CHAPTER XXIV

“I CAME NOT TO SEND PEACE, BUT A SWORD”

MR. ALLEN, having business in London, determined to go on Saturday, and

spend the next day with Zachariah. Although he always called on his old

friend whenever he could do so, he was not often away from home on a

Sunday. He also resolved to take George with him. Accordingly on

Saturday morning they were up early and caught a coach on the North Road.

The coaches by this time had fallen off considerably, for the Birmingham

railway was open, and there was even some talk of a branch through

Cowfold; but there were still perhaps a dozen which ran to places a good

way east of the line. Father and son dismounted at the “George and Blue

Boar,” where they were to sleep. Sunday was to be spent with the

Colemans, whom George had seen before but very seldom; never, indeed,

since he was a boy.

Zachariah still went to Pike Street Chapel, but only in the morning to

hear Mr. Bradshaw, who was now an old man, and could not preach twice.

On that particular Sunday on which Zachariah, Pauline, Mr. Allen, and

George heard him he took for his text the thirteenth verse of the twelfth

chapter of Deuteronomy: “Take heed to thyself that thou offer not thy

burnt offerings in every place thou seest.” He put down his spectacles

after he had read these words, for he never used a note, and said: “If

your religion doesn’t help you, it is no religion for you; you had better

be without it. I don’t mean if it doesn’t help you to a knowledge of a

future life or of the way to heaven. Everybody will say his religion

does that. What I do mean is, that the sign of a true religion—true for

_you_, is this—Does it assist you to bear your own private

difficulties?—does it really?—not the difficulties of the schools and

theology, but those of the parlour and countinghouse; ay, difficulties

most difficult, those with persons nearest to you? . . . Everybody ought

to have his _own_ religion. In one sense we are all disciples of Christ,

but nevertheless each man has troubles peculiar to himself, and it is

absurd to expect that any book system will be sufficient for each one of

us at all points. You must make your own religion, and it is only what

you make yourself which will be of any use to you. Don’t be disturbed if

you find it is not of much use to other persons. Stick to it yourself if

it is really your own, a bit of yourself. There are, however, in the

Book of God universal truths, and the wonderful thing about them is, that

they are at the same time more particularly adapted to you and me and all

our innermost wants than anything we can discover for ourselves. That is

the miracle of inspiration. For thousands and thousands of years some of

the sayings here have comforted those who have well nigh despaired in the

desert of the world. The wisdom of millions of apostles, of heroes, of

martyrs, of poor field labourers, of solitary widows, of orphans of the

destitute, of men driven to their last extremity has been the wisdom of

this volume—not their own, and yet most truly theirs. . . . Here is a

word for us this morning: ‘_Take heed to thyself that thou offer not thy

burnt offerings in every place thou seest_.’ Ah, what a word it is! You

and I are not idolaters, and there is no danger of our being so. For you

and me this is not a warning against idolatry. What is it for us then?

Reserve yourself; discriminate in your worship. Reserve yourself, I say;

but what is the implication? What says the next verse? ‘_In the place

which the Lord shall choose_;’ that is to say, keep your worship for the

Highest. Do not squander yourself, but, on the other hand, before the

shrine of the Lord offer all your love and adoration. What a practical

application this has! . . . I desire to come a little closer to you.

What are the consequences of not obeying this Divine law? You will not

be struck dead nor excommunicated, you will be simply _disappointed_.

Your burnt offering will receive no answer; you will not be blessed

through it; you will come to see that you have been pouring forth your

treasure, and something worse, your heart’s blood—not the blood of

cattle—before that which is no God—a nothing, in fact. ‘Vanity of

vanities,’ you will cry, ‘all is vanity.’ My young friends, young men

and young women, you are particularly prone to go wrong in this matter.

You not only lay your possessions but yourselves on altars by the

roadside.”

It was the first time George had ever heard anything from any public

speaker which came home to him, and he wondered if Mr. Bradshaw knew his

history. He interpreted the discourse after his own way, and Priscilla

was ever before him.

