God and the Devil

God’s merits are so transcendent that it is not surprising his faults

should be in reasonable proportion. The faults are, indeed, on such a

scale that, when looked at without relation to the merits with which they

are interwoven, they become so appalling that people shrink from

ascribing them to the Deity and have invented the Devil, without seeing

that there would be more excuse for God’s killing the Devil, and so

getting rid of evil, than there can be for his failing to be everything

that he would like to be.

For God is not so white as he is painted, and he gets on better with the

Devil than people think. The Devil is too useful for him to wish him ill

and, in like manner, half the Devil’s trade would be at an end should any

great mishap bring God well down in the world. For all the mouths they

make at one another they play into each other’s hands and have got on so

well as partners, playing Spenlow and Jorkins to one another, for so many

years that there seems no reason why they should cease to do so. The

conception of them as the one absolutely void of evil and the other of

good is a vulgar notion taken from science whose priests have ever sought

to get every idea and every substance pure of all alloy.

God and the Devil are about as four to three. There is enough

preponderance of God to make it far safer to be on his side than on the

Devil’s, but the excess is not so great as his professional claqueurs

pretend it is. It is like gambling at Monte Carlo; if you play long

enough you are sure to lose, but now and again you may win a great deal

of excellent money if you will only cease playing the moment you have won

it.

The Note-Books of Samuel Butler · 第 525 / 602 题