As wife of the British ambassador to the Porte, Lady Mary had the

_entrée_ of the homes of the Turks, rich and poor, where she was

always cordially received and hospitably entertained. Besides this, she

was familiar with the language of her hostesses of the harems which she

visited and was thus able to become far more intimately acquainted with

the people than those who must needs depend on unreliable interpreters.

For these reasons her sprightly pictures of the life of the Turkish

women have always had special value and one can easily understand

her admiration for them and for many of their customs which are so

different from those of her own country--England. She would have fully

endorsed what her distinguished countrywoman, Lady Isabel Burton wrote

many years afterwards: “As a rule I met with nothing but courtesy in

the harems and much hospitality, cordiality and refinement.” _The

Romance of Isabel Lady Burton: The Story of Her Life Told in Part by

Herself and in Part by W. H. Wilkins_, Vol. II, p. 452 (New York,

1897).

[122] _Turkey and the Turks_, p. 84, _et seq._ (by Z. D. Ferriman, New

York, 1911).

“There has been,” writes an American woman who has had exceptional

opportunities for studying the condition of women in Turkey, “a vast

amount of pity wasted upon the Moslem woman. It may surprise even the

woman suffragist to learn that the laws of Mohammed confer upon women

a greater degree of legal protection than any code of laws since the

middle Roman law. The more recent liberties and protection granted to

married women by the laws of divorce and the exclusive property rights

now in the United States alone can be properly compared to those in

force in, Turkey.” _In the Palaces of the Sultan_, pp. 448, 449

(by Anna Bowman Dodd, New York, 1903).

[123] Ibid.

[124] _The Evil of the East, or Truths about Turkey_, p. 42 (London,

1888).

[125] See the _North American Review_.

[126] Lieutenant Wood in his “Journey to the Source of the Oxus,” p.

194 (London, 1872), writes: “Nowhere is the difference between European

and Mohammedan society more strongly marked than in the lower walks

of life. The broad line that separates the rich and poor in civilized

society is as yet but faintly drawn in Central Asia. Here unreserved

intercourse between their superiors has polished the manners of the

lower classes and, instead of this familiarity breeding contempt, it

begets self-respect in the dependent.... Indeed, all the inferior

classes possess an innate self-respect and a natural gravity of

deportment which differs as far from the suppleness of a Hindustani as

from the awkward rusticity of an English clown.” These characteristics

of the people of Central Asia, which so impressed the gallant explorer

of the Oxus, are much more striking in the inhabitants of Anatolia.

Another author writes: “The fine manners of all classes of Mohammedans

in Constantinople were a constant source of admiration to me. It was

as if the grace and dignity of past times--of Courts of the eighteenth

century--had taken refuge in Stamboul. Your Caiquejee, your Cafeje

and the very boot-blacks, if they are Mohammedans, know how to be

unobtrusively polite and well-bred towards each other, and even towards

the Giaour himself, if he treats them civilly. The older fashioned,

the more prejudiced, the Turkish gentleman, the finer are his manners,

the more gracious and delightful his welcome.” _The Sultan and His

Subjects_, Vol. I, pp. 280, 281 (by Richard Davy, New York, 1897).

[127] “The houses of the great Turkish ladies,” declares that keen

observer, Lady Montague, “are kept clean with as much nicety as those

in Holland.” _Letters_, Vol. II, p. 24 (London, 1793).

[128] _Destruction of the Greek Empire_, p. 524 (London, 1903).

[129] _Diary of a Turk_, p. 64 (London, 1903).

Writing to the poet, Pope, Lady Montague declares: “I can assure you

that the Princesses and great ladies pass their time at their looms

embroidering veils and robes, surrounded by their maids, which are

always very numerous, in the same manner as we find Andromache and

Helen described.” _Op. cit._, Vol. I, p. 110.

[130] _Op. cit._, pp. 54, 55, 98, 99.

[131] _Letters_, Vol. I, p. 104.

[132] The noted traveler and Orientalist, Sir Richard Burton,

graphically defines the meaning of the word Kaif, so frequently heard

in the Near East as “The savoring of animal existence; the passive

enjoyment of mere sense; the pleasant languor, the dreamy tranquillity,

the airy castle-building which in Asia stands in lieu of the vigorous,

intensive, passionate life of Europe. It is the result of a lively,

impressible, excitable nature and exquisite sensibility of nerve--a

facility for voluptuousness unknown to northern regions where happiness

is placed in the exertion of mental and physical powers; where niggard

earth commands ceaseless sweat of brow; and damp, dull air demands

perpetual excitement, exercise or change, or adventure, or dissipation

for want of something better. In the East man requires but rest and

shade; upon the banks of a bubbling stream or under the cool shelter

of a perfumed tree he is perfectly happy smoking a pipe, or sipping a

cup of coffee, or drinking a glass of sherbert, but, above all things,

deranging his body and mind as little as possible; the trouble of

conversations, the displeasures of memory and the vanity of thought

being the most unpleasant interruptions to his _Kaif_. No wonder that

_Kaif_ is a word untranslatable in our mother-tongue.” _Personal

Narrative of a Pilgrimage to El-Medinah and Meccah_, pp. 23, 24

(Boston, 1859).

[133] _Ferriman_, _op. cit._, p. 334. Professor W. M. Ramsay, than whom

no one has a more intimate knowledge of the Osmanlis, writes: “Whenever

any work has to be done for which absolute honesty is required, there

is always a Turk employed; they are human watchdogs whom everybody

employs and trusts.” _Impressions of Turkey During Twelve Tears

Wanderings_, p. 43 (London, 1897).

Dr. Schliemann bears the same testimony to their honesty and

trustworthiness in his _Troja_, pp. 10, 11.

[134] _Turquie Agonisante_, p. 49 (Paris, 1913).

[135] _Les Massacres d’Arménie_, pp. 19, 20 (Paris, 1918).

[136] _Ansayrii_, Vol. II, p. 144 (London, 1851). _Cf._ Schliemann’s

_Troja_, p. 338.

[137] _The Odyssey_, XIV, 57, 58.

[138] _Don Quixote_, Part I, Chap. XL.

[139] _Cf._ Pierre Loti in _Turquie Agonisante_, p. 49 (Paris, 1913).

[140] _A History of Greece from its Conquest by the Romans to the

Present Time_, Vol. V, p. 161 (Oxford, 1877). Finlay gives the

following quotation from the _Turco-Græcia_, p. 487, of Crusius

who writes as vigorously in favor of the Osmanlis as Knolles or Pierre

Loti.

“Et mirum est inter barbaros in tanta tantæ urbi colluvie nullas cædes

audiri, vim iniustam non ferri, ius cuivis dici. Ideo Constantinopolin

Sultanus refugium totius orbis scribit: quod omnes miseri ibi tutissime

lateant: quodque omnibus, tam infimis quam summis, tam Christianis quam

infidelibus iustitia administretur.” Could the verdict of history be

more explicit than in the remarkable statements here quoted?

[141] See also his informing brochure, _Les Massacres D’Arménie_

(Paris, 1918).

[142] In Persia, according to the eminent traveler and Orientalist,

Arminius Vambery, “Inferior officials cheat the people, and the latter

again avail themselves of every opportunity to cheat the officials.

Every one in that country lies, cheats and swindles. Nor is such

behavior looked upon as anything immoral or improper; on the contrary,

the man, who is straightforward and honest in his dealings is sure

to be spoken of contemptuously as a fool or madman.” _The Life and

Adventures of Arminius Vambery, written by Himself_, p. 284 (London,

1914).

How the Persians have degenerated since the days of Cyrus and Darius!

Then, according to Herodotus, their sons were carefully instructed from

their fifth to their twentieth year in three things alone--to ride,

to draw the bow, and to speak the truth--“παιδεύονσι δε τους πᾶιδας,

απ πενταετέος αρξάμενοι μέχρι εικοσαέτεος, τρία μουνα, ἱππεύειν καὶ

τοξεύειν καὶ άληθίξεσθαι.” I, 136.

[143] It is interesting to note here that in the Treaty of Amity and

Commerce which was concluded in 1535 between France and the Sublime

Porte one of the articles reads: “It is forbidden to molest the French

in matters of their religion which they have full liberty to practice.”

This guarantee of religious freedom included the Christians of all

other nations--a guarantee with which the Ottoman government has always

faithfully complied. _Cf._ _Histoire de l’Empire Ottoman_, Tom. I, p.

171, 173 (by the Vicomte de la Jonquière, Paris, 1914).

[144] Quoted from _Turkey and the Ottomans_, p. 142, _et. seq._ (by

Lucy M. Garnett, New York, 1911).

[145] _Cf._ _Turkish Memories_, p. 128, _et passim_ (by Sidney

Whitman). See _Through Armenia on Horseback_, Chap. VIII (by G. H.

Hepworth, New York, 1918), and _In the Palaces of the Sultan_, pp. 426,

427 (by Anna Bowman Dodd).

[146] _Op. cit._, p. 108.

[147] Ibid., p. 116.

[148] _Op. cit._, p. 231.

[149] November 29, 1912.

[150] _Le Chemin de Fer de Bagdad_, p. 226 (Paris, 1915).

[151] _Narrative of the Euphrates Expedition carried on by Order of

the British Government during the years 1835, 1836 and 1837_, p. 360

(London, 1868).

[152] Ibid., p. viii.

[153] Lord Palmerston, it is interesting to observe in this connection,

did not hesitate to declare in Parliament that the construction of the

Suez Canal, as planned by De Lesseps, was physically impracticable and

that the project was but a trap set for gullible capitalists.

[154] “Ismaili to Koweit Ry.,” _National Review_, p. 464, May,

1902.

[155] _Nineteenth Century_, p. 1084, June, 1909.

[156] Ibid., p. 1085.

[157] _Nineteenth Century_, p. 966 _et seq._, May, 1914.

[158] June, 1901, p. 629.

[159] June, 1901, p. 629.

[160] _Nineteenth Century_, p. 961, May, 1914.

[161] Chéradame, _op. cit._, p. V.

[162] “Le tres distingué M. Eugène Gallos de la Société de Géographie

de Paris qui, avec M. Le Général Dolot, ont parconru en 1914 la Syrie

et la Mesopotamie peuvent affirmer qu il y avait la-has une seconde

France, aimant inlassablement celle qui est en train d’ écrire sa plus

belle page dans l’histoire des nations.” _Bagdad, Son Chemin de Fer,

Son Importance, Son Avenir_, p. 25 (by Émile Aublé, Paris, 1917).

[163] _The Geographical Journal_, p. 33 _et seq._, July, 1917.

[164] _The Fortnightly Review_, p. 777, May, 1911.

[165] Speaking in the British Parliament April 8, 1903, Lord E.

Fitzmaurice went still further when he declared: “Bound up with the

future of this (Bagdad) Railway there is probably the future political

control of large regions in Asia Minor, Mesopotamia and the Persian

Gulf.”

[166] _The Fortnightly Review_, p. 216, February, 1914.

[167] “Les Gouvernment français et anglais refuserent formellment leur

approbation et leur appui et conseillerent a leur nationaux de s’en

abstenir.” E. Aublé, _op. cit._, p. 15.

[168] _The Nineteenth Century_, p. 1090 _et seq._, June, 1909.

It is gratifying to know that this anti-German feeling was not shared

by Sir Clinton and his associates and by clear-visioned men like Sir

Edwin Pears who did not hesitate to declare: “The Germans, in inviting

British coöperation from the first, have acted fairly and loyally.”

_The Contemporary Review_, p. 589, November, 1908.

[169] M. Aublé, _op. cit._, p. 16, referring to this matter, writes:

“Si en elle--même l’enterprise du Chemin de Fer de Bagdad est resté

telle qu’elle s’est presentée au début, une œuvre allemande, c’est

parce qu’on n’a pas voulu profiter des offres allemandes pour lui

donner un caractère international.”

[170] _The Nineteenth Century_, p. 1312, June, 1914.

[171] Ibid., p. 1313. After all negotiations looking towards

internationalization of the Bagdad Railway had failed, M. Geraud, who

is evidently a monarchist, wrote: “We cannot help regretting that

the two powers who held the protectorate of the Orient--France her

old religious protectorate, and England the protectorate of Anatolia

sanctioned by the Cyprus Convention--should, in the space of one

generation, have laid down such beneficent weapons.... In order that

so much destruction could be consummated, all that was responsible in

England and France was the rule of democracy.”

[172] _Cf._ his interesting brochure, _Les Chemins de Fer in Turquie

d’Asie_ (Zurich, 1902).

[173] _Revue de Géographie_, p. 398, May, 1902.

[174] According to Herodotus it was a three months’ journey from

Ephesus to Susa--a somewhat greater distance than from Constantinople

to Bagdad.

