CHAPTER XXIV.

DR. JOHN WALKER.

Jenner’s references to the good effects of vaccination in London

were curiously inconsistent. That vaccination in which he professed

to rejoice was chiefly the work of Dr. John Walker, whose practice

he had denounced as so widely at variance with what he considered

correct, that even the wreck of the Royal Jennerian Society was not

thought too heavy a price to pay for deliverance from complicity

with him. The London Vaccine Institution, established in 1806 by

Walker and his friends, was responsible for the large majority

of vaccinations effected in the metropolis. Walker was a pure

enthusiast, of boundless energy, with a craze for vaccinating.

Adverse results had no effect upon him: he did not deny, but simply

did not recognise them, and held on prophesying and practising with

mechanical persistency. Nevertheless, he ran aground. The income of

the Institution had dwindled to less than £100 a year when Andrew

Johnstone, a Cumberland man, a school-fellow of Walker, came to

his assistance. With a commercial eye he surveyed the situation.

He perceived that though vaccination had fallen into disrepute,

there remained many believers who only required stirring up and

solicitation to provide funds to keep Walker going and to yield

the collector a satisfactory commission. As the Royal Jennerian

Society had ceased to exist for any active purpose in 1810, nothing

remaining “but a Patronage, a Presidency, and an unorganised body

of Subscribers and Governors,” it occurred to him that it would be

good policy to annex these to the revived enterprise, and in due

course a union was effected, and the LONDON VACCINE INSTITUTION

AND ROYAL JENNERIAN SOCIETY became the title to conjure with. An

attempt was made to secure Jenner for President, but that was too

bold a stroke. He thus answered the application--

CHELTENHAM, _3rd September, 1813_.

Although it must be evident that every institution which has for

its object the extension of Vaccine Inoculation, must have my

best wishes for its success, yet, for reasons which on reflection

must be obvious, you must see the impossibility of my accepting

the offered appointment.

Highly impressive were the Reports of the reconstituted Institution

under the patronage of the Corporation of the City of London with

the City Arms on the covers. Subsequently the King, George IV.,

appeared as patron, and the City Arms gave place to the Royal Arms.

Among the presidents were the Archbishop of Canterbury, four or

five Dukes (one of them Wellington), half a dozen Marquises and as

many Bishops, about a score of Earls, with M.P.’s and pious and

philanthropic notables many. So much was due to the tact of Andrew

Johnstone, who understood the use of names, who never dropped one

of the least influence, and, spite of Jenner’s ill-will, dealt

with his honours and countenance as though they belonged to the

Institution. Business is business, he would have said, and holds

no reckoning with pique and dislike. Nevertheless the financial

results did not correspond with the overpowering patronage. The

income of the Institution never attained £1000 a year, whilst the

bills for advertising and printing sometimes approached £500. In

the Report for 1827 we find the operations thus summarised--

Vaccinated during 1826 by Dr. Walker, 4,217

From the beginning, 1803, 65,750

By appointed Inoculators in London and environs

in 1826, 16,999

From the beginning, 237,119

By appointed Inoculators in the country in 1826, 21,261

From the beginning, 548,430

The income of the Institution in 1826 was £620 15s., and the

expenditure £715 12s., leaving a deficit of £94 17s.

The figures are interesting, for they afford some idea of the

extent of London vaccination during a quarter of a century. The

operations of the Vaccine Institution lay chiefly among the

poor--the vast majority in London as in every city; and if we

allow that in the course of five-and-twenty years, 350,000, in

a population of upwards of 1,000,000 in the flux of life and

death, were operated on, we give a liberal estimate in favour

of vaccination. That even so many could have much effect on the

prevalence of smallpox (except for aggravation) is incredible,

unless the vicarious action of vaccination be seriously asserted.

Turning over Walker’s report it is amusing to observe how any

abatement in London smallpox was attributed to vaccination, and any

increase to its neglect--an ingenuous exemplification of the fable

of the Fly and the Wheel.

The appointed inoculators of the Institution were a numerous

body--250 names and addresses are given in one of the Reports. They

were chiefly London tradesmen with a taste for doing what they

thought “good.” As vaccination came to be regarded as professional

work, these “unqualified practitioners” gave cause for offence,

but Walker held stoutly to his opinion, which he shared with

Jenner, that vaccination might be performed by any man or woman.

