Marriage is honorable in all.--_Hebr. 13, 4._

"And God saw everything that He had made, and, behold, it was

very good." These words of Holy Scripture immediately following

the statement: "And God created man in His image, male and female

created He them," contain the divine verdict regarding the social

relation that we call matrimony or marriage. Declared the all-wise

God: "It was very good."

That, however, was in the holy and happy days of Paradise, in

the midst of righteousness, purity, and bliss. Sin entered, and

things changed; the image of the divine Maker was forfeited, that

purity effaced, over that bliss was written in indelible letters:

"Paradise Lost." What, then, became of the marriage relation? Was

it, too, dissolved, forfeited, lost? Wonderful Providence! From

that universal wreck,--of the few things which God permitted man to

carry with him, remains, to insure him happiness and welfare in the

midst of a world otherwise steeped in misery and tears, the marriage

estate. It was not lost.

The Gospel-lesson of to-day presents the Savior as being present

at a marriage feast, and records that on that occasion He changed

water into wine and manifested forth His glory. By His presence and

by that miracle He also manifested forth, endorsed, sanctioned,

and placed His divine approbation upon matrimony, as He once did

amid the scenes of Eden's creation and loveliness. Nothing could

be more significant than that, when the God-man came to found His

kingdom upon earth, and entered upon His Messianic work, His first

work should have been wrought in honor of the wedding tie. And so

God's Word speaks of marriage throughout. When the Apostle desires

a comparison to set forth the holy and pure relation between Christ

and His Church, he knows none more sublime and noble than the union

that exists between man and woman in wedlock, for which reason the

Church is called Christ's bride--Christ is called her Bridegroom.

To raise one's tongue or pen in impiety or censure against marriage

is to raise them against heaven and Christ. To set up in its place

the teaching and practice of celibacy, by which men and women are

divested, in the name of religion, from the ties and duties of

family; to turn away, or in any manner to advocate what may break

down the proper relation between the sexes, is casting reproach upon

God's institution, and a perversion of true religion, as it is of

nature's laws. To speak depreciatingly, disparagingly of marriage,

to arch the brow, to puck the lips up in a smile, when it is called

"holy" matrimony, and in any way to entertain light and derogatory

views concerning it and family life, is to get oneself into conflict

with, and to invite the ill favor of, Him who has thrown a sacred

hedge around the institution, when on Sinai's mountain, in His Ten

Commandments, He commanded how we should regard this estate.

"Marriage," says the Apostle in our text, "is honorable in all."

There is nothing concerning it that is unworthy, unholy, hindersome

to piety and salvation. The Son of God would not have graced with

His presence and miracle those Galilean nuptials if it had not been

holy throughout. Concerning the honorableness of that estate would I

speak at this time a few words of plainness and truth. May He who is

called the God of families bless them to our instruction!

Among the views concerning matrimony, there is also this one, taught

by men sitting in professors' chairs and senselessly repeated by

the ungodly multitude, that, as man has evolved from a lower to a

higher form of existence, so morality and also matrimony have only

gradually, in the course of many centuries, yes, thousands of

years, evolved to what it now is. Originally man knew as little of

matrimony as the beasts of the field. Little by little, pride and

self-interest induced especially strong men to take unto themselves,

and keep with themselves, one or a few of the other sex, and so it

eventually grew into a custom and rule that one man and one woman

should form a union for life, and in evidence of that they will even

point to the Bible, the instance of Abraham, who beside his wife,

Sarah, had her maid, Hagar, and Jacob had two, really four wives,

and David, Solomon, in fact, all the Jews among the Old Testament

kings practiced polygamy,--it was only with the introduction of

Christianity that monogamy, the union of one man and one woman, and

the indissolubleness of the marriage-tie, became general rule. What

folly of folly, contrary to all sacred and secular story!

Without entering too explicitly upon this subject, do we not read

in the chapters of Genesis that when Pharaoh of Egypt had cast his

eyes upon Sarah, thinking she was Abraham's sister, that after he

had been rightly informed, he at once desisted from his advances and

made explanation? And did not Abimelech, when about to fall into

a like error, offer apology and make restitution? Is it not plain

from these cases that they well knew that the marriage relation was

not to be broken, that one man was not to take another man's wife?

