Handel and Bach

i

If you tie Handel’s hands by debarring him from the rendering of human

emotion, and if you set Bach’s free by giving him no human emotion to

render—if, in fact, you rob Handel of his opportunities and Bach of his

difficulties—the two men can fight after a fashion, but Handel will even

so come off victorious. Otherwise it is absurd to let Bach compete at

all. Nevertheless the cultured vulgar have at all times preferred

gymnastics and display to reticence and the healthy, graceful, normal

movements of a man of birth and education, and Bach is esteemed a more

profound musician than Handel in virtue of his frequent and more involved

complexity of construction. In reality Handel was profound enough to

eschew such wildernesses of counterpoint as Bach instinctively resorted

to, but he knew also that public opinion would be sure to place Bach on a

level with himself, if not above him, and this probably made him look

askance at Bach. At any rate he twice went to Germany without being at

any pains to meet him, and once, if not twice, refused Bach’s invitation.

ii

Rockstro says that Handel keeps much more closely to the old Palestrina

rules of counterpoint than Bach does, and that when Handel takes a

licence it is a good bold one taken rarely, whereas Bach is niggling away

with small licences from first to last.

The Note-Books of Samuel Butler · 第 169 / 602 题