I am unable, Madam, to express the grievous sentiments that

Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at

https://www.pgdp.net

LETTERS TO EUGENIA;

OR,

A PRESERVATIVE

AGAINST RELIGIOUS PREJUDICES.

BY BARON D'HOLBACH,

AUTHOR OF THE SYSTEM OF NATURE, THE SOCIAL SYSTEM,

GOOD SENSE, CHRISTIANITY UNVEILED, ECCE HOMO,

UNIVERSAL MORALITY, RELIGIOUS CRUELTY, &c., &c., &c.

TRANSLATED FROM THE FRENCH, BY

ANTHONY C. MIDDLETON, M. D.

... "Arctis

Religionum animos nodis exsolvere pergo."

LUCRETII _De Rerum Natura_, lib. iv. _v._ 6, 7.

BOSTON:

PUBLISHED BY JOSIAH P. MENDUM,

AT THE OFFICE OF THE BOSTON INVESTIGATOR.

1857.

NAIGEON'S PREFACE.

1768.

For many years this work has been known under the title of _Letters to

Eugenia_. The secretive character of those, however, into whose hands

the manuscript at first fell; the singular and yet actual pleasure

that is caused generally enough in the minds of all men by the

exclusive possession of any object whatever; that kind of torpor,

servitude, and terror in which the tyrannical power of the priests

then held all minds--even those who by the superiority of their

talents ought naturally to be the least disposed to bend under the

odious yoke of the clergy,--all these circumstances united contributed

so much to stifle in its birth, if I may so express myself, this

important manuscript, that for a long time it was supposed to be lost;

so much did those who possessed it keep it carefully concealed, and so

constantly did they refuse to allow a copy to be taken. The

manuscripts, indeed, were so scarce, even in the libraries of the

curious, that the late M. De Boze, whose pleasure it was to collect

the rarest works belonging to every species of literature, could never

succeed in acquiring a copy of the _Letters to Eugenia_, and in his

time there were only three in Paris; it may have been from design,

_propter metum Judaeorum_;[1] it may have been there were actually no

more known.

[1] _On account of fear of the Jews_, or, in other words, the

intolerant clergy of the despotic government.

It is not till within five or six years that MSS. of these letters

have become more common; and there is reason to believe that they are

now considerably multiplied, since the copy from which this edition is

printed has been revised and corrected by collation with six others,

that have been collected without any great difficulty. Unhappily, all

these copies swarm with faults, which corrupt the sense, and

comprehend many variations, but which also, to use the language of the

Biblical critics, have served sometimes to discover and to fix the

true reading! More often, however, they have rendered it more

uncertain than it was before what one ought to be followed--a new

proof of the multiplicity of copies, because the more numerous are the

manuscripts of a work, the more they differ from each other, as any

one may be fully convinced by consulting those of the _Letter of

Thrasybulus to Leucippus_, and the various readings of the New

Testament collected by the learned Mill, and which amount to more than

thirty thousand.

However this may be, we have spared no pains to reestablish the text

in all its purity; and we venture to say, that, with the exception of

four or five passages, which we found corrupted in all the manuscripts

that we had an opportunity to collate, and which we have amended to

the best of our ability, the edition of these letters that we now

offer to the reader will probably conform almost exactly with the

original manuscript of the author.

