CHAPTER XIV

CAMPAIGN FOR CONGRESS

In the months that remained of his term, after the election of his

successor, President Tyler pursued with much vigor his purpose of

accomplishing the annexation of Texas, regarding it as the measure

which was specially to illustrate his administration and to preserve

it from oblivion. The state of affairs, when Congress came together in

December, 1844, was propitious to the project. Dr. Anson Jones had

been elected as President of Texas; the republic was in a more

thriving condition than ever before. Its population was rapidly

increasing under the stimulus of its probable change of flag; its

budget presented a less unwholesome balance; its relations with

Mexico, while they were no more friendly, had ceased to excite alarm.

The Tyler government, having been baffled in the spring by the

rejection of the treaty for annexation which they had submitted to the

Senate, chose to proceed this winter in a different way. Early in the

session a joint resolution providing for annexation was introduced in

the House of Representatives, which, after considerable discussion and

attempted amendment by the anti-slavery members, passed the House by a

majority of twenty-two votes.

In the Senate it encountered more opposition, as might have been

expected in a chamber which had overwhelmingly rejected the same

scheme only a few months before. It was at last amended by inserting a

section called the Walker amendment, providing that the President, if

it were in his judgment advisable, should proceed by way of

negotiation, instead of submitting the resolutions as an overture on

the part of the United States to Texas. This amendment eased the

conscience of a few shy supporters of the Administration who had

committed themselves very strongly against the scheme, and saved them

from the shame of open tergiversation. The President, however, treated

this subterfuge with the contempt which it deserved, by utterly

disregarding the Walker amendment, and by dispatching a messenger to

Texas to bring about annexation on the basis of the resolutions, the

moment he had signed them, when only a few hours of his official

existence remained. The measures initiated by Tyler were, of course,

carried out by Polk. The work was pushed forward with equal zeal at

Washington and at Austin. A convention of Texans was called for the

4th of July to consider the American propositions; they were promptly

accepted and ratified, and in the last days of 1845 Texas was formally

admitted into the Union as a State.

Besides the general objections which the anti-slavery men of the North

had to the project itself, there was something especially offensive to

them in the pretense of fairness and compromise held out by the

resolutions committing the Government to annexation. The third section

provided that four new States might hereafter be formed out of the

Territory of Texas; that such States as were formed out of the portion

lying south of 36 degrees 30', the Missouri Compromise line, might be

admitted with or without slavery, as the people might desire; and that

slavery should be prohibited in such States as might be formed out of

the portion lying north of that line. The opponents of slavery

regarded this provision, with good reason, as derisive. Slavery

already existed in the entire territory by the act of the early

settlers from the South who had brought their slaves with them, and

the State of Texas had no valid claim to an inch of ground north of

the line of 36 degrees 30' nor anywhere near it; so that this clause, if it

had any force whatever, would have authorized the establishment of

slavery in a portion of New Mexico, where it did not exist, and where

it had been expressly prohibited by the Mexican law. Another serious

objection was that the resolutions were taken as committing the United

States to the adoption and maintenance of the Rio Grande del Norte as

the western boundary of Texas. All mention of this was avoided in the

instrument, and it was expressly stated that the State was to be

formed "subject to the adjustment by this Government of all questions

of boundary that may arise with other governments," but the moment the

resolutions were passed the Government assumed, as a matter beyond

dispute, that all of the territory east of the Rio Grande was the

rightful property of Texas, to be defended by the military power of

the United States.

Even if Mexico had been inclined to submit to the annexation of Texas,

it was nevertheless certain that the occupation of the left bank of

the Rio Grande, without an attempt at an understanding, would bring

about a collision. The country lying between the Nueces and the Rio

Grande was then entirely uninhabited, and was thought uninhabitable,

though subsequent years have shown the fallacy of that belief. The

occupation of the country extended no farther than the Nueces, and the

Mexican farmers cultivated their corn and cotton in peace in the

fertile fields opposite Matamoras.