They came back to the little house, and sat down to dinner in the little

front room. There were portraits on the walls—nothing else but

portraits—and the collection at first sight was inconsistent. Major

Cartwright was still there; there were also Byron, Bunyan, Scott, Paine,

Burns, Mr. Bradshaw, and Rousseau. It was closely expressive of its

owners. Zachariah and Pauline were private persons; they were, happily

for them, committed to nothing, and were not subsidised by their

reputations to defend a system. They were consequently free to think at

large, and if they admired both Bunyan and Rousseau, they were at liberty

to do so. Zachariah, in a measure, and a very large measure, had

remained faithful to his earliest beliefs—who is there that does not?—and

although they had been modified, they were still there; and he listened

to Mr. Bradshaw with the faith of thirty years ago. He also believed in

a good many things he had learned without him, and perhaps the old and

the new were not so discordant as at first sight they might have seemed

to be. He was not, in fact, despite all his love of logic, the “yes _or_

no” from which most people cannot escape, but a “yes _and_ no”; not

immorally and through lack of resolution, but by reason of an original

receptivity and the circumstances of his training. If he had been merely

a student the case would have been different but he was not a student.

He was a journeyman printer; and hard work has a tendency to demolish the

distinctions of dialectics. He had also been to school outside his shop,

and had learned many lessons, often confusing and apparently

contradictory. Blanketeer marches; his first wife; the workhouse

imprisonment; his second wife; the little Pauline had each come to him

with its own special message, and the net result was a character, but a

character disappointing to persons who prefer men and women of linear

magnitude to those of three dimensions.

After dinner the conversation turned upon politics and Mr. Allen

described his interview with Mr. Broad, regretting that the movement in

the district round Cowfold would receive no countenance from the minister

of the very sect which ought to be its chief support.

“A sad falling off,” said Zachariah, “from the days, even in my time,

when the Dissenters were the insurrectionary class. Mr. Bradshaw, last

Sunday, after his sermon, shut his Bible, and told the people that he did

not now interfere much in political matters; but he felt he should not be

doing his duty if he did not tell those whom he taught which way they

ought to vote, and that what he had preached to them for so many years

would be poor stuff if it did not compel them into a protest against

taxing the poor for the sake of the rich.”

“Yes,” replied Mr. Allen; “but then Broad never has taught what Bradshaw

teaches; he never seems to me to see anything clearly; at least he never

makes me see anything clearly; the whole world is in a fog to him.”

“From what I have heard of Mr. Broad,” said Pauline, “I should think the

explanation of him is very simple; he is a hypocrite—an ordinary

hypocrite. What is the use of going out of the way to seek for

explanations of such commonplace persons?”

“Pauline, Pauline,” cried Zachariah, “you surely forget, my child, in

whose company you are!”

“Oh, as for that,” said George, “Miss Coleman needn’t mind me. I haven’t

married Mr. Broad, and my father is quite right. For that matter, I

believe Miss Coleman is right too.”

“Well,” said Mr. Allen, “it is rather strong to say a man is an ordinary

hypocrite, and it is not easy to prove it.”

“Not easy to prove it,” said Pauline, shifting a little her chair and

looking straight at Mr. Allen, with great earnestness; “hypocrisy is the

one thing easiest to prove. I can tell whether a man is a hypocrite

before I know anything else about him. I may not for a long time be able

to say what else he may be, but before he speaks, almost, I can detect

whether he is sincere.”

“You women,” said Zachariah, with a smile, “or you girls rather, are so

positive. Just as though the world were divided like the goats and the

sheep in the gospel. That is a passage that I never could quite

understand. I never, hardly, see a pure breed either of goat or sheep.

I never see anybody who deserves to go straight to heaven or who deserves

to go straight to hell. When the judgment day comes it will be a

difficult task. Why, Pauline, my dear, I am a humbug myself.”

“Ah well, I have heard all that before; but, nevertheless, what I say is

true. Some men, using speech as God meant men to use it, are liars, and

some are not. Of course not entirely so, nor at all times. We cannot

speak mere truth; we are not made to speak it. For all that you are not

a liar.”

“Anyhow, I shall go on,” said Mr. Allen. “We shall have a desperate

fight, and shall most likely lose; but no Tory shall sit for our county

if I can help it.”

“Of course you will go on,” said Zachariah. “So shall I go on. We are

to have a meeting in Clerkenwell to-morrow night, although, to tell you

the truth, I don’t feel exactly the interest in the struggle which I did

in those of five-and-twenty years ago, when we had to whisper our

treasons to one another in locked rooms and put sentries at the doors.

You know nothing about those times, George.”

“I wish I had,” said George, with an unusual passion, which surprised his

father and caused Pauline to lift her eyes from the table and look at

him. “I only wish I had. I can’t speak as father can, and I often say

to myself I should like to take myself off to some foreign country where

men get shot for what they call conspiracy. If I knew such a country I

half believe I would go to-morrow.”

