CHAPTER II

IN THE DARK

"Every morn and every night

Some are born to sweet delight,

Some are born to sweet delight,

Some are born to endless night."--BLAKE.

The Gilbert children had a very happy home. In Oxford they were

constantly under the eyes of parents who loved them tenderly, and loved

to have them at hand. The schoolroom was between drawing-room and study,

the nurseries adjacent to the parents' bedroom.

Mrs. Gilbert, a very handsome, large-hearted, attractive woman, was

devoted to her husband, and gave him constant and loving care so long as

she lived. She dearly loved her children; but she thought, though

perhaps she was mistaken, that she liked boys better than girls; and she

had so few boys! Husband and children were all the world to her; she was

happy in their midst, full of plans for them, greatly preoccupied with

their future, and looked up to and beloved by all.

Dr. Gilbert was a schoolfellow of De Quincey, and in his

_Confessions_[1] De Quincey thus speaks of him: "At this point, when the

cause of Grotius seemed desperate, G----[2] (a boy whom subsequently I

had reason to admire as equally courageous, truthful, and far-seeing)

suddenly changed the whole field of view."

And again referring to his leaving school, De Quincey writes: "To three

inferior servants I found that I ought not to give less than one guinea

each; so much therefore I left in the hands of G----[2], the most

honourable and upright of boys."

What weeks and months of anguish must have been passed by these parents,

when the bright little three-year-old child was struck down into

darkness, and the light of the "handsome black eyes" extinguished for

ever. She was smitten into the ranks of the blind; and of the blind

nearly sixty years ago, when their privation was a stigma, an

affliction, "a punishment sent by the Almighty;" when even good and

merciful people looked upon it as "rebellion" to endeavour to mitigate

and alleviate the lot of those who lived in the dark. Bessie's parents

did not and could not accept this view. They saw their child rise from

her bed of sickness unchanged, though grievously maimed; but she was the

same little Bessie who had been given to them bright and clever and

happy, and by God's grace they resolved that she should never lose her

appointed place in the family circle. From the very first they were, as

we have seen, advised to educate her with her sisters. This advice they

followed; and at the same time inquired in all directions as to the

methods and material and implements which might give special help to

their blind child. Packets of letters yellow with age, long paragraphs

copied from old newspapers by Mrs. Gilbert and sent to people living in

distant parts, accounts of apparatus, lists of inventions and

suggestions bear constant and touching tribute to the loving care of a

mother upon whose time and strength in that large young family there

must have been so many demands. The surviving members of the family do

not even remember by name many of those whose letters have been

preserved; letters now valuable, not in themselves, but as showing that

if Bessie Gilbert lived to do a great work on behalf of the blind, and

did it, undaunted by obstacles and difficulty that might well have

seemed beyond her strength, she did but inherit the strong will and

indomitable courage, the power of endurance and devotion which

characterised her parents.

These letters throw much light upon the condition of the blind at the

beginning of this century. One packet is specially interesting as the

story of the successful effort of a person unknown, and without

influence, to effect an improvement in a public institution. It may,

probably it must, have been told in later years to Bessie herself; it

would encourage her, and may encourage others, to persevere in efforts

on behalf of those who are helpless and afflicted.

Mrs. Wood, wife of the Rev. Peter Wood, Broadwater Rectory, Worthing,

was interested in the condition of the blind. She had visited

institutions in Zurich, in Paris, had heard of work being done on their

behalf in Edinburgh, and was acquainted with the condition of the School

for the Indigent Blind, St. George's Fields, London.

She wrote in 1831 to Mr. Henry V. Lynes, Mr. Gaussen, Mr. Dodd, Mr.

Pigou, Mr. Capel Cure, and other members of the Committee of the St.

George's Fields School, begging them to inquire into the methods for

teaching the blind to read, recently discovered, and at that time

attracting attention. With her letter she sent specimens of books and

other data to be submitted to the Committee.

Mr. Gaussen, writing from the Temple, 12th March 1831, replies that he

will have much pleasure in forwarding her excellent views, and that Mr.