It is true that Texas claimed the eastern bank of the Rio Grande from

its source to its mouth; and while the Texans held Santa Anna

prisoner, under duress of arms and the stronger pressure of his own

conscience, which assured him that he deserved death as a murderer,

"he solemnly sanctioned, acknowledged, and ratified" their

independence with whatever boundaries they chose to claim; but the

Bustamente administration lost no time in repudiating this treaty, and

at once renewed the war, which had been carried on in a fitful way

ever since.

[Illustration: HENRY CLAY.]

[Sidenote: August 23, 1843.]

But leaving out of view this special subject of admitted dispute, the

Mexican Government had warned our own in sufficiently formal terms

that annexation could not be peacefully effected. When A. P. Upshur

first began his negotiations with Texas, the Mexican Minister of

Foreign Affairs, at his earliest rumors of what was afoot, addressed a

note to Waddy Thompson, our Minister in Mexico, referring to the

reported intention of Texas to seek admission, to the Union, and

formally protesting against it as "an aggression unprecedented in the

annals of the world," and adding "if it be indispensable for the

Mexican nation to seek security for its rights at the expense of the

disasters of war, it will call upon God, and rely on its own efforts

for the defense of its just cause." A little while later General

Almonte renewed this notification at Washington, saying in so many

words that the annexation of Texas would terminate his mission, and

that Mexico would declare war as soon as it received intimation of

such an act. In June, 1845, Mr. Donelson, in charge of the American

Legation in Mexico, assured the Secretary of State that war was

inevitable, though he adopted the fiction of Mr. Calhoun, that it was

the result of the abolitionist intrigues of Great Britain, which he

credited with the intention "of depriving both Texas and the United

States of all claim to the country between the Nueces and the Rio

Grande."

No one, therefore, doubted that war would follow, and it soon came.

General Zachary Taylor had been sent during the summer to Corpus

Christi, where a considerable portion of the small army of the United

States was placed under his command. It was generally understood to be

the desire of the Administration that hostilities should begin without

orders, by a species of spontaneous combustion; but the coolness and

prudence of General Taylor made futile any such hopes, if they were

entertained, and it required a positive order to induce him, in March,

1846, to advance towards the Rio Grande and to cross the disputed

territory. He arrived at a point opposite Matamoras on the 28th of

March, and immediately fortified himself, disregarding the summons of

the Mexican commander, who warned him that such action would be

considered as a declaration of war. In May, General Arista crossed the

river and attacked General Taylor on the field of Palo Alto, where

Taylor won the first of that remarkable series of victories, embracing

Resaca de la Palma, Monterey, and Buena Vista, all gained over

superior forces of the enemy, which made the American commander for

the brief day that was left him the idol alike of soldiers and voters.

After Baker's election in 1844, it was generally taken as a matter of

course in the district that Lincoln was to be the next candidate of

the Whig party for Congress. It was charged at the time, and some

recent writers have repeated the charge, that there was a bargain made

in 1840 between Hardin, Baker, Lincoln, and Logan to succeed each

other in the order named. This sort of fiction is the commonest known

to American politics. Something like it is told, and more or less

believed, in half the districts in the country at every election. It

arises naturally from the fact that there are always more candidates

than places, that any one who is a candidate twice is felt to be

defrauding his neighbors, and that all candidates are too ready to

assure their constituents that they only want one term, and too ready

to forget these assurances when their terms are ending. There is not

only no evidence of any such bargain among the men we have mentioned,

but there is the clearest proof of the contrary. Two or more of them

were candidates for the nomination at every election from the time

when Stuart retired until the Whigs lost the district.