Moreover, it never occurred to Abraham, or any of the patriarchs,

to put away from themselves their wives, for any reasons, and these

men lived nearly two thousand years before Christ. How absurd the

contention that men originally lived without a knowledge of the

sanctity of marriage! Turning to secular history, we have record

of the same. Rome, for instance, was founded in the eighth century

before Christ. Its first citizens were robbers, and such as had

been banished for gross offenses from other cities of Italy. But

concerning the marriage relation--they did not live as brutes.

Every physically able inhabitant was legally required to wed, and

for several centuries not a solitary case of divorce occurred.

Such a thing was regarded simply impossible. It was not until late

centuries, when effeminacy had taken hold upon the city, that we

hear of those social abominations. The same may be said of our

heathen forefathers, the German and Teutonic tribes; marriage, with

them, was held in highest respect.

This, then, is the true view according to Bible and history. God

instituted marriage at creation, and God ordained that it should

be a union between one man and one woman, and that this union is

indissoluble and inseparable. As everything else, however, suffered

by the fall of man into sin, so also this divine regulation. The

corruption at the time of the flood was such that God destroyed the

world on that very account. "They took them wives of all that they

chose," is the sacred account. It is with regret that we read of

men like Abraham, Jacob, David, who were not found strong enough

to resist the common corruption, but were deplorably drawn into

looseness of the marriage ties.

How was it at the time of the Savior? The teaching of the synagogue

was, that "whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a

writing of divorcement." When it entered a man's mind to get rid

of his wife, all he needed to do was to write upon a piece of

parchment: "I divorce myself from my wife," have it signed by two

or three witnesses, and the wife had to go; or if it occurred to

a woman to sever herself from her husband, she demanded a writing

of divorcement from him, and if he refused, life became miserable,

or she would simply run away, as Herodias did from her husband,

Philip, and married her husband's brother, Herod Antipas. And these

occurrences were not done with blushing reserve, those guilty of it

boasted of it. Beloved, are we not rapidly falling upon such times?

The miserable revelations that come from our courts are veritable

cesspools reeking with stench and bestial filth. As one eminent

jurist has expressed it: "Broken marriages are as common as broken

window-panes." Divorce, what is it practically, in effect, but

enabling men and women to live in successive polygamy? Now, over

against this and all like influences and evils that would break

down the honor of marriage, our Lord clearly and emphatically

laid down God's Law. Here it is: "They are no more twain, but one

flesh." "What, therefore, God has joined together, let not man put

asunder," and again, "Whosoever shall put away his wife and marry

another, committeth adultery, and whosoever marrieth her that is

put away committeth adultery." These words are as clear as language

can be. Only one exception does Christ give to the rule, Matt. 5,

32: "Whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of

fornication." Fornication means unfaithfulness to each other in

the marriage relation. Illicit intercourse with another person,

that is given as the exception, as a just cause for severance. As

for other causes, the Bible recognizes not one. And even in cases

of fornication it does not _demand_ a divorce. That, then, is the

position of the Scripture and of our church. This is the practice of

her clergy.

Again, another particular that tends to the honorableness of the

marriage state, as pointed out in the text, is the high purpose

which it is intended to serve according to the will of God. The

family life is the foundation of human society. Married life,

without seeking to fulfill its first purpose, the perpetuating of

the human race and the bringing up of one's offspring in the proper

manner, is to undermine, frustrate, that foundation of the state.