[175] _Süddeutsche Monatshefte_, September, 1915. _Cf._ _The Quarterly

Review_, p. 149, January, 1917.

[176] _Der Kampf um die Dardanellen_ (Stuttgart, 1916).

[177] _The Quarterly Review_, p. 528, October, 1917.

[178] For an interesting article on this subject, see “Plato in the

Folk-lore of the Konia Plain,” by F. W. Hasluck, in the _Annual of

the British School of Athens_, No. XVIII.

[179] Called Rum--Rome--because it was, before its conquest by the

Seljuks, a portion of the Roman-Byzantine Empire.

[180] See _Turkey in Europe_, p. 185 (by C. Eliot, London, 1908).

[181] In the Koran, Sura V., it is written, “O believers! surely wine

and games of chance and statues, and divining arrows are an abomination

of Satan’s work! Avoid them that ye may prosper.”

[182] _Cf._ _Mishcat-Ul-Masabih, or a Collection of the Most Authentic

Traditions Regarding the Actions and Sayings of Mohammed_, Vol. II,

pp. 368–370 (trans. from the Original Arabic by Capt. A. N. Mathews,

Calcutta, 1809). “The Angel Gabriel did not visit Mohammed as he

promised to do one night because of the presence of a puppy, saying to

Mohammed ‘we angels do not go into a house in which are pictures or

dogs.’” Vol. II, p. 368.

[183] Sismondi, writing of the Eastern story-tellers, among whom

are women as well as men, informs us they sometimes “excite terror

or pity, but they more frequently picture to their audience those

brilliant and fantastic visions which are the patrimony of the eastern

imagination.... The physicians frequently recommend them to their

patients in order to soothe pain, to calm agitation or to produce

sleep after long watchfulness; and these story-tellers, accustomed to

sickness, modulate their voices, soften their tones and gently suspend

them as sleep steals over the sufferers.” _Historical View of the

Literature of Southern Europe_, Vol. I, p. 62 (Bohn Edition).

[184] The Sheik-ul-Islam issued a vigorous fetwa against it in which

he declared that its use “was contrary to the Koran” and that “smoking

was a hideous and abominable practice of the Giaours, which no true

Believer should adopt.”

[185] “The Eastern nations are generally so addicted to both that

they say ‘a dish of coffee and a pipe of tobacco are a complete

entertainment’; and the Persians have a proverb that coffee without

tobacco is meat without salt.” Sale, _The Koran_, p. 88, “Preliminary

Discourse.”

[186] “Most people who have travelled in the Levant are enthusiastic in

their praises of the Turkish coffee which they drank out there. There

is no reason why coffee prepared in the Turkish style should not become

popular here. There is no difficulty about making it. That the coffee

may have the delicious flavor it has in the Levant, the beans must be

freshly roasted and ground very fine. The water must be boiled in a tin

or copper coffee-pot. To supply, say four or five persons with coffee

in tiny cups, two or three teaspoonfuls of the powder should be put

into the pot while the water is actually boiling therein. Some people

do not like sugar in their coffee, but if sugar is required, it should

be put into the boiling water and allowed to melt before the coffee is

added. Great sweetness is not appreciated by connoisseurs in coffee

drinking. When the ground coffee is added to the boiling water, the pot

should be taken off the fire and the coffee stirred up in the water

with a teaspoon. Then it should be put on the fire again until the

froth rises up. It is then poured into the cups. It is better to pour

out the coffee slowly, placing the pot on the fire at short intervals,

and thus getting more froth for pouring out into the cups, as the

taste of the coffee is supposed to be better with the yellowish froth

on the surface. It is on account of this idea that greedy people in

Turkey choose those cups that have the most froth when coffee is handed

round on a tray, leaving those with less to the others who are waiting

their turn to be served.” Halil Halid’s _Diary of a Turk_, p. 244

(London, 1903).

[187] In marked contrast to this wildly lyrical praise of the fragrant

and delicious beverage made from the Arabian berry, is the denunciation

which was hurled against it by the orthodox followers of Islam who

declared it to be a menace to public morals and one of the four

ministers of the Devil--the other three being wine, opium, and tobacco.

“During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries coffee-drinkers were

persecuted more rigorously in Constantinople than wine-bibbers have

ever been in England or America. Their most unrelenting enemy was the

bloody Murad IV--himself a drunkard--who forbade the use of coffee

under pain of death. He and his nephew, Mehmed IV, after him used to

patrol the city in disguise, à la Harun-al-Rashid, in order to detect

and punish for themselves any violation of the law.... A personage

no more straitlaced than Charles II caused a court to hand down the

following decision: ‘The Retayling of Coffe may be an innocente Trayde;

but as it is used to nourisshe Sedition, spredde Lyes, and scandalyse

Greate Mene, it may also be a common Nuissaunce.’” _Constantinople

Old and New_, p. 24 (by H. G. Dwight, New York, 1915).

[188] _The Beauties of the Bosphorus_, p. 127 (London, 1839).

[189] _Cf._ his _Origin of Cultivated Plants_, p. 439 _et seq._ (New

York; _Géographie Botanique Raisonnée_ (Paris, 1885).

[190] _Historical Sketches_, Vol. I, p. 116, 117 (by Cardinal Newman,

London, 1901).

[191] _Cf._ _Discovery in Greek Lands_, p. 57 _et seq._ (by F. H.

Marshall, Cambridge, 1920). See also _A Century of Archæological

Discoveries_, p. 166 ff. (by A. Michaelis, New York, 1908).

Nothing impressed us more during our journey through Anatolia than the

utter destruction of those superb cities of which a Roman author once

wrote,

_Magnificas Asiæ perreximus urbes._

Of many of these even the sites were unknown until they were recently

discovered by the archæologists of Europe. The site of the famous

temple of Diana at Ephesus was not identified until 1869, although this

celebrated structure was once classed as one of the seven wonders of

the world. Nowhere in Asia Minor does one find anything to compare with

the stately temples of Pæstum, Girgenti, and Segesta which, with the

exception of the wonderful monuments in Athens, are the most remarkable

and best preserved groups of ancient Greek architecture in existence.

[192] The region through which they marched was described in the

graphic language of an old chronicler as _Terram horroris et

salsuginis, terram siccam, sterilem, inamœnam_.

[193] _The History of the Crusades_, Vol. 1. p. 126 (New York, n. d.).

[194] Ibid., p. 257.

[195] Ibid., p. 258.

[196] Called by Cicero _Tauri-Pylæ_.

[197] As legend has it, Charlemagne sleeps in Odenberg, in Hesse,

where crowned and armed and girt with his trusty sword, _La Joyeuse_,

he awaits the advent of Anti-Christ when he will awake and deliver

Christendom.

Bonaparte, it is supposed in certain parts of France, will again return

to restore the country to its pristine glory. When Louis Napoleon

submitted the plebiscite to the countrymen, many gave their vote under

the impression that it was in support of his famous uncle.

[198] _Lares et Penates_ or _Cilicia and Its Governors_, p. 79 (by W.

B. Barker, London, 1853).

[199] Barker, _op. cit._, p. 82.

[200] The legend about people sleeping preternatural lengths of time

has an honored place in the folklore of many nations in both the East

and the West. We have already noted the traditions concerning the long

sleeps of Barbarossa, Charlemagne, Napoleon, and other distinguished

characters. But many other instances might be enumerated showing the

prevalence of similar tales in many lands from the sleepers of Sardis,

mentioned by Aristotle, to Rip Van Winkle, immortalized by Washington

Irving.

[201] _Cf._ Strabo, XIV, 5; and Arrian’s _Anabasis of Alexander_, II,

5. For an account of Asurbanipal, in the light of recent Assyrian

discoveries, see _Graven in the Rock_, Chap. XIV (by S. Kinns, London,

1891).

[202]

_Talk of our souls and realms beyond the grave,_

_The very boys will laugh and say you rave._

[203] _History of Greece_, Vol. X, p. 311 (by W. Mitford, London, 1810).

[204] The Greek word for pinion is _tarsos_.

[205] _Cf._ Josephus, _Antiquities of the Jews_, I. 6; VIII. 7. 2. The

Jewish historian was probably misled by the similarity of sounds of

the two words and ventured to solve what has always been a riddle to

historians and Scripture commentators.

[206] “Oppidum autem Britanni vocant,” says Cæsar, referring to the

capital of Cassivellaunus, now London, “cum sylvas impeditas vallo

atque fossa munierunt, quo incursiones hostium vitandæ causa convenire

consuerunt.” _De Bello Gallico_, Lib. V, Cap. 21.

[207] Strabo, _Geography_, XIV, 51.

[208] J. B. Lightfoot in _Philippians_, Appendix on St. Paul and

Seneca, p. 271.

[209] _The Cities of St. Paul, Their Influence on His Life and

Thought_, pp. 88, 89 (London, 1907).

[210] _The Heathen World and St. Paul_, p. 20 (by E. H. Plumptre,

London, n.d.).

[211] _Acts of the Apostles_, xvii; 6.

[212] In one of his beautiful homilies on the _Epistle of St. Paul to

the Romans_, St. John Chrysostom, the greatest of pulpit orators,

declares: “I honor Rome for this reason; for, though I could celebrate

her praises on many other accounts;--for her greatness, for her beauty,

for her power, for her wealth, for her warlike exploits, yet, passing

over all these things, I glorify her for this reason, that St. Paul

in his lifetime wrote to the Romans, and loved them, and was present

among them and conversed with them, and ended his life among them.

Wherefore the city is on this account renowned more than all others;

on this account I admire her, not on account of her gold, her columns

or her other splendid decorations.” _Oeuvres Complètes de Saint Jean

Chrysostome_, Tom XVI, p. 308 (Paris, 1871).

[213] _Across Asia Minor on Foot_, pp. 35, 351 (by W. J. Childs, New

York, 1917).

[214] The massacre in Constantinople which so horrified the civilized

world was, like that in Adana, provoked by the revolutionary activities

of the Armenians. After having boldly announced their intention of

applying the torch to the city and “reducing it,” as their posted

placards phrased it, “to a desert of ashes,” a party of audacious young

conspirators proceeded to blow up the Ottoman Imperial Bank, while

others of their associates made the Psammatia quarter flow in the blood

of helpless inhabitants. During eighteen hours of terror the carnage

which the Armenians caused by their use of dynamite and by throwing

bombs from the windows upon the Turkish soldiers, who were detailed

to suppress the outbreak, rivaled anything recorded in the worst days

of the Paris Commune of 1871. _Cf._ _Turquie Agonisante_, p. 174 (by

Pierre Loti).

Without pretending to absolve the exasperated Turks for their part in

this appalling massacre, I may ask “what would the people of New York

do if a foreign mob from the East Side with the red flag at their head

were to attempt to blow up the Subtreasury Building and to make the

same use of high explosives in their wanton destruction of life and

property as did the Armenians in their ghastly work in Constantinople?”

The answer will be sufficient attenuation for the conduct of the

infuriated Turks on this frightful occasion. And yet, according to the

reports flashed through the world at the time, this massacre, like that

at Adana and at numberless other places, was laid to the charge of

the “unspeakable Turk.” It was the old, old story; the Turk is always

guilty, the Armenian never.

[215] _A Wandering Scholar in the Levant_, pp. 147–150 (London, 1896).

[216] Pierre Loti tells of a French consul in Asia Minor who barely

escaped assassination at the hands of an Armenian agitator who, when

questioned regarding his attempt on the life of the functionary, coolly

replied: “I did this in order that the Turks might be accused of it and

in the hope that the French would rise up against them after the murder

of their consul.” _Les Massacres d’Arménie_, p. 50 (Paris, 1918).

[217] _The Diary of a Turk_, p. 130.

[218] D. G. Hogarth, _op. cit._, p. 77.

[219] Ibid., 65.

[220] Halil Halid’s _Diary of a Turk_, p. 129 (London, 1903). “Alors,”

declares Pierre Loti, “comme des lions exaspérés ils se dechaînent

contre ceux que, depuis des siècles, on leur a denoncés comme les

plus dangereux responsables de tous les malheurs de la patrie....

Hélas! oui, les Turcs ont massacré! Je pretends toutefois que le

recit de leur tueries a toujours été follement exagéré et les details

enlaidis à plaisir; je pretends aussi--et personne là-bas n’osera me

contredire--que la beaucoup plus lourde part des crimes commis revient

aux Kurdes dont je n’ai jamais pris la defense.” _Op. cit._, p. 22–24.