At the same time it is not to be denied that there was a tacit

understanding among the Whigs of the district that whoever should, at

each election, gain the honor of representing the one Whig

constituency of the State, should hold himself satisfied with the

privilege, and not be a candidate for reelection. The retiring member

was not always convinced of the propriety of this arrangement. In the

early part of January, 1846, Hardin was the only one whose name was

mentioned in opposition to Lincoln. He was reasonably sure of his own

county, and he tried to induce Lincoln to consent to an arrangement

that all candidates should confine themselves to their own counties in

the canvass; but Lincoln, who was very strong in the outlying counties

of the district, declined the proposition, alleging, as a reason for

refusing, that Hardin was so much better known than he, by reason of

his service in Congress, that such a stipulation would give him a

great advantage. There was fully as much courtesy as candor in this

plea, and Lincoln's entire letter was extremely politic and civil. "I

have always been in the habit," he says, "of acceding to almost any

proposal that a friend would make, and I am truly sorry that I cannot

to this." A month later Hardin saw that his candidacy was useless, and

he published a card withdrawing from the contest, which was printed

and commended in the kindest terms by papers friendly to Lincoln, and

the two men remained on terms of cordial friendship.

[Sidenote: Lincoln to James, Nov. 24, 1845. Unpublished MS.]

[Sidenote: Lincoln to James, Jan. 14, 1846. Unpublished MS.]

[Sidenote: Ibid.]

It is not to be said that Lincoln relied entirely upon his own merits

and the sentiment of the constituents to procure him this nomination.

Like other politicians of the time, he used all proper means to attain

his object. A package of letters, written during the preliminary

canvass, which have recently come into our hands, show how intelligent

and how straightforward he was in the ways of politics. He had no fear

of Baker; all his efforts were directed to making so strong a show of

force as to warn Hardin off the field. He countenanced no attack upon

his competitor; he approved a movement--not entirely disinterested--

looking to his nomination for Grovernor. He kept up an extensive

correspondence with the captains of tens throughout the district; he

suggested and revised the utterances of country editors; he kept his

friends aware of his wishes as to conventions and delegates. He was

never overconfident; so late as the middle of January, he did not

share the belief of his supporters that he was to be nominated without

a contest. "Hardin," he wrote, "is a man of desperate energy and

perseverance, and one that never backs out; and, I fear, to think

otherwise is to be deceived.... I would rejoice to be spared the labor

of a contest, 'but being in' I shall go it thoroughly...." His

knowledge of the district was curiously minute, though he

underestimated his own popularity. He wrote: "As to my being able to

make a break in the lower counties, ... I can possibly get Cass, but I

do not think I will. Morgan and Scott are beyond my reach, Menard is

safe to me; Mason, neck and neck; Logan is mine. To make the matter

sure your entire senatorial district must be secured. Of this I

suppose Tazewell is safe, and I have much done in both the other

counties. In Woodford I have Davenport, Simms, Willard, Braken, Perry,

Travis, Dr. Hazzard, and the Clarks, and some others, all specially

committed. At Lacon, in Marshall, the very most active friend I have

in the district (if I except yourself) is at work. Through him I have

procured the names and written to three or four of the most active

Whigs in each precinct of the county. Still, I wish you all in

Tazewell to keep your eyes continually on Woodford and Marshall. Let

no opportunity of making a mark escape. When they shall be safe, all

will be safe--I think." His constitutional caution suggests those

final words. He did not relax his vigilance for a moment until after

Hardin withdrew. He warned his correspondents day by day of every move

on the board; advised his supporters at every point, and kept every

wire in perfect working order.

The convention was held at Petersburg on the 1st of May. Judge Logan

placed the name of Lincoln before it, and he was nominated

unanimously. The Springfield "Journal," giving the news the week

after, said: "This nomination was of course anticipated, there being

no other candidate in the field. Mr. Lincoln, we all know, is a good

Whig, a good man, an able speaker, and richly deserves, as he enjoys,

the confidence of the Whigs of this district and of the State."

The Democrats gave Mr. Lincoln a singular competitor--the famous

Methodist preacher, Peter Cartwright. It was not the first time they

had met in the field of politics. When Lincoln ran for the Legislature

on his return from the. Black Hawk war, in 1832, one of the successful

candidates of that year was this indefatigable circuit-rider. He was

now over sixty years of age, in the height of his popularity, and in

all respects an adversary not to be despised. His career as a preacher

began at the beginning of the century and continued for seventy years.

