THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

In referring to the Democratic party in this discussion we may save time

by simply saying that since it was born again at the St. Louis

convention it is near enough like its Republican ally to pass for a twin

brother.

The former party of the “common people” is no longer under the boycott

of the plutocracy since it has adopted the Wall street label and

renounced its middle class heresies.

The radical and progressive element of the former Democracy have been

evicted and must seek other quarters. They were an unmitigated nuisance

in the conservative counsels of the old party. They were for the “common

people” and the trusts have no use for such a party.

Where but to the Socialist party can these progressive people turn? They

are now without a party and the only genuine Democratic party in the

field is the Socialist party, and every true Democrat should thank Wall

street for driving him out of a party that is democratic in name only

and into one that is democratic in fact.

The St. Louis convention was a trust jubilee. The Wall street

reorganizers made short work of the free silver element. From first to

last it was a capitalistic convocation. Labor was totally ignored. As an

incident, two thousand choice chairs were reserved for the Business

Men’s League of St. Louis, an organization hostile to organized labor,

but not a chair was tendered to those whose labor had built the

convention hall, had clothed, transported, fed and wined the delegates

and whose votes are counted on as if they were so many dumb driven

cattle, to pull the ticket through in November.

As another incident, when Lieutenant Richmond Hobson dramatically

declared that President Cleveland had been the only president who had

ever been patriotic enough to use the federal troops to crush union

labor, the trust agents, lobbyists, tools and clackers screamed with

delight and the convention shook with applause.

The platform is precisely the same as the Republican platform in

relation to labor. It says nothing and means the same. A plank was

proposed condemning the outrages in Colorado under Republican

administration, but upon order from the Parryites it was promptly thrown

aside.

The editor of _American Industries_, organ of the Manufacturers’

Association, commented at length in its issue of July 15 on the triumph

of capital and the defeat of labor at both Republican and Democratic

national conventions. Among other things he said: “The two labor

lobbies, partly similar in make-up, were, to put it bluntly, thrown out

bodily in both places.” And that is the simple fact and is known of all

men who read the papers. The capitalist organs exult because labor, to

use their own brutal expression, was kicked bodily out of both the

Republican and Democratic national conventions.

What more than this is needed to open the eyes of workingmen to the fact

that neither of these parties is their party and that they are as

strangely out of place in them as Rockefeller and Vanderbilt would be in

the Socialist party?

And how many more times are they to be “kicked out bodily” before they

stay out and join the party of their class in which labor is not only

honored but is supreme, a party that is clean, that has conscience and

convictions, a party that will one day sweep the old parties from the

field like chaff and issue the Proclamation of Labor’s Emancipation?

Judge Alton B. Parker corresponds precisely to the Democratic platform.

It was made to order for him. His famous telegram in the expiring hour

removed the last wrinkle and left it a perfect fit.

Thomas W. Lawson, the Boston millionaire, charges that Senator Patrick

McCarren, who brought out Judge Parker for the nomination, is on the pay

roll of the Standard Oil Company as political master mechanic at twenty

thousand dollars a year, and that Parker is the chosen tool of Standard

Oil. Mr. Lawson offers Senator McCarren one hundred thousand dollars if

he will disprove the charge.

William Jennings Bryan denounced Judge Parker as a tool of Wall street

before he was nominated and declared that no self-respecting Democrat

could vote for him, and after his nomination he charged that it had been

dictated by the trusts and secured by “crooked and indefensible

methods.” Mr. Bryan also said that labor had been betrayed in the

convention and need look for nothing from the Democratic party. He made

many other damaging charges against his party and its candidates, but

when the supreme test came he was not equal to it, and instead of

denouncing the betrayers of the “common people” and repudiating their

made-to-order Wall street program, he compromised with the pirates that

scuttled his ship and promised with his lips the support his heart

refused and his conscience condemned.

The Democratic nominee for President was one of the Supreme Judges of

the State of New York who declared the eight-hour law unconstitutional

and this is an index of his political character.

In his address accepting the nomination he makes but a single allusion

to labor and in this he takes occasion to say that labor is charged with

having recently used dynamite in destroying property and that the

perpetrators should be subjected to “the most rigorous punishment known

to the law.” This cruel intimation amounts to conviction in advance of

trial and indicates clearly the trend of his capitalistically trained

judicial mind. He made no such reference to capital, nor to those

ermined rascals who use judicial dynamite in blowing up the constitution

while labor is looted and starved by capitalistic freebooters who

trample all law in the mire and leer and mock at their despoiled and

helpless victims.

It is hardly necessary to make more than passing reference to Henry G.

Davis, Democratic candidate for Vice-President. He is a coal baron,

railroad owner and, of course, an enemy to union labor. He has amassed a

great fortune exploiting his wage-slaves and has always strenuously

resisted every attempt to organize them for the betterment of their

condition. Mr. Davis is a staunch believer in the virtue of the

injunction as applied to union labor. As a young man he was in charge of

a slave plantation and his conviction is that wage-slaves should be kept

free from the contaminating influence of the labor agitator and render

cheerful obedience to their master.

Mr. Davis is as well qualified to serve his party as is Senator

Fairbanks to serve the Republican party and wage-workers should have no

trouble in making their choice between this pernicious pair of

plutocrats, and certainly no intelligent workingman will hesitate an

instant to discard them both and cast his vote for Ben Hanford, their

working class competitor, who is as loyally devoted to labor as

Fairbanks and Davis are to capital.

Debs: His Life, Writings and Speeches, with a Department of Appreciations · 第 158 / 206 题