With regard to the author's name and quality we can offer nothing but

conjectures. The only particulars of his life upon which there is a

general agreement are, that he lived upon terms of great intimacy with

the Marquis de la Fare, the Abbe de Chaulieu, the Abbe Terrasson,

Fontenelle, M. de Lassere, &c. The late MM. Du Marsais and Falconnet

have often been heard to declare that these letters were composed by

some one belonging to the school of Seaux. All that we can pronounce

with certainty is the fact, that it is only necessary to read the

work to be entirely convinced the author was a man of extensive

knowledge, and one who had meditated profoundly concerning the matters

upon which he has treated. His style is clear, simple, easy, and in

which we may remark a certain urbanity, that leads us to be sure that

he was not an obscure individual, nor one to whom good company and

polished society were unfamiliar. But what especially distinguishes

this work, and which should endear it to all good and virtuous people,

is the signal honesty which pervades and characterizes it from the

very beginning to the end. It is impossible to read it without

conceiving the highest idea of the author's probity, whoever he may

have been--without desiring to have had him for a friend, to have

lived with him, and, in a word, without rendering justice to the

rectitude of his intentions, even when we do not approve of his

sentiments. The love of virtue, universal benevolence, respect to the

laws, an inviolable attachment to the duties of morality, and, in

fine, all that can contribute to render men better, is strongly

recommended in these Letters. If, on the one hand, he completely

overthrows the ruinous edifice of Christianity, it is to erect, on the

other hand, the immovable foundations of a system of morality

legitimately established upon the nature of man, upon his physical

wants, and upon his social relations--a base infinitely better and

more solid than that of religion, because sooner or later the lie is

discovered, rejected, and necessarily drags with it what served to

sustain it. On the contrary, the truth subsists eternally, and

consolidates itself as it grows old: _Opinionum commenta delet dies,

naturae judicia confirmat_.[2]

[2] "Time effaces the comments of opinion, but it confirms the

judgments of nature."--CICERO.

The motto affixed to many of the manuscript copies of these letters

proves that the worthy man to whom we owe them did not desire to be

known as their author, and that it was neither the love of reputation,

nor the thirst of glory, nor the ambition of being distinguished by

bold opinions, which the priests, and the satellites subjected to them

by ignorance, denominate _impieties_, which guided his pen. It was

only the desire of doing good to his fellow-beings by enlightening

them, which actuated him, and the wish to uproot, so to speak,

religion itself, as being the source of all the woes which have

afflicted mankind for so many ages. This is the motto of which we

spoke:--

"Si j'ai raison, qu'importe a qui je suis?"

(If reason's mine, no matter who I am.)

It is a verse of Corneille, whose application is exceedingly

appropriate, and which should be upon the frontispiece of all books of

this nature.

We are unable to say any thing more certain concerning the person to

whom our author has addressed his work. It appears, however, from many

circumstances in these Letters, that she was not a supposititious

marchioness, like her of the _Worlds_ of M. de Fontenelle, and that

they have really been written to a woman as distinguished by her rank

as by her manners. Perhaps she was a lady of the school of the Temple,

or of Seaux. But these details, in reality, as well as those which

concern the name and the life of our author, the date of his birth,

that of his death, &c., are of little importance, and could only serve

to satisfy the vain curiosity of some idle readers, who avidiously

collect these kind of anecdotes, who receive from them a kind of

existence in the world, and who feel more satisfaction from being

instructed in them than from the discovery of a truth. I know that

they endeavor to justify their curiosity by saying that when a person

reads a book which creates a public sensation, and with which he is

himself much pleased, it is natural he should desire to know to whom a

grateful homage should be addressed. In this case the desire is so

much the more unreasonable because it cannot be satisfied; first,

because when death and proscription is the penalty, there has never

been and there never will be a man of letters so imprudent, and, to

speak plainly, so strangely daring, as to publish, or during his life

to allow a book to be printed, in which he tramples under foot

temples, altars, and the statues of the gods, and where he attacks

without any disguise the most consecrated religious opinions;

secondly, because it is a matter of public notoriety that all the

works of this character which have appeared for many years are the

secret testaments of numbers of great men, obliged during their lives

to conceal their light under a bushel, whose heads death has withdrawn

from the fury of persecutors, and whose cold ashes, consequently, do

not hear in the tomb either the importunate and denunciatory cries of

the superstitious, or the just eulogiums of the friends of truth;

thirdly and lastly, _because this curiosity, so unfortunately

entertained, may compromise in the most cruel manner the repose, the

fortune, and the liberty of the relatives and friends of the authors

of these bold books!_ This single consideration ought, then, to

determine those hazarders of conjectures, if they have really good

intentions, to wrap in the inmost folds of their hearts whatever

suspicions they may entertain concerning the author, however true or

false they may be, and to turn their inquiring spirits to a use more

beneficial for both themselves and others.

TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE.