He was the son of one of the pioneers of the West, and grew up in the

rudest regions of the border land between Tennessee and Kentucky. He

represents himself, with the usual inverted pride of a class-leader,

as having been a wild, vicious youth; but the catalogue of his crimes

embraces nothing less venial than card-playing, horse-racing, and

dancing, and it is hard to see what different amusements could have

been found in southern Kentucky in 1801.

This course of dissipation did not continue long, as he was "converted

and united with the Ebenezer Methodist Episcopal Church" in June of

that year, when only sixteen years old, and immediately developed such

zeal and power in exhortation that less than a year later he was

licensed to "exercise his gifts as an exhorter so long as his practice

is agreeable to the gospel." He became a deacon at twenty-one, an

elder at twenty-three, a presiding elder at twenty-seven, and from

that time his life is the history of his church in the West for sixty

years. He died in 1872, eighty-seven years of age, having baptized

twelve thousand persons and preached fifteen thousand sermons. He was,

and will always remain, the type of the backwoods preacher. Even in

his lifetime the simple story of his life became so overgrown with a

net-work of fable that there is little resemblance between the simple,

courageous, prejudiced itinerant of his "Autobiography" and the

fighting, brawling, half-civilized, Protestant Friar Tuck of bar-room

newspaper legend.

It is true that he did not always discard the weapons of the flesh in

his combats with the ungodly, and he felt more than once compelled to

leave the pulpit to do carnal execution upon the disturbers of the

peace of the sanctuary; but two or three incidents of this sort in

three-quarters of a century do not turn a parson into a pugilist. He

was a fluent, self-confident speaker, who, after the habit of his

time, addressed his discourses more to the emotions than to the reason

of his hearers. His system of future rewards and punishments was of

the most simple and concrete character, and formed the staple of his

sermons. He had no patience with the refinements and reticences of

modern theology, and in his later years observed with scorn and sorrow

the progress of education and scholarly training in his own communion.

After listening one day to a prayer from a young minister which shone

more by its correctness than its unction, he could not refrain from

saying, "Brother--, three prayers like that would freeze hell over!"--

a consummation which did not commend itself to him as desirable. He

often visited the cities of the Atlantic coast, but saw little in them

to admire. His chief pleasure on his return was to sit in a circle of

his friends and pour out the phials of his sarcasm upon all the

refinements of life that he had witnessed in New York or Philadelphia,

which he believed, or affected to believe, were tenanted by a species

of beings altogether inferior to the manhood that filled the cabins of

Kentucky and Illinois. An apocryphal story of one of these visits was

often told of him, which pleased him so that he never contradicted it:

that becoming bewildered in the vastness of a New York hotel, he

procured a hatchet, and in pioneer fashion "blazed" his way along the

mahogany staircases and painted corridors from the office to his room.

With all his eccentricities, he was a devout man, conscientious and

brave. He lived in domestic peace and honor all his days, and dying,

he and his wife, whom he had married almost in childhood, left a

posterity of 129 direct descendants to mourn them. [Transcriber's

Note: Lengthy footnote (1) relocated to chapter end.]

With all his devotion to the cause of his church, Peter Cartwright was

an ardent Jackson politician, with probably a larger acquaintance

throughout the district than any other man in it, and with a personal

following which, beginning with his own children and grandchildren and

extending through every precinct, made it no holiday task to defeat

him in a popular contest. But Lincoln and his friends went

energetically into the canvass, and before it closed he was able to

foresee a certain victory.

An incident is related to show how accurately Lincoln could calculate

political results in advance--a faculty which remained with him all

his life. A friend, who was a Democrat, had come to him early in the

canvass and had told him he wanted to see him elected, but did not

like to vote against his party; still he would vote for him, if the

contest was to be so close that every vote was needed. A short time

before the election Lincoln said to him: "I have got the preacher, and

I don't want your vote."