[221] Commenting on this subject Professor, now Sir William Ramsay,

writes, “Lord Salisbury protests in the strongest terms that Britain

has never entertained any schemes of acquisition in Asia Minor. There

is, however, probably no Russian or German or Frenchman who believes

him.... The protestations that Britain entertains no designs in Asia

Minor merely make people abroad all the more sure that a British

statesman’s word can never be trusted.” And, referring to her creation

of a new consular department to aid her in compassing her designs, he

observes “as a piece of statesmanship, crafty and unscrupulous, but

able, it was a master-stroke; though I think no one among us will ever

look back to it without blushing for the jockeying by which it was

effected.” _Impressions of Turkey During Twelve Years Wanderings_,

pp. 142–144 (London, 1897).

In the light of recent events how significant--almost prophetic--are

these words of Sir William on British policy and diplomacy regarding

Turkey!

[222]

_Where men once dwelt, a dreary lake is seen,_

_And coots and bitterns haunt the waters green._

_Metamorphoses_, VIII, 24, 25.

[223] Count Marcellinus, one of the first ministers of Justinian,

vividly describes, in a single sentence, the frightful depredations

of Attila when this dreadful “Scourge of God” _Pene totam Europam,

invasis excisique civitatibus atque castellis, conrasit_. This

sentence perfectly describes the depredations of Timur and Jenghiz

Khan during their terror-inspiring careers in Western Asia. Of Jenghiz

Khan the Arabian traveler, Ibn Batuta, writes that he “came into the

countries of Islamism and destroyed them.” The same authority says

that after destroying such great cities as Bokhara and Samarcand

“he killed the inhabitants, taking prisoners the youth only and

leaving the country quite desolate. He then passed over the Gihon

and took possession of all Khorasan and Irak, destroying the cities

and slaughtering the inhabitants.” His son, Hulaku, laid Bagdad in

ruins, whence he proceeded with his followers to Syria, continuing his

depredations “until divine Providence put an end to his career.” _The

Travels of Ibn Batuta_, pp. 87, 88, 89 (trans. by S. Lee, London,

1829).

The English historian, Marshman, writing of the elder Mongol conqueror,

declares: “From the Caspian to the Indus, more than one thousand miles

in extent, the whole country was laid waste with fire and sword by the

ruthless barbarians who followed Jenghiz Khan. It was the greatest

calamity which had befallen the human race since the Deluge and five

centuries have been barely sufficient to repair that desolation.”

_History of India from Remote Antiquity to the Accession of the Mogul

Dynasty_, Vol. I, p. 49 (London, 1842).

“Well might the Mussulman and Christian world shrink down upon its

knees in the presence of such a terrible visitation. ‘We pray God,’

writes Ibin al Athir, ‘that He will send to Islam and to the Mussulmans

someone who can protect them, for they are the victims of the most

terrible calamity, the men killed, their goods pillaged, their children

carried off, their wives reduced to slavery or put to death, the

country in fact, laid waste.’ Juveni says that in the country traversed

by the Mongols, only a thousandth part of the population remained

and where there were previously one hundred thousand inhabitants

there remained but a hundred. ‘If nothing interferes with the growth

of the population in Khorasan and Irak Ajem from now to the day of

resurrection,’ he adds, ‘it will not be the tenths of what it was

before the conquest.’” _History of the Mongols_, Part III, p. i

(by H. Howorth, London, 1888).

Jenghiz Khan and “his followers tramped over the fairest portions of

the earth with the faggot and the sword in their hands, forestalling

the day of doom and crumbling into ruin many old civilizations. His

creed was to sweep away all cities as the haunts of slaves and of

luxury, that his herds might freely feed upon grass whose green was

free from dusty feet. It does make one hide one’s face in terror to

read that from 1211 to 1223 eighteen million four hundred and seventy

thousand human beings perished in China and Tangut alone at the hands

of Jenghiz and his followers; a fearful hecatomb which haunts the

memory until one forgets the other features of the story.” Howorth,

_op. cit._, Part I, p. 113.

[224] Pliny in his _Historia Naturalis_, II, 86, writes: _Maximus terræ

memoria mortalium extitit motus, Tiberii Cæsaria principatu_; XII

_urbibus Asiæ una nocte prostatis_.

[225] _History of Greece From Its Conquests by the Romans to the

Present Time, B.C. 146 to A.D. 1864_, Vol. I, p. 224 (by George

Finlay, Oxford, 1877).

[226] I do not ignore the atrocities which the Turks, especially

during the last few decades, are alleged to have committed in Armenia

and elsewhere. But until reliable testimony as to the Ottoman side of

the question is forthcoming it is only fair to the accused for one to

suspend judgment.

[227] _Mahomet et le Coran_, p. vii (Paris, 1865).

[228] “Neque in hoc me falli opinor cum hodieque non paucos ex

nostris, alioquin non indoctos, Mahumeticarum rerum tam rudes videam,

ut Mahumetanos Idolatras, Lunæque ac Mahumeti adoratores existiment,

aliasque de Agarenica secta ejusque Auctore neptias effutiant.”

_Alcorani Textus Universus_, Tom. I, p. 6 (Patavii, 1698).

Padre Lodovico Marracci, who was a religious of the order of the Clerks

Regular of the Mother of God, was the confessor of Pope Innocent XII.

It was in obedience to the command of this Pontiff that he published

his great work on the Koran on which he spent forty of the best years

in his life. It embraces three folio volumes with the text of the Koran

in Arabic, accompanied by a Latin translation and copious notes, and is

notable as being the most successful of the earlier attempts to make

the Koran and Mohammedanism known to the Christian world.

[229] _Das Leben und die Lehre des Mohammed_, Vol. II, p. 181 (Berlin,

1862).

[230]

_A mil Franceis fait bien oerchier la vile,_

_Les sinagoges et les mahumeries:_

_A mailz de fer, à ouignèes qu ’il tindrent,_

_Fruissent Mahum e trestutes les ydles._

Lai CCXCVI.

[231]

_A. I. josdi s’ala d’ un fort vin enivrer;_

_De la taverne issi; quant il s’en volt aler,_

_En une place vit. I. fumier reverser;_

_Mahomes si colcha, ne s’en volt trestorner:_

_Là l’estranglèrent porc, si com j’oï conter;_

_Por ce ne volt juis de char de porc goster._

Vv. 5547 _et seq._ (Paris, 1860).

[232] Porcorum verum esum, justa prorsus ratione, contemnunt qui

morsibus eorum dominum consumserunt. _Recueil des Historiens des

Croisades_, Tom. IV, p. 130 (Paris, 1879).

[233] “As a sample of the controversial works of the theologians of the

Reformed Church on this subject,” Mr. R. B. Smith in his interesting

work on _Mohammed and Mohammedanism_, p. 79 (London, 1876), calls

attention to “the following modest title-page of a ponderous work

written in 1666: Anti-Christus Mahometes: ubi non solum per Sanctam

Scripturam, ac Reformatorum testimonia, verum etiam per omnes alios

probandi modos et genera, plene, fuse, imvicte solideque demonstratur

Mahometem esse unum illum verum, magnum de quo in Sacris fit mentio,

Antichristum.”

[234] _Mohammedanism_, p. 12 (New York, 1916).

[235] _Historia Orientalis_, _Dedicatio_, p. 5 (by J. H. Hottinger,

Zurich, 1660).

[236] “Quod vero dissimulandum non est, licet quidam docte, satis

solideque scripserint, nonnulli ex rerum Sarracenicarum ignorantia,

vera plerumque omittentes, ficta ac fabulosa in medium protulerunt,

quæ Mahumetanis risus excitarent eosque in errore suo obstinatiores

efficerent.” _Alcorani Textus Universus_, Tom. I, p. 1 (Patavii, 1698).

[237] Referring to the widespread errors concerning Mohammed and his

teachings the eminent Orientalist, Adrian Reland, wrote more than two

centuries ago: “Quotidie magis magisque experior mundum decipi velle et

præconceptis opinionibus regi”--I daily become more and more convinced

that the world wishes to be deceived and is governed by preconceived

opinions. _De Religione Mohammedica_, p. xxii (Utrecht, 1705). Is

there not still room for improvement in this respect?

[238] “Mohammed litt an einer Krankheit, welche in jener ausgepragten

Form, wie bei ihm, in unseren Gegenden bisweilen bei Frauen, aber

selten bei Mannern vorkommt, Mann hat ihr verschiedene Namen gegeben;

Schönlein heisst sie _hysteria muscularis_.” _Op. cit._, Vol. I, p. 207.

[239] “Nulla porro falsa doctrina eat quæ non aliqua vera

intermisceat.” _Quæst_, Evang. II. 40.

[240] _Handbuch der allgemeinen Kirchengeschicte_, Vol. I, p. 748

(Freiburg im Breisgau, 1884).

“It can be readily understood how the sight of the Muslim trader at

prayer, his frequent prostrations, his absorbed and silent worship

of the Unseen, would impress the heathen African, endowed with that

strong sense of the mysterious such as generally accompanies a low

stage of civilization. Curiosity would naturally prompt inquiry and the

knowledge of Islam thus imparted might sometimes win over a convert who

might have turned aside had it been offered unsought, as a free gift.”

_The Preaching of Islam_, p. 418 (by T. W. Arnold, London, 1913).

This view was emphasized by good old Father Marracci more than two

centuries ago when he wrote: “Si ethnicus humani intellectus captum

excedentia, vel naturali conditioni et imbecilitati dificillima, si non

impossibilia, ... cum Alcoranica doctrina comparaverit, statim ab his

refugiet et ad illa obviis ulnis accurret.” _Op. cit._, Tom. II,

p. 9.

[241] _Cf._ J. Barthélemy Saint-Hilaire, _op. cit._, p. x.

[242] _De Heresibus Liber, Patrologia Græca_, Vol. XVIV, Col. 763 _et

seq._ (Migne Edition).

[243] “Summa vero hujus hæresis intentio est ut Christus Dominus ut

neque Deus neque Dei Filius esse credatur; sed licet magnus Deoque

dilectus homo tamen purus et vir quidem sapiens et propheta maximus.

Quæ quidem olim diaboli machinatione concepta primo per Arium seminata

deinde per istum Satanam, scilicet Machumet, provecta, per Antichristum

vero ex toto secundum diabolicam intentionem complebitur.” _Petri

Venerabilis Opera Omnia_, col. 655, _Patrologia Latina_, Vol.

Tom. CLXXXIX (Migne Edition).

[244] “Seminator di scandalo e di scisma.” Inferno, XXVIII, 35.

[245] C. Snouck Hurgronje, _Mohammedanism_, p. 129, _et seq._ (New

York, 1916).

[246] The duty of the imam “is to stand in front of the congregation,

facing the Kibleh or Mecca-pointing niche, at the appointed hours

of devotion, that is ordinarily, as every one knows, five times a

day, when he recites aloud the public prayers, marks time for the

various devotional postures, and, in a word, acts as fugleman to the

worshipers ranged behind him, from whom, however, he is distinguished

by no special dress, caste or character! _Primus inter pares_;

but nothing more. The Khatib, or preacher, usually reads out of an

old, well-thumbed manuscript sermon book, or, though much more rarely,

delivers _extempore_ the Friday discourse, a short performance,

seldom exceeding ten minutes in duration.... Once outside the mosque,

the imam, the khatib, or whoever else may have officiated during the

prayers, is a house-mason, a green-grocer, or pipe-maker, or anything

else, as before.” _Essays on Eastern Questions_, p. 91, _et

seq._ (by W. G. Palgrave, London, 1872).

[247] _Op. cit._, p. 82.

[248] The word “mosque” is derived from the Arabic _masjid_ which

signifies a place of worship.

[249] For a full description of Beith Allah--house of God--and the holy

Kaaba, “Navel of the World,” as the Arabian geographer, Ibn Haukal,

calls it, see Sir Richard Burton’s _A Pilgrimage to El Medina and

Mecca_, Chaps. XXIV, XXV.

[250] _Cf._ _Aspects of Islam_, p. 199 _et seq._ (by D. B. MacDonald,

New York, 1911).

[251] _Bibliothèque Orientale_, Tom. II, p. 81 (by Barthèlemy

d’Herbelot, The Hague, 1777).

[252] D’Herbelot, _op. cit._, Tom. II, p. 106.

[253] D’Herbelot, _op. cit._, Tom. II, p. 351.

[254] _Op. cit._, p. 122, _et seq._

[255] _Mohammed and Islam_, p. 45 (by Ignaz Goldziher, trans, by K. C.

Seelye, New Haven, 1917).

[256] _Mohammed and Mohammedanism_, p. 334. _et seq._ (by R.

B. Smith. London, 1876).

[257] _Studies in a Mosque_, p. 169 (London, 1893).

