_Appeal to Reason, December 14, 1907_
It is a strange and pathetic coincidence that almost at the very moment
I completed the introduction to the brochure of Thomas McGrady on “The
Catholic Church and Socialism,” now in press, the sad news came that he
had passed away, and the painful duty now devolves upon me to write the
word “finis” at the close of his work and add a few words of obitual
eulogy.
It is not customary among Socialists to pronounce conventional and
meaningless panegyrics upon departed comrades; nor to pay fulsome
tribute to virtues they never possessed. Mere form and ceremony have had
their day—and a long and gloomy day it has been—and can have no place
among Socialists when a comrade living pays his last reverent regards to
a comrade dead.
Thomas McGrady was born at Lexington, Ky., June 6, 1863. In 1887, at 24
years of age, he was ordained as a Catholic priest at the Cathedral of
Galveston, Tex. His next pastorate was St. Patrick’s church, Houston,
followed by his transfer to St. Patrick’s church, Dallas, Tex. In 1890
he returned to his Kentucky home, beginning his pastoral service there
in Lexington, his native city. Later he went to St. Anthony’s church,
Bellevue, Ky., and it was here, in 1896, that he began his first serious
study of economic, political and social questions. He was first
attracted by Henry George’s Single Tax, but abandoned that as inadequate
after some Socialist literature fell into his hands, and he became
convinced that nothing less than a social revolution, and the abolition
of the capitalist competitive system would materially better the
existing industrial and social condition of the people.
Father McGrady, who always had the lofty courage of his convictions, now
avowed himself a Socialist. He drank deep at the fountain of Socialist
literature and mastered its classics. His library contained the works of
the standard authors of all nations.
It was at this time that Father McGrady was at the very pinnacle of his
priestly power and popularity. He was young, just past thirty, brilliant
and scholarly. His magnetic personality was irresistible. Tall, fully
six feet, splendidly proportioned, commanding, he was a magnificent
specimen of physical manhood. He had a massive head, a full, fine face,
florid complexion, clear features, and the bluest, kindliest and most
expressive of eyes.
Widely and deeply read, cultured in the genuine sense, sociable and
sympathetic, Father McGrady attracted friends by an irresistible charm,
and held them by the same magic power.
He was an orator and a wit, a scholar and a humanitarian.
He had the exquisite fancy of a poet and could dally, according to mood,
with a daisy or a star.
In his heroic and finely moulded physical proportions, his large and
shapely head, clear complexion and expressive eyes, he resembled
strongly Robert G. Ingersoll.
This resemblance was accentuated by the kindly and infectious humor, the
brilliant flashes of wit, the terse and epigrammatic speech, and the
keen and incisive satire of which both were master.
These two men, had they not been separated by the cruel and hateful
prejudices inherent in capitalist society, and all its conventional
institutions, would have been the boonest of friends and loved each
other as brothers.
Father McGrady soon began to feel that his new convictions did not fit
his old conventicle. Honesty and candor being his predominant
characteristics, the truth that dawned upon his brain found ready
expression from his eloquent lips. He took his congregation into his
confidence and told them frankly that he was a Socialist. Thenceforward
every discourse attested that fact. He was warned by the bishop,
threatened by the archbishop, but his flock closed around him, a living,
throbbing citadel. He ministered to them in their suffering, comforted
them in their sorrow, solemnized their nuptial vows, baptized their
babes, tenderly laid to rest their dead, and they truly loved him.
But the conviction that the orthodox pulpit and the forum of freedom
were irreconcilable, and that as a priest he was in the fetters of
theology, grew upon him, and in spite of the pleadings and protestings
of his followers he resigned his pastorate and withdrew from the
priesthood. The touching scene attending his farewell sermon has never
been described, and never will be, in human speech. The congregation,
seeming more like one great family, under Father McGrady’s tender and
affectionate ministrations, felt stricken as if by an unspeakably sad
personal bereavement, and sat in silence as they paid homage to their
departing friend and pastor in sobs and tears.
The tremendous public reception given the modern Saul at Cincinnati,
across the Ohio from his Kentucky home, is vividly remembered by
thousands who struggled in the crush of common humanity to get within
sound of his voice. He was now a full-fledged Social Revolutionist, and
like his immortal prototype of many centuries ago, the common people
heard him gladly.
The formal abdication of the priesthood by Father McGrady created a
great sensation. The dignitaries of the church affected pious rejoicing.
The recreant priest had long been a thorn in their complacent flesh. It
was well that the holy church was purged of his pernicious influence.
Columns of reports appeared in the daily papers, and the features of the
converted priest, with which these accounts were embellished, became
familiar to hundreds of thousands. A Socialist priest was indeed an
anomaly. Vast concourses of people were attracted by the mere mention of
his name. When he was announced to speak, standing room was always at a
premium.
McGrady was now at his best. The deep convictions he was now free to
express flowered in his speech and his oratory, like the peals of a
great organ and the chimes of sweet bells, moved and swayed the eager
masses. Everywhere the eloquent exponent of Socialism and pleader for
the oppressed was in demand. His fame preceded his footsteps.
Auditoriums, theaters and public halls were taxed to their capacity. The
eloquent Socialist evangelist was now one of the commanding figures of
the American platform. He was doing, superbly doing, the grand work for
which he had been fitted as if by special providence. From the Atlantic
seaboard to the Pacific slope his resonant voice was heard and the
multitude were stirred by his burning message of social regeneration.
