CHAPTER VIII

HOW FISHERS FISHED

The poor mackerel season ended in the second week of July. Why, when

mackerel were so scarce, the _Meum and Tuum_ did not give up the fishing

and try for "midsummer herring" it is difficult to understand, and Posh

does not remember the reason, if there was one. Possibly the change of

nets, etc., etc., was too much trouble. Anyhow, the season was

unprofitable for the mackerel boats. On Monday, July 13th, FitzGerald

was still on the _Scandal_ at Lowestoft, and wrote from there to Mr.

Spalding (_Two Suffolk Friends_, p. 113): "Posh made up and paid off on

Saturday. I have not yet asked him, but I suppose he has just paid his

way, I mean so far as Grub goes. . . . Last night it lightened to the

South, as we sat in the Suffolk Gardens--I, and Posh, and Mrs. Posh. . . ."

The "making up" may require some little explanation. The "drift"

fishing--i.e. the herring and mackerel fishing (for though sprats and

pilchards are caught by drift nets, it is unnecessary to consider them

when dealing with the great North Sea drift fishing)--is carried on on a

system of sharing profits between owners and fishermen. Trawlers, i.e.

craft that fish with a "trawl" net for flat fish, haddocks, etc., etc.,

are managed differently.

"Making up" is the technical term for balancing profit and loss of a

season, and ascertaining the sums which are due to owners and crew

respectively.

In the days when Fitzgerald was a "herring merchant," the systems of

Yarmouth and Lowestoft were different. At Yarmouth the owner of the boat

took nine shares out of sixteen, and bore all losses of damaged or lost

nets, etc., the remaining seven shares being divided among the crew in

varying proportions. For instance, the skipper took 1.75 or two shares,

the mate 1.25 or 1.5, and so on down to the boy with his one-half or

three-eighths share. At Lowestoft the shares were also divided into

sixteen; but the owner took only eight, and the crew the other eight. The

losses of gear, nets, etc., however, were borne equally between the two

lots of eight shares, and, on the whole, I believe the Yarmouth system

was more favourable to the men, though the Lowestoft system made the

skipper and crew more careful of the nets and gear than they might have

been did not they suffer for any loss of them. The introduction of steam

drifters has made the shares complicated in the extreme. The owners take

so much as owners of the boat, so much for the engines, etc., etc., and,

in fact, the owners get the share of a very greedy lion. However, the

prices rule so high nowadays, and the catches are occasionally so large

(the other day a steam drifter brought in over 200 pounds worth of fish

to Grimsby as the result of one night's fishing), that the great

Martinmas fishing of the east coast has become a gamble in which fortunes

may be made and lost. Many a boat earns over 2000 pounds from October to

December. A lucky skipper may take 200 pounds for his share of the home

fishing alone. But such figures would have sounded fantastic in

FitzGerald's day, for I have been assured over and over again by herring

fishers that in the sixties and seventies, ay, even in the eighties of

last century, 20 pounds was a "good season's share" for a prominent hand

of a successful drifter.

Posh, as half owner, would take four-sixteenth shares, and as skipper

would probably take another two-sixteenths, so that he would draw more

than any one else.

Some time during the spring or summer of 1868 there was great excitement

amongst the fishing-boat owners of Lowestoft and other ports on account

of an Act just passed regulating the building of vessels, having especial

regard to the ventilation of the cuddy, forecastle, or the men's sleeping

quarters. Posh tells me that many owners of drifters considered that the

Act applied to all craft, including fishing boats, and that great expense

was undergone by some over-conscientious owners in fitting ventilating

drums and shafts in accordance with the Act. If the statute applied to

any drifter it would apply to the _Meum and Tuum_, and FitzGerald

evidently thought that the intention of the Act was that fishing boats

should be exempt. He proved to be right, for the regulations were never

enforced on fishing boats. He wrote to Posh:--

"WOODBRIDGE, _Saturday_.

"DEAR POSH,

"You must lay out three halfpence on the _Eastern Times_ for last

Friday. In that Newspaper there is a good deal written about that Act

for altering Vessels: the Writer is quite sure--that the Act does

_not_ apply to Fishing craft; and he writes as if he knew what he was

writing about. But most likely if he had written just the contrary,

it would have seemed as right to me. Do you therefore fork out three

halfpennies, as I tell you, and study the matter and talk it over with

others. The owners of Vessels should lose no time in meeting, and in

passing some Resolution on the Subject.

