QUINQUAGESIMA SUNDAY.

For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.--_Rom.

3, 23._

A few days more, and we shall have entered upon Lent. What is Lent?

Lent is a time of several weeks which for ages has been set apart

among Christians for a period of more than usual seriousness. As

observed in our Church, it is a time marked out from the rest of the

year as more especially devoted to the contemplation of those vital

truths on which our Christian religion is founded. To be brief,

Lenten time with us is Passion time. Passion, in simple English,

means suffering, more particularly, the suffering of Christ.

Accordingly, Passion time, or Passion tide, is the season when we

are more especially called upon to commemorate, and call to mind,

and ponder, and think over the suffering of our Savior, Christ,

those scenes announced in the Gospel when He was betrayed into the

hands of wicked men, and by them was falsely accused, reviled,

mocked, scourged, crowned with thorns, and at last crucified.

In order that we might do that in the proper manner, as we ought to

do, the Church, from the earliest period, has appointed the forty

days of Lent, just as it has appointed the four Sundays in Advent,

to be a preparation for Christmas. For there are two great seasons

in the year which it behooves every Christian to conscientiously

observe, if he wishes to pay dutiful honor to his Savior.

The first season is Christmas, in memory of His loving kindness in

coming down from heaven, putting on the nature of man. The other

season is Lent, to commemorate His dying love. Both these seasons

are so important, of such moment to the welfare of the soul,

that the Church has set apart the four Sundays which come before

Christmas and the forty days which come before Easter as a time of

preparation. The wisdom of such an arrangement no one can doubt.

Just like the early bell on Sunday is meant to call us to get

ready for church, the service of God's house, so Advent and Lent

call us to get ready for Christmas and Good Friday. When a musical

instrument has been laid by for a while, it needs tuning, or it

will make but sorry music. The minds and hearts of most Christians,

too, require to be gotten into tune before they can bear their

part fitly and harmoniously in the services by which the Church

commemorates the death and resurrection of her Lord. And how? What

is the best way to prepare for a profitable and advantageous Lent?

That is conditioned by another question: What was it that delivered

our blessed Lord into the hands of those wicked men, that caused

Him that shameful treatment, mockery, and finally nailed Him to

the cross? The malice of the chief priest, the treachery of Judas,

the cowardice of Pontius Pilate? Deeper, my beloved, deeper; they

were but the instrumental, not the procuring cause. The real cause,

you know it, was something else,--sin. To do away with, to secure

the pardon of that, Christ died. Then it is plain, that in order

to understand the value of His suffering, to observe that season

aright, we must begin with being convinced of the evil, of the

exceeding hatefulness and danger of sin.

Here is the first elementary truth which meets us at the threshold

of Lent, without which it will be of no more value to you than a

lock without a key, a mine without a shaft; herein consists its best

preparation, to secure a right conviction of sin. That, God blessing

the effort, shall be the intent of our sermon.

When the ostrich, scouring along the sandy desert, finds that it

cannot escape the huntsman, it is said to thrust its head into

a bush, and fancying that the danger which it ceases to see has

ceased to exist, it remains there, quite tranquil, to receive the

death-blow of the huntsman. Poor, senseless, stupid bird! Yet not

one degree more so than is the folly of many who are not birds, but

possessed of reason and soul. Plenty there are who, shutting their

eyes to the evil, burrowing their heads in the sand-heap of excuses

and false peace, thus hide until the fatal stroke of death puts an

end to their earthly career, and opening their eyes in a place where

there is no repentance, as the rich man in the parable, they realize

that it is too late.

If we turn to the Bible, it teaches that there are two great classes

or kinds of sin; and if we turn to the witness within and the

evidence without, we shall find what the Bible tells us everywhere

corroborated and borne out. The one kind of sin is the Original or

Birth Sin, that all men are naturally engendered, are conceived and

born in sin; that is, they are all, from their mother's womb, full

of evil desires and propensities, and that this is the fountainhead

of all other, or actual, sins, such as evil thoughts, words, and

deeds. There are many who reject this doctrine; they contend that

when man is born into this world, his soul is as pure as the snow

that comes down in beautiful flurries from the sky, and as perfect

as the vessel that passes from the potter's hand; they tell us that

we are God's favorite creatures, that He has made us lords of the

creation and heirs of eternal life, and that, therefore, it is quite

impossible that we should be so prone to sin, as our Church, setting

forth the doctrine of the Bible in her confession, declares us to

be. But they are willfully ignorant. The question whether we are

prone to sin from our cradles upward is a mere question of fact. One

has only to look into one's own heart, and what do you find there,

good or evil? You will say, a little of both. Be it so; but tell

me, or rather tell yourselves, honestly and truly, which of the

two cost you the most trouble to learn, and which of the two comes

the easier? Is there a doubt? Does one contract good habits easier

than bad, or the reverse? Is it easier for a sober man to become

a drunkard than for a poor, miserable, besotted drunkard to trace

his steps back and to become sober? Or, another point of view. Ask

mothers, accustomed to watch their children from earliest infancy,

whether every child that has come under their observation had not

something to learn that was good, and something to unlearn that was

evil. Now, whence did this evil come from? It cannot have been

taught to the child, for the evil showed itself at a time before all

teaching; it had it naturally. And so it is in other things. The

good wheat must be sown and looked after, or it will never amount

to much. The weeds sprout up and spread of themselves, and it is as

great a labor to keep them down as to get the good wheat up. The

truth is, "Like begetteth like." "In Adam's fall we sinned all." The

fountain was polluted, so is the stream; sin is born in the bone, as

it were, and without God's help we can no more mend it than a sick

man can mend and cure himself without the help of a physician.