[258] “The spiritual energy of Islam is not, as has been so often

maintained, commensurate with its political power. On the contrary, the

loss of political power and worldly prosperity has served to bring to

the front the finer spiritual qualities which are the truest incentives

to missionary work. Islam has learned the uses of adversity and so far

from a decline in worldly prosperity being a presage of the decay of

this faith, it is significant that those very Muslim countries that

have been longest under Christian rule show themselves most active in

the work of proselyting. The Indian and Malay Mohammedans display a

zeal and enthusiasm for the spread of the faith, which one looks for in

vain in Turkey and Morocco.” T. W. Arnold, _op. cit._, p. 426, 427.

[259] According to Dr. Hubert Jansen’s painstaking _Verbreitung des

Islams_, the number of Mohammedans in the world in 1897 was 259,680,672.

[260] “Si les Mussulmans et les Chrétiens me prâtaient l’oreille,

je ferais cesser leur divergence, et ils diviendraient frères à

l’extérieur et à l’intérieur.” _Rappel à l’Intelligent, Avis à

Indifferent_, p. 105 (Paris, 1858).

[261] An American writer, referring to the Italian campaign in Tripoli,

asks: “Is there rain enough in the sweet heavens to wash away the stain

on Italy’s fair name made deep and black by ruthless massacre?” G. F.

Herrick in _Christian and Mohammedan_, p. 236 (New York, 1912).

And an English author writing of the British war on the Gold Coast

declares: “Our ‘prestige’ serves as an excuse for committing what we

should condemn as crimes in any other nation. It is an entity that has

juggled us into the belief that to destroy what we cannot retain is the

prerogative not of barbarism, but of civilization and Christianity....

Truly this war will be a _damnosa hereditas_ to posterity, alike

whether we accept or disclaim the fearful responsibilities in which it

has involved us.” R. B. Smith, _op. cit._, p. 258.

[262] “Aggredior vos non, ut nostri sæpe faciunt, armis sed verbis;

non vi, sed ratione; non odio, sed amore.” Peter the Venerable, _op.

cit._, col. 673. “I attack you, not as our people often do with

arms, but with words; not by force but by reason; not in hate but in

love.” These are the words with which Peter the Venerable opens his

first book against Mussulmans and shows what should be the attitude of

the missionary that would have a hearing with a people who are as proud

and sensitive as are the followers of Mohammed.

[263] For a helpful map, indicating the course of the Royal Road, the

reader is referred to the third volume of Rawlinson’s _Five Great

Monarchies_ (New York, 1881). Much light is also thrown on this

interesting subject by Rennell’s valuable work, _The Geographical

System of Herodotus_, Vol. I, Sec. 13 (London, 1830).

It is well, in reference to this subject, to recollect that the

ordinary policy of the Asiatic monarchies was not that of holding

immense continuous areas of territory, but the comparatively simpler

one of safeguarding the great highways of communication. “It is

important to remember this in connection with rapid conquest like

that of Alexander. To conquer the Achæmenian empire did not mean the

effective occupation of all the area within its extreme frontiers--that

would have been a task exceeding one man’s lifetime--but the conquest

of its cultivated districts and the holding of the roads which

connected them.” _Cf._ _The House of Seleucus_, Vol. I, p. 22

(by E. R. Bevan, London, 1902).

[264] _Mishkab_ V, 6. Hughes’ _Dictionary of Islam_, p. 635

(London, 1885).

[265] _Mohammedanism_, p. 85 (New York, 1916).

[266] _Missionary Review_, 1889, p. 302.

[267] _Personal Narrative of a Pilgrimage to El-Medinah and Meccah_, p.

299 (by Richard F. Burton, Boston, 1858).

[268] “But for the earthquakes which have here and there rent the walls

and caused the roofs to fall in nothing would be missing except the

woodwork carried off by the builders of more recent cities. The removal

of the basalts and other hard materials drawn from the quarries of the

district would have been too troublesome and expensive.” _The Earth

and Its Inhabitants_, Vol. IV, p. 285 (New York, 1885).

[269] “Nel far le mercanzie, non si contano, ma si pesano casse intere

di denari; e non si fa mai compra o vendita dove non corran quaranta,

cinquanta, ottanta o centomila que piu a minuto non si parla e sarebbe

vergogna.” _Viaggi di Pietro della Valle_, Vol. I, p. 331

(Brighton, 1843).

When one remembers the purchasing power of money in the time of the

illustrious patrician compared with what it is now, the sums mentioned

were indeed considerable.

[270] _Op. cit._, Vol. I, p. 353.

[271] _The Voyage of John Huyghen Van Linschoten to the East Indies_,

Vol. I, p. 48 (pub. by the Hakluyt Society, London, 1885). “Merchants

come thither”--Ormuz--“from India with ships loaded with spicery

and precious stones, pearls, cloths of silk and gold, elephants’

teeth and many other wares, which they sell to the merchants of

Hormos”--Ormuz--“and which these in turn carry all over the world to

dispose of again. In fact ’tis a city of immense trade.” _The Book of

Ser Marco Polo the Venetian Concerning the Kingdoms and Marvels of the

East_, Vol. I, p. 107 (trans. by H. Yule, London, 1903).

[272] _Hakluyt’s Voyages_, Vol. V, p. 446 (Glasgow, 1904).

[273] “Mettendo attorno al campo della carovana ... molte sentinelle

che tutta la notte scorrevano intorno e gridavano, (secondo la lors

usanza) agli amici que stessero all ’erta ed ai nemici che non si

accostassero.” _Op. cit._, Vol. I, p. 353.

[274] _See_ Vol. I, p. 7.

[275] “Vivendi licentia, inquies, illos allicit. Ita puto: sed

aliquid aliud est quod illos sub boni verique specie decipiat.

Habet nimirum hæc superstitio quidquid plausibile ac probabile in

Christiana Religione reperitur et quæ naturæ legi ac lumini consèntanea

videntur. Mysteria illa fidei nostræ quæ primo aspectu inchedibilia

et impossibiblia apparent, et præcipue quæ nimis ardua humanæ naturæ

consentur, penitus excludit.” _Op. cit._ Tom. I, p. 4.

[276] _Dictionnaire Philosophique_, s. v. “Mahometanisme.”

[277] _Mankind and the Church_, p. 289 (by G. A. Lefroy, London, 1907).

[278] “A certain solidarity characterizes not only family relations

but all Moslem society. There are no paupers; almsgiving is not a

mere theoretical obligation but an essential religious duty really

discharged. It may be replied that there are many beggars. There are

and the spectacle is very unpleasant; but from the beggars’ point of

view, could they, given their misfortunes, have a better life? If

one has twisted limbs or any incurable malady, including laziness,

is it not more healthy, interesting and lucrative to sit begging at

street-corners than to be the inmate of a charitable institution?

One thing is certain--Moslem beggars never starve.” _Turkey in

Europe_, p. 176 (by Sir Charles Eliot, London, 1908).

[279] Lieutenant Wood, the gallant explorer of the Oxus, referring to

this subject, writes: “Often ... have I observed that the Mohammedans,

both old and young, however worn out by fatigue or suffering from

hunger and thirst, have postponed all thought of self-indulgence to

their duty to their God.

It is not with them the mere force of habit; it is the strong

impression on their minds that the duty of prayer is so important that

no circumstance can excuse its omission.” _Journey to the Source of

the Oxus_, p. 93 (London, 1872).

[280] These good reports about Mohammedans are not of recent date. Read

what Ricoldus de Monte Crucis, a Dominican missionary among them in the

thirteenth century, has to say of them: “Quis enim non obstupescat si

diligenter consideret quanta ... devotio in oratione, misericordia ad

pauperes, reverencia ad nomen Dei et prophetas et loca sancta, gravitas

in moribus, affabilitas ad extraneos, concordia et amor ad suos.”

_Peregrinatores Medii Ævi Quatuor_, p. 131 (by J. C. M. Laurent,

Leipsic, 1864).

[281] Regarding the Armenian’s capacity for business, Mr. Curzon has

wittily remarked, that, while “it takes four Turks to cheat one Frank,

two Franks to cheat one Greek and two Greeks to cheat one Jew, it takes

six Jews to cheat one Armenian.” _Researches in the Highlands of

Turkey_, Vol. I, p. 8 (by H. F. Tozer, London, 1869).

According to Dr. Schliemann, however, the palm for business ability

must be awarded to the Greeks from the island of Lesbos. “The Lesbian

Greeks,” he tells us, “have the reputation of being the shrewdest

merchants in the world; as a proof it is alleged that in cities the

commerce of which is in the hands of Lesbians not a Jew is to be

found.” _Troja_, p. 324.

[282] The learned Benedictine, Father Parisot, has recently collected

the vocabulary of this interesting dialect which is threatened with

early extinction.

[283] This peculiarity is explained by the fact that when the Jews and

Moors were expelled from Spain at the end of the fifteenth century tens

of thousands of Jews migrated to Salonica and Constantinople where

Spanish is still spoken by large numbers of their descendants.

[284] A like superstition attaches to nearly all similar remains of

antiquity not only in Syria but in Egypt as well. Some are reputed to

have special virtues for those suffering from tic-douloureux or from

rheumatism for which affections they are said by Orientals to possess

even greater curative properties than their famous panacea--the bezoar

stone.

[285] Ibn Butlan, a noted Arabian physician, and a Christian, of

Bagdad, who visited Aleppo in the middle of the eleventh century thus

refers to this curious tradition: “In the lower part of the castle

is a cave where he”--Abraham--“concealed his flocks. When he milked

these, the people used to come for their milk crying ‘_Halaba ya

la_’?--Milked yet or not?--asking thus one of the other, and hence

the city came to be called Halab--Milked.” _Cf._ G. le Strange’s

_Palestine Under the Moslems_, p. 363 (London, 1890).

[286] _The Hittites_, p. 12 (London, 1903).

[287] Genesis xxiii.

[288] Ezekiel xvi: 3.

[289] Kings ii: 12.

[290] St. Jerome in the beginning of his commentary on the gospel of

St. Matthew, pertinently observes in this connection: “Notandum est ...

nullam sanctarum assumi mulierum sed eas quas Scriptura reprehendit: ut

que propter peccatores venerat, de peccatoribus nascens, omnium peccata

deleret. Unde et in consequentibus Ruth Moabitis ponitur et Bethsabee

uxor Uriæ.”

[291] _Travels in Syria and the Holy Land_, p. 147 (London, 1822).

[292] _Cf._ _The Language of the Hittites_ in _The Times Literary

Supplement_, p. 180 (London, April 3, 1919).

[293] When the speech of the Hittites ceased to be a living tongue

cannot even be surmised. St. Paul heard it in Lystra of Lycaonia,

but how much later it may have continued to be spoken in certain

other parts of Asia Minor cannot now be determined. As a people they

doubtless long survived and, although they were gradually absorbed

by neighboring races, “it is believed that some of them still exist,

with their early distinctive characteristics, among the hills of the

anti-Taurus range.”

We are likewise in ignorance as to when the languages of Egypt and

Babylonia gave place to those of their conquerors. According to Sayce

“the Egyptian hieroglyphics were still written and read in the time of

Decius, the cuneiform characters of Babylon were employed in the age

of Domitian.” _The Ancient Empires of the East_, p. ix (New York,

1886).

[294] According to recent investigations this was probably what is now

known as the Wady el ’Arish and not the Nile, as usually supposed.

[295] Genesis xii: 5.

[296] Sayce’s _Lectures on the Origin and Growth of Religion as

Illustrated by the Religion of the Ancient Babylonians_, p. 410

(London, 1898). Lucius Ampelius writing in his _Liber Memorialis_,

Cap. II, of the origin of the constellations, refers to a more

extraordinary legend in connection with the Euphrates. “_Pisces

ideo pisces quia bello Gigantum Venus perturbata in piscem se

transfiguravit. Nam dicitur et in Euphrate fluvio ovum piscis in ora

flumimis columba adsedisse dies plurimos et exclusisse deam benignam

et misericordem hominibus ad bonam vitam. Utrique memoriæ causa pisces

inter sidera locati._”

[297] For an interesting report on the excavations made at Djerabis on

behalf of the British Museum, see the beautifully illustrated monograph

_Carchemish_ (by D. G. Hogarth, London, 1915).

[298] It is to this legend that is due the Mussulman name--Nimroud

Dagh--the Mountain of Nimrod--of the elevation on which stands the

citadel of Urfa.

[299] In the “Testament of St. Ephrem,” as given by Assemani, occurs

the words “Benedicta civitas, ... Edessa sapientum mater, quæ ex vivo

Filii ore benedictionem per ejus discipulum accepit. Illa igitur

benedictio in ea maneat donec Sanctus apparuerit.” _Bibliotheca

Orientalis_, Tom. I, p. 141 (Rome, 1719).