In Walker’s words, “It is easier to perform the whole business of

vaccination than it is to thread a needle--yea, it is easier.”

The annexation of the remains of the Royal Jennerian Society by

Walker was much disliked by Jenner and his associates; and when

the revived enterprise showed signs of prosperity, their dislike

developed to open enmity, and John Ring’s services as bravo and

satirist were called into requisition. He first tried his hand,

anonymously, in a volume of doggerel, published in 1815, entitled

_The Vaccine Scourge_,[185] in which Walker is represented as

singing--

I am a jolly beggar,

From Cockermouth I came;

I do pretend to be a Friend,

John Walker is my name;

And a-begging we will go, will go, will go,

And a-begging we will go.

The verses, extending over a hundred pages, are wretched stuff,

vulgar and malevolent, and a few extracts from the Preface will

indicate the animus of the entire performance. Ring’s assumption

was, first, that Walker was a rogue from whom the public required

to be protected; second, that his Institution was superfluous; and

third, that if greater facilities for vaccination were wanted in

London, it should be left to the Government to provide them--

These hints may serve to warn the public. Dr. Walker is an

artful, avaricious, and ambitious man; but let him be cautious

how he acts when he tries to exercise his art, to glut his

avarice, and to gratify his ambition. Let him recollect what was

inscribed on the tombstone of an infamous scoundrel--

“Lie still if you’re wise;

You’ll be damned if you rise.”

We recommend him and his accomplices not to try to obtain

money by false pretences. A Vaccine Institution has long been

established by the Legislature, where, as well as at other

Institutions, matter may be procured free of expense; and no one

who has much zeal in the cause of Vaccination will find much

difficulty in procuring it. If farther aid is necessary, let it

be granted by Parliament, and not to a set of swindlers. It is

not meet to take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs.

Many of the agents of the London Vaccine Institution were chemists

and apothecaries, and these, according to Ring, had an interest in

the propagation of smallpox--

To exterminate Smallpox by means of chemists and apothecaries,

the greatest friends of Smallpox, is to cast out devils by

Beelzebub, the prince of the devils. You might as well expect

a foxhunter to destroy the breed of foxes, or a ratcatcher to

exterminate the race of rats.

The _Vaccine Scourge_ producing little effect, Ring returned to

the charge in the following year, 1816, with _A Caution against

Vaccine Swindlers and Imposters_.[186] The _Caution_ is a series

of libels, the puerility and extravagance of which were their own

nullification. A motto was taken from the _New Monthly Magazine_

for the title-page, as follows--

The Jennerian discovery has shed a brilliant lustre on our era;

but unfortunately, the discovery has been in a great degree

rendered abortive by _bastard institutions_, created for the

purpose of filling the pockets of _a set of adventurers, without

education_, and _destitute of principle_. We could name several

wretches who have fattened, and are still fattening, on such jobs.

Ring delivered his mind unequivocally. Walker was an imposter, and

the London Vaccine Institution prospered by his frauds--

There is a Society in this Metropolis [he wrote], falsely calling

itself the Royal Jennerian Society, which has been collecting

subscriptions to a considerable amount under that assumed name;

and thus collecting money under false pretences.

An eminent physician speaking of this Society and its successful

state, called it a successful villany; and villany is not the

less villany because it is successful.

It has also been organising a complete system of quackery, by

granting diplomas to persons totally ignorant of the first

principles of the medical profession, which will add to the

present host of empirics.

No one can now pass along the streets without being annoyed with

the inscription, VACCINATION GRATIS UNDER THE SANCTION OF THE

LONDON VACCINE INSTITUTION in one pane of glass, MACASSAR OIL in

a second, and PATENT BLACKING in a third. In short Vaccination is

now _quite a drug_.

These were words of envy and malice, and came with odious

inconsistency from the spokesman of Jenner, who had instructed

and encouraged his acquaintances, male and female, to practise

vaccination. We may, however, take Ring’s evidence as to Walker’s

activity in London--

Dr. Walker glories in his chemical, galenical, pharmaceutical,

and dentrifical inoculators; and boasts that they exceed in

number those of any other vaccine institution; but he glories in

his shame. _Non numerentur, sed ponderentur._ They are springing

up under every pestle and mortar, and barber’s pole, like

mushrooms in a hot-bed, from Hyde-Park Corner to Whitechapel, and

from Whitechapel to Blackwall. It is the duty of every regular

practitioner to expose such imposters, and to encourage such

exposure. It is, in fact, the rescuing of life from fraudulent

and rapacious hands.