It was in the midst of these oratorical triumphs that the first distinct
shock of organized opposition was felt. The capitalist press as a unit,
and as if by preconcerted action, cut him out of its columns. The
sensation created by McGrady’s leap from the Catholic pulpit to the
Socialist platform had been fully exploited as far as its news value was
concerned, and now the renegade priest, as his whilom paters in Christ,
who profess to love their enemies, call him, must be relegated to
oblivion by being totally ignored. The church he formerly served so
faithfully now began to-actively pursue him. Where he was announced to
speak priests admonished the faithful, either openly from the pulpit or
covertly through the confessional, not to stain their souls by venturing
near the anti-Christ. But this form of opposition, however vexatious,
trying and difficult to overcome, but aroused the latent spirit of the
crusader and intensified his determination. In the fierce fires of
persecution, fed and fanned by religious ignorance and fanaticism, he
was tempered for the far greater work that spread out before him, rich
and radiant as a field of promise.
“Unhappy man!” as Hugo wrote of Marshal Ney, who bared his breast to the
leaden hail of English foe on the field of Waterloo, “Thou wast reserved
for French bullets!”
Notwithstanding that McGrady was attracting vast audiences, including
many who had never before heard the philosophy of Socialism expounded,
the very ones most desired, and without whom progress is impossible;
notwithstanding the door receipts almost uniformly recouped the treasury
of the local Socialists by a substantial net balance, certain “leaders,”
whose narrow prejudices were inflamed by the new agitator’s success and
increasing popularity in the movement, began to turn upon him, and sting
him with venomous innuendo or attack him openly through the Socialist
press.
Paradoxical as it may seem, he was denied the right to serve the
Socialist movement—by Socialists.
Among the first charges brought against him—not by capitalists; they
were too wise, if not too decent, to utter such a palpable untruth, but
by men calling themselves Socialists—was that he had joined the movement
as a “grafter,” and was making Socialist speeches for “the money there
was in it.”
A baser falsehood, a more atrocious slander was never uttered.
Had McGrady been a miserable grafter instead of a great white soul, he
would have remained in the pulpit. His people worshipped him and his
“superiors” held out the most glittering inducements if he would only
abandon his wicked and abominable “economic heresies.” The eloquence and
power of the young priest were widely recognized in church circles. A
brilliant future spread out before him. He could easily become the
petted and pampered favorite of the fathers. But he spurned the life of
ease and luxury at the price of his self-respect. The positions of
eminence he might attain by stifling his convictions sank to degradation
from his lofty point of view.
Turning his back upon the wealth and luxury of the capitalist class he
cast his lot with the proletariat, the homeless and hungry, the ragged
and distressed, and this he did, according to some Socialists, to
“graft” on them, and the cry was raised, “The grafter must go!”
It was this that shocked his tender sensibilities, silenced his eloquent
tongue, and broke his noble and generous heart.
Those Socialists who vilified him as a “sky pilot,” and as a “grafter,”
who declared him to be “unsound,” “unscientific,” and who indulged in
similar tirade and twaddle, ought now to be satisfied. Their ambition
has been realized. They scourged the “fakir” from the platform with
whips of asps into a premature grave and he will trouble them no more.
May they find it in their consciences to forgive themselves.
There is a deep lesson in the melancholy and untimely death of Comrade
Thomas McGrady. Let us hope that so much good may result from it that
the cruel sacrifice may be softened by the atonement and serve the
future as a noble and inspiring example.
While it is the duty of every member to guard the movement against the
imposter, the chronic suspicion that a man who has risen above the
mental plane of a scavenger is a “grafter” is a besetting sin, and has
done incalculable harm to the movement. The increasing cry from the same
source that only the proletariat is revolutionary and that
“intellectuals” are middle class reactionaries is an insult to the
movement, many of whose staunchest supporters are of the latter type.
Moreover, it would imply by its sneering allusion to the “intellectuals”
that the proletariat are a brainless rabble, reveling in their base
degeneracy and scorning intellectual enlightenment.
Many a fine spirit who would have served the movement as an effective
agitator and powerful advocate, stung to the quick by the keen lash in
the hand of a “comrade,” has dropped into silence and faded into
obscurity.
Fortunately the influence of these self-appointed censors is waning. The
movement is no longer a mere fanatical sect. It has outgrown that period
in spite of its sentinels and doorkeepers.
Between watchful devotion, which guards against imposters and chronic
heresy hunting, which places a premium upon dirt and stupidity, and
imposes a penalty upon brains and self-respect, there is a difference
wide as the sea. The former is a virtue which cannot be too highly
commended, the latter a vice which cannot be too severely condemned.
Thomas McGrady was an absolutely honest man. Almost ten years of
intimate and varied relations with him enables the writer to
conscientiously pay him this tribute—to place this perennial flower
where he sleeps.
No attempt is made to convert our deceased comrade into a saint. Could
he speak he would not be shorn of his foibles. Like all great souls he
had his faults—the faults that attested his humanity and brought into
more perfect relief the many virtues which adorned his manly character
and enriched his noble life.
Thomas McGrady found joy in social service and his perfect consecration
to his social ideals was the crowning glory of his life and the bow of
promise at his death.