[300] _Cf._ _Histoire Politique, Religieuse et Littéraire d’ Edesse

jusque à la Première Croisade_, p. 81 (by R. Duval, Paris, 1892).

[301] _Ecclesiastical History_, Bk. I, Chap. XIII.

[302] An ancient manuscript in the British Museum contains a service

book of Saxon times, in which the letter of Our Lord to Abgar follows

the Lord’s Prayer and the Apostle’s Creed. At the end of the letter,

which is in the Latin version of Rufinus, occurs the words: “Sive in

domu tua, sive in civitate tua, sive in omni loco nemo inimicorum

tuorum dominabit. Et insidias diaboli ne timeas et carmina inimicorum

tuorum destruuntur (sic), et omnes inimici tui expellentur a te: sive

a grandine, sive a tonitrua (sic) non noceberis, et ab omni periculo

liberaberis: sive in mare, sive in terra, sive in die, sive in nocte,

sive in locis obscuris. Si quis hanc epistolam secum habuerit, securus

ambulet in pace.” _Cf._ _Ancient Syriac Documents Relative

to the Earliest Establishment of Christianity in Edessa and the

Neighboring Countries, from the Year after Our Lord’s Ascension to

the Beginning of the Fourth Century, Discovered, Edited, Translated

and Annotated by the late W. Cureton_, p. 154 (London, 1864). See

also _The Book of Cerne_, p. 205, _et seq._ (by the erudite

Benedictine, Dom. A. B. Kuypers, Cambridge, England, 1902).

[303] For a critical discussion of the “Legend of Abgar” see _Les

Origines de l’Eglise d’Edesse et La Légende d’ Abgar_ (by the

learned Sulpician, L. J. Tixeront, Paris, 1888).

“The practice of keeping this letter as a philactery prevailed in

England till the last century.... ‘The common people’ there have had

it in their houses in many places in a frame with a picture before it

and they generally with much honesty and devotion regard it as the word

of God and the genuine epistle of Christ.’... I have a recollection of

having seen the same thing in cottages in Shropshire.” Cureton, _op.

cit._, p. 155.

[304] In the province of Osrhoene, about a day’s journey from Edessa,

was a celebrated mart called Batne, where the Indians and the Seres

came to trade with the Edessenes and rich merchants from other

cities at an annual fair which was held in this place in the month

of September. Here, Ammianus Marcellinus informs us “magna promiscuæ

fortunæ convenit multitudo ad commercanda quæ Indi et Seres aliaque

plurima vehi terra marique consueta.” _Rerum Gestarum_, Lib. XIV,

Cap. III, 3.

For an illuminating map showing the importance of Edessa as a trade

center during Roman times, see V. Chapot’s _La Frontière de

L’Euphrate de Pompée à la Conquête Arabe_, facing p. 402 (Paris,

1907).

[305] L. J. Tixeront, _op. cit._, p. 7, _et seq._

[306] _Cf._ _The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Record

and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia_, p. 200 (by T. G. Pinches,

London, 1908).

[307] Genesis xi: 31.

[308] Ibid., 17.

[309] Purgatorio, XXVII, 94–108. Dante but follows the teaching of the

Angelic Doctor who, writing on the active and the contemplative life,

declares: “Istæ duæ vitæ significantur per duas uxores Jacob: activa

quidem per Liam, contemplativa vero per Rachelem; et per duas mulieres

quæ Dominum hospitio receperunt: contemplativa quidem per Mariam,

activa vero per Martham.” _Summ. Theol._ Pars II, 2dæ, Q CLXXIX,

Art. i.

[310] _Cf._ _The Book of the Bee_, p. 95–97, from the Syriac of _Mar

Solomon, Bishop of Basra_ (trans. by E. A. W. Budge, Oxford, 1886).

[311] Students of history will remember that the Emperor Carcacalla

was assassinated at Haran by one of his soldiers while on a visit to

the temple of the Moon. The Roman general Crassus suffered a crushing

defeat at the same place and was treacherously slain in the vicinity

while in a conference with a Persian satrap.

[312] “Quæ jam a Mithradati regni temporibus, ne Oriens a Persis

occuparetur, viribus restitit maximis.” Lib. XXV, Cap. IX.

[313] _Cf._ Assemani, _op. cit._, Tom. III, Part II, p. 927, _et seq._

Nisibis, “la grand metropole nestorienne, vit naïtre dans ses murs

la première Université théologique, les premiers cours publics de

théologie. Ce phenomene qui excitait l’admiration et étonnement du

_quæstor sacri palatii_ de Justinien ne peut que nous donner une

idée avantageuse de la culture du clerge nestorien a cette époque de

son histoire.” _Le Christianisme dan l’Empire Perse sous la Dynastie

Sassanide, (224–632)_, p. 301 (by J. Labourt, Paris, 1904).

[314] Dion Cassius, _History of Rome_, Bk. I, XVIII, 26.

[315] Genesis xxxv: 8.

[316] “In such circumstances,” writes one who knew the desert well,

“the mind is influenced through the body. Though your mouth glows and

your skin is parched with heat, yet you feel no languor, the effect of

humid heat; your lungs are lightened, your sight brightens, your memory

recovers its tone and your spirits become exuberant; your fancy and

imagination are powerfully aroused and the wildness and sublimity of

the scenes around you stir up all the energies of your soul--whether

for exertion, danger or strife. Your _morale_ improves; you become

frank and cordial, hospitable and single-minded: the hypocritical

politeness and the slavery of civilization are left behind you in the

city.... All feel their hearts dilate and their pulses beat strong

as they look down from their dromedaries upon the glorious desert.

Where do we hear of a traveler being disappointed by it? It is another

illustration of the ancient truth that Nature returns to man, however

unworthily he has treated her. And believe me, when once your tastes

have conformed to the tranquillity of such travel, you will suffer real

pain in returning to the turmoil of civilization. You will anticipate

the bustle and confusion of artificial life, its luxury and its false

pleasures with repugnance. Depressed in spirits you will for a time

after your return feel incapable of bodily or mental exertion. The

air of cities will suffocate you and the care-worn and cadaverous

countenances of citizens will haunt you like a vision of judgment.”

_Personal Narrative of a Pilgrimage to Al-Medinah and Meccah_,

Vol. I, pp. 150, 151 (by Richard F. Burton, London, 1893).

[317] _A celeritate Tigris incipit vocari. Ita appellant Medi

sagittam._ Pliny, _Naturalis Historia_, VI, XXVII.

[318] We have seen in a previous chapter how unfounded is this

statement.

[319] _The Book of Ser Marco Polo_, Vol. I, p. 60 (trans. by H. Yule,

London, 1903).

[320] _Geschichte der Ilchaner_, Vol. I, p. 191 (Darmstadt, 1842).

[321] Acts of the Apostles, ii: 9, 11.

[322] See map III of Heussi and Mulert’s _Atlas zur Kirchengeschichte_

for the extensive territory occupied by the Nestorian Church during its

greatest development.

[323] The dwelling of the Patriarch, as described by a noted traveler

of the last century, “is solidly built of hewn-stone and stands on the

very edge of a precipice overhanging a ravine through which winds a

branch of the Zab. A dark vaulted passage led us into a room scarcely

better lighted by a small window closed by a greased sheet of coarse

paper. The tattered remains of a felt carpet, spread in a corner, was

the whole of its furniture. The garments of the Patriarch were hardly

less worn and ragged. Even the miserable allowance of 300 piastres,

about £2 10s., which the Porte had promised to pay him monthly on his

return to the mountains was long in arrears, and he was supported

entirely by the contributions of his faithful but poverty-stricken

flock. Kochanes was, moreover, still a heap of ruins.” _Discoveries

among the ruins of Nineveh and Babylon, with Travels in Armenia,

Kurdistan and the Desert_, p. 363 (by A. H. Layard, New York, 1856).

[324] “La progression des Chrétians a été la suivante; en 1750, zéro;

en 1856, de 30,000 a 40,000; en 1900, 66,000. Tout donne à espérer

que le retour définitif des Nestoriens à la foi portera bientot et

définitivement ce nombre, si ce n’est deja un fait accomplit, a

140,000.” _Les Missions Catholiques Francaises au XIXe Siècle_, p.

271 (Paris, 1900).

[325] For the dogmatic definitions of the Church at the General

Councils of Ephesus and Chalcedon against the heresies of Nestorius and

Eutyches see Denzinger’s _Enchiridion_, pp. 52, 65.

[326] The word Copt is apparently derived from the middle part of the

Greek word _Aigyptos_ which means Egyptian. It is, however, always

used to indicate a member of the Egyptian Monophysite Church.

[327] Melchite is a Græco-Syriac word which signifies imperial. It was

given at the outbreak of the Monophysite schism to those Christians in

Syria, Palestine, and Egypt who accepted the decrees of Chalcedon and

remained loyal to the Emperor in Constantinople and to the Catholic

Church. The name is now applied to the Uniates of these lands.

[328] _Cf._ _Verfassung und gegenwärtiger Bestand Sämtilicler Kirchen

des Orients_, p. 384 (by I. Silbernagl, Regensburg, 1904).

[329] _The Orthodox Eastern Church_, p. 19 (by A. Fortescue, London,

1908).

[330] Fortescue, _op. cit._, p. 15.

[331] Not having a hierarchy, the Protestants in Turkey do not

constitute a _Millet_. The Porte has consequently organized them,

consisting chiefly of a small number of converted Armenians, and

Syrians, into a special group under the Minister of Police.

[332] Among Orientals a common designation of Franks, which, since

the time of the Crusades, has been applied to all the inhabitants of

Western Europe.

[333] _Paradiso_, VI, I, 2.

[334] Addressing once a company of bishops Constantine declared: “You

are bishops whose jurisdiction is within the Church; I also am a bishop

ordained by God to overlook whatever is external to the Church.”

Eusebius, _The Life of Constantine_, IV, 24.

[335] Fortescue, _op. cit._, p. 28.

[336] _The Churches Separated from Rome_, p. 151 (by L. Duchesne, New

York, 1907).

“For three centuries after the foundation of New Rome,” writes

Freeman, “Latin remained the tongue of government, law and warfare;

and down to the last days of the Empire survivals of its use in that

character still lingered on.... But Greek was from the beginning the

tongue of literature and religion; and, even under Justinian himself,

it began to creep into use as an alternative language of the law of

Rome.--Gradually the Greek tongue displaced Latin for all purposes, but

not till it had received a large infusion of Latin technical terms....

Save this technical Latin infusion the tongue of Constantinople was

thoroughly Greek. The strange spectacle was there to be seen of an

Emperor of the Romans, a Patriarch of New Rome, a Roman Senate and

People glorying in the Roman name, and deriving their whole political

existence from a Roman source, but in whose eyes the speech of Ennius

and Tacitus and Claudian was simply the despised idiom of Western

heretics and barbarians.” _Historical Essays_, Third Series, pp.

248, 249 (London, 1879).

[337] How great was their exasperation at the Pope’s action is evinced

by the language they addressed to Luitprand, Archbishop of Cremona,

when, in 968, he went on an embassy to Constantinople. “But,” they

indignantly declare, “the mad and silly Pope does not know that St.

Constantine transferred the imperial scepter, all the senate and the

whole Roman army hither, and that at Rome he left only vile creatures

such as fishermen, pastrycooks, bird-catchers, bastards, plebeians and

slaves.” _Cf._ Fortescue, _op. cit._, p. 94.

[338] _Cf._ _Le Schisme Oriental du XI Siècle_, p. 275 (by L. Brehier,

Paris, 1899).

[339] Now that the crash had come “one asks oneself what else the

Legates could have done. They had waited long enough, and, if ever a

man clearly showed that he wanted schism, it was Cerularius. He had

already excommunicated the Pope by taking his name off the diptychs.

We should note that this is the only sentence that the Roman Church

pronounced against the Eastern Communion. She has never excommunicated

it as such nor the other patriarchs. If they lost her communion it was

because they too, following Cerularius’ example, struck the Pope’s name

from their diptychs.” Fortescue, _op. cit._, p. 185.

[340] Although Innocent III, preacher of the Crusade, promptly

excommunicated the Crusaders for their perfidy and treachery, the

Greeks, nevertheless, persisted in declaring that His Holiness was the

real cause of their misfortunes.

[341] According to the custom that subsequently prevailed it was the

Grand Vizier who, in the Sultan’s name, gave the _berat_ to the

newly appointed Patriarch. As to bishops-elect it was obligatory that

they should receive their _berat_ from the government before their

consecration.

[342] Thus, during the seventy-five years between 1625 and 1700,

there were no fewer than 50 patriarchs whose average tenure of office

was a year and a half. Compare this with the long reign--seventy-two

years--of Gregory XVI, Pius IX, and Leo XIII whose average tenure of

office was twenty-four years--just thirty-six times as long as that of

the unfortunate Patriarchs in question.

