CHAPTER XXV

CIVIL WAR IN KANSAS

Out of the antagonistic and contending factions mentioned in the last

two chapters, the bogus Legislature and its Border-Ruffian adherents

on the one hand, and the framers and supporters of the Topeka

Constitution on the other, grew the civil war in Kansas. The bogus

Legislature numbered thirty-six members. These had only received, all

told, 619 legal bond fide Kansas votes; but, what answered their

purposes just as well, 4408 Missourians had cast their ballots for

them, making their total constituency (if by discarding the idea of a

State line we use the word in a somewhat strained sense) 5427. This

was at the March election, 1855. Of the remaining 2286 actual Kansas

voters disclosed by Seeder's census, only 791 cast their ballots. That

summer's emigration, however, being mainly from the free States,

greatly changed the relative strength of the two parties. At the

election of October 1, 1855, in which the free-State men took no part,

Whitfield, for delegate, received 2721 votes, Border Ruffians

included. At the election for members of the Topeka Constitutional

Convention, a week later, from which the pro-slavery men abstained,

the free-State men cast 2710 votes, while Reeder, their nominee for

delegate, received 2849. For general service, therefore, requiring no

special effort, the numerical strength of the factions was about

equal; while on extraordinary occasions the two thousand Border-

Ruffian reserve lying a little farther back from the State line could

at any time easily turn the scale. The free-State men had only their

convictions, their intelligence, their courage, and the moral support

of the North; the conspiracy had its secret combination, the

territorial officials, the Legislature, the bogus laws, the courts,

the militia officers, the President, and the army. This was a

formidable array of advantages; slavery was playing with loaded dice.

With such a radical opposition of sentiment, both factions were on the

alert to seize every available vantage ground. The bogus laws having

been enacted, and the free-State men having, at the Big Springs

Convention, resolved on the failure of peaceable remedies to resist

them to a "bloody issue," the conspiracy was not slow to cover itself

and its projects with the sacred mantle of authority. Opportunely for

them, about this time Governor Shannon, appointed to succeed Reeder,

arrived in the Territory. Coming by way of the Missouri River towns,

he fell first among Border-Ruffian companionship and influences; and

perhaps having his inclinations already molded by his Washington

instructions, his early impressions were decidedly adverse to the

free-State cause. His reception speech at Westport, in which he

maintained the legality of the Legislature, and his determination to

enforce their laws, delighted his pro-slavery auditors. To further

enlist his zeal in their behalf, a few weeks later they formally

organized a "law-and-order party" by a large public meeting held at

Leavenworth. All the territorial dignitaries were present; Governor

Shannon presided; John Calhoun, the Surveyor-General, made the

principal speech, a denunciation of the "abolitionists" supporting the

Topeka movement; Chief-Justice Lecompte dignified the occasion with

approving remarks. With public opinion propitiated in advance, and the

Governor of the Territory thus publicly committed to their party, the

conspirators felt themselves ready to enter upon the active campaign

to crush out opposition, for which they had made such elaborate

preparations.

Faithful to their legislative declaration they knew but one issue,

slavery. All dissent, all non-compliance, all hesitation, all mere

silence even, were in their stronghold towns, like Leavenworth,

branded as "abolitionism," declared to be hostility to the public

welfare, and punished with proscription, personal violence, expulsion,

and frequently death. Of the lynchings, the mobs, and the murders, it

would be impossible, except in a very extended work, to note the

frequent and atrocious details. The present chapters can only touch

upon the more salient movements of the civil war in Kansas, which

happily were not sanguinary; if, however, the individual and more

isolated cases of bloodshed could be described, they would show a

startling aggregate of barbarity and loss of life for opinion's sake.

Some of these revolting crimes, though comparatively few in number,

were committed, generally in a spirit of lawless retaliation, by free-

State men.

Among other instrumentalities for executing the bogus laws, the bogus

Legislature had appointed one Samuel J. Jones sheriff of Douglas

County, Kansas Territory, although that individual was at the time of

his appointment, and long afterwards, United States postmaster of the

town of Westport, Missouri. Why this Missouri citizen and Federal

official should in addition be clothed with a foreign territorial

shrievalty of a county lying forty or fifty miles from his home is a

mystery which was never explained outside a Missouri Blue Lodge.