Vynes has secured the reference of her plan to the Committee; that it

will be well considered, but for his own part he is bound to express the

greatest doubt as to the result. He suggests that instead of teaching

the blind to read there should be more reading aloud to them, "so as to

stimulate their minds to more exertion, which in many cases is the

source of the kind treatment they meet with."

A brother of the Secretary, Mr. Dodd, writes that he also will do what

he can, although he has heard that the benefit of the plan "is so

limited that quite as much good may be accomplished by teaching the

pupils to commit portions of Scripture to memory as by teaching them to

read."

Mr. Vynes informs Mrs. Wood that he has, at her request, attended the

meeting of the Committee, that only two of the other gentlemen she had

written to were present, Mr. Pigou and Mr. Gaussen. "The latter is not

favourable to the plan, neither is Mr. Dodd, the Secretary." The

gentlemen present who spoke were all "well satisfied with the amount of

religious knowledge which their blind pupils already possess, so that I

much fear they will take little trouble to increase it." He refers to a

"rumour" that the "art of reading" has been introduced into the

Edinburgh School for the Blind, but adds that the "Meeting did not seem

inclined to give any credit to it;" and suggests that, if it is true,

Mrs. Wood might let them hear more about it, as he had secured a

reference of the whole matter to the consideration of the House

Committee.

Now Mrs. Wood was nothing daunted by these successive splashes of cold

water. She wrote afresh to members of the Committee. She obtained facts

from Edinburgh, and she wisely limited her appeal to a petition that the

blind should be enabled to read the Scriptures for themselves. But

whether at that time she recognised the fact or not, there can be no

doubt that the whole question of what the blind could do _themselves_

would be opened by this step, and must be decided.

Mr. Vynes writes to her again on the 29th March, and it is interesting

to observe that a Committee in 1831 was very much the same sort of thing

that it is now.

Among the seven or eight gentlemen present I found Mr. Jackman, the

Chaplain of the Institution, being the first time I had ever the

pleasure of meeting him. Both Mr. Jackman and Mr. Dodd [the

Secretary] affirm that these poor blind pupils are already as well

instructed as it is possible they should be, under their afflicting

circumstances. They are correctly moral in their general conduct,

influenced by religious feelings and principles, with contented and

pious minds. Mr. Jackman mentioned as a proof that they do think

beyond the present moment, the average number who now participate

at every celebration of the Lord's Supper is one or two and twenty,

though formerly there had been but three or four. They can repeat a

large portion of the Psalms, not merely the singing Psalms, but

take the alternate verse of the reading version without requiring

any prompting. And all the pupils have a variety of the most

important texts strongly impressed upon their memories. Their

memories are generally good, and they assure me they are fully

exercised upon sound truths. These gentlemen are of opinion that

more is to be learned by the ear than ever can be acquired by the

fingers, and therefore see no advantage attending the new plan

which can at all compensate the trouble and expense of introducing

it.

Two of the gentlemen present, Mr. Capel Cure and Mr. Meller, very

handsomely supported your view of the subject, and recommended a

trial to be made. At the same time they candidly confessed

themselves quite unable to point out the best way, or indeed any

way, to set about it; upon which the Committee very naturally threw

the burthen upon me, or, my dear madam, you must allow me to say,

rather upon you. I read to them the plan which you had sketched

out, which, however, the Committee do not think very practicable.

They will not seek out an idle linguist as you recommend; but if

you will bring a qualified man to their door, with all appliances

to boot--that is, all the books requisite for introducing the

system, then they will be ready to treat with him. And here the

matter rests for the present.

"Here" probably the Committee expected it to rest. But not so Mrs. Wood,

who reconsidered and amended her suggestion as to "an idle linguist."

The next letter from Mr. Vynes, 15th April 1831, announces that Mr. Gall

of Edinburgh "has offered to come to London to put our Committee in more

complete possession of his plan, and to instruct some of our teachers

gratuitously." The Sub-committee recommended that this offer should be

accepted; the General Committee had resolved to adopt the

recommendation. "They have also very properly," he continues, "agreed to

reimburse Mr. Gall the expenses of his journey and of his necessary

residence in London. The account which Mr. Gall has given of his

invention is doubtless overcharged; it exhibits all the enthusiasm which

generally attends all new discoveries. His estimate of the expense is

somewhat vague. He requires very little _time_ to enable his poor blind

pupils to read and to write as correctly, and almost as quickly, as the

more fortunate poor who have the blessing of sight. However, if Mr. G.

does but accomplish one-half of what he has promised, our Committee will

be quite satisfied.

