Bunyan and the _Odyssey_

Anything worse than _The Pilgrim’s Progress_ in the matter of defiance of

literary canons can hardly be conceived. The allegory halts continually;

it professes to be spiritual, but nothing can be more carnal than the

golden splendour of the eternal city; the view of life and the world

generally is flat blasphemy against the order of things with which we are

surrounded. Yet, like the _Odyssey_, which flatly defies sense and

criticism (no, it doesn’t; still, it defies them a good deal), no one can

doubt that it must rank among the very greatest books that have ever been

written. How Odyssean it is in its sincerity and downrightness, as well

as in the marvellous beauty of its language, its freedom from all taint

of the schools and, not least, in complete victory of genuine internal

zeal over a scheme initially so faulty as to appear hopeless.

I read that part where Christian passes the lions which he thought were

free but which were really chained and it occurred to me that all lions

are chained until they actually eat us and that, the moment they do this,

they chain themselves up again automatically, as far as we are concerned.

If one dissects this passage it fares as many a passage in the _Odyssey_

does when we dissect it. Christian did not, after all, venture to pass

the lions till he was assured that they were chained. And really it is

more excusable to refuse point-blank to pass a couple of lions till one

knows whether they are chained or not—and the poor wicked people seem to

have done nothing more than this,—than it would be to pass them.

Besides, by being told, Christian fights, as it were, with loaded dice.

The Note-Books of Samuel Butler · 第 290 / 602 题