One of his inoculators is Mr. Campbell, who cures all sorts of

incurable diseases with _Elephants’ Milk_. He says he recently

sent 20,000 bottles to Russia at 11s. each. He also sells the

Milk in pills at 2s. 9d. a box. The poor have the Milk at

half-price; and strict secresy is preserved.

In Walker’s Plan for 1814, it appears that he grants his diplomas

to those who _are not_, as well as to those who _are_, of the

medical profession, and that Inoculators in the country are

requested and _authorised_ to put up a board with the following

inscription, PROTECTION FROM SMALLPOX UNDER THE SANCTION OF

THE LONDON VACCINE INSTITUTION. Then is to follow the name

of the farrier, cobbler, barber, barber-surgeon, apothecary,

man-midwife, tooth-drawer, druggist, chemist, oil-man,

cheesemonger, drysalter, or grocer, who dispenses the blessing of

Vaccination gratuitously.

The motley crew thus appointed are directed to make an Annual

Return of the numbers inoculated by them in order to swell Dr.

Walker’s list; and such inoculators are not in general very nice

in their calculations. Many of them will, in all probability,

like other quacks, pretend to a hundred times more than they

really perform.

Those who continued to believe that Vaccination was an easy and

harmless operation, could see nothing but good management in the

multiplication of Walker’s agencies, nor anything but meanness

in Ring’s sneers at tradesmen. His assertion that the use of

the title of the Royal Jennerian Society was fraudulent, had no

justification, yet it was his persistent reproach--

Honesty is the best policy. I therefore sincerely advise Dr.

Walker and his Board, to assume no more the title of the Royal

Jennerian Society, to which they must know they have not the

least claim, lest they should be brought before the Lord Mayor

as swindlers, and be prosecuted for obtaining money under false

pretences. I am informed that they have already been compelled

to refund a legacy of £100; and it is to be hoped they will be

compelled to refund the rest of their ill-gotten store.

Lastly, he appealed to the members of the Jennerian Society,

demanding--

How long will they suffer their names to be prostituted, and the

public to be deluded by a set of swindlers and imposters; by

men who are neither dignified by their rank, nor distinguished

by their talents; by a set of daring adventurers and despicable

upstarts! It is a gross insult and indignity, to which no man of

the least sense of honour, or of shame, would submit.

But they did submit, and why not? Enthusiasm for Vaccination had

passed away. It had been found out; it was everywhere distrusted;

and those who held by it had to see it pushed on the same terms as

any other quack prescription. What then was there to object to in

Walker s procedure? The reason for Ring’s libels lay in Jenner’s

jealousy. Walker was Jenner’s abhorrence. He had joined in the

conspiracy to oust Walker from the Jennerian Society in 1806, but

the operation proved fatal to the Society, whilst Walker conveyed

the confidence and subscriptions of the faithful to his new

Institution. What wonder, then, that Jenner disliked the eccentric

Quaker! Even worse; Walker accurately appraised Jenner’s share in

“the vaccine discovery,” which came, he said, from Jenner as a

hint, and was developed by Pearson and Woodville in practice--a

fact that was as gall and wormwood to Jenner. Moreover, Walker

had written a Jenneric Opera in which Jenner was represented as a

country apothecary riding up to London on a cow, and going round

a-begging among the nobility and gentry. Wherefore says Ring--

As to the calumny and detraction which Dr. Jenner and his friends

have received at the hands of that desperate adventurer in his

Jenneric Opera and elsewhere, they are content to bear it,

provided he will not again use the language of flattery toward

them; nor lavish his encomiums on them in that polluted channel,

the Medical Journal. His resentment can do very little harm,

which is more than can be said of his adulation.

“It is the slaver kills, and not the bite!”

Ring was an awkward champion. He sneered at Walker’s diplomas

certifying fitness to act as vaccinator--

They will have the same authority [he said] and the same virtue

as a diploma from the University of St. Andrews; and in all

probability will in a short time be sold at the same price--

Forgetful that it was from St. Andrews that Jenner purchased his

M.D.!

With equal recklessness, he denounced Walker as a vaccinator,

saying--

He tells the public in his Address that “Vaccination will shed

consolation into the bosom of every family;” but alas! I have

known many a family that has had reason to rue the day in which

they believed him, when he told them this flattering tale....

