IV.

AMONG such books my youth was passed. All the seeds of Christianity--of

superstition, were sown in my mind and cultivated with great diligence

and care.

All that time I knew nothing of any science--nothing about the other

side--nothing of the objections that had been urged against the blessed

Scriptures, or against the perfect Congregational creed. Of course I

had heard the ministers speak of blasphemers, of infidel wretches,

of scoffers who laughed at holy things. They did not answer their

arguments, but they tore their characters into shreds and demonstrated

by the fury of assertion that they had done the Devil's work. And yet in

spite of all I heard--of all I read, I could not quite believe. My brain

and heart said No.

For a time I left the dreams, the insanities, the illusions and

delusions, the nightmares of theology. I studied astronomy, just a

little--I examined maps of the heavens--learned the names of some of the

constellations--of some of the stars--found something of their size and

the velocity with which they wheeled in their orbits--obtained a faint

conception of astronomical spaces--found that some of the known stars

were so far away in the depths of space that their light, traveling at

the rate of nearly two hundred thousand miles a second, required many

years to reach this little world--found that, compared with the great

stars, our earth was but a grain of sand--an atom--found that the old

belief that all the hosts of heaven had been created for the benefit of

man, was infinitely absurd.

I compared what was really known about the stars with the account of

creation as told in Genesis. I found that the writer of the inspired

book had no knowledge of astronomy--that he was as ignorant as a Choctaw

chief--as an Eskimo driver of dogs. Does any one imagine that the author

of Genesis knew anything about the sun--its size? that he was acquainted

with Sirius, the North Star, with Capella, or that he knew anything of

the clusters of stars so far away that their light, now visiting our

eyes, has been traveling for two million years?

If he had known these facts would he have said that Jehovah worked

nearly six days to make this world, and only a part of the afternoon of

the fourth day to make the sun and moon and all the stars?

Yet millions of people insist that the writer of Genesis was inspired by

the Creator of all worlds.

Now, intelligent men, who are not frightened, whose brains have not been

paralyzed by fear, know that the sacred story of creation was written by

an ignorant savage. The story is inconsistent with all known facts,

and every star shining in the heavens testifies that its author was an

uninspired barbarian.

I admit that this unknown writer was sincere, that he wrote what he

believed to be true--that he did the best he could. He did not claim

to be inspired--did not pretend that the story had been told to him by

Jehovah. He simply stated the "facts" as he understood them.

After I had learned a little about the stars I concluded that this

writer, this "inspired" scribe, had been misled by myth and legend, and

that he knew no more about creation than the average theologian of my

day. In other words, that he knew absolutely nothing.

And here, allow me to say that the ministers who are answering me are

turning their guns in the wrong direction. These reverend gentlemen

should attack the astronomers. They should malign and vilify Kepler,

Copernicus, Newton, Herschel and Laplace. These men were the real

destroyers of the sacred story. Then, after having disposed of them,

they can wage a war against the stars, and against Jehovah himself for

having furnished evidence against the truthfulness of his book.

Then I studied geology--not much, just a little--just enough to find in

a general way the principal facts that had been discovered, and some of

the conclusions that had been reached. I learned something of the action

of fire--of water--of the formation of islands and continents--of

the sedimentary and igneous rocks--of the coal measures--of the chalk

cliffs, something about coral reefs--about the deposits made by rivers,

the effect of volcanoes, of glaciers, and of the all surrounding

sea--just enough to know that the Laurentian rocks were millions of ages

older than the grass beneath my feet--just enough to feel certain that

this world had been pursuing its flight about the sun, wheeling in light

and shade, for hundreds of millions of years--just enough to know that

the "inspired" writer knew nothing of the history of the earth--nothing

of the great forces of nature--of wind and wave and fire--forces that

have destroyed and built, wrecked and wrought through all the countless

years.

And let me tell the ministers again that they should not waste their

time in answering me. They should attack the geologists. They should

deny the facts that have been discovered. They should launch their

curses at the blaspheming seas, and dash their heads against the infidel

rocks.

Then I studied biology--not much--just enough to know something of

animal forms, enough to know that life existed when the Laurentian rocks

were made--just enough to know that implements of stone, implements that

had been formed by human hands, had been found mingled with the bones

of extinct animals, bones that had been split with these implements, and

that these animals had ceased to exist hundreds of thousands of years

before the manufacture of Adam and Eve.

Then I felt sure that the "inspired" record was false--that many

millions of people had been deceived and that all I had been taught

about the origin of worlds and men was utterly untrue. I felt that I

knew that the Old Testament was the work of ignorant men--that it was a

mingling of truth and mistake, of wisdom and foolishness, of cruelty and

kindness, of philosophy and absurdity--that it contained some

elevated thoughts, some poetry,---a good deal of the solemn and

commonplace,--some hysterical, some tender, some wicked prayers, some

insane predictions, some delusions, and some chaotic dreams.

Of course the theologians fought the facts found by the geologists, the

scientists, and sought to sustain the sacred Scriptures. They mistook

the bones of the mastodon for those of human beings, and by them proudly

proved that "there were giants in those days." They accounted for the

fossils by saying that God had made them to try our faith, or that the

Devil had imitated the works of the Creator.

They answered the geologists by saying that the "days" in Genesis were

long periods of time, and that after all the flood might have been

local. They told the astronomers that the sun and moon were not

actually, but only apparently, stopped. And that the appearance was

produced by the reflection and refraction of light.

They excused the slavery and polygamy, the robbery and murder upheld

in the Old Testament by saying that the people were so degraded that

Jehovah was compelled to pander to their ignorance and prejudice.

In every way the clergy sought to evade the facts, to dodge the truth,

to preserve the creed.

At first they flatly denied the facts--then they belittled them--then

they harmonized them--then they denied that they had denied them. Then

they changed the meaning of the "inspired" book to fit the facts.

At first they said that if the facts, as claimed, were true, the Bible

was false and Christianity itself a superstition. Afterward they said

the facts, as claimed, were true and that they established beyond all

doubt the inspiration of the Bible and the divine origin of orthodox

religion.

Anything they could not dodge, they swallowed, and anything they could

not swallow, they dodged.

I gave up the Old Testament on account of its mistakes, its absurdities,

its ignorance and its cruelty. I gave up the New because it vouched

for the truth of the Old. I gave it up on account of its miracles,

its contradictions, because Christ and his disciples believed in the

existence of devils--talked and made bargains with them, expelled them

from people and animals.

This, of itself, is enough. We know, if we know anything, that devils do

not exist--that Christ never cast them out, and that if he pretended to,

he was either ignorant, dishonest or insane. These stories about devils

demonstrate the human, the ignorant origin of the New Testament. I gave

up the New Testament because it rewards credulity, and curses brave and

honest men, and because it teaches the infinite horror of eternal pain.

The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 04 (of 12) Dresden Edition—Lectures · 第 21 / 103 题