"Thus far, then, I may congratulate you, my dear madam, on the

successful result of your active and persevering exertions."

After this there is a long pause; and the next letter from Mr. Vynes is

dated Clapton, 24th August 1831. We can picture to ourselves the

feelings with which Mrs. Wood would read it in the far-off Broadwater

rectory.

DEAR MADAM--I have now the pleasure of returning to you the various

books and papers which you so kindly sent up for the inspection of

the Committee of our Blind School, and have to give you our best

thanks for the use of them. You will be pleased to hear this new

system of reading and writing is making some progress in the London

school. As a proof that the General Committee are satisfied, I will

report to you the results of their meeting on the 13th of this

month. They first voted fifty guineas to Mr. Gall as a compliment

for the service he has already done to the Institution. But when

Mr. G. was called in and acquainted with their vote, he at once,

respectfully, but very positively, declined to accept of any

remuneration for what he had done, saying his object was to

introduce the new system to serve the poor blind and not himself.

The Committee then elected Mr. Gall as Honorary Member of the

Corporation, and requested the House Committee to find out (if

possible) something acceptable to Mrs. Gall, and empowered them to

present it to her. I mention all this in justice to Mr. Gall. It is

indeed highly creditable to him, for we are told that he is by no

means in affluent circumstances. Mr. Gall continues in almost daily

attendance at the school, and will remain some short time longer,

so anxious is he to establish his system permanently in this

school. On the female side he has already pretty well succeeded;

Miss Grove, the sub-matron, and also one of the blind inmates

having qualified themselves to become teachers.

On the male side, Mr. G. has hitherto been baffled, and therefore

has asked the Committee for some extra aid. This matter is still

under consideration.... On the whole, then, I think I may now

venture to congratulate you, my dear madam, on the attainment of

the object you have so much at heart--that these poor blind shall

be enabled to read those oracles which will give them comfort in

this world and lead them to perfect happiness hereafter.

And thus cautiously and quietly, with the inevitable resistance of

officials to any change, and the caution of a Committee on their guard

against enthusiasm, and not sanguine as to results, an important change

was inaugurated. Henceforward the blind were no longer to be treated as

incurables in a hospital, capable of no instruction and able to do no

more than commit to memory moral precepts and religious truths. They

were to learn reading and writing, a door was set open that would never

again be closed. Education was shown to be possible, and work would

follow.

In August 1832 Mrs. Gilbert received the copy of a letter written by Mr.

Edward Lang, teacher of mathematics, St. Andrew Square, Edinburgh, to a

Mr. Alexander Hay. Mr. Lang had invented a system of printing for the

use of the blind, with simplifications of letters and the introduction

of single signs for many "redundant sounds." He is in favour of these

modifications, and adds:

Were not the prejudice so strong in favour of ordinary spellings of

words, I would, had I been engaged in the formation of such an

alphabet, have innovated much more extensively. But words, like

men, must carry their genealogy, not their qualifications, on their

coats-of-arms; and though this arrangement conceals many

obliquities of descent, and more than many real characters, it must

be acquiesced in, since the law of prescription in this, as in many

other cases, prevents the exercise of reason. He concludes: Most

warmly do I recommend your whole system to the attention of all who

feel interested in the diffusion of knowledge; and I trust that its

advantages will soon be felt by those who were once consigned by

barbarous laws, or by dark superstition, to destruction or to

neglect, but who now are re-elevated to their own station through

the light of a milder and nobler humanity.

At the close of this year, 1832, a Mrs. Wingfield sent to Mrs. Gilbert a

newspaper paragraph giving an account of a meeting of the Managers of

the Blind Asylum, Edinburgh. After some routine business these managers

had proceeded to examine the "nature and efficiency" of the books lately

printed for the use of the blind. Some of the blind boys in the Asylum,

who had been using the books for "only a few weeks," picked out words

and letters and read "slowly but correctly." By repeated trials, and by

varying the exercises, the directors were of opinion that the art

promised to be of "the greatest practical utility to the blind." Mr.

