident, then, that the function of the college is to unfold the

intellectual, physical, moral, and spiritual life of the young people,

and especially to form character that shall be fully equipped for

carrying out the divine purpose of life.

THE ADVANCEMENT OF KNOWLEDGE.

Colleges in America · 第 4 / 10 段