Darwin among the Machines

[To the Editor of the _Press_, Christchurch, New Zealand—13 June, 1863.]

Sir—There are few things of which the present generation is more justly

proud than of the wonderful improvements which are daily taking place in

all sorts of mechanical appliances. And indeed it is matter for great

congratulation on many grounds. It is unnecessary to mention these here,

for they are sufficiently obvious; our present business lies with

considerations which may somewhat tend to humble our pride and to make us

think seriously of the future prospects of the human race. If we revert

to the earliest primordial types of mechanical life, to the lever, the

wedge, the inclined plane, the screw and the pulley, or (for analogy

would lead us one step further) to that one primordial type from which

all the mechanical kingdom has been developed, we mean to the lever

itself, and if we then examine the machinery of the _Great Eastern_, we

find ourselves almost awestruck at the vast development of the mechanical

world, at the gigantic strides with which it has advanced in comparison

with the slow progress of the animal and vegetable kingdom. We shall

find it impossible to refrain from asking ourselves what the end of this

mighty movement is to be. In what direction is it tending? What will be

its upshot? To give a few imperfect hints towards a solution of these

questions is the object of the present letter.

We have used the words “mechanical life,” “the mechanical kingdom,” “the

mechanical world” and so forth, and we have done so advisedly, for as the

vegetable kingdom was slowly developed from the mineral, and as, in like

manner, the animal supervened upon the vegetable, so now, in these last

few ages, an entirely new kingdom has sprung up of which we as yet have

only seen what will one day be considered the antediluvian prototypes of

the race.

We regret deeply that our knowledge both of natural history and of

machinery is too small to enable us to undertake the gigantic task of

classifying machines into the genera and sub-genera, species, varieties

and sub-varieties, and so forth, of tracing the connecting links between

machines of widely different characters, of pointing out how subservience

to the use of man has played that part among machines which natural

selection has performed in the animal and vegetable kingdom, of pointing

out rudimentary organs [_see note_] which exist in some few machines,

feebly developed and perfectly useless, yet serving to mark descent from

some ancestral type which has either perished or been modified into some

new phase of mechanical existence. We can only point out this field for

investigation; it must be followed by others whose education and talents

have been of a much higher order than any which we can lay claim to.

Some few hints we have determined to venture upon, though we do so with

the profoundest diffidence. Firstly we would remark that as some of the

lowest of the vertebrata attained a far greater size than has descended

to their more highly organised living representatives, so a diminution in

the size of machines has often attended their development and progress.

Take the watch for instance. Examine the beautiful structure of the

little animal, watch the intelligent play of the minute members which

compose it; yet this little creature is but a development of the cumbrous

clocks of the thirteenth century—it is no deterioration from them. The

day may come when clocks, which certainly at the present day are not

diminishing in bulk, may be entirely superseded by the universal use of

watches, in which case clocks will become extinct like the earlier

saurians, while the watch (whose tendency has for some years been rather

to decrease in size than the contrary) will remain the only existing type

of an extinct race.

The views of machinery which we are thus feebly indicating will suggest

the solution of one of the greatest and most mysterious questions of the

day. We refer to the question: What sort of creature man’s next

successor in the supremacy of the earth is likely to be. We have often

heard this debated; but it appears to us that we are ourselves creating

our own successors; we are daily adding to the beauty and delicacy of

their physical organisation; we are daily giving them greater power and

supplying, by all sorts of ingenious contrivances, that self-regulating,

self-acting power which will be to them what intellect has been to the

human race. In the course of ages we shall find ourselves the inferior

race. Inferior in power, inferior in that moral quality of self-control,

we shall look up to them as the acme of all that the best and wisest man

can ever dare to aim at. No evil passions, no jealousy, no avarice, no

impure desires will disturb the serene might of those glorious creatures.

Sin, shame and sorrow will have no place among them. Their minds will be

in a state of perpetual calm, the contentment of a spirit that knows no

wants, is disturbed by no regrets. Ambition will never torture them.

Ingratitude will never cause them the uneasiness of a moment. The guilty

conscience, the hope deferred, the pains of exile, the insolence of

office and the spurns that patient merit of the unworthy takes—these will

be entirely unknown to them. If they want “feeding” (by the use of which

very word we betray our recognition of them as living organism) they will

be attended by patient slaves whose business and interest it will be to

see that they shall want for nothing. If they are out of order they will

be promptly attended to by physicians who are thoroughly acquainted with

their constitutions; if they die, for even these glorious animals will

not be exempt from that necessary and universal consummation, they will

immediately enter into a new phase of existence, for what machine dies

entirely in every part at one and the same instant?

