The correspondent of the New York _Times_ wrote:--

“He exhausted ancient and modern history in gathering

maxims and examples for the illustration of the points

which he made. Portions of the speech were marked by great

felicity of language and beauty of imagery. It exhibited,

perhaps, more of the speculative theorist than of the

practical statesman. Though he took pains to disavow

everything of this character, and to present his views as

the basis and guide of practical action, it was by far the

most elaborate and comprehensive speech made in Congress

for many years, and was heard with great attention by the

Senate and crowded galleries.”

A few extracts from newspapers will show how the speech was

received at a distance.

* * * * *

The _Independent_, of New York, in printing the speech, thus

noticed it:--

“Charles Sumner’s argument for the Rights of Men ought to

be printed by the hundred thousand, and scattered like

seed-grain throughout the nation. It is a speech worth

a lifetime to have achieved,--the greatest of all Mr.

Sumner’s great speeches. Standing in some respects almost

alone in the Senate, his position is all the more morally

grand for his isolation, and his plea all the more eloquent

for his moral heroism. Generous readers will overlook

their minor differences of opinion from Mr. Sumner, for

the sake of agreeing with him to the full in the masterly,

unanswerable, and incomparable argument which he has made

in behalf of securing to every American citizen his just

rights before the law.”

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 13 (of 20) · 第 73 / 125 题