The election was held in August, and the Whig candidate's majority was

very large--1511 in the district, where Clay's majority had been only

914, and where Taylor's, two years later, with all the glamour of

victory about him, was ten less. Lincoln's majority in Sangamon County

was 690, which, in view of the standing of his competitor, was the

most remarkable proof which could be given of his personal popularity;

[Transcriber's Note: Lengthy footnote (2) relocated to chapter end.]

it was the highest majority ever given to any candidate in the county

during the entire period of Whig ascendancy until Yates's triumphant

campaign of 1852.

This large vote was all the more noteworthy because the Whigs were

this year upon the unpopular side. The annexation of Texas was

generally approved throughout the West, and those who opposed it were

regarded as rather lacking in patriotism, even before actual

hostilities began. But when General Taylor and General Ampudia

confronted each other with hostile guns across the Rio Grande, and

still more after the brilliant feat of arms by which the Americans

opened the war on the plain of Palo Alto, it required a good deal of

moral courage on the part of the candidates and voters alike to

continue their attitude of disapproval of the policy of the

Government, at the same time that they were shouting paeans over the

exploits of our soldiers. They were assisted, it is true, by the fact

that the leading Whigs of the State volunteered with the utmost

alacrity and promptitude in the military service. On the 11th of May,

Congress authorized the raising of fifty thousand volunteers, and as

soon as the intelligence reached Illinois the daring and restless

spirit of Hardin leaped forward to the fate which was awaiting him,

and he instantly issued a call to his brigade of militia, in which he

said: "The general has already enrolled himself as the first volunteer

from Illinois under the requisition. He is going whenever ordered. Who

will go with him? He confidently expects to be accompanied by many of

his brigade." The quota assigned to Illinois was three regiments;

these were quickly raised, [Footnote: The colonels were Hardin,

Bissell, and Forman.] and an additional regiment offered by Baker was

then accepted. The sons of the prominent Whigs enlisted as private

soldiers; David Logan was a sergeant in Baker's regiment. A public

meeting was held in Springfield on the 29th of May, at which Mr.

Lincoln delivered what was considered a thrilling and effective speech

on the condition of affairs, and the duty of citizens to stand by the

flag of the nation until an honorable peace was secured.

It was thought probable, and would Have been altogether fitting, that

either Colonel Hardin, Colonel Baker, or Colonel Bissell, all of them

men of intelligence and distinction, should be appointed general of

the Illinois Brigade, but the Polk Administration was not inclined to

waste so important a place upon men who might thereafter have views of

their own in public affairs. The coveted appointment was given to a

man already loaded to a grotesque degree with political employment--

Mr. Lincoln's old adversary, James Shields, He had left the position

of Auditor of State to assume a seat on the Bench; retiring from this,

he had just been appointed Commissioner of the General Land Office. He

had no military experience, and so far as then known no capacity for

the service; but his fervid partisanship commended him to Mr. Polk as

a safe servant, and he received the commission, to the surprise and

derision of the State. His bravery in action and his honorable wounds

at Cerro Gordo and Chapultepec saved him from contempt and made his

political fortune. He had received the recommendation of the Illinois

Democrats in Congress, and it is altogether probable that he owed his

appointment in great measure to the influence of Douglas, who desired

to have as few Democratic statesmen as possible in Springfield that

winter. A Senator was to be elected, and Shields had acquired such a

habit of taking all the offices that fell vacant that it was only

prudent to remove him as far as convenient from such a temptation. The

election was held in December, and Douglas was promoted from the House

of Representatives to that seat in the Senate which he held with such

ability and distinction the rest of his life.

[Sidenote: December 28, 1841.]