It is very necessary that his followers pray that the Lord have

mercy on them, if they have no other director than Dr. Walker.

Concerning the consequences of Walker’s operations, Ring, no

doubt, testified truly. Many continue to rue the day when they

listen to the flattering tale of the vaccinator. But the testimony

came strangely from a Jennerite, who was ready to swear that

any abatement of smallpox in London was due to the vaccinations

effected in great part by “that desperate adventurer,” Walker!

Ring was implacable, the more so, perhaps, as Walker and his

friends were apparently indifferent to his abuse. He burst forth

afresh in the _London Medical Repository_ for 1821, where among

much else we find the following--

HANOVER STREET, _11th October, 1821_.

The mock Royal Jennerian Society is extending its impositions and

depredations. The emissaries of this bastard institution, as well

as the principals, should suffer transportation if there be any

public spirit among us.

I beg leave to add that the present Society is disclaimed by Dr.

Jenner, who cautioned the Emperor of Russia against it when his

Majesty was in London in 1814.

In my _Caution against Vaccine Swindlers and Imposters_,

published in 1816, I related several instances of the ill effects

of Dr. Walker’s practice, and some in which it had proved

fatal. It was partly for his mal-practice, and partly for his

mis-conduct, that he was about to be expelled from the Royal

Jennerian Society; and, after his artful and wicked stratagems,

was permitted to resign; yet now he has the arrogance to call

himself Director of that Society, and to issue his venal diplomas

in its name. If Dr. Walker must imitate the universities of St.

Andrews and Aberdeen, let him at least have like them _some_

certificate of qualification. If he is determined _to grow rich

by degrees_, let him also endeavour to grow wise and honest.

The diplomas which thus moved Ring’s wrath were imposing documents,

certifying that the holder was authorised to vaccinate, intended to

be framed and exhibited in the shop or parlour. There was a picture

of something like an arch of Waterloo Bridge with London in the

background and the Royal Arms overhead; Jenner standing on a pier

with a dead serpent hanging in limp folds over his arm, with the

inscription, _Per omnia littora vincitur variola_; a woman milking

a cow with a group of children around her, drinking milk out of

porringers, as if milk were cowpox; whilst the bed of the Thames

was blocked with the names of the great and good who had testified

in favour of vaccination--an allegorical style of representation

then much in vogue and considered impressive.

In order to create prejudice, Ring had much to say of Walker’s

religious and political principles. He was a Quaker of the Thomas

Paine pattern, and like Paine had associated with the French

revolutionists; but whilst dressing as a Friend, and associating

with Friends, he was too unconformable a personality for their

Society, and was never received into membership. Ring’s imputations

of rapacity and avarice were grossly absurd as applied to Walker.

He cared for nothing beyond support in his work as vaccinator. It

was said he would take a £5 note, fold it, stick a pin through

it, write an address on the back, and post it. He would rarely

vaccinate the well-to-do. If they came to his office, he would

ask, “Who is thy medical attendant?” and wrapping up some fresh

matter on glasses would say, “Take this with my compliments to

thy medical attendant, and he will do what is requisite quite as

well as myself.” When he did call at a house to vaccinate, he

never asked for a fee, and his biographer, Dr. Epps,[187] observes

that he was only known on one occasion to express a wish for

remuneration. Meeting a merchant in St. Paul’s Churchyard, whose

household he had vaccinated at some inconvenience, he observed,

“Friend, if thou has sent by thy servant a draft for my services to

thy family, he has either robbed me or deceived thee.” When money

was brought to him, he usually called his wife to receive it, she

having the undivided care of all that pertained to him apart from

vaccination. Of this good woman, Annie, he was in the habit of

speaking with an admiration and unreserve that constituted one of

his numerous oddities. For example, when Dr. Moore in his _History

of Vaccination_ observed somewhat maliciously--

John Walker, it is said, procured a medical diploma from the

indulgent University of Leyden; and more excellent work than

Walker’s has rarely been performed by a humbler instrument--

Walker good-humouredly replied, that Moore as a Glasgow man

naturally preferred his own University to that of Leyden, but he

too had cause to love Glasgow--

“Glasgow is a bonnie town, and there are bonnie lasses in it.”