“Which means,” said Pauline, “that there would be an end of you and your

services. If you care anything for a cause, you can do something better

than get shot for it; and if you want martyrdom, there is a nobler

martyrdom than death. The Christians who were trundled in barrels with

spikes in them deserve higher honour than those who died in a moment,

before they could recant. The highest form of martyrdom, though, is not

even living for the sake of a cause, but living without one, merely

because it is your duty to live. If you are called upon to testify to a

great truth, it is easy to sing in flames. Yes, yes, Mr. George, the

saints whom I would canonise are not martyrs for a cause, but those who

have none.”

George thought that what Pauline said—just as he had thought of Mr.

Bradshaw’s sermon—seemed to be said for him; and yet what did she know

about him? Nothing. He was silent. All were silent, for it is

difficult to follow anybody who pitches the conversation at so high a

level; and Zachariah, who alone could have maintained it, was dreaming

over his lost Pauline and gazing on the sacred pictures which were hung

in the chamber of his heart. Just at that moment he was looking at the

one of his wife as a girl; the room in which he was sitting had gone; he

was in the court near Fleet Street; she had cleared the space for the

dance; she had begun, and he was watching her with all the passion of his

youth. The conversation gradually turned to something more indifferent,

and the company broke up.

On the Monday George and his father went home. It is very depressing,

after being with people who have been at their best, and with whom we

have been at our best, to descend upon ordinary existence. George felt

it particularly as he stood in the shop on Tuesday morning and reflected

that for the whole of that day—for his father was out—he should probably

not say nor hear a word for which he cared a single straw. But there was

to be an election meeting that evening, and Mr. Allen was to speak, and

George, of course, must be there. The evening came, and the room at the

Mechanics’ Institute, which had just been established in Cowfold, was

crowded. Admission was not by ticket, so that, though the Whigs had

convened it, there was a strong muster of the enemy. Mr. Allen moved the

first resolution in a stirring speech, which was constitutionally

interrupted with appeals to him to go home and questions about a grey

mare—“_How about old Pinfold’s grey mare_?”—which seemed conclusive and

humorous to the last degree. Old Pinfold was a well-known character in

Cowfold, horse-dealer, pig-jobber, attendant at races, with no definite

occupation, and the grey mare was an animal which he managed to impose

upon Mr. Allen, who sued him and lost. When Mr. Allen’s resolution had

been duly seconded, one Rogers, a publican, got up and said he had

something to say. There was indescribable confusion, some crying, “Turn

him out;” others “Pitch into ’em, Bill.” Bill Rogers was well known as

the funny man in Cowfold, a half-drunken buffoon, whose wit, such as it

was, was retailed all over the place; a man who was specially pleased if

he could be present in any assembly collected for any serious purpose and

turn it into ridicule. He got upon a chair, not far from where George

sat, but refused to go upon the platform. “No, thank yer my friends, I’m

best down here; up there’s the place for the gentlefolk, the clever uns,

them as buy grey mares!”—(roars of laughter)—“but, Mr. Chairman, with

your permission”—and here Bill put his had upon his chest and made a most

profound bow to the chair, which caused more laughter—“there is just one

question I should like to ask—not about the grey mare, sir”—(roars of

laughter again)—“but I see a young gentleman here beknown to us

all”—(points to George)—“and I should just like to ask him, does his

mother-in-law—not his mother, you observe, sir—does his mother-in-law

know he’s out?” Once more there was an explosion, for Mr. Broad’s

refusal to take part in the contest was generally ascribed to Mrs. Broad.

George sat still for a moment, hardly realising his position, and then

the blood rose to his head; up crashed across the forms, and before the

grin had settled into smoothness on Bill’s half-intoxicated features

there was a grip like that of a giant on his greasy coat collar; he was

dragged amidst shouts and blows to the door, George nothing heeding, and

dismissed with such energy that he fell prostrate on the pavement. His

friends had in vain attempted to stop George’s wrathful progress; but

they were in a minority.

