CASE XXXII.

J. P. aged 57, was admitted into the hospital, January 19, 1799; he was

stated to have been insane about three weeks, and that his disorder came

on shortly after the death of his master, in whose service he had

continued many years, and to whom he was much attached. He had been in the

hospital three times before, and had each time been discharged well. His

disorder usually recurred every seven or eight years. His father also had

been maniacal about the middle period of life, but never recovered. When

admitted he was very talkative, although his natural character was

reserved. He endeavoured to explain his meaning with superior correctness,

and sought to define every subject, however trifling, with a tedious

minuteness; but, upon religion and politics, the Scylla and Charybdis of

human discussion, he was pertinacious and intollerant. This dictatorial

manner and stubbornness of opinion, not being capable of producing the

relations of peace and amity with other philosophers, equally obstinate,

and whose principles had been matured by long confinement, it became

necessary to shut him up in his cell. During the period of his seclusion,

nothing very incoherent escaped from him; every thing he said was within

the sphere of possibility. His fastidiousness rendered him unhappy: he

acknowledged the food which was brought him to be good, but he conceived

it might have been better. The cathartic medicine, which was administered

to him, he confessed had answered the purpose, but its taste was most

nauseous, and he had never before been so severely griped. He ornamented

his person and apartment in a very whimsical manner: latterly he tore his

clothes because he suspected the taylor had deceived him in the materials.

After this he continued naked until the beginning of March, when he

appeared more composed, and sensible of the state he had been in. On the

morning of the 12th, when the keeper opened his cell, he was speechless;

his mouth drawn to the right side, and so feeble that he could not support

himself. A cathartic medicine was given, and sinapisms were applied to the

feet and legs. In the evening he was much recovered, his speech had

returned, and he was able to move himself. He was visited again at

midnight, when he appeared still better. In the morning it was evident

that he had experienced another attack, his mouth was drawn aside; he was

stupid, and died within half an hour. The head was opened on the

following day. The tunica arachnoidea was in some places slightly opake.

The pia mater was inflamed, but not to any considerable degree. There was

no water between any of the membranes. The ventricles were of a natural

capacity, and did not contain any fluid. There was no extravasation in any

part of the substance of the cerebrum or cerebellum. Excepting the slight

inflammation of the pia mater, the brain had a very healthy appearance;

its consistence was firm; the scull was unusually thick. I regret, from a

promise which had been made to the friends, of inspecting the head only,

that the thoracic and abdominal viscera were not examined.

This history has been related to shew, that although the patient died with

those symptoms, which indicate pressure on the brain, as loss of speech,

the mouth being drawn aside, stupor and insensibility; yet the brain did

not afford the same appearances, on dissection, as have been usually

detected in such cases. The following relation is an additional example of

the same fact:

Observations on madness and melancholy · 第 44 / 64 题