"I have not seen Newson, but West was down at the Ferry some days back

and saw him. For a wonder, he [Newson] was _Fishing_!--for

Codlings--for there really was nothing else to do: no Woodbridge

Vessels coming in and out the Harbour, nor any work for the Salvage

Smacks. He spoke of his Wife as much the same: Smith, the Pilot,

thought her much altered when last he saw her.

"You will buy such things as you spoke of wanting at the Lowestoft

Sales if they go at a reasonable price. As to the claim made by your

Yawl, I suppose it will come down to half. The builders are coming to

my house again next week, I believe, having left their work undone.

"Now, here is a Letter for your Mantelpiece to-morrow--Sunday--I don't

think I have more to say.

"Yours E. FG.

"Mr. Durrant has never sent me the hamper of Flowers he promised.

"P.S. I post this letter before Noon so as you will receive it this

evening: and can get the Newspaper I tell you of:

"_Eastern Times_ for _Friday_ last sold at Chapman's."

Posh does not remember whether he laid out the three halfpence or not.

But he doubts it. "I knowed as that couldn't ha' nothin' ta dew along o'

us," says he. And he stuck to his guns and proved to be right.

"West" has been mentioned before as being an old fellow with whom

FitzGerald used to navigate the river Deben in a small boat before the

building of the _Scandal_. Newson's wife, like Posh's, was often ailing.

Kind "Fitz" had written previously (July 25th, 1868; _Letters_, Eversley

Edition, p. 106) to Professor Cowell:--

". . . I only left Lowestoft partly to avoid a Volunteer Camp there

which filled the Town and People with Bustle: and partly that my

Captain might see his Wife: who cannot last very much longer I think:

scarcely through the Autumn, surely. She goes about, nurses her

children, etc., but grows visibly thinner, weaker and more ailing."

{The "Happy New Year" yawl, belonging to Posh's beach company: p107.jpg}

The "claim made by your yawl" refers to a claim for salvage made by the

company of beach men (of which Posh was a member) owning a yawl.

FitzGerald (as has been seen before) always took a humorous interest in

the doings of the "sea pirates," yclept beach men or "salwagers," and he

doubtless enjoyed his little chuckle at Posh's expense.

The builders were at work on Little Grange, which FitzGerald predicted he

would never live in but would die in. However, he falsified both

predictions, for he lived in the house ten years and died in Norfolk.

Mr. Durrant was still in default. I doubt if FitzGerald ever got those

flowers. They were plants, Posh tells me, which FitzGerald wished to

plant out at Little Grange.

I can find no record of the principal, the Martinmas or Autumn, fishing

of 1868. But in the spring of 1869 the _Meum and Tuum_ went to the "West

Fishing" for mackerel, even as a large number of our modern steam

drifters go now, to the indignation of the pious fishermen of Penzance,

Newlyn, and St. Ives. These good fellows of the west have, I think, some

reason to complain that it is unfair that they should suffer for

righteousness' sake. Looking at the point in dispute impartially, it

_does_ seem hard that the men of the locality should see Easterlings

bringing in good catches of fish as the result of what the Cornishmen

regard as a desecration of "the Lord's Day." The religious sentiment

which prevents the western and southern men from putting off on Sunday is

genuine and sincere enough. The Scotch herring boats, which come in

their thousands to Yarmouth and Lowestoft for the autumn fishing, are

always in harbour from Saturday night to Monday morning, though the local

boats fish all days and nights. But by keeping in harbour the Scotchmen

offend the sensibilities of no one, whereas there is much bitterness

caused in the west by the refusal of the Easterlings to fall in with

local custom.

On March 1st, 1869, FitzGerald wrote to Professor Cowell (_Letters_, II,

107, Eversley Edition):--

"MY DEAR COWELL,

". . . My lugger Captain has just left me to go on his Mackerel Voyage

to the Western Coast; and I don't know when I shall see him again. . .

. You can't think what a grand, tender Soul this is, lodged in a

suitable carcase."

FitzGerald thought very highly of that "carcase" of Posh's, as will be

seen from the story of the Laurence portrait, set forth hereinafter, as

the lawyers, whom Posh hates so much, would say.

The sleeping partner throughout seems to have had more anxiety on account

of Posh's sea hazards than on account of business losses. How the

mackerel paid I do not know, but Posh was in time to go north for the

beginning of the herring fishing in July.

Edward FitzGerald and "Posh" "Herring Merchants" · 第 8 / 18 章