The session of 1846-7 opened with the Sangamon district of Illinois

unrepresented in Congress. Baker had gone with his regiment to Mexico,

It did not have the good fortune to participate in any of the earlier

actions of the campaign, and his fiery spirit chafed in the enforced

idleness of camp and garrison. He seized an occasion which was offered

him to go to Washington as bearer of dispatches, and while there he

made one of those sudden and dramatic appearances in the Capitol which

were so much in harmony with his tastes and his character. He went to

his place on the floor, and there delivered a bright, interesting

speech in his most attractive vein, calling attention to the needs of

the army, disavowing on the part of the Whigs any responsibility for

the war or its conduct, and adroitly claiming for them a full share of

the credit for its prosecution.

He began by thanking the House for its kindness in allowing him the

floor, protesting at the same time that he had done nothing to deserve

such courtesy. "I could wish," he said, "that it had been the fortune

of the gallant Davis [Footnote: Jefferson Davis, who was with the army

in Mexico.] to now stand where I do and to receive from gentlemen on

all sides the congratulations so justly due to him, and to listen to

the praises of his brave compeers. For myself, I have, unfortunately,

been left far in the rear of the war, and if now I venture to say a

word in behalf of those who have endured the severest hardships of the

struggle, whether in the blood-stained streets of Monterey, or in a

yet sterner form on the banks of the Rio Grande, I beg you to believe

that while I feel this a most pleasant duty, it is in other respects a

duty full of pain; for I stand here, after six months' service as a

volunteer, having seen no actual warfare in the field;"

Yet even this disadvantage he turned with great dexterity to his

service. He reproached Congress for its apathy and inaction in not

providing for the wants of the army by reinforcements and supplies; he

flattered the troops in the field, and paid a touching tribute to

those who had died of disease and exposure, without ever enjoying the

sight of a battle-field, and, rising to lyric enthusiasm, he repeated

a poem of his own, which he had written in camp to the memory of the

dead of the Fourth Illinois. [Transcriber's Note: Lengthy footnote (3)

relocated to chapter end.] He could not refrain from giving his own

party all the credit which could be claimed for it, and it is not

difficult to imagine how exasperating it must have been to the

majority to hear so calm an assumption of superior patriotism on the

part of the opposition as the following: "As a Whig I still occupy a

place on this floor; nor do I think it worth while to reply to such a

charge as that the Whigs are not friends of their country because many

of them doubt the justice or expediency of the present war. Surely

there was all the more evidence of the patriotism of the man who,

doubting the expediency and even the entire justice of the war,

nevertheless supported it, because it was the war of his country. In

the one it might be mere enthusiasm and an impetuous temperament; in

the other it was true patriotism, a sense of duty. Homer represents

Hector as strongly doubting the expediency of the war against Greece.

He gave his advice against it; he had no sympathy with Paris, whom he

bitterly reproached, much less with Helen; yet, when the war came, and

the Grecian forces were marshaled on the plain, and their crooked

keels were seen cutting the sands of the Trojan coast, Hector was a

flaming fire, his beaming helmet was seen in the thickest of the

fight.

They did not die in eager strife

Upon a well-fought field;

Nor from the red wound poured their life

Where cowering foemen yield.

Death's ghastly shade was slowly cast

Upon each manly brow,

But calm and fearless to the last,

They sleep securely now.

Yet shall a grateful country give

Her honors to their name;

In kindred hearts their memory live,

And history guard their fame.

Not unremembered do they sleep

Upon a foreign strand,

Though near their graves thy wild waves sweep,

O rushing Rio Grande!

There are in the American army many who have the spirit of Hector; who

strongly doubt the propriety of the war, and especially the manner of

its commencement; who yet are ready to pour out their hearts' best

blood like water, and their lives with it, on a foreign shore, in

defense of the American flag and American glory."

Immediately after making this speech, Baker increased the favorable

impression created by it by resigning his seat in Congress and

hurrying as fast as steam could carry him to New Orleans, to embark

there for Mexico. He had heard of the advance of Santa Anna upon

Saltillo, and did not wish to lose any opportunity of fighting which

might fall in the way of his regiment. He arrived to find his troops

transferred to the department of General Scott; and although he missed

Buena Vista, he took part in the capture of Vera Cruz, and greatly

distinguished himself at Cerro Gordo. When Shields was wounded, Baker

took command of his brigade, and by a gallant charge on the Mexican

guns gained possession of the Jalapa road, an act by which a great

portion of the fruits of that victory were harvested.

