DISFRANCHISEMENT INCONSISTENT WITH REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT.

REMARKS IN THE SENATE, ON THE CREDENTIALS OF A SENATOR FROM FLORIDA,

JANUARY 19, 1866.

January 19th, Mr. Doolittle, of Wisconsin, presented the

credentials of Hon. William Marvin as Senator of Florida. Mr.

Sumner, seizing the occasion to declare what he thought an

essential element of republican government to be observed in

Reconstruction, said:--

I have no desire to discuss the question arising on the presentation

of these credentials, and I may say that there are reasons for the

expression of personal respect toward the gentleman who appears as

Senator from Florida. In many particulars--not in all, unhappily--he

has done well where he was placed. I say, unhappily not in all

particulars; for no person can read his speeches and say that in

everything he has done what a governor of one of those States at this

time should do. But I have no desire to discuss his case.

The Senator has alluded to the actual condition of Florida. I also ask

attention to the actual condition of things there, as represented by

thoroughly competent witnesses, whose character is vouched by the first

citizens of that State.

Mr. Sumner here read two communications, mentioning that

four fifths of the Legislature were Rebel officers, and

setting forth the programme of the Rebel States hostile to

Reconstruction, and declaring that the only hope of Union men

was in Congress. He then said:--

There, Sir, is testimony direct from Florida. Besides, we have the

Constitution which the recent pretended Convention has put forward,--a

Constitution which, after recognizing the abolition of Slavery, and

therefore the citizenship of those once slaves, proceeds to decree

their disfranchisement; and Senators are expected to receive this

document as creating a republican form of government,--a Constitution

which begins by the denial of equality to nearly one half its citizens!

The question is entirely changed since the abolition of Slavery, for

all are now citizens; and I insist, and at a proper time shall argue

the question, that no State, where the government has lapsed, can be

recognized as republican in form, while disfranchising any considerable

portion of its citizens, especially if it founds any right, immunity,

or privilege on color.

The credentials were laid on the table, and never afterwards

considered.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 13 (of 20) · 第 43 / 125 题