[Sidenote: Wm. Phillips, "Conquest of Kansas," p. 152, _et seq._]

A few days after the "law-and-order" meeting in Leavenworth, there

occurred a murder in a small settlement thirteen miles west of the

town of Lawrence. The murderer, a pro-slavery man, first fled, to

Missouri, but returned to Shawnee Mission and sought the official

protection of Sheriff Jones; no warrant, no examination, no commitment

followed, and the criminal remained at large. Out of this incident,

the officious sheriff managed most ingeniously to create an

embroilment with the town of Lawrence, Buckley, who was alleged to

have been accessory to the crime, obtained a peace-warrant against

Branson, a neighbor of the victim. With this peace-warrant in his

pocket, but without showing or reading it to his prisoner, Sheriff

Jones and a posse of twenty-five Border Ruffians proceeded to

Branson's house at midnight and arrested him. Alarm being given,

Branson's free-State neighbors, already exasperated at the murder,

rose under the sudden instinct of self-protection and rescued Branson

from the sheriff and his posse that same night, though without other

violence than harsh words.

[Sidenote: Shannon, proclamation, November 29, 1855. Senate Ex. Doc.,

3d Sess. 34th Cong., Vol. II., p. 56.]

[Sidenote: Phillips, p. 168.]

Burning with the thirst of personal revenge, Sheriff Jones now accused

the town of Lawrence of the violation of law involved in this rescue,

though the people of Lawrence immediately and earnestly disavowed the

act. But for Sheriff Jones and his superiors the pretext was all-

sufficient. A Border-Ruffian foray against the town was hastily

organized. The murder occurred November 21; the rescue November 26.

November 27, upon the brief report of Sheriff Jones, demanding a force

of three thousand men "to carry out the laws," Governor Shannon issued

his order to the two major-generals of the skeleton militia, "to

collect together as large a force as you can in your division, and

repair without delay to Lecompton, and report yourself to S. J. Jones,

sheriff of Douglas County." [Footnote: Governor Shannon, order to

Richardson, November 27, 1855. Same order to Strickler, same date.

Senate Executive Documents, 3d Sess. 34th Cong., Vol. II., p. 53.] The

Kansas militia was a myth; but the Border Ruffians, with their

backwoods rifles and shotguns, were a ready resource. To these an

urgent appeal for help was made; and the leaders of the conspiracy in

prompt obedience placarded the frontier with inflammatory handbills,

and collected and equipped companies, and hurried them forward to the

rendezvous without a moment's delay. The United States Arsenal at

Liberty, Missouri, was broken into and stripped of its contents to

supply cannon, small arms, and ammunition. In two days after notice a

company of fifty Missourians made the first camp on Wakarusa Creek,

near Franklin, four miles from Lawrence. In three or four days more an

irregular army of fifteen hundred men, claiming to be the sheriff's

posse, was within striking distance of the town. Three or four hundred

of these were nominal residents of the Territory; [Footnote: Shannon,

dispatch, December 11, 1855, to President Pierce. Senate Ex. Doc., 3d

Sess. 34th Cong., Vol. II., p. 63.] all the remainder were citizens of

Missouri. They were not only well armed and supplied, but wrought up

to the highest pitch of partisan excitement. While the Governor's

proclamation spoke of serving writs, the notices of the conspirators

sounded the note of the real contest. "Now is the time to show game,

and if we are defeated this time, the Territory is lost to the South,"

said the leaders. There was no doubt of the earnestness of their

purpose. Ex-Vice-President Atchison came in person, leading a

battalion of two hundred Platte County riflemen.