There is not any other spot on the surface of the globe where

I have experienced a happiness so complete as I obtained in it

in 1799. Let any bachelor who cannot divine what this assertion

may mean, be informed, that it was then and there I entered into

marriage; and the covenant was ratified in the office of the

Clerk of the Peace for the county of Lanarkshire.[188]

Walker was obstinate, but not vindictive. Dr. James Sims offered

him £1000 in 1806 to prosecute his adversaries for conspiracy,

but he left them to their devices, and proved his quality by

outworking and superseding them. He replied to Moore’s flippant

version of the causes that led to the division and destruction of

the Royal Jennerian Society with perfect self-control and manifest

truthfulness, but at the same time with a simplicity not of this

world.[189] Jenner’s spite, Ring’s abuse, and the sneers of the

superfine did him little harm; and, if vaccination were beneficial,

I should have nothing but praise for the good people, who,

recognising the sincerity of his work, disregarded trivialities of

manner, and supported him loyally as a faithful servant.

Walker was nothing but a vaccinator. Day after day, in rain or

sunshine, his lank figure, and self-complacent visage under a

white broad-brimmed hat were to be seen making the round of the

vaccine stations. When he entered a room, he first glanced at the

table on which he expected to find his books. If any mothers had

placed their children’s bonnets or garments thereon, they were at

once swept off. He then ranged the company in order against the

wall like a schoolmaster, and delivered a short address on the

protection he was about to confer. The children’s names were taken

down with a preliminary caution to speak distinctly. When women

muttered or gabbled, the Doctor grew irritable, and would sometimes

make a troublesome woman spell her infant’s name half-a-dozen

times, adding, “Now thou wilt know how to speak plainly.” Having

got the names, he had next to look out for virus. The few mothers

who had ventured to return with their vaccinated babes for

examination, would perhaps lose courage and attempt to escape, when

Walker would dart to the door and arrest the fugitive, saying,

“Thou foolish woman! If thou wilt not do good to others, I will

bless thy little one,” and would proceed to gather what he called

his “Vaccine Roses.” He pursued his operations calmly indifferent

to the screams of the children and the complaints of the

mothers, and as he disposed of each case pronounced the illusory

benediction, “Thy child is safe: fear not: fare thee well.”

Walker died in 1830, aged seventy-one, after a short illness, in

which “he refused to take any medicine though himself a physician.”

In the Report of the London Vaccine Institution for 1831 we read--

He was a man who day after day, month after month, and year after

year, watched with the care of a parent the cause of which he

was so experienced an advocate; who was willing to know nothing

but the object of his early love, Vaccination; who for upwards

of a quarter of a century never omitted one lawful day going his

rounds to the numerous stations of the Institution; and who, it

may be almost said, ended his life with the lancet in his hand,

for he went round to the stations two days before he died.

Toward the end of his life, he used to boast that he had performed

upwards of one hundred thousand vaccinations. So far as vaccination

prevailed in London, it was chiefly through Walker’s exertions; and

he was just the character, being set going, to keep going whatever

the adverse evidence or obloquy. He had his plans and his methods,

and those who tried to modify them took nothing by their pains.

He was a man to have his own way, and those who did not like him

might leave him. Whether from incapacity or affectation, he made no

attempt at politeness, and said precisely what he thought without

accommodation. He was a piece of mechanism rather than of genial

humanity.

FOOTNOTES:

[185] _The Vaccine Scourge containing the New Beggar’s Opera_ alias

_the Walkerian Farce_, alias _the London Vaccine Hoax; in answer to

Dr. Walker’s Jenneric Opera. A Rod for the Fool’s Back._ London,

1815. Pp. 122. Price 3s.

[186] _A Caution against Vaccine Swindlers and Imposters._ By John

Ring. London, 1816. Pp. 140.

[187] _The Life of John Walker, M.D., Graduate of the University of

Leyden; Licentiate of the Royal College of Physicians of London;

and late Director of the Royal Jennerian and London Vaccine

Institutions._ By John Epps, M.D., London, 1831. Pp. 342.

[188] _John Walker’s Reply to James Moore._ London, 1818. Pp. 16.

[189] _John Walker’s Reply to James Moore on his Mis-Statements

respecting the Vaccine Establishments in the Metropolis and their

Officers and Servants both Living and Dead._ London, 1818. Pp. 114.

The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters · 第 24 / 43 章