OF WAGERING.

WAGERING, as now practised by politics and contracts, is become a branch

of assurances; it was before more properly a part of gaming, and as it

deserved, had but a very low esteem; but shifting sides, and the war

providing proper subjects, as the contingencies of sieges, battles,

treaties, and campaigns, it increased to an extraordinary reputation, and

offices were erected on purpose which managed it to a strange degree and

with great advantage, especially to the office-keepers; so that, as has

been computed, there was not less gaged on one side and other, upon the

second siege of Limerick, than two hundred thousand pounds.

How it is managed, and by what trick and artifice it became a trade, and

how insensibly men were drawn into it, an easy account may be given.

I believe novelty was the first wheel that set it on work, and I need

make no reflection upon the power of that charm: it was wholly a new

thing, at least upon the Exchange of London; and the first occasion that

gave it a room among public discourse, was some persons forming wagers on

the return and success of King James, for which the Government took

occasion to use them as they deserved.

I have heard a bookseller in King James’s time say, “That if he would

have a book sell, he would have it burnt by the hand of the common

hangman;” the man, no doubt, valued his profit above his reputation; but

people are so addicted to prosecute a thing that seems forbid, that this

very practice seemed to be encouraged by its being contraband.

The trade increased, and first on the Exchange and then in coffee-houses

it got life, till the brokers, those vermin of trade, got hold of it, and

then particular offices were set apart for it, and an incredible resort

thither was to be seen every day.

These offices had not been long in being, but they were thronged with

sharpers and setters as much as the groom-porters, or any gaming-ordinary

in town, where a man had nothing to do but to make a good figure and

prepare the keeper of the office to give him a credit as a good man, and

though he had not a groat to pay, he should take guineas and sign

polities, till he had received, perhaps, £300 or £400 in money, on

condition to pay great odds, and then success tries the man; if he wins

his fortune is made; if not, he’s a better man than he was before by just

so much money, for as to the debt, he is your humble servant in the

Temple or Whitehall.

But besides those who are but the thieves of the trade, there is a method

as effectual to get money as possible, managed with more appearing

honesty, but no less art, by which the wagerer, in confederacy with the

office-keeper, shall lay vast sums, great odds, and yet be always sure to

win.

For example: A town in Flanders, or elsewhere, during the war is

besieged; perhaps at the beginning of the siege the defence is vigorous,

and relief probable, and it is the opinion of most people the town will

hold out so long, or perhaps not be taken at all: the wagerer has two or

three more of his sort in conjunction, of which always the office-keeper

is one; and they run down all discourse of the taking the town, and offer

great odds it shall not be taken by such a day. Perhaps this goes on a

week, and then the scale turns; and though they seem to hold the same

opinion still, yet underhand the office-keeper has orders to take all the

odds which by their example was before given against the taking the town;

and so all their first-given odds are easily secured, and yet the people

brought into a vein of betting against the siege of the town too. Then

they order all the odds to be taken as long as they will run, while they

themselves openly give odds, and sign polities, and oftentimes take their

own money, till they have received perhaps double what they at first

laid. Then they turn the scale at once, and cry down the town, and lay

that it shall be taken, till the length of the first odds is fully run;

and by this manage, if the town be taken they win perhaps two or three

thousand pounds, and if it be not taken, they are no losers neither.

It is visible by experience, not one town in ten is besieged but it is

taken. The art of war is so improved, and our generals are so wary, that

an army seldom attempts a siege, but when they are almost sure to go on

with it; and no town can hold out if a relief cannot be had from abroad.

Now, if I can by first laying £500 to £200 with A, that the town shall

not be taken, wheedle in B to lay me £5,000 to £2,000 of the same; and

after that, by bringing down the vogue of the siege, reduce the wagers to

even-hand, and lay £2,000 with C that the town shall not be taken; by

this method, it is plain—

If the town be not taken, I win £2,200 and lose £2,000.

If the town be taken, I win £5,000 and lose £2,500.

This is gaming by rule, and in such a knot it is impossible to lose; for

if it is in any man’s or company of men’s power, by any artifice to alter

the odds, it is in their power to command the money out of every man’s

pocket, who has no more wit than to venture.

An Essay Upon Projects · 第 31 / 50 题