News of this proceeding reached the people of Lawrence little by

little, and finally, becoming alarmed, they began to improvise means

of defense. Two abortive imitations of the Missouri Blue Lodges, set

on foot during the summer by the free-State men, provoked by the

election invasion in March, furnished them a starting-point for

military organization. A committee of safety, hurriedly instituted,

sent a call for help from Lawrence to other points in the Territory,

"for the purpose of defending it from threatened invasion by armed men

now quartered in its vicinity." Several hundred free-State men

promptly responded to the summons. The Free-State Hotel served as

barracks. Governor Robinson and Colonel Lane were appointed to

command. Four or five small redoubts, connected by rifle-pits, were

hastily thrown up; and by a clever artifice they succeeded in bringing

a twelve-pound brass howitzer from its storage at Kansas City.

Meantime the committee of safety, earnestly denying any wrongful act

or purpose, sent an urgent appeal for protection to the commander of

the United States forces at Fort Leavenworth, another to Congress, and

a third to President Pierce.

Amid all this warlike preparation to keep the peace, no very strict

military discipline could be immediately enforced. The people of

Lawrence, without any great difficulty, obtained daily information

concerning the hostile camps. They, on the other hand, professing no

purpose but that of defense and self-protection, were obliged to

permit free and constant ingress to their beleaguered town. Sheriff

Jones made several visits unmolested on their part, and without any

display of writs or demand for the surrender of alleged offenders on

his own. One of the rescuers even accosted him, conversed with him,

and invited him to dinner. These free visits had the good effect to

restrain imprudence and impulsiveness on both sides. They could see

that a conflict meant serious results. With the advantage of its

defensive position, Lawrence was as strong as the sheriff's mob. On

one point especially the Border Ruffians had a wholesome dread. Yankee

ingenuity had invented a new kind of breech-loading gun called "Sharps

rifle." It was, in fact, the best weapon of its day. The free-State

volunteers had some months before obtained a partial supply of them

from the East, and their range, rapidity, and effectiveness had been

not only duly set forth but highly exaggerated by many marvelous

stories throughout the Territory and along the border. The Missouri

backwoods-men manifested an almost incredible interest in this

wonderful gun. They might be deaf to the "equalities" proclaimed in

the Declaration of Independence or blind to the moral sin of slavery,

but they comprehended a rifle which could be fired ten times a minute

and kill a man at a thousand yards.

The arrivals from Missouri finally slackened and ceased. The irregular

Border-Ruffian squads were hastily incorporated into the skeleton

"Kansas militia." The "posse" became some two thousand strong, and the

defenders of Lawrence perhaps one thousand.

[Sidenote: Richardson to Shannon, December 3, 1855; Phillips, p. 186.]

[Sidenote: Anderson to Richardson; Phillips, p. 210.]

Meanwhile a sober second thought had come to Governor Shannon. To

retrieve somewhat the precipitancy of his militia orders and

proclamations, he wrote to Sheriff Jones, December 2, to make no

arrests or movements unless by his direction. The firm defensive

attitude of the people of Lawrence had produced its effect. The

leaders of the conspiracy became distrustful of their power to crush

the town. One of his militia generals suggested that the Governor

should require the "outlaws at Lawrence and elsewhere" to surrender

the Sharps rifles; another wrote asking him to call out the Government

troops at Fort Leavenworth. The Governor, on his part, becoming

doubtful of the legality of employing Missouri militia to enforce

Kansas laws, was also eager to secure the help of Federal troops.

Sheriff Jones began to grow importunate. In the Missouri camp while

the leaders became alarmed the men grew insubordinate. "I have reason

to believe," wrote one of their prominent men, "that before to-morrow

morning the black flag will be hoisted, when nine out of ten will

rally round it, and march without orders upon Lawrence. The forces of

the Lecompton camp fully understand the plot and will fight under the

same banner."

[Sidenote: Sumner to Shannon. December 1, 1855; Phillips, p. 184.]

After careful deliberation Colonel Sumner, commanding the United

States troops at Fort Leavenworth, declined to interfere without

explicit orders from the War Department. These failing to arrive in

time, the Governor was obliged to face his own dilemma. He hastened to

Lawrence, which now invoked his protection. He directed his militia

generals to repress disorder and check any attack on the town.

