THE LINE OF CHAGHATĀY
“The Mongol armies,” writes Mr. S. Lane-Poole, “divided into several
immense brigades, swept over Khwārazm, Khorāsān, and Afghanistān, on
the one hand; and on the other, over Āzerbāyjān, Georgia, and Southern
Russia; whilst a third division continued the reduction of China. In
the midst of these diverging streams of conquest Chingiz Khān died
in A.H. 624 (1227), at the age of sixty-four. The territory he and
his sons had conquered stretched from the Yellow Sea to the Euxine,
and included lands or tribes wrung from the rule of Chinese, Tanguts,
Afghans, Persians, and Turks.
“It was the habit of a Mongol chief to distribute the clans over which
he had ruled as appanages among his sons, and this tribal rather than
territorial distribution obtained in the division of the empire among
the sons of Chingiz. The founder appointed a special appanage of tribes
in certain loosely defined camping-grounds to each son, and also
nominated a successor to himself in the Khānate.”[379]
In this division of the newly founded Mongol Empire,--_i.e._
Transoxiana, with part of Kāshghar,--Badakhshān, Balkh, and Ghazna fell
to the lot of Chingiz Khān’s second son, Chaghatāy, the founder of the
Khānate of that name, which existed for 146 years, till its overthrow
by Tīmūr in A.H. 771 (1370).
The annals of his branch of his dynasty have hitherto been obscurer
than those of the other descendants of Chingiz.[380] He appears to have
profited by the lessons of the Naiman chancellor,[381] and to have
developed into a just and energetic ruler, capable of preserving order
among the heterogeneous population under his charge.
He scrupulously observed the _Yasāk_, or Civil Code, established by
his father, and, like him, was tolerant towards all religions and
creeds. He fixed his capital at Almāligh,[382] in the extreme east of
his dominions. His Mongol ministers, loving the life of the steppes,
probably induced him to choose this locality rather than Samarkand or
Bokhārā.[383] They would serve no Khān who did not lead a life worthy
of free-born men; and Chaghatāy and his immediate successors saw, as
did his later descendants, that the one way of retaining the allegiance
of his people was to humour their desires in this respect and live with
them a nomad’s life.[384]
In the year A.H. 639 (1241) both Ogdāy and Chaghatāy,[385] the great
Khāns of the Mongolian Empire, died, and the successors of Chingiz fell
to disputing the succession.
We do not propose to enlarge on the struggles and disorders which
existed almost without cessation in Turkestān during the whole
period of the Chaghatāy Khān’s rule, and will confine ourselves to
a consideration of the social conditions of that country under his
successors.[386] The Mongols in contact with communities possessed of a
comparatively high standard of civilisation lost none of their passion
for their boundless steppe. In their eyes the town, the settled abode,
were abominations, indicating deep-seated effeminacy and corruption:
the only life worth living was that of the herdsman, roving free as
air, with his tent of white felt.
Their subjects who preferred a sedentary existence, so long as they
were obedient and orderly, were left in tranquil occupation of their
homes, and were even encouraged by their nomad lords to repair the
damage suffered by their cities in war. Ruin doubtless fell on many
great centres of population, such as Herāt;[387] but in Persia
and Transoxiana there was no systematic obliteration of organised
society,[388] no reversion to the nomadic level. The case in Mongolia
and Kāshgharia was different. Less than a century prior to the rise of
the Mongols these countries had been occupied by the Uīghūrs, who were
a race which had attained a certain degree of development, and evinced
it by preferring a settled existence in towns. Their successors, the
Kara-Khitāy, though less civilised, seem also to have affected urban
life. In these countries, however, during the Chaghatāy period, no new
towns sprang up, while those already in being fell into a state of ruin.
“Amidst the terrible ravages committed by the Mongolians,” writes
Vambéry,[389] “the science of theology and its votaries alone continued
to flourish. In the days of the earlier Chaghatāy Khāns the mullās of
Turkestān had enjoyed a certain amount of protection, thanks partly to
the principle of religious toleration, and partly to the superstitious
awe in which every class of the priesthood was held; and in almost
every town there was some one or other holy man to whom the Moslems
had recourse in the day of peril. The spiritual teachers thus became
at the same time secular protectors, and from this time forward we
find the _Sadr-i-sharī`at_ (heads of the religious bodies) and chief
magistrates, and in general all men of remarkable piety, attaining an
influence in the towns of Transoxiana unknown in the rest of Islām;
an influence which maintains itself to this day, though the land has
been for centuries governed by Musulman princes. The seats of spiritual
authority were filled by regular dynasties of learned men of certain
families, as though they had been thrones.”
It appears that about the year A.H. 721 (1321) a final division of
the Chaghatāy Khānate took place. The two branches established were
the Khāns of Transoxiana and those of Jatah, or Moghūlistan;[390] but
each had other provinces in its possession. As for the history of the
western branch, it is only necessary to mention that during the fifty
years of their rule, which continued until Tīmūr made himself master
of the country, we find no less than fifteen Khāns recorded--some of
them strangers in blood to the Chaghatāy line--and long periods of
anarchy.[391]
Leaving, then, this confused chapter of Central Asian history, we will
pass to the rise of the mightiest of her conquerors.