But this original sin is not the only kind. Though men deny that,

they cannot deny the other, what our Catechism calls Actual Sin.

Like trees in the forest does it surround them. Where is the man

that dares affirm that he has never been guilty of doing what he

should never have done, or guilty of not doing what he should have

done? Lives there a person so happy as to look back on the past and

feel no remorse, or forward to the future and feel no fear? What?

Is there no page of your history that you would obliterate, no leaf

that, with God's permission, you would tear from the book of life's

story? To David's prayer, "Lord, remember not the sins of my youth,

nor my transgressions," have you no solemn and hearty Amen? If you

could be carried back to the starting-post, and stood again at your

mother's knee, and sat again at the old school desk with companions

that are now changed, or scattered, or dead, or gone, were you to

begin life anew, would you run the selfsame course, would you live

over the selfsame life? Is there no speech to unsay, no act to undo,

no day, Sunday, or evening to spend better? No one among those with

whom you are now living or among those that have gone before--to

whom you would bear yourself otherwise than you have done? Where is

there a breathing man that can say: "I am pure in my heart. I am

clear from all sin"? If he does, he deceives himself, the truth is

not in him. As well deny your existence as deny the existence of

actual sin.

But what men will not deny they will seek to excuse. It were

amusing, if it were not a matter so serious, to observe with what

palliation and apologies defenses are thrown up by which, after all,

men's sins do not look so exceedingly sinful. Thus there be those

who say: If we are naturally born to evil, as the Bible says and

our experience testifies, we cannot help it, and how can it be a

fault of ours if we do wrong? And how can God blame and punish us

for not being better than He made us? It is thus that Scotland's

famous poet, Burns, sings:

Thou knowest that Thou hast formed me

With passions wild and strong,

And listening to their witching voice

Has often led me wrong.

In other words, I am a sinner, but the fault is not mine, but God's.

Or, again, they ascribe the blame to the power of temptation.

"The serpent beguiled me," was the excuse of the first sinner; it

is still, in a more or less measure, the excuse of every sinner.

Temptation came upon them so suddenly and with such stealth and

vehemence that it swept them off their feet before they were aware

of it. Or (once more), like the original sinner, they lay their

blame upon their fellow-man. "The woman that Thou gavest to be

with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat." What parent or

mother has not discovered, in correcting a disobedient boy, that he

is uniformly punishing the wrong one? It was always the other boy

who brought about the evil act, and so, invariably, it is the bad

company, evil influences, peculiar surroundings, locality, that make

people to sin.

Whatever the palliatives and excuses, my beloved hearers, the thing

will not do; it is vain and ignoble, and, in part, what has been

said is blasphemy. In the first place, whatever prompted, tempted

the act, the act was done by the sinner himself, and not by another;

he knew of it, he consented to it, he gave his members and body to

it. It is also useless to say that he was swept away by temptation.

The same excuse might the suicide plead who seeks the river, stands

on its brink, and, leaping in, is swept off to his watery grave. We

go down like Samson to Delilah; we stand in the way of sinners, we

frequent the places of guilty pleasures, and then, falling, complain

about the strength of temptation. Away with all such subterfuges and

opiates that simply drug the conscience!

What is sin? Sin, says God's Word, is the transgression of the Law,

the most terrible and abominable thing in this world. Sin is that

which drove man out of Paradise garden, robbed him of the divine

image, severed the happy relation between him and his Creator,

and plunged him into accursedness and misery. Sin is a disease

which turns all moral beauty into rottenness, causes all grief and

distress, breaks hearts, and fills our cemeteries, man's worst,

man's most ruinous and most formidable enemy, that dogs his every

footstep in this life, and calls down upon his body and soul the

wrath and eternal damnation from a God who hates and who punishes

sin.

What greater comfort, then, than to know how and where to receive

deliverance and remedy from it. It has been stated before among the

excuses that man is born a sinner, and because born so, he cannot be

blamed for sinning, any more than a sick person for dying. He cannot

help it. That seems very plausible, indeed. It would be very unjust

to blame a sick person for dying, provided there were no remedies;

but in a country where there are plenty of physicians and the sick

have only to send for them,--if in such a country a sick man is

obstinate, and will not send for a physician, nor take the means of

being made well, he is to blame, and if he dies, he is guilty of his

own death. And suppose now that the physician does not wait to be

sent for, that he comes of his own accord to the sick man's bedside,

that he brings a medicine of rare herbs in his hand, and says to the

sick man: "My friend, I heard you were very sick, and so I came to

see you and fetch you a medicine which is a certain cure if you take

it. Never mind your poverty, I ask no payment." But the sick man

refuses it; he does not like its look, or he finds it is bitter to

take, or a neighbor has told him not to heed the physician, and he

dies. Who is to blame? That's our case precisely. We have a soul's

sickness. But a great Physician is come to us. He has a dear remedy,

a specific, made of the most precious ingredients, _viz._, His holy,

precious blood and His innocent suffering and death. He brings that

medicine to our doors. Shall we refuse to take it? Shall we say

that we will have none of it? We may do so; there is no compulsion;

this heavenly Physician foists Himself on none. But whose shall

be the blame, who be the loser? Be wise, then. Lenten time is

repenting time. May we, as it says in the Collect, so pass through

this holy time of our Lord that we may obtain the pardon of our

sins. May we enter this incoming season with a solemn earnestness

toward spiritual things, with a resolve to spend its days in sacred

devotion under the cross, and with sorrow over our past failures

set ourselves to a better and more consecrated life. And to this may

the good Lord graciously incline the hearts of every one of us! Amen.

Faith and Duty: Sermons on Free Texts, with Reference to the Church-Year · 第 32 / 76 题