Melchior Adam gives the following account:--

"Ibi Comoediam scripsit, _Capitis Caput_ plenam nigri salis &

acerbitatis adversus Monachum, qui ejus vitæ insidiatus erat.

Ibi & alteram Comoediam edidit _fabulam Gallicam_, plenam

candidi salis; in qua forensia sophismata præcipue taxat. Hanc

narrabat hac occasione scriptam & actam esse. Cum alteram de

Monacho scipsisset, fama sparsa est de agenda Comoedia, quod

illo tempore inusitatum erat. Dalburgius lecta, illius Monachi

insectatione, dissuasit editionem & actionem, quod eodem tempore

& apud Philipum Palatinum Franciscanus erat _Capellus_, propter

potentiam & malas artes invisus nobilibus & sapientibus viris in

aula. Intellexit periculum Capnio & hanc Comoediam occultavit.

Interea tamen, quia flagitabatur actio, alteram dulcem fabellam

edit, & repræsentari ab ingeniosis adolescentibus, quorum ibi

extant nomina, curat."

Mr. Hallam (_Literat. of Europe_, vol. i. p. 292., {90} 1st ed.), misled

by Warton and others, gives a very defective and erroneous account of

the _Progymnasmata Scænica_, which he supposed to contain several

dramas; but he concludes by saying, "the book is very scarce, and I have

never seen it." Gottsched, in his _History of the German Drama_, merely

says he had seen some notice of a Latin drama by Reuchlin. Hans Sachs

translated it into German, after his manner, and printed it in 1531

under the title of _Henno_.

Notes and Queries, Number 06, December 8, 1849 · 第 41 / 88 题