Next Saturday a report of the scene appeared in the county newspaper,

giving full particulars, considerably exaggerated; and Mr. Broad read all

about it to Mrs. Broad on Saturday afternoon, in the interval between the

preparation of his two sermons. He had heard the story on the following

day; but here was an authentic account in print. Mrs. Broad was of

opinion that it was shocking; so vulgar, so low; her poor dear Priscilla,

and so forth. Mr. Broad’s sullen animosity was so much stimulated that

it had overcome his customary circumspection, and on the Sunday evening

he preached from the text, “Pure religion and undefiled before God and

the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their

affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.” Mr. Broad

remarked that the Apostle James made no mention here of the scheme of

redemption; not because that was not the chief part of religion, but

because he was considering religion in the aspect—he was very fond of

this word “aspect”—which it presented to those outside the Church. He

called upon his hearers to reflect with him for a few moments, in the

first place, upon what religion was not; secondly, upon what it was; and

thirdly, he would invite their attention to a few practical conclusions.

He observed that religion did not consist in vain strife upon earthly

matters, which only tended towards divisions in the Body of Christ. “At

such a time as this, my brethren, it is important for us to remember that

these disputes, especially if they are conducted with unseemly heat, are

detrimental to the interests of the soul and give occasion to the enemy

to blaspheme.” When Mr. Broad came to the secondly, and to that

sub-division of it which dealt with freedom from worldly spots, he

repeated the words with some emphasis, “‘Unspotted from the world.’

Think, my friends, of what this involves. Spots! The world spots and

stains! We are not called upon to withdraw ourselves from the world—the

apostle does not say that—but to keep ourselves unspotted, uncontaminated

he appears to mean, by worldly influence. The word unspotted in the

original bears that interpretation—uncontaminated. Therefore, though we

must be in the world, we are not to be _of_ the world, but to set an

example to it. In the world! Yes, my brethren, we must necessarily be

in the world; that is the condition imposed upon us by the Divine

Providence, because we are in a state of probation; we are so

constituted, with a body, and with fleshly appetites, that we must be in

the world; but we must be separate from it and its controversies, which

are so unimportant compared with our eternal welfare.”

Mr. Bushel sat on high at his desk, where he gave out the hymns, and

coughed every now and then, and looked straight at the pew where the

Allens and George sat. Mr. Bushel knew well enough that, although he was

just as ardent on the other side, the sermon was not meant for him, and

not one of Mr. Broad’s remarks touched him. He thought only of the

Allens, and rejoiced inwardly. George walked home with Priscilla in

silence. At supper-time he suddenly said:

“I think your father might have found something better to do than preach

at me.”

Priscilla was shocked. She had never heard a criticism on her father

before.

“Really, George, what are you thinking of to talk in that way about a

sermon, and on a Sunday night too?”

“He did preach at me; and if he has anything to say against me, why

doesn’t he come and say it here or at the shop?”

“O George, this is dreadful! Besides, mamma _did_ come and talk to me.”

“What has that got to do with it? Well, what did your mother say?”

“Why, she told me all about this meeting, and how you fought a man and

nearly killed him, and you a member at Tanner’s Lane, and how you

oughtn’t to have been there at all, and what Mr. Bushel was going to do.”

“Oughtn’t to have been there at all? Why not? I don’t believe you know

any more than this table why I was there.”

“Oh yes, I do. You never tell me anything, but Mrs. Bushel told me. You

want to get them all turned out of their farms.”

“Bosh! There you are again!—the pains I took the other night again to

make you comprehend what Free Trade meant. I knew you didn’t understand

a word about it; and if you did understand, you wouldn’t believe me. You

never take any notice of anything I say; but if Mrs. Bushel or any other

blockhead tells you anything, you believe that directly.”

Priscilla’s eyes filled; she took out her handkerchief, and went

upstairs. George sat still for a while, and then followed her. He found

her sitting by the baby’s cradle, her head on her hands and sobbing. It

touched him beyond measure to see how she retreated to her child; he went

to her; his anger was once more forgotten, and once more he was

reconciled with kisses and self-humiliation. The next morning, however,

as he went to the square, the conversation of the night before returned

to him. “What does it all mean?” he cried to himself. “Would to God it

were either one thing or another! I could be happy if I really cared for

her, and if I hated her downright I could endure it like any other

calamity which cannot be altered; but this is more than I can bear!”

The Allens, father and mother, held anxious debate whether they should

take any notice of the attack by their pastor, and in the end determined

to do nothing. They considered, and rightly considered, that any action

on their part would only make George’s position more difficult, and he

was the first person to be considered.

