II.

IF this God exists, how do we know that he is-I good? How can we prove

that he is merciful, that he cares for the children of men? If this

God exists, he has on many occasions seen millions of his poor children

plowing the fields, sowing and planting the grain, and when he saw them

he knew that they depended on the expected crop for life, and yet this

good God, this merciful being, withheld the rain. He caused the sun to

rise, to steal all moisture from the land, but gave no rain. He saw the

seeds that man had planted wither and perish, but he sent no rain. He

saw the people look with sad eyes upon the barren earth, and he sent no

rain. He saw them slowly devour the little that they had, and saw them

when the days of hunger came--saw them slowly waste away, saw their

hungry, sunken eyes, heard their prayers, saw them devour the miserable

animals that they had, saw fathers and mothers, insane with hunger,

kill and eat their shriveled babes, and yet the heaven above them was

as brass and the earth beneath as iron, and he sent no rain. Can we say

that in the heart of this God there blossomed the flower of pity? Can

we say that he cared for the children of men? Can we say that his mercy

endureth forever?

Do we prove that this God is good because he sends the cyclone that

wrecks villages and covers the fields with the mangled bodies of

fathers, mothers and babes? Do we prove his goodness by showing that he

has opened the earth and swallowed thousands of his helpless children,

or that with the volcanoes he has overwhelmed them with rivers of fire?

Can we infer the goodness of God from the facts we know?

If these calamities did not happen, would we suspect that God cared

nothing for human beings? If there were no famine, no pestilence, no

cyclone, no earthquake, would we think that God is not good?

According to the theologians, God did not make all men alike. He made

races differing in intelligence, stature and color. Was there goodness,

was there wisdom in this?

Ought the superior races to thank God that they are not the inferior? If

we say yes, then I ask another question: Should the inferior races thank

God that they are not superior, or should they thank God that they are

not beasts?

When God made these different races he knew that the superior would

enslave the inferior, knew that the inferior would be conquered, and

finally destroyed.

If God did this, and knew the blood that would be shed, the agonies that

would be endured, saw the countless fields covered with the corpses of

the slain, saw all the bleeding backs of slaves, all the broken hearts

of mothers bereft of babes, if he saw and knew all this, can we conceive

of a more malicious fiend?

Why, then, should we say that God is good?

The dungeons against whose dripping walls the brave and generous have

sighed their souls away, the scaffolds stained and glorified with noble

blood, the hopeless slaves with scarred and bleeding backs, the writhing

martyrs clothed in flame, the virtuous stretched on racks, their joints

and muscles torn apart, the flayed and bleeding bodies of the just, the

extinguished eyes of those who sought for truth, the countless patriots

who fought and died in vain, the burdened, beaten, weeping wives,

the shriveled faces of neglected babes, the murdered millions of the

vanished years, the victims of the winds and waves, of flood and flame,

of imprisoned forces in the earth, of lightning's stroke, of lava's

molten stream, of famine, plague and lingering pain, the mouths that

drip with blood, the fangs that poison, the beaks that wound and tear,

the triumphs of the base, the rule and sway of wrong, the crowns that

cruelty has worn and the robed hypocrites, with clasped and bloody

hands, who thanked their God--a phantom fiend--that liberty had been

banished from the world, these souvenirs of the dreadful past, these

horrors that still exist, these frightful facts deny that any God exists

who has the will and power to guard and bless the human race.

The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 04 (of 12) Dresden Edition—Lectures · 第 94 / 103 题