Interviews were held with the free-State commanders, and the situation

was fully discussed. A compromise was agreed upon, and a formal treaty

written out and signed. The affair was pronounced to be a

"misunderstanding"; the Lawrence party disavowed the Branson rescue,

denied any previous, present, or prospective organization for

resistance, and under sundry provisos agreed to aid in the execution

of "the laws" when called upon by "proper authority." Like all

compromises, the agreement was half necessity, half trick. Neither

party was willing to yield honestly nor ready to fight manfully. The

free-State men shrank from forcible resistance to even bogus laws. The

Missouri cabal, on the other hand, having three of their best men

constantly at the Governor's side, were compelled to recognize their

lack of justification. They did not dare to ignore upon what a

ridiculously shadowy pretext the Branson peace-warrant had grown into

an army of two thousand men, and how, under the manipulation of

Sheriff Jones, a questionable affidavit of a pro-slavery criminal had

been expanded into the _casus belli_ of a free-State town. They

consented to a compromise "to cover a retreat."

[Sidenote: Shannon to President Pierce, December 11, 1855, Senate Ex.

Doc., 3d Sess. 34th Cong. Vol. II., pp. 63-5.]

When Governor Shannon announced that the difficulties were settled,

the people of Lawrence were suspicious of their leaders, and John

Brown manifested his readiness to head a revolt. But his attempted

speech was hushed down, and the assurance of Robinson and Lane that

they had made no dishonorable concession finally quieted their

followers. There were similar murmurs in the pro-slavery camps. The

Governor was denounced as a traitor, and Sheriff Jones declared that

"he would have wiped out Lawrence." Atchison, on the contrary,

sustained the bargain, explaining that to attack Lawrence under the

circumstances would ruin the Democratic cause. "But," he added with a

significant oath, "boys, we will fight some time!" Thirteen of the

captains in the Wakarusa camp were called together, and the situation

was duly explained. The treaty was accepted, though the Governor

confessed "there was a silent dissatisfaction" at the result. He

ordered the forces to disband; prisoners were liberated, and with the

opportune aid of a furious rain-storm the Border-Ruffian army

gradually melted away. Nevertheless the "Wakarusa war" left one bitter

sting to rankle in the hearts of the defenders of Lawrence, a free-

State man having been killed by a pro-slavery scouting party.

The truce patched up by this Lawrence treaty was of comparatively

short duration. The excitement which had reigned in Kansas during the

whole summer of 1855, first about the enactments of the bogus

Legislature, and then in regard to the formation of the Topeka

Constitution, was now extended to the American Congress, where it

raged for two long months over the election of Speaker Banks. In

Kansas during the same period the vote of the free-State men upon the

Topeka Constitution and the election for free-State officers under it,

kept the Territory in a ferment. During and after the contest over the

speakership at Washington, each State Legislature became a forum of

Kansas debate. The general public interest in the controversy was

shown by discussions carried on by press, pulpit, and in the daily

conversation and comment of the people of the Union in every town,

hamlet, and neighborhood. No sooner did the spring weather of 1856

permit, than men, money, arms, and supplies were poured into the

Territory of Kansas from the North.

[Sidenote: J.N. Holloway, "History of Kansas," pp. 275, 276.]

In the Southern States also this propagandism was active, and a number

of guerrilla leaders with followers recruited in the South, and armed

and sustained by Southern contributions and appropriations, found

their way to Kansas in response to urgent appeals of the Border

chiefs. Buford, of Alabama; Titus, of Florida; Wilkes, of Virginia;

Hampton, of Kentucky; Treadwell, of South Carolina, and others,

brought not only enthusiastic leadership, but substantial assistance.

Both the factions which had come so near to actual battle in the

"Wakarusa war," though nominally disbanded, in reality continued their

military organizations,--the free-State men through apprehension of

danger, the Border Ruffians because of their purpose to crush out

opposition. Strengthened on both sides with men, money, arms, and

supplies, the contest was gradually resumed with the opening spring.