This leads me to refer to an evil which I hardly know how to speak

of, which should be named in the blackest of evils,--I mean the

willful intention and resolve to defeat the first of those purposes

for which matrimony was instituted by God. It comes looming up

on the view of this generation as a great, a growing, an almost

national crime. The foundation of a home is the first thing intended

in matrimony. But some deliberately resolve that there shall be

no home, or at least that it shall be as narrow, as limited, as

possible. Be it to avoid pain, be it to shrink the duty of the

parent, be it to remain free to enjoy the world,--arts base and

black, devices which in the Old Testament were punished by death,

are used to carry out these ungodly and absurd resolves; ungodly,

because it would not be possible more grossly to outrage God's law

than in this way; absurd, because a marriage contracted with that

understanding and intention is a contradiction, a misnomer, a fraud

on society and on the Church. And so I say, as God's minister and

in His name, as we who must speak fearlessly, that this act of

deliberately preventing the formation of a home is a crime, and

one which brings down curses from a God of justice, who knows and

who rewards according to our deeds. "Marriage," be it noted, "is

honorable in all"; it is a holy and pure estate, and holiness must

prevail therein.

And now let us regard the other part of our discourse: If marriage

is a holy estate, then it must be entered honorably and must be

continued honorably.

Marriage ought to be entered honorably. There is something appalling

in the thoughtlessness, the irresponsibility with which young people

will contract marriage; there seems to be often no apparent sense

of the gravity of the act, no reflection upon what is involved. A

pleasant face, captivating demeanor, money, or position are not

infrequently the flimsy threads that tie the conjugal knot.

But how can any one who is a Christian enter upon that relation

which, more than any other, affects the whole life, without

consulting and seeking the blessing of the divine Author? Yet it

is done, and alas! done only too often by those who ought to know

better. Some contract acquaintanceship, keep company, and have an

interchange of hearts, and never think of their God and Savior in

connection with it. Religion, in fact, seems unwelcome and out of

place to many at such a time, whilst one heart-felt prayer to Him

in connection with such an acquaintance would in thousands of cases

have prevented anguish of souls from which there is no refuge but

the grave.

In other words, whether you will be happy or unhappy in the marriage

life depends largely upon the companion of your choice. Therefore,

when choosing a life's companion, ask God for His counsel to give

you the spouse of His choice; and when you marry, marry honorably.

The contracting parties in to-day's Gospel-lesson were not a runaway

couple, or Jesus would not have honored their wedding feast with

His presence. Nor did they marry from sheer necessity to hide the

results of sin. Their relatives and friends, and, if still living,

their parents were there; they had asked for and received the honest

and unqualified consent of the latter. It is not an idle service

or the mere acknowledgment of a civil contract, but a proper and

significant Christian act to have marriage solemnized by a religious

ceremony, conducted by a minister of the church, and blessed in the

name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.

No Christian man or woman should ever think of contracting a

marriage alliance at which a servant of God is not present to invoke

the Savior's blessing. Marriage should be entered into reverently,

discreetly, and in the fear of God. Nor can I in this connection

refrain from calling attention to the good old church custom called

in English "publishing the banns," the persons asking for the prayer

of a Christian congregation upon their union. Thus, in the ways

indicated, does a Christian enter upon marriage "honorably."

And having entered upon it thus, it ought to be so continued. There

is one thing that married couples ought ever to remember, this: that

they are both sinners. If they bear that in mind, they will not

look for imaginary perfections in their life's partner, and will,

conscious of their own shortcomings, bear with the shortcomings of

the other. And where there is this conviction that both are sinners,

they will find their balance in the Savior of sinners. It is well

enough to bring into married life an amiable disposition, the happy

faculty of controlling one's temper, but, believe me, the best

thing to bring along, the most effective safeguard against discord

and estrangement, is the fear of the Lord, the mutual respect for

God's law and authority. Temporary differences, quarrels even, may

arise in that home, but cannot remain. The husband has been hard

and unkind, but will be prompt to make amends. If the wife has been

contrary, quarrelsome, or has in other ways angered her husband, the

love of Christ will not let her rest, but to acknowledge and seek

reconciliation. There is nothing like genuine religion to regulate

the household, to take off the frictions of daily life, to educate

us in self-denial, in bearing and forbearing with one another.

Let us, then, keep before us the dignity of the estate, and conduct

ourselves honorably therein, until God shall summon us from this

earthly relation to the marriage feast of the Lamb on high. Amen.

Faith and Duty: Sermons on Free Texts, with Reference to the Church-Year · 第 24 / 76 题