We take it that when the state of things shall have arrived which we have

been above attempting to describe, man will have become to the machine

what the horse and the dog are to man. He will continue to exist, nay

even to improve, and will be probably better off in his state of

domestication under the beneficent rule of the machines than he is in his

present wild state. We treat our horses, dogs, cattle and sheep, on the

whole, with great kindness, we give them whatever experience teaches us

to be best for them, and there can be no doubt that our use of meat has

added to the happiness of the lower animals far more than it has

detracted from it; in like manner it is reasonable to suppose that the

machines will treat us kindly, for their existence is as dependent upon

ours as ours is upon the lower animals. They cannot kill us and eat us

as we do sheep, they will not only require our services in the

parturition of their young (which branch of their economy will remain

always in our hands) but also in feeding them, in setting them right if

they are sick, and burying their dead or working up their corpses into

new machines. It is obvious that if all the animals in Great Britain

save man alone were to die, and if at the same time all intercourse with

foreign countries were by some sudden catastrophe to be rendered

perfectly impossible, it is obvious that under such circumstances the

loss of human life would be something fearful to contemplate—in like

manner, were mankind to cease, the machines would be as badly off or even

worse. The fact is that our interests are inseparable from theirs, and

theirs from ours. Each race is dependent upon the other for innumerable

benefits, and, until the reproductive organs of the machines have been

developed in a manner which we are hardly yet able to conceive, they are

entirely dependent upon man for even the continuance of their species.

It is true that these organs may be ultimately developed, inasmuch as

man’s interest lies in that direction; there is nothing which our

infatuated race would desire more than to see a fertile union between two

steam engines; it is true that machinery is even at this present time

employed in begetting machinery, in becoming the parent of machines often

after its own kind, but the days of flirtation, courtship and matrimony

appear to be very remote and indeed can hardly be realised by our feeble

and imperfect imagination.

Day by day, however, the machines are gaining ground upon us; day by day

we are becoming more subservient to them; more men are daily bound down

as slaves to tend them, more men are daily devoting the energies of their

whole lives to the development of mechanical life. The upshot is simply

a question of time, but that the time will come when the machines will

hold the real supremacy over the world and its inhabitants is what no

person of a truly philosophic mind can for a moment question.

Our opinion is that war to the death should be instantly proclaimed

against them. Every machine of every sort should be destroyed by the

well-wisher of his species. Let there be no exceptions made, no quarter

shown; let us at once go back to the primeval condition of the race. If

it be urged that this is impossible under the present condition of human

affairs, this at once proves that the mischief is already done, that our

servitude has commenced in good earnest, that we have raised a race of

beings whom it is beyond our power to destroy and that we are not only

enslaved but are absolutely acquiescent in our bondage.

For the present we shall leave this subject which we present gratis to

the members of the Philosophical Society. Should they consent to avail

themselves of the vast field which we have pointed out, we shall

endeavour to labour in it ourselves at some future and indefinite period.

I am, Sir, &c.,

CELLARIUS.

NOTE.—We were asked by a learned brother philosopher who saw this article

in MS. what we meant by alluding to rudimentary organs in machines.

Could we, he asked, give any example of such organs? We pointed to the

little protuberance at the bottom of the bowl of our tobacco pipe. This

organ was originally designed for the same purpose as the rim at the

bottom of a tea-cup, which is but another form of the same function. Its

purpose was to keep the heat of the pipe from marking the table on which

it rested. Originally, as we have seen in very early tobacco pipes, this

protuberance was of a very different shape to what it is now. It was

broad at the bottom and flat, so that while the pipe was being smoked,

the bowl might rest upon the table. Use and disuse have here come into

play and served to reduce the function to its present rudimentary

condition. That these rudimentary organs are rarer in machinery than in

animal life is owing to the more prompt action of the human selection as

compared with the slower but even surer operation of natural selection.

Man may make mistakes; in the long run nature never does so. We have

only given an imperfect example, but the intelligent reader will supply

himself with illustrations.

The Note-Books of Samuel Butler · 第 65 / 602 题