The vague and double-meaning phrases of the Lawrence agreement

furnished the earliest causes of a renewal of the quarrel. "Did you

not pledge yourselves to assist me as sheriff in the arrest of any

person against whom I might have a writ?" asked Sheriff Jones of

Robinson and Lane in a curt note. "We may have said that we would

assist any proper officer in the service of any legal process," they

replied, standing upon their interpretation. This was, of course, the

original controversy--slavery burning to enforce her usurpation,

freedom determined to defend her birthright. Sheriff Jones had his

pockets always full of writs issued in the spirit of persecution, but

was often baffled by the sharp wits and ready resources of the free-

State people, and sometimes defied outright. Little by little,

however, the latter became hemmed and bound in the meshes of the

various devices and proceedings which the territorial officials

evolved from the bogus laws. President Pierce, in his special message

of January 24, declared what had been done by the Topeka movement to

be "of a revolutionary character" which would "become treasonable

insurrection if it reach the length of organized resistance."

Following this came his proclamation of February 11, leveled against

"combinations formed to resist the execution of the territorial laws."

Early in May, Chief-Justice Lecompte held a term of his court, during

which he delivered to the grand jury his famous instructions on

constructive treason. Indictments were found, writs issued, and the

principal free-State leaders arrested or forced to flee from the

Territory. Governor Robinson was arrested without warrant on the

Missouri River, and brought back to be held in military custody till

September. [Transcriber's Note: Lengthy footnote relocated to chapter

end.] Lane went East and recruited additional help for the contest.

Meanwhile Sheriff Jones, sitting in his tent at night, in the town of

Lawrence, had been wounded by a rifle or pistol in the attempt of some

unknown person to assassinate him. The people of Lawrence denounced

the deed; but the sheriff hoarded up the score for future revenge. One

additional incident served to precipitate the crisis. The House of

Representatives at Washington, presided over by Speaker Banks, and

under control of the opposition, sent an investigating committee to

Kansas, consisting of Wm. A. Howard, of Michigan, John Sherman,

[Footnote: Owing to the illness of Mr. Howard, chairman of the

committee, the long and elaborate majority report of this committee

was written by John Sherman. Its methodical analysis and powerful

presentation of evidence made it one of the most popular and

convincing documents ever issued.] of Ohio, and Mordecai Oliver, of

Missouri, which, by the examination of numerous witnesses, was probing

the Border-Ruffian invasions, the illegality of the bogus Legislature,

and the enormity of the bogus laws to the bottom.

[Sidenote: Howard Report, p. 66.]

Ex-Governor Reeder was in attendance on this committee, supplying

data, pointing out from personal knowledge sources of information,

cross-examining witnesses to elicit the hidden truth. To embarrass

this damaging exposure, Judge Lecompte issued a writ against the ex-

Governor on a frivolous charge of contempt. Claiming but not receiving

exemption from the committee, Beeder on his personal responsibility

refused to permit the deputy marshal to arrest him. The incident was

not violent, nor even dramatic. No posse was summoned, no further

effort made, and Reeder, fearing personal violence, soon fled in

disguise. But the affair was magnified as a crowning proof that the

free-State men were insurrectionists and outlaws.

It must be noted in passing that by this time the Territory had by

insensible degrees drifted into the condition of civil war. Both

parties were zealous, vigilant, and denunciatory. In nearly every

settlement suspicion led to combination for defense, combination to

some form of oppression or insult, and so on by easy transition to

arrest and concealment, attack and reprisal, expulsion, theft, house-

burning, capture, and murder. From these, again, sprang barricaded and

fortified dwellings, camps and scouting parties, finally culminating

in roving guerrilla bands, half partisan, half predatory. Their

distinctive characters, however, display one broad and unfailing

difference. The free-State men clung to their prairie towns and

prairie ravines with all the obstinacy and courage of true defenders

of their homes and firesides. The pro-slavery parties, unmistakable

aliens and invaders, always came from, or retired across, the Missouri

line. Organized and sustained in the beginning by voluntary

contributions from that and distant States, they ended by levying

forced contributions, by "pressing" horses, food, or arms from any

neighborhood they chanced to visit. Their assumed character changed

with their changing opportunities or necessities. They were squads of

Kansas militia, companies of "peaceful emigrants," or gangs of

irresponsible outlaws, to suit the chance, the whim, or the need of

the moment.