Gall also stated that the apparatus for writing to and by the blind was

in a state of considerable forwardness. This paragraph Mrs. Gilbert

copied and sent, on the 10th of January 1833, to her father's cousin,

Mr. J. Wintle of Lincoln's Inn Fields, who had, as she learnt, a friend

in Edinburgh. To this friend, Mr. Ellis, application was duly made, and

he set about instituting inquiries which resulted, on the 13th of April

1833, in the despatch of a portentous epistle, such a letter as at that

time was considered worthy of heavy postage. He had obtained for Mr.

Wintle every possible scrap of information on the subject in question.

Letters follow from him direct to Mrs. Gilbert, and on the 2d of

November 1833 Mr. Ellis "presents his compliments, and, after many

delays, is happy in being able at last to forward the articles he was

commissioned to procure for Mrs. Gilbert's little girl."

The following list shows how much had been done in two years:--

1. Gall's First Book. Three other Lesson Books and the Gospel of St.

John.

2. Hay's Alphabet and Lessons (Mr. Lang's friend), with outline sketch

of Map.

3. The string alphabet, with a printed statement of its invention and

use.

4. Seven brass types constructed on the principles of the string

alphabet.

5. Several packets of metallic pieces representing the notes in music.

Another letter preserved by Mrs. Gilbert was from a Mr. Richardson, of

11 Lothian Street, Edinburgh, to her uncle, Mr. Morrell, at that time

staying in Edinburgh, dated 14th January 1837. It gives an account of

the globes, maps, boards, etc., in use in the Edinburgh Asylum, and

shows what rapid advance has been made since the little boys were

examined by the managers in 1833.

Mrs. Gilbert would learn not so much from the account of the things

done, as the manner of doing them; from the explanation of the method of

adapting ordinary maps and globes to the use of the blind, and of

employing gum and sand and string and pieces of cork; the little holes

in the map instead of the names of cities, and the movable pegs. All

these hints were very valuable to her; and every one of them was turned

to good account in the schoolroom at Oxford.

In 1839 Mr. J. Wintle sends raised books from London. In 1840 he has

gone, out of health, on a visit to his friend Mr. Ellis, Inverleith Row,

Edinburgh. One of his first visits was to the Edinburgh Asylum, and he

writes an account of it to Mrs. Gilbert, "in the hope of being useful to

your daughter Bessie." He promises further information from Glasgow,

which is, so he learns, "the fountain-head of all works for the blind,

save those published in America," and he announces a copy of the New

Testament as almost ready, price L2: 2s. It was ultimately procured by

Mrs. Gilbert and presented to Bessie.

And now we may lay aside the time-worn, yellow paper, the large and

copious letters, the anxious inquiries and the willing replies. They

did not, however, end at this period, they went on throughout the whole

life of these good parents. There was no new invention, no new system

into which they did not at once inquire, nothing that could be procured

which they did not obtain for their child.

But they never swerved from their original intention to educate Bessie

at home in the schoolroom with her sisters. The apparatus which replaced

pen and pencil and slate might differ, as slate differs from paper. She

had to put her fingers on the globe upon which her sisters cast their

eyes, and to feel the movements of the planets around the sun, in the

orrery which gave her so much pleasure; but her lessons were given and

learnt at the same time, and she lost none of the happiness and

stimulating effect of companionship in work and play.

There can be no doubt that she was influenced throughout life by her own

early training, which had made it impossible for her to believe in the

numerous so-called "disabilities" of the blind. Some of her friends

thought that she had not an adequate notion of what these really were.

Perhaps those who are born blind, or who have lost sight at so early an

age that no memory of it remains, do not adequately realise their

privation. Sight is to them a "fourth dimension," a something that it is

absolutely impossible to realise. They can talk about it, but it is

impossible for them to understand it.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] _Confessions of an English Opium Eater_, pp. 48 and 73, by Thomas de

Quincey. Edinburgh, 1862.

[2] Gilbert.

Elizabeth Gilbert and Her Work for the Blind · 第 2 / 23 章