Next Saturday there was some business to be done in London, and George

went, this time by himself. On the Sunday morning he called on the

Colemans, and found Zachariah at home, but Pauline away. Mr. Bradshaw,

too, was not to preach that day. It was wet, and Zachariah and George

sat and talked, first about the election, and then about other

indifferent subjects. Conversation—even of the best, and between two

friends—is poor work when one of the two suffers from some secret sorrow

which he cannot reveal, and George grew weary. Zachariah knew what was

the matter with him, and had known it for a long while, but was too

tender to hint his knowledge. Nevertheless, remembering his own history,

he pitied the poor boy exceedingly. He loved him as his own child, for

his father’s sake, and loved him all the more for an experience so nearly

resembling another which he recollected too well.

“How is it Mr. Bradshaw is not preaching to-day?” said George.

“He is ill; I am afraid he is breaking up; and latterly he has been

worried by the small attacks made upon him by people who are afraid to

say anything distinctly.”

“What kind of attacks?”

“Well, they insinuate that he is Arian.”

“What is that?”

Zachariah explained the case as well as he could, and George was much

interested.

“Arian or not, I tell you one thing, Mr. Coleman, that Mr. Bradshaw,

whenever I have heard him, seems to help me as Mr. Broad never does. I

never think about what Mr. Broad says except when I am in chapel, and

sometimes not then.”

“Bradshaw speaks from himself. He said a thing last Sunday which stuck

by me, and would have pleased a country lad like you more than it did

three parts of his congregation, who are not so familiar with country

life as he is. He told us he was out for a holiday, and saw some men

hoeing in a field—‘Hoeing the charlock,’ he said to himself; but when he

came nearer he found they were hoeing turnips—hoeing up the poor plants

themselves, which lay dying all around; hoeing them up to let the other

plants have room to grow.

“I have known men,” added Zachariah after a pause, “from whose life so

much—all love, for example—has been cut out; and the effect has been, not

ruin, but growth in other directions which we should never have seen

without it.”

Zachariah took down a little book from his shelf, and wrote George’s name

in it.

“There, my boy, it is not much to look at, but I know nothing better, and

keep it always in your pocket. It is the _Imitation of Christ_. You

will find a good deal in it which will suit you, and you will say, as I

have said a thousand times over it, that other people may write of

science or philosophy, but this man writes about me.”

He put it on the table, and George opened it at the sentence, “_He that

can best tell how to suffer will best keep himself in peace_. _That man

is conqueror of himself_, _and lord of the world_, _the friend of

Christ_, _and the heir of heaven_.” He turned over the leaves again—“_He

to whom the Eternal Word speaketh is delivered from a world of

unnecessary conceptions_.” Zachariah bent his head near him and gently

expounded the texts. As the exposition grew George’s heart dilated, and

he was carried beyond his troubles. It was the birth in him—even in him,

a Cowfold ironmonger, not a scholar by any means—of what philosophers

call the _idea_, that Incarnation which has ever been our Redemption. He

said nothing to Zachariah about his own affairs, nor did Zachariah, as

before observed, say anything to him; but the two knew one another, and

felt that they knew one another as intimately as if George had imparted

to his friend the minutest details of his unhappiness with his wife.

Towards the end of the afternoon Pauline returned, and inquired how the

battle went in Cowfold.

“I am afraid we shall be beaten. Sometimes I don’t seem to care much

about it.”

“Don’t care! Why not?”

“Oh, we talk and talk, father and I, and somehow people’s minds are made

up without talking, and nobody ever changes. When we have our meetings,

who is it who comes? Does Bushel come? Not a bit of it. We only get

our own set.”

“Well,” said Zachariah, the old man’s republican revolutionary ardour

returning, “this is about the only struggle in which I have felt much

interest of late years. I should like to have cheap bread, and what is

more, I should like to deprive the landlords of that bit of the price

which makes the bread dear. I agree with you, my boy. Endless

discussion is all very well—forms ‘public opinion,’ they say; but I wish

a stop could be put to it when it has come round to where it began; that

one side could say to the other, ‘You have heard all our logic, and we

have heard all yours;’ now then, let us settle it. ‘Who is the strongest

and best drilled?’ I believe in insurrection. Everlasting debate—and it

is not genuine debate, for nobody really ranges himself alongside his

enemy’s strongest points—demoralises us all. It encourages all sorts of

sophistry, becomes mere manœuvring, and saps people’s faith in the truth.

