OF ENMITY AND HATRED.
The _colours_ or _common opinions_ concerning _hatred_, are to be taken
from the _contrary_ of those which concern love and friendship.
_Hatred_ differs from anger in this; that anger regards only what is
done to oneself; but _hatred_ not. And in this, that anger regards
particulars only; the other, universals also. And in this, that anger is
curable; hatred not. And in this, that anger seeks the vexation, hatred
the damage, of one’s adversary. That with anger there is always joined
grief; with hatred, not always. That anger may at length be satiated;
but hatred never.
Hence it appears how the judge or auditor may be made _friend_ or
_enemy_ to us, and how our adversary may be made appear _friend_ or
_enemy_ to the judge; and how we may answer to our adversary, that would
make us appear _enemies_ to him.
==========