His resignation left a vacancy in Congress, and a contest,

characteristic of the politics of the time, at once sprang up over it.

The rational course would have been to elect Lincoln, but, with his

usual overstrained delicacy, he declined to run, thinking it fair to

give other aspirants a chance for the term of two months. The Whigs

nominated a respectable man named Brown, but a short while before the

election John Henry, a member of the State Senate, announced himself

as a candidate, and appealed for votes on the sole ground that he was

a poor man and wanted the place for the mileage. Brown, either

recognizing the force of this plea, or smitten with a sudden disgust

for a service in which such pleas were possible, withdrew from the

canvass, and Henry got his election and his mileage.

[Illustration: THE BOUNDARIES OF TEXAS. This map gives the boundary

between Mexico and the United States as defined by the treaty of 1828;

the westerly bank of the Sabine River from its mouth to the 32d degree

of longitude west from Greenwich; thence due north to the Arkansas

River, and running along its south bank to its source in the Rocky

Mountains, near the place where Leadville now stands; thence due north

to the 42d parallel of latitude, which it follows to the Pacific

Ocean. On the west will be seen the boundaries claimed by Mexico and

the United States after the annexation of Texas. The Mexican

authorities considered the western boundary of Texas to be the Nueces

River, from mouth to source; thence by an indefinite line to the Rio

Pecos, and through the elevated and barren Llano Estacado to the

source of the main branch of the Red River, and along that river to

the 100th meridian. The United States adopted the Texan claim of the

Rio Grande del Norte as their western limit. By the treaty of peace of

1848, the Mexicans relinquished to the United States the territory

between the Nueces and the Rio Grande del Norte; also the territory

lying between the last-named river and the Pacific Ocean, and north of

the Gila River and the southern boundary of New Mexico, which was a

short distance above the town of El Paso.]

[Illustration: ZACHARY TAYLOR.]

[Relocated Footnote (1): The impressive manner of Mrs. Cartwright's

death, who survived her husband a few years, is remembered in the

churches of Sangamon County. She was attending a religious meeting at

Bethel Chapel, a mile from her house. She was called upon "to give her

testimony," which she did with much feeling, concluding with the

words, "the past three weeks have been the happiest of all my life; I

am waiting for the chariot."

When the meeting broke up, she did not rise with the rest. The

minister solemnly said, "The chariot has arrived."--"Early Settlers of

Sangamon County," by John Carroll Power.]

[Relocated Footnote (2):

Stuart's maj. over May in 1836 in Sangamon Co. was 543

" " " Douglas " 1838 " " " " 295

" " " Ralston " 1840 " " " " 575

Hardin's " " McDougall " 1843 " " " " 504

Baker's " " Calhoun " 1844 " " " " 373

Lincoln's " " Cartwright " 1846 " " " " 690

Logan's " " Harris " 1848 " " " " 263

Yates's " " Harris " 1850 " " " " 336 ]

[Relocated Footnote (3): We give a copy of these lines, not on account

of their intrinsic merit, but as illustrating the versatility of the

lawyer, orator, and soldier who wrote them.

Where rolls the rushing Rio Grande,

How peacefully they sleep!

Far from their native Northern land,

Far from the friends who weep.

No rolling drums disturb their rest

Beneath the sandy sod;

The mold lies heavy on each breast,

The spirit is with God.

They heard their country's call, and came

To battle for the right;

Each bosom filled with martial flame,

And kindling for the fight.

Light was their measured footsteps when

They moved to seek the foe;

Alas that hearts so fiery then

Should soon be cold and low!]

Abraham Lincoln: a History — Volume 01 · 第 14 / 25 章