In half an hour, if two persons were to sit opposite one another, they

could muster every single reason for and against Free Trade. What is the

use of going on after that? Moreover, insurrection strengthens the

belief of men in the right. A man who voluntarily incurs the risk of

being shot believes ever afterwards, if he escapes, a little more

earnestly than he did before. ‘Who is on the Lord’s side, let him come

unto me,’ says the flag. Insurrection strengthens, too, the faith of

others. When a company of poor men meet together and declare that things

have got to such a pass that they will either kill their enemies or die

themselves, the world then thinks there must, after all, be _some_

difference between right and wrong.”

“Father, that is all past now. We must settle our quarrels in the

appointed way. Don’t say anything to discourage Mr. Allen. Besides,

people are not so immovable as you think. How they alter I don’t know;

but they do alter. There is a much larger minority in favour of Free

Trade than there was ten years ago.”

“All past now, is it? You will see one of these days.”

It was time for tea, and Pauline left to get the tea-things. In the

evening they strolled out for a walk through Barnsbury and up Maiden

Lane, then a real and pretty lane stretching north-westwards through

hedges to Highgate. After they had gone a few hundred yards Zachariah

went back; he had forgotten something, and George and Pauline walked on

slowly together. The street was crowded, for it was just about church

time, but on the opposite side of the road George saw somebody whom he

knew, but who took no notice of him.

“How odd!” he said to Pauline; “that is Tom Broad! What is he doing

here, I wonder?”

Pauline made no answer, and at that moment Zachariah rejoined them.

The reason for Mr. Thomas Broad’s appearance in that quarter will be best

explained by the following letter, which he had received the day before

from his father:—

“MY DEAR THOMAS,—I was very glad to hear of your success at Mr.

Martin’s chapel, at Hackney, on Sunday afternoon. Although it was

nothing more than an afternoon service, you must remember that it is

the first invitation to a metropolitan pulpit which you have

received. It would be as well if you were to call on Mr. Martin at

your earliest convenience, and also on Mr. Chandler, in Leather Lane,

whom you mentioned to me, and who, I believe, is a prominent deacon.

The choice of your subject was judicious, although it is not so easy

to fix the character of a discourse for the afternoon as for the

morning or evening. ‘_I will give him a white stone_’ is a text I

have used myself with great profit. A young minister, I need hardly

say, my dear Thomas, ought to confine himself to what is generally

accepted, and not to particularise. For this reason he should avoid

not only all disputed topics, but, as far as possible, all reference

to particular offences. I always myself doubted the wisdom, for

example, of sermons against covetousness, or worldliness, or

hypocrisy. Let us follow our Lord and Master, and warn our hearers

against sin, and leave the application to the Holy Spirit. I only

mention this matter now because I have found two or three young

students err in this direction, and the error, I am sure, militates

against their usefulness.

“Your dear mamma and Tryphosa are both quite well. Not so Priscilla.

I grieve to say she is _not_ well. George’s conduct lately has been

very strange. I am afraid that he will be a trouble not only to us,

but to the Church of Christ. Both he and his father have kindled

strife amongst us in this unhappy election contest, for which, as a

minister of God’s Word, I have held aloof. For one or two Sundays

the Allens have absented themselves from Divine service in the

evening, and we know that there has been no sickness in the house. I

feel certain that before long they will withdraw their subscription.

I have good reason to believe that their friend, Mr. Coleman,

exercises a very baleful influence upon them. However, God’s will be

done! These are the trials which His servants who minister to His

flock must expect. Good-bye, my dear Thomas. Mamma and Tryphosa

send their love. Give diligence to make your calling and election

sure.—Your affectionate father,

“JOHN BROAD.

“_P.S._—It will be as well, perhaps, if you can ascertain whether the

Allens visit the Colemans, and more particularly if George goes

there. The Coleman household consists, I believe, of a father and

daughter. You will remember that Coleman has been a convict, and, I

have heard, has tendencies towards infidelity. Priscilla informs me

that Mr. Allen and George will be in London to-morrow; but she does

not know what they are going to do there. You will doubtless be able

to obtain the information I desire, and on future occasions I will

also advise you when either George or his father is in the

metropolis.”

Mr. Thomas Broad had his own reasons for complying with his father’s

request. He hated the Colemans and George with as much active malignity

as was possible to his heavy unctuous nature. Why he should hate the

Colemans is intelligible, and his hatred to George can also be explained,

partly through sympathy between father and son, and partly because the

hatred of a person like Thomas Broad to a person like George Allen needs

no explanation.

The Revolution in Tanner's Lane · 第 24 / 27 章