[343] _Hom. II in Ephesios._

[344] “The Holy Father,” as Mgr. Duchesne beautifully declares, “has

put all his heart into it; I might almost say, he had put only his

heart into it.” _Op. cit._, p. 41.

[345] “Eo vel magis quod non ingenti discrimine seiunguntur: imo, si

pauca excipias, sic cetera consentimus, ut in ipsis catholici nominis

vindiciis non raro ex doctrina, ex more, ex ritibus, quibus orientales

utuntur, testimonia atque argumenta promanus.”

[346] Inferno XXVIII, 35.

[347] _Lectures on the History of the Eastern Church_, pp. 2, 30

(London, 1861).

The testimony of Professor H. Gelzer, likewise a Protestant, is

almost the same as that of Dean Stanley. Writing of the monastic

establishments of the Orthodox Church he pertinently inquires: “While

the Catholic Orders as teaching and nursing bodies have become an

important element in the civilization of the nineteenth century, what

have Athos, Sinai, Patmos or Megaspilion been doing? The Greeks often

bitterly complain of the mighty progress of Catholic propaganda, but

they must themselves admit that the best schools and hospitals in

Turkey belong to the Catholic Orders.” _Von Heiligen Berge und aus

Makendonien_, p. 2 (Leipsig, 1904).

[348] _Das Testament Leos_ XIII, in _Reden und Aufsätze_, Vol. II, p.

279 (Geissen, 1904).

[349] Fortescue, _op. cit._, p. 432, 433.

[350] Psalms, xliv: 10, “Neque aliud fortasse mirabilius est,”

declares the Sovereign Pontiff, “ad catholicitatis notam in Ecclesia

Dei illustrandam, quam singulare quod ei præbent obsequium dispares

cæremoniarum formæ nobilesque vestustatis linguæ, ex ipsa Apostolorum

et Patrum consuetudine nobiliares; fere ad imitationem obsequii

lectissimi quod Christi divino Ecclesiæ auctori, exhibitum est

nascenti, quum Magi ex varii Orientis plagis devecti venerunt ...

adorare eum.”

[351] St. Paul to the Ephesians, iv: 13.

[352] St. John’s Gospel, xvii: 20, 21.

[353] Jonah, iv: 11. Those “that knew not how to distinguish between

their right hand and their left,” is supposed to refer to young

children.

[354] Genesis x: 11.

[355] iii: 19.

[356] ii: 13–15.

[357] _Anabasis_, Bk. III, Chap. 4. _Cf._ also _Travels in the Track of

the Ten Thousand_, p. 139 _et seq._ (by W. F. Ainsworth, London, 1844).

[358] _Charon_, 23.

[359] Even Cicero, declares: “Et apud Herodotum, patrem historiæ ...

sunt innumerabiles fabulæ.” _De Legisbus_ Lib. I, Cap. I.

[360] Arabian writers, it is true, had agreed “during nine hundred

years, in identifying the mounds on the east bank of the Tigris

opposite Mosul with the ruins of Nineveh” but their views were so far

from meeting with general acceptance that so late as 1843 the great

French explorer, Botta, was convinced when he uncovered the wonderful

palace of Sargon II, King of Assyria, B. C. 721–705, that the site of

Nineveh was occupied by the ruins of Khorsabad. But the noted English

investigator, Layard, “contrary to the teachings of Arabian and Syrian

historians and local tradition,” was equally positive that “the ruins

of Nineveh were buried under the mound of Nimroud,” which is twenty

miles to the south of the actual site of the famous Assyrian capital

which was so long the rival and eventually the conqueror of Babylon.

_Cf._ _By Nile and Tigris_, Vol. II, p. 8 _et seq._, 15,

16 (by E. A. Wallis Budge, London, 1920).

[361] _The Buried City of the East: Nineveh_, Preface (London, 1851).

[362] _Nineveh and Its Palaces. The Discoveries of Botta and Layard

Applied to the Elucidation of Holy Writ_, p. 1 _et seq._ (by J.

Bonomi, London, 1852).

[363] “At the end of the seventeenth century, B.C., Asurbanipal’s

sculptors at Nineveh were representing horses which the frieze of

the Parthenon can hardly equal, and lions which no sculptor has ever

surpassed in careful observations and truthful delineation.” _The

Ancient History of the Near East_, p. 536 (by H. R. Hall, London,

1913).

[364] vi: 1.

[365] See his _Discoveries in the Ruins of Nineveh and Babylon_, pp.

342–345 (London, 1853); _cf._ also _Hormuzd Rassam’s Asshur and the

Land of the Nimrod_, p. 31 (New York, 1897), which gives an account

of the discovery of more tablets, among which were the famed Deluge

tablets.

[366] Relaçam em que se tratam as guerras e grandes victorias que

alcançou o grãde rey da Persia Xa Abbas do grão Turco Mahometto and seu

Filho Amethe, pello Padre F. Antonio de Gouvea (Lisboa, 1611).

[367] _Purchas His Pilgrimes_, Part II, pp. 1533, 1534 (London, 1625).

[368] As to the signification of the strange, wedge-shaped character

described by the noted Italian traveler, Pietro della Valle admits that

he knows nothing. In the fifteenth chapter of his _Viaggi_ he

frankly declares: “E queste iscritzioni in que lingua e lettera siano

non si sa perchè è caratere oggi ignoto.”

[369] _Some Yeares Travels into Divers Parts of Asia and Afrique_, p.

145 _et seq._ (London, 1638).

[370] Chardin became an English citizen and achieved such fame as a

traveler that a tablet was dedicated to his memory in Westminster Abbey

bearing the legend “Sir John Chardin--_nomen sibi fecit eundo_.”

[371] _Explorations in Bible Lands during the 19th Century_, pp. 23, 24

(by H. V. Hilprecht, Philadelphia, 1903).

How Grotefend achieved such marvelous success when others, apparently

more competent than he, had failed has been explained by the fact that

“he early displayed a remarkable aptitude for the solution of riddles:

a peculiar talent which he shared in common with Dr. Hincks, who also

acquired great distinction as a cuneiform scholar.” _The Discovery

and Decipherment of the Trilingual Cuneiform Inscriptions_, p. 169

(by A. J. Booth, London, 1902).

Dr. R. W. Rogers, in his instructive work, _A History of Babylonia

and Assyria_, Vol. I, p. 61 (New York, 1915), referring to the same

subjects, writes:

“It were difficult, if not impossible, to define the qualities of

mind which must inhere in the decipherer of a forgotten language. He

is not necessarily a great scholar, though great scholars have been

successful decipherers. He may know but little of the languages that

are cognate with the one whose secrets he is trying to unravel. He may,

indeed, know nothing of them, as has several times been the case. But

the patience, the persistence, the power of combination, the divine

gift of insight, the historical sense, the feeling for archæological

indications, these must be present, and all of these were present in

the extraordinary man, Grotefend, who now attacked the problem that had

baffled so many.”

[372] Hilprecht, _op. cit._, p. 71; _cf._ _A Memoir of Major General

Sir Henry Creswicke Rawlinson_, pp. 143–148, 153–157 (by his brother,

Canon George Rawlinson, London, 1898); Booth, _op. cit._, pp. 106–114.

[373] Although it was supposed that this prize, awarded by so learned

a body as the French Institute, would be tantamount to _une sanction

qui devrait dissiper toutes les susceptibilités_, many remained

as skeptical as ever and continued “to decry a language in which one

can never know if a syllable is ideographic or phonetic, and, when

phonetic, which of two or three different values it may have in that

place.” _Cf._ A. J. Booth, _op. cit._, p. 416.

[374] _Op. cit._, pp. 118, 119.

[375] _New Light on the Bible and the Holy Land_, p. 10 (by B. T.

Evetts, New York).

[376] _The Civilization of Babylonia and Assyria_, p. 110 (by M.

Jastrow, Philadelphia, 1915).

[377] A few years before his death, when presiding at the commencement

exercises of the College of Dole, in the Department of the Jura in

which he was born and brought up, Pasteur told his youthful audience:

“When one has studied much, one comes back to the faith of a Breton

peasant; as to myself, had I studied more I should have the faith of a

Breton peasant-woman.” _The Ave Maria_, February 14, 1920.

[378] _Bible, Science and Faith_, p. 314, 315 (Baltimore, 1895). _Cf._

also _Evolution and Dogma_, Chap. VIII (by J. A. Zahm, Chicago, 1896).

[379] _Babel und Bibel_, p. 4 (Leipzig, 1903).

[380] A name which, as we have seen, is also applied to the Euphrates.

[381] _Cf._ R. I. Wilberforce in _The Five Empires_, Chaps. XV, XVIII

(London, 1852).

[382] _Alexander the Great_, p. 368 (by B. I. Wheeler, New York,

1900).

[383] Creasy’s _Decisive Battles of the World_, p. 79 (New York,

1899).

It was at Arbela, where was to be settled once for all the question of

world supremacy, that Alexander, when counseled by his generals to make

a night attack on Darius, gave the famous answer οὐ κλέπτο τἠν νίκην--I

steal no victory--words that were his motto during his eventful and

brilliant career.

[384] _Voyages en Turquie, en Perse et aux Indes_, Vol I, p. 185

(Paris, 1677).

[385] Die Bedeutung des heutigen Namen’s Kal. ‘at Schergat ist bis

jetzt unaufgeklärt geblieben und durfte vielleicht eine Altassyrische

Reminiscenz bergen. _Vom Mittelmer zum Persischen_ Golf. Vol.

II, p. 210 (by M. von Oppenheim, Berlin, 1900). His countryman, Baron

Thielmann, writing of the same ruins a quarter of a century earlier,

declares: “This great field of ruin with its pyramid looks truly

venerable, but science has as yet made no discoveries here which

could help us solve the mystery of this remnant of an ancient era.”

_Journey in the Caucasus, Persia and Turkey in Asia_, Vol. II, p.

136 (London, 1875).

[386] _Cf._ Sayce _Lectures on the Origin and Growth of Religion

as Illustrated by the Religion of the Ancient Babylonians_, p. 122

(London, 1898).

[387] See Jastrow, _op. cit._, p. 229.

[388] See W. Andræ’s _Der Anu-Adad-Tempel in Assur_ (Leipsic, 1909);

and his _Die Festungswerke von Assur_ (Leipsic, 1913).

[389] _Op. cit._, Vol. I, p. 328.

[390] See _Die Stelenreien in Assur_, p. ii (by Walter Andræ, Leipsic,

1913).

[391] “Many other works of Semiramis,” writes Strabo, “besides those

of Babylon, are extant in almost every part of this continent, as,

for example, earth-works which are called mounds of Semiramis, walls

and fortresses, aqueducts and cisterns for water, stair-like roads

over mountains, canals communicating with rivers and lakes; roads and

bridges.” _Geography_, Bk. XVI, Chap. II.

[392] Polyænus _Strategemeta_, VIII, 26.

[393] _Cf._ _La Légende de Semiramis_, pp. 22, 23 (by François

Lenormant), in _Mémoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres

et des Beaux Arts de Belgique_, Tom. XL (1873).

[394] A. H. Sayce in _Herodotos, with Notes, Introductions and

Appendices_, p. 105 (London, 1883).

[395] Ibid., p. 303.

[396] Ibid., p. 362.

[397] Mr. Robertson Smith in _The English Historical Review_, Vol.

II, p. 305, April, 1887.

[398] _Op. cit._, p. 317.

[399] As many fantastic stories are related about Dietrich von

Bern--Theodoric the Great, King of the East Goths--as there are about

Semiramis. As the Assyrian queen was said to have been nursed by doves

in her infancy and to have been transformed into a dove after her death

so, the German legends have it, Dietrich von Bern was descended from a

spirit and made his exit from the world on a black horse. In Lusatia

the mythical _Wild Huntsman_ who, during violent storms, rides

furiously across the heavens is called Dietrich von Bern. Living so

long after Semiramis it is more surprising that his life should be made

the theme of Middle High German poems and Old Norse sagas than that the

Assyrian queen should have been made the subject of oriental myth and

Greek legend.

[400] Lehmann-Haupt in his interesting and illuminating lecture on

_Die historische Semiramis und ihre Zeit_, which was delivered

before the _Deutsche Orient-Gesellschaft_ in Berlin, February

6, 1910, declares: “Von der sagenhaften Ümhüllung befreit, sehen

wir Semiramis vor uns als eine Herrschergestalt, die zu einer Zeit,

da sonst der Frau eine Beteiligung am öffentlichen Leben versagt

war, die Geschichte zweier, vornehmlich durch ihre Klugheit und

Umsicht verbundener Reiche in Krieg und Frieden entscheidendend und

durchgreifend geleitet hat.” P. 68 (Tübingen, 1910).

