BY M.V. DESHAYES.

No body among the metals and the metalloids (silicium, titanium,

tungsten, chromium, phosphorus, etc.) has occupied a more prominent

position in modern metallurgy than _manganese_, and it is chiefly due

to its great affinity for oxygen. When this substance was discovered,

more than a century ago (1774), by the celebrated Swedish chemist and

mineralogist, Gahn, by treating the black oxide of manganese in the

crucible, no one would have thought that the new element, so delicate

by itself, without any direct industrial use, would become, in the

middle of the nineteenth century, one of the most powerful and

necessary instruments for the success of the Bessemer process, as well

for its deoxidizing properties as for the qualities which it imparts

to steel, increasing its resistance, its durability, and its

elasticity, as has been shown elsewhere.

Without entering into a complete history (for it is beyond the task

which we have here assumed),[1] it will not be without interest to

recall how, when manganese was first obtained in a pure state, that it

was supposed that it would remain simply an object of curiosity in the

laboratory; but when its presence was proved in spiegeleisen and when

it came to be considered an essential ingredient in the best German

and English works for cutlery steel (where it is thrown into the

crucible as the peroxide), then we find that its qualities become

better and better appreciated; and it is surprising that no

technologist ever devoted his attention to the production of manganese

alloys.

[Footnote 1: See _Engineering_, May 27, 1881]

It was not till after the investigations of Dr. Percy, Tamm, Prieger,

and Bessemer, who employed crucibles for the production of these

alloys, that Hendersen received the idea of utilizing it in the

Siemens furnace. So important a compound could not remain unemployed.

The works at Terre Noire produced, by the Martin furnace, for a number

of years, ferro-manganese of 70 to 80 per cent. Shortly afterward,

when competition in the market was established, the works at Carniola

and at Carinthia, some English factories, and more especially the

works at Saint-Louis, near Marseilles, of Terre Noire, of Montluçon,

etc., successfully adopted the manufacture of _ferro-manganese with

the blast furnace_, which is without doubt the method best adapted for

the reduction of metallic oxides, as well in consideration of the

reactions as from an economical point of view. Before very long it was

possible to produce, by the blast furnace, alloys of 40, 60, 80, and

even 86 per cent., in using the hot air apparatus of Siemens, Cowper,

and Witwell, with the employment of good coke, and principally by

calculating the charges for the fusion in such a manner as to obtain

an extra basic and refractory slag.

Following in the same path, the Phoenix Co., of Ruhrort, sent, in

1880, to the Metallurgical Exposition of Dusseldorf, samples of

ferro-manganese obtained in a blast furnace, with an extra basic slag

in which the silica was almost entirely replaced by alumina. The works

of L'Esperance, at Oberhausen, exhibited similar products, quite pure

as to sulphur and phosphorus, and they had a double interest at the

exhibition, in consideration of the agitation over the Thomas and

Gilchrist process (see the discussions which were raised at the

meeting of the Iron and Steel Institute). This process unfortunately

requires for its prompt success the use of a very large quantity of

spiegel or of ferro-manganese, in order to sufficiently carburize and

deoxidize the burnt iron, which is the final product of the blowing.

The production of ferro-manganese by the blast furnace depends upon

the following conditions.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 315, January 14, 1882 · 第 68 / 122 题