[Sidenote: Memorial, Senate Ex. Doc., 3d Sess. 34th Cong. Vol. II., p.

74.]

[Sidenote: Phillips, pp. 289-90.]

[Sidenote: Memorial, Senate Ex. Doc., 3d Sess. 34th Cong. Vol. II., p.

75.]

Since the unsatisfactory termination of the "Wakarusa war," certain

leaders of the conspiracy had never given up their project of

punishing the town of Lawrence. A propitious moment for carrying it

out seemed now to have arrived. The free-State officers and leaders

were, thanks to Judge Lecompte's doctrine of constructive treason,

under indictment, arrest, or in flight; the settlers were busy with

their spring crops; while the pro-slavery guerrillas, freshly arrived

and full of zeal, were eager for service and distinction. The former

campaign against the town had failed for want of justification; they

now sought a pretext which would not shame their assumed character as

defenders of law and order. In the shooting of Sheriff Jones in

Lawrence, and in the refusal of ex-Governor Beeder to allow the

deputy-marshal to arrest him, they discovered grave offenses against

the territorial and United States laws. Determined also no longer to

trust Governor Shannon, lest he might again make peace, United States

Marshal Donaldson issued a proclamation on his own responsibility, on

May 11, 1856, commanding "law-abiding citizens of the Territory" "to

be and appear at Lecompton, as soon as practicable and in numbers

sufficient for the proper execution of the law." Moving with the

promptness and celerity of preconcerted plans, ex-Vice-President

Atchison, with his Platte County Rifles and two brass cannon, the

Kickapoo Rangers from Leavenworth and Weston, Wilkes, Titus, Buford,

and all the rest of the free lances in the Territory, began to

concentrate against Lawrence, giving the marshal in a very few days a

"posse" of from 500 to 800 men, armed for the greater part with United

States muskets, some stolen from the Liberty arsenal on their former

raid, others distributed to them as Kansas militia by the territorial

officers. The Governor refused to interfere to protect the threatened

town, though an urgent appeal to do so was made to him by its

citizens, who after stormy and divided councils resolved on a policy

of non-resistance.

[Sidenote: Memorial, Senate Ex. Doc., 3d Sess. 34th Cong. Vol. II., p.

77.]

They next made application to the marshal, who tauntingly replied that

he could not rely on their pledges, and must take the liberty to

execute his process in his own time and manner. The help of Colonel

Sumner, commanding the United States troops, was finally invoked, but

his instructions only permitted him to act at the call of the Governor

or marshal. [Footnote: Sumner to Shannon, May 12, 1856. Senate Ex.

Doc., No. 10, 3d Sess. 34th Cong. Vol. V., p. 7.] Private persons who

had leased the Free-State Hotel vainly besought the various

authorities to prevent the destruction of their property. Ten days

were consumed in these negotiations; but the spirit of vengeance

refused to yield. When the citizens of Lawrence rose on the 21st of

May they beheld their town invested by a formidable military force.

During the forenoon the deputy-marshal rode leisurely into the town

attended by less than a dozen men, being neither molested nor opposed.

He summoned half a dozen citizens to join his posse, who followed,

obeyed, and assisted him. He continued his pretended search and, to

give color to his errand, made two arrests. The Free-State Hotel, a

stone building in dimensions fifty by seventy feet, three stories high

and handsomely furnished, previously occupied only for lodging-rooms,

on that day for the first time opened its table accommodations to the

public, and provided a free dinner in honor of the occasion. The

marshal and his posse, including Sheriff Jones, went among other

invited guests and enjoyed the proffered hospitality. As he had

promised to protect the hotel, the reassured citizens began to laugh

at their own fears. To their sorrow they were soon undeceived. The

military force, partly rabble, partly organized, had meanwhile moved

into the town.