How different is this conclusion of the learned German, which is based

on the brilliant discoveries of Andræ and his colleagues, from that

of the distinguished Orientalist, F. Lenormant, who, as the result

of an exhaustive study of Semiramis, makes the _ex cathedra_

statement “_ce personage divin ... doit être definitivement rayé de

l’histoire_--this divine personage ought to be definitely expunged

from history.” _Op. cit._, p. 68.

[401] _Geography_, Bk. XVI, Chap. I, IX.

[402] Arrian’s _Anabasis of Alexander_, Bk. VII, Chap. VII.

[403] _Voyage au Levant_, Tom. III, p. 200 (Amsterdam, 1727).

[404] Ibid., III, p. 183.

[405] So hot is it in Susa, the Greek geographer writes, that “lizards

and serpents at midday in the summer ... cannot cross the streets quick

enough to prevent their being burnt to death midway by the heat.”

_Op. cit._, Bk. XV, Chap. III.

[406] “There are few sights more appalling than a sandstorm in the

desert, the ‘Zauba’ah,’ as the Arabs call it. Devils or pillars of

sand, vertical and inclined, measuring a thousand feet high, rush over

the plain lashing the sand at their base like a sea surging under

a furious whirlwind; shearing the grass clean away from the roots,

tearing up trees which are whirled like leaves and sticks in the air,

and sweeping away tents and houses as if they were bits of paper. At

last the columns join at the top and form, perhaps three thousand feet

above the earth, a gigantic cloud of yellow sand which obliterates not

only the horizon but even the midday sun. These sand-spouts are the

terror of travelers.” _Thousand and One Nights_, Vol. I, p. 114

(by Richard F. Burton, Benares, 1885).

[407] _Narrative of a Residence in Koordistan and on the Site of

Ancient Nineveh with a Journal of a Voyage down the Tigris to Bagdad_,

Vol. II, p. 148 (London, 1836).

[408] _Journey in the Caucasus, Persia and Turkey in Asia_, Vol. II, p.

138 (London, 1875).

[409] _Convito_, IV., 2.

[410] _Divina Commedia_, IV, v. 121, _et seq._

[411] Moore’s _Lalla Rookh_, p. 181 (New York, 1890).

[412] _Life and Letters of E. B. Cowell_, p. 318 (by G. Cowell, London,

1904).

[413] Daniel, iii.

[414] _Op. cit._, II, 139.

[415] Gertrude L. Bell, in _Amurath to Amurath_, p. 246 (London,

1911).

[416] “Le Khalife, alors tout-puissant, vivait là au milieu de ses

milices et de tous les grands scheiks de son royaume, plus entouré

de courtisans que Louis XIV à Versailles. Il réservait d’ailleurs

toutes ses faveurs à ceux qui venaient embellir Samara en coustruisant

quelques belles residences dans le voisinage du palais.” _Description

du Palais de Al-Moutasim Fils d’Haroun-al-Raschid à Samara et de

Quelques Monuments Arabs connus de la Mesopotamia_, p. 23 and plate

XIV (par M. H. Violet, Paris, 1909). _Cf._ Sarre und Herzfeld’s

illuminating monograph on Samara.

[417] _Cf._ Von Oppenheim, _op. cit._, II, p. 221.

[418] _Op. cit._, p. 381.

[419] _Cf._ _Travels and Researches in Asia Minor, Mesopotamia,

Chaldea and Armenia_, Vol. II, p. 152 (by W. F. Ainsworth, London,

1842).

[420] _Les Missions Catholiques Françaises au XIXe Siècle_, Tom.

I, p. 223, _et seq._ (Paris, 1900).

[421] _Cf._ _Histoire de l’Empire Ottoman_, Tom. I, p. 172 _et seq._

(by the Vicomte De la Jonquière, Paris, 1914).

[422] _Du Caucasus au Golfe Persique à travers l’Arménie, le Kurdistan

et la Mesopotamie_, p. 458 _et seq._ (by P. Müller-Simonis and H.

Hyvernat, Washington, 1892).

[423] See the interesting work of Mme. Dieulafoy on _La Perse, la

Chaldée et la Susiane_, p. 576 _et seq._ (Paris, 1887).

[424] _Turquie Agonisante_, p. 137 (Paris, 1913).

[425] _Baghdad during the Abbassid Caliphate from Contemporary Arabic

and Persian Sources_, pp. 12–14 (by G. Le Strange, Oxford, 1900).

[426] Le Strange, _op. cit._, p. 64 _et seq._

[427] Le Strange, _op. cit._, p. 71.

[428] _The Book of Ser Marco Polo_, Vol. I, p. 63 (translated and

edited by H. Yule, London, 1903).

[429] _Bibliothèque Orientale_, Tom. I, p. 326 (The Hague, 1777).

[430] _Op. cit._, I, 72.

[431] _History of the Mongols from the Ninth to the Nineteenth

Century_, Part III, p. 127 (by H. H. Howorth, London, 1888).

[432] See _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society_, on a _Greek

Embassy to Bagdad 917, A. D._ (January, 1897).

[433] _Cf._ Gibbon’s _Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire_,

Chap. LII.

[434] At this period, Sir Richard Burton tells us, London and Paris

were in a state of quasi-savagery and “their palatial halls were spread

with rushes.”

[435] Bagdad, at the zenith of its grandeur under Harun-al-Rashid,

was the worthy successor of Babylon and Nineveh. It “had outrivalled

Damascus, ‘the Smile of the Prophet,’” and “was essentially a city

of pleasure, a Paris of the ninth century.” “Thither flocked from

all parts of the oriental world the most noted and capable poets,

musicians and artificers of the time; and the first thought of the

Arabian or Persian craftsman who had completed some specially curious

or attractive specimen of his art was to repair to the capital of the

Muslim world, to submit it to the Commander of the Faithful from whom

he rarely failed to receive a rich reward for his labors. Surrounded by

pleasure-gardens and groves of orange, tamarisk, and myrtle, refreshed

by an unfailing luxuriance of running streams, supplied either by

art or nature, the great city on the Tigris is the theme of many an

admiring ode or laudatory ghazel; and the poets of the time all agree

in describing it as being, under the rule of the great Caliph, a sort

of terrestrial paradise of idlesse and luxury, where, to use their own

expressions, the ground was irrigated with rose-water and the dust of

the roads was musk, where flowers and verdure overhung the ways and the

air was perpetually sweet with the many-voiced song of birds, and where

the chirp of lutes, the dulcet warble of flutes and the silver sound of

singing houris rose and fell in harmonious cadence from every corner of

the streets of palaces that stood in vast succession in the midst of

their gardens and orchards, gifted with perpetual verdure by the silver

abundance of the Tigris, as it sped its arrowy flight through the

thrice-blest town.” _Thousand and One Nights_, Vol. IX, pp. 333,

334 (translated by John Payne, London, 1884).

[436] _Historical View of the Literature of the South of Europe_,

Vol. I, p. 30 (New York, 1827).

[437] _Haroun-Al-Raschid, Caliph of Bagdad_, p. 53 (by E. H.

Palmer, London, 1881).

[438] Palmer, _op. cit._, p. 83.

[439] This crime, declares Sir Richard Burton, “stands out in ghastly

prominence as one of the most terrible tragedies recorded in history

and its horrible details make men write passionately on the subject to

this our day.” _Thousand and One Nights_, Vol. X, p. 142 (Benares,

1885).

[440] Sismondi, _op. cit._, I, 30.

[441]

_Tamed Greece to tame her victress now began,_

_And with her arts fair Latium over-ran._

HORACE, _Epistles_, Book II, 1.

[442] Gibbon, _op. cit._, Chap. LII.

[443] See D’Herbelot’s _Bibliothèque Orientale_, s. v. “Honain.”

[444] _Cf._ _A History of Greece_, Vol. II, p. 224 (by G.

Finlay, Oxford, 1877).

[445] _The History and Conquests of the Saracens_, p. 157 (London,

1877).

[446] Longfellow has chosen the grim episode said to have been

connected with the tragic death of Al-Mostassem at the hands of Hulagu

Khan for one of his well-known poems in which he makes his victor and

executioner address the avaricious Caliph in the following words:

_I said to the Caliph, “Thou art old,_

_Thou hast no need of so much gold;_

_Thou shouldst not have heaped and hidden it here,_

_Till the breath of battle was hot and near,_

_But have sown through the land these useless hoards,_

_To spring into shining blades and swords,_

_And keep thine honor sweet and clear.”_

* * * * *

_Then into his dungeon I locked the drone,_

_And left him there to feed all alone,_

_In the honey cells of his golden hive;_

_Never a prayer, nor a cry, nor a groan,_

_Was heard from those massive walls of stone,_

_Nor again was the Caliph seen alive._

[447] Freeman, _op. cit._, p. 132.

[448] “Tamerlan fit passer au fil de l’epée tous sea Habitants, n’

epargnant ni age, ni sexe, ni condition et fit raser rez pied, rez

terre tous ses principaux bätimens.” D’Herbelot, _op. cit._, s. v.

“Timour.”

[449] _Cf._ Gibbon, _op. cit._, Chap. LXV. “The ground which

had been occupied by flourishing cities was often marked by

his”--Timour’s--“abominable trophies--by columns or pyramids of human

heads.” Ibid., Chap. LXV. “The people of Ispahan supplied seventy

thousand human skulls for the structure of several lofty towers.”

Ibid., Chap. XXXIV.

[450] Howorth, _op. cit._, Part III, p. 1.

[451] _Cf._ Benjamin of Tudela, _op. cit._, p. 98 _et seq._ According

to the Babylonian Talmud which “became the main factor in the history

and development of Judaism,” the Jews of Babylon passed for a purer

race than those of Palestine.

[452] “_Tous les pays_,” it is said in the French translation

of the Babylonian Talmud, “_sont comme de la pâte relativement à

la Palestine, mais ce pays l’est relativement à la Babylonie._”

_Cf._ _Géographie du Talmud_, p. 320 (by A. Neubauer, Paris,

1868).

[453] The clever Ottoman author, Halil Halid, pertinently writes in

reference to this subject: “In the language of diplomacy the French

term ‘_action civilisatrice_’ may still have an impressive

sound, but owing to the free use made of it by every politician and

journalist, the sense of the term has been much contaminated with

vulgarity. The dignified charm of the English political literature

dealing with the affairs of the East has also begun to degenerate into

something like a commonplace. The notion intended by the term is this,

that when one of the mighty Powers of Christendom finds it incumbent

upon itself to take under its patronizing ægis the internal affairs

of a Muslim nation, which is incapable of holding its own, freedom,

justice and the spread of civilization will either immediately or

gradually follow the introduction of its good rule and signs of the

public well-being will spring up here, there and everywhere.

“There is no necessity to cite here any examples of the astounding work

which the civilizing Powers are doing in Eastern countries, as any one

who studies the political settlement of these countries can find ample

instances for himself. It should only be remarked that all the pains

taken in this direction are at the expense of the sovereign rights and

national independence of the people which submit to the civilizing

tutelage.” _The Crescent versus the Cross_, pp. 184, 185 (London,

1907).

[454] “Neejdee horses are especially esteemed for great speed and

endurance of fatigue; indeed in this latter quality none can come up to

them. To pass twenty-four hours on the road without drink and without

flagging is certainly something; but to keep up the same abstinence and

labor conjoined under the burning Arabian sky for forty-eight hours at

a stretch is, I believe, peculiar to animals of the breed.” _Personal

Narrative of a Journey Through Central and Eastern Arabia_, p. 310

(by W. G. Palgrave, London, 1869).

[455] The most prized horses in Arabia belong, it is said, to the

_Khamsa_, namely, to one of the _Kehilan_ breeds, which,

according to tradition, are descended from Mohammed’s five favorite

mares.

[456] _Cf._ E. Reclus, _Asia_, Vol. IV, p. 466 (New York,

1855).

[457] _Op. cit._, pp. 25, 26.

[458] See _La Province de Bagdad_, p. 108 (by Habib K. Chicha,

Cairo, 1908).

[459] “Who is so foolish as to suppose that God, after the manner of a

husbandman, planted a paradise, in Eden towards the East, and placed

in it a tree of life, visible and palpable, so that one tasting of the

fruit by the bodily teeth obtained life?” _De Principiis_, Bk. IV,

Chap. I.

[460] _De Genesi ad Litteram_, Lib. VIII, Cap. I.

[461] _Wo lag das Paradies_, p. 44 (Leipsic, 1881).