To save his official skirts from stain, the deputy-marshal now went

through the farce of dismissing his entire posse of citizens and

Border Ruffians, at which juncture Sheriff Jones made his appearance,

claiming the "posse" as his own. He planted a company before the

hotel, and demanded a surrender of the arms belonging to the free-

State military companies. Refusal or resistance being out of the

question, half a dozen small cannon were solemnly dug up from their

concealment and, together with a few Sharps rifles, formally

delivered. Half an hour later, turning a deaf ear to all remonstrance,

he gave the proprietors until 5 o'clock to remove their families and

personal property from the Free-State Hotel. Atchison, who had been

haranguing the mob, planted his two guns before the building and

trained them upon it. The inmates being removed, at the appointed hour

a few cannon balls were fired through the stone walls. This mode of

destruction being slow and undramatic, and an attempt to blow it up

with gunpowder having proved equally unsatisfactory, the torch was

applied, and the structure given to the flames. [Footnote: Memorial,

Senate Executive Document, 3d Session 34th Congress. Volume II, pp.

73-85.] Other squads had during the same time been sent to the several

printing-offices, where they broke the presses, scattered the type,

and demolished the furniture. The house of Governor Robinson was also

robbed and burned. Very soon the mob was beyond all control, and

spreading itself over the town engaged in pillage till the darkness of

night arrested it. Meanwhile the chiefs sat on their horses and viewed

the work of destruction.

[Sidenote: House Reports, 2d Sess., 36th Cong., Vol. III, part 1, p.

39.]

[Sidenote: Holloway, p. 351.]

[Sidenote: Memorial to the President.]

If we would believe the chief actors, this was the "law and order

party," executing the mandates of justice. Part and parcel of the

affair was the pretense that this exploit of prairie buccaneering had

been authorized by Judge Leeompte's court, the officials citing in

their defense a presentment of his grand jury, declaring the

free-State newspapers seditious publications, and the Free-State Hotel

a rebellious fortification, and recommending their _abatement_ as

nuisances. The travesty of American government involved in the

transaction is too serious for ridicule. In this incident, contrasting

the creative and the destructive spirit of the factions, the Emigrant

Aid Society of Massachusetts finds its most honorable and triumphant

vindication. The whole proceeding was so childish, the miserable plot

so transparent, the outrage so gross, as to bring disgust to the

better class of Border Ruffians who were witnesses and accessories.

The free-State men have recorded the honorable conduct of Colonel

Zadock Jackson, of Georgia, and Colonel Jefferson Buford, of Alabama,

as well as of the prosecuting attorney of the county, each of whom

denounced the proceedings on the spot.

[Relocated Footnote: Governor Robinson being on his way East, the

steamboat on which he was traveling stopped at Lexington, Missouri. An

unauthorized mob induced the Governor, with that persuasiveness in

which the Border Ruffians had become adepts, to leave the boat,

detaining him at Lexington on the accusation that he was fleeing from

an indictment. In a few days an officer came with a requisition from

Governor Shannon, and took the prisoner by land to Westport, and

afterwards from there to Kansas City and Leavenworth. Here he was

placed in the custody of Captain Martin, of the Kickapoo Rangers, who

proved a kind jailer, and materially assisted in protecting him from

the dangerous intentions of the mob which at that time held

Leavenworth under a reign of terror.

Mrs. Robinson, who has kindly sent us a sketch of the incident,

writes: "On the night of the 28th [of May] for greater security

General Richardson of the militia slept in the same bed with the

prisoner, while Judge Lecompte and Marshal Donaldson slept just

outside of the door of the prisoner's room. Captain Martin said: 'I

shall give you a pistol to help protect yourself if worse comes to

worst!' In the early morning of the next day, May 29, a company of

dragoons with one empty saddle came down from the fort, and while the

pro-slavery men still slept, the prisoner and his escort were on their

way across the prairies to Lecompton in the charge of officers of the

United States Army. The Governor and other prisoners were kept on the

prairie near Lecompton until the 10th of September, 1856, when all

were released."]

END OF VOL. I.

Abraham Lincoln: a History — Volume 01 · 第 25 / 25 章