[462] Lib. II, dist. 17, c. 5, “Unde volunt in orientali parte esse

paradisum, longo interjacente spatio vel maris vel terræ a regionibus

quas incolant hominea secretum, et in alto situm, usque ad lunarem

circulum pertingentem, unde nec aquæ diluvii illuc pervenerunt.”

[463] _Cf._ _Curious Myths of the Middle Ages_, p. 255 _et

seq._ (by S. Baring Gould, London, 1892).

[464] _The Voyage and Travaile of Sir John Mandeville_, Chap. XXX.

[465] See _Select Letters of Christopher Columbus_, pp. 141–147

(translated by R. H. Major and printed for the Hakluyt Society, London,

1870).

[466] _La Nouvelle Revue_, April 15, 1893.

[467] _Atlantis, The Antediluvian World_, p. 455 (New York, 1884).

[468] _Popular Science Monthly_, p. 678, September, 1883.

[469] _Paradise Found_, p. 433 (by W. F. Warren, Boston, 1885).

[470] _The Human Species_, p. 175–177 (New York, 1890).

[471] _Histoire Ancienne de l’Orient_, Tom. I, p. 96 _et

seq._ (Paris, 1881).

[472] See chapter on The Site of the Garden of Eden, in _Science

and the Church_ (by J. A. Zahm, Chicago, 1896), from which I have

extensively drawn for the present treatment of the subject.

[473] _Cf._ _Dictionnaire de la Bible_, Tom. IV, Col. 2121

(pub. by F. Vigoroux, Paris, 1908).

[474] See _Reise der K. preussichen Gesellschaft nach Persia_,

Tom. I, p. 146 (by H. Brugsch, Leipsic, 1862).

[475] _Cf._ Dom Calmet, _Commentaire littéral sur la Genèse_,

p. 61 (Paris, 1715).

[476] Duo sunt amnes qui in unum coeunt deinde abeunt in diversas

partes. Ita flumen unum est in confluente; duo autem inferioribus

alveis sunt capita, et duo versus mare postquam rursus longius

dividi incipiunt. See his _Commentarius in Genesin_. The map of

Babylonia, which accompanies the text renders the author’s view quite

clear, although it does not specify the site of the Garden of Eden.

[477] See _The Higher Criticism and the Verdict of the Monuments_,

pp. 95, 96 (by A. H. Sayce, London, 1894). _Cf._ _The Old

Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria

and Babylonia_, Chaps. I, II (by T. G. Pinches, London, 1908);

_The Chaldean Account of Genesis_, p. 305 (by George Smith,

London, 1876).

[478] Ibid., p. 97.

[479] _Op. cit._, pp. 97, 98.

[480] _Modern Science and Bible Lands_, pp. 197, 198 (New York,

1889).

[481] _Skizze der Geschichte und Geographie Arabiens von den ältesten

Zeiten bis zum Propheten Muhammed_, Vol. II, p. 317, _et seq._

(Berlin, 1890).

[482] _Aufsätze und Abhandlungen_, p. 273 _et seq._ (Munich,

1901).

[483] “E chiaro che il narratore nel detto brano della Genesi ha avuto,

dinazi agli occhi un luogo ben noto, e si e data la pena di discriverlo

mimutamente, affinche non potessero surgere dubbi sul paese che egli

voleva indicare.” _Studi di Storia Orientale_, Vol. I, p. 121

(Milan, 1911).

[484] Referring to the discovery of the word Eden--Edina--in cuneiform

inscriptions the distinguished Assyriologist, T. G. Pinches, _op.

cit._, p. 72, writes: “That we shall ultimately find other instances

of Eden as a geographical name, occurring by itself and not in

composition with another word, as in the expression _Sipar Edina_,

and even a reference to _gannat Edinni_, ‘the Garden of Eden,’ is

to be expected.”

[485] Purgatorio, XXXIII, 145.

[486] So called because of an Eastern tradition that it was the

plantain and not the apple which was the forbidden fruit in Paradise.

It is also known as Adam’s fig.

[487] _Paradise Lost_, Bk. IV.

[488] Nature herself confesses to have given the tenderest hearts to

the human race, as she gave them tears; this is the best part of our

faculties. _Satire XV_, vv. 131–133.

[489] According to Dr. Fries, an eminent German scholar, all

games of ball are traceable back to an old light myth which was

presumably Babylonian in origin: “_Alles Ballspiel_,” he

writes, “_ja bis herab zum Lawn-Tenis auf denselben Gedanken-den

Lichtkampf-zurückgeht._” _Studien zur Odyssee_, Vol. I, p. 324

(Leipsic, 1910).

[490] _The Excavations at Babylon_, p. 15 (London, 1914).

[491] “But the devils believed not, they taught men sorcery and that

which was sent down to the two angels at Babel, Harut and Marut.”

_The Koran_, Sura II, 96.

[492] Chap. XIII, vv. 19–21. In lieu of the word “satyrs” the

_Vulgate_ has _pilosi_--the hairy ones--which is more in

keeping with the original Hebrew text.

[493] Genesis xi: 4.

[494] Ερημία μεγάλη ἐστιν ἡ μεγάλη πόλις, Bk. XVI, I, 5.

[495] _The Principal Navigations, Voyages, Traffiques and Discoveries

of the English Nation_, Vol. X, Part I, p. 63 (collected by Richard

Hakluyt, Edinburgh, 1889).

[496] “The inhabitants of these parts are as fond of attributing every

vestige of antiquity to Nimrod as those of Egypt are to Pharaoh.” Rich,

_Memoir on the Ruins of Babylon_ (London, 1818).

[497] _Op. cit._, Tom. I, p. 382 _et seq._

[498] That Della Valle had no doubt that the mound of Babil was really

the ruin of the Tower of Babel is quite evident from the positive

statement which he makes to this effect: “che sia quella Babel antica è

la torre di Nembrotto, non c’è dubbio, secondo me, perche oltre che il

sito lo dimostra, da’ paesani ancora oggidi è conisciuta per tale, ed

in Arabico è chiamata volgarmente Babel.” _Op. cit._, p. 384.

[499] Koldewey, _op. cit._, p. 11, _et seq._

[500] _Op. cit._, p. 101.

[501] _Travels in Georgia, Persia, Armenia, Ancient Babylonia_,

Vol. II, p. 365 (by Robert Ker Porter, London, 1822).

[502] _Op. cit._, p. 317. The Jews of Babylonia call the tower of

Birs-Nimrud “Nebuchadnezzar’s prison,” for what reason is not clear.

[503] _The Old Testament in the Light of Historical Records and

Legends of Assyria and Babylonia_, p. 138 (by T. G. Prinches,

London, 1908).

[504] _Observations Connected with the Astronomy and Ancient History,

Sacred and Profane, on the Ruins of Babylon_, p. 2 (by T. Maurice,

London, 1816).

[505] Ibid., Vol. II, p. 336.

[506] _Cf._ _Expedition de Mesopotamie_, Vol. I, Lib. I (Paris, 1863).

[507] See also _Die Tempel von Babylon and Borsippa_, p. 59 (by

Dr. Koldewey, Leipsic, 1911), that speaks of Oppert’s _verkehrter

Stadtplan von Babylon_ and who declares that Borsippa, as

an independent city, bore the same relation to Babylon as does

Charlottenburg to Berlin.

[508] _The History of Herodotus_, Bk. I, 178, 179.

[509] _Library_, Lib. II, Chap. VII.

[510] Rich, _op. cit._, p. 43.

[511] _De Rebus Gestis Alexandri Magni_, Lib. V, Cap. I.

[512] _The Geographical System of Herodotus Examined and

Explained_, p. 347.

[513] _Op. cit._, p. 2.

[514] _Im Lande des Einstigen Paradieses_, p. 30 (Stuttgart,

1903). According to Oppert the great wall of Babylon embraces an area

fifteen times as great as that of Paris in 1850 and as extended as that

of the entire department of the Seine. Ibid., Vol. I, p. 234.

[515] _Op. cit._, p. 5.

[516] _Op. cit._, II, 8.

[517] Koldewey, _op. cit._, p. 54.

[518] Arrian’s _Anabasis of Alexander_, Bk. VII, Chap. XXVI.

[519] According to the measurements of Rich, the current of the

Euphrates runs at a medium rate of about two knots an hour while that

of the Tigris has a maximum velocity of full seven knots.

[520] _Commentary on Isaias_, Bk. V, Chap. XIII, _Patrologiæ

Latinæ_, Vol. XXIV (Migne, Paris, 1865).

[521] _Op. cit._, Bk. I, Chap. 181.

[522] _Geography_, Bk. XVI, Chap. I, Sec. 5.

[523] _Op. cit._, p. 196.

[524] Ibid., p. 196.

[525] “Principio Assyrii”--the Chaldeans--“propter planitiem

magnitudinemque regionum quos incolebant, cum cœlum ex omni parte

patens et apertum intuerentur, trajectiones motusque stellarum

observaverunt.” _De Divinatione_, Lib. I.

[526] _Op. cit._, Lib. V, Cap. I.

[527] _Op. cit._, p, 103.

[528] For a description of the ruins of Cuzco and the Great Chimu, as

compared with those of Babylon, see _Along the Andes and Down the

Amazon_, Chaps. XIII, XV (by J. A. Zahm, New York, 1911).

[529] _The History and Conquests of the Saracens_, p. 2 _et

seq._ (by E. A. Freeman, London, 1877).

[530] _Babel and Bibel_, p. 36, 37 (London, 1903).

[531] _The Archæology of the Cuneiform Inscriptions_, p. 111

(London, 1908).

[532] Entitled _Der babylonische Ursprung der ägyptischen Kultur_

(1892).

[533] Pliny, speaking of Belus, says: “Inventor hic fuit sideralis

scientiæ, Naturalis Historiæ,” Lib. VI. Cap. 30.

[534] _Astrology and Religion among the Greeks and Romans_, p. 8

(New York, 1912).

[535] See especially _Astronomisches aus Babylon, oder das Wissen der

Chaldäer uber den gestirnten Himmel_ (by J. Epping, in collaboration

with J. Straszmaier, Freiburg im Breisgau, 1889); _Die Babylonische

Mondrechnung_ (by F. Kugler, Freiburg im Breisgau, 1900).

[536] _Cf._ Dumont _op. cit._, p. 60.

[537] A comparison of the lunar periods as given by Babylonian and by

modern astronomers will show how exact were the calculations of the

observers of ancient Chaldea.

Periods as calculated by Babylonian astronomers:

Mean sidereal month 27 days, 7 hours, 43’ 14″

Mean synodic month 29 days, 12 hours, 44’ 31.3″

Mean draconitic month 27 days, 5 hours, 5’ 35.8″

Mean anomalistic month 27 days, 13 hours, 18’ 34.9″

Periods as calculated by modern astronomers:

Mean sidereal month 27 days, 7 hours, 43’ 11.5″

Mean synodic month 29 days, 12 hours, 44’ 2.9″

Mean draconitic month 27 days, 5 hours, 5’ 36″

Mean anomalistic month 27 days, 13 hours, 18’ 39.3″

From the foregoing figures it is seen that the maximum difference

of time, as given by ancient and modern observers, is less than a

half minute; the minimum one-fifth of a second! See Kugler’s _Die

Babylonische Mondrechnung_, pp. 24, 40, 46.

[538] Kugler _op. cit._, p. 206.

[539] Hammurabi’s code which is carefully engraved on a large stele

of black diorite was found by M. de Morgan and the distinguished

Dominican archæologist, Father Scheil, among the ruins of Susa--the

Susan of the Bible--whither it had been carried from Babylon as loot

by the Elamites. When found in December, 1901, and January, 1902, it

was in fragments but the parts were easily rejoined. In October, 1902,

there appeared an admirable translation of it by Father Scheil which

everywhere excited the greatest interest among scholars both of the Old

and the New World. In many respects, it is the most interesting and

valuable inscribed monument of old Babylonia which has yet been brought

to light.

[540] _Babylonian and Assyrian Laws, Contracts and Letters_, pp.

vii, viii (by C. H. W. Johns, New York, 1904).

[541] _Op. cit._, p. 186.

[542] _Apocalypse_, xvii: 5; xviii: 21.

[543] _Daniel_ iv: 27, 28.

[544] Chap. li: 58.

[545] Chap. li: 37.

[546] Chap. li: 62.

[547] _Psalm_ cxviii: 89.

Transcriber’s Notes:

1. Obvious printers’, punctuation and spelling errors have been

corrected silently.

2. Where hyphenation is in doubt, it has been retained as in the

original.

3. Some hyphenated and non-hyphenated versions of the same words have

been retained as in the original.

4. Italics are shown as _xxx_.

From Berlin to Bagdad and Babylon · 第 20 / 20 章