In 1819 an anonymous translation of the LETTERS TO EUGENIA was

published in London by Richard Carlile. This translation in some of

its parts was sufficiently complete and correct, but in others it was

at absolute variance with the original work; in other parts, also, it

was interlarded with matter not written by d'Holbach; and in others,

large portions of the original Letters were entirely omitted, as were

likewise a number of notes and the whole of the preliminary

observations, with which the volume was introduced to the public by

Naigeon, so long the intimate friend of both d'Holbach and Diderot. In

again presenting the work in an English dress, the London translation

has been made the foundation of this, but the whole has been

thoroughly revised and collated with the original. The omitted

portions have been translated and inserted in their proper places, and

though some passages of the London work, not entirely faithful to the

original, have been allowed to stand, yet the book, as it now

appears, is essentially a new one, and is the most accurate and

complete translation of the LETTERS TO EUGENIA which has ever been

made into the English language.

The work at first came anonymously from the press, and the mystery of

its authorship was sedulously maintained in the introductory

observations of Naigeon, in consequence of the danger which then

attended the issue of Infidel productions, not only in France but

throughout Christendom. The book was printed in Amsterdam, at

d'Holbach's own expense, by Marc-Michael Rey, a noble printer, to whom

the world is greatly indebted for the inestimable aid he rendered the

philosophers. But bold as he was, and then living in a country the

most free of any in the world, he dared not openly send these LETTERS

from his own press. They were issued in 1768, in two duodecimo

volumes, without any publisher's name, and with the imprint of

_London_ on the title page, in order to set those persecutors at bay

who were prowling for victims, and who sought to burn author, printer,

and book at the same pile. The prudence of the author and printer

saved _them_ from this fate; but the book had hardly reached France

before its sale was forbidden under penalty of fines and imprisonment,

and it was condemned by an act of Parliament to be burnt by the

public executioner in the streets of Paris, all of which particulars

will be narrated in the BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR OF BARON D'HOLBACH, which

I am now preparing for the press.

Of the excellence of the LETTERS TO EUGENIA, nothing need here be

said. The work speaks for itself, and abounds in that eloquence

peculiar to its author, and overflows with kindly sentiments of

humanity, benevolence and virtue. Like d'Holbach's other works, it is

distinguished by an ardent love of liberty, and an invincible hatred

of despotism; by an unanswerable logic, by deep thought, and by

profound ideas. The tyrant and the priest are both displayed in their

true colors; but while the author shows himself inexorable as fate

towards oppressive hierarchies and false ideas, he is tender as an

infant to the unfortunate, to those overburdened with unreasonable

impositions, to those who need consolation and guidance, and to those

searching after truth. Addressed, as the LETTERS were, to a lady

suffering from religious falsehoods and terrors, the object of the

writer is set forth in the motto from Lucretius which he placed on the

title page, and which may thus be expressed in English:--

"Reason's pure light I seek to give the mind,

And from Religion's fetters free mankind."

A. C. M.

The name of the lady was designedly kept in secrecy, and was unknown,

except to _a very few_, till some years after d'Holbach's death. We

now know from the _Feuilles Posthumes_ of Lequinio, who had it from

Naigeon, that the _Letters_ were written several years before their

publication, for the instruction of a lady formerly distinguished at

the French Court for her graces and virtues. They were addressed to

the charming Marguerite, Marchioness de Vermandois. Her husband held

the lucrative post of farmer-general to the king, and besides

inherited large estates. He possessed excellent natural abilities, and

his mind was strengthened and adorned by culture and letters. Had his

modesty permitted him to appear as such, he would now be known as a

poet of genius and merit, for he wrote some poems and plays that were

much admired by all who were allowed to peruse them. He was married in

1763, on the day he completed his twenty-first year, to Marguerite

Justine d'Estrades, then only nineteen years of age, and whom he saw

for the first time in his life only six weeks before they became

husband and wife. Like most of the matches then made among the higher

classes in France, this was one of a purely mercenary character. The

father of the Marquis de Vermandois, and the father of Marguerite, as

a means of joining their estates, contracted their children without

deigning to consult the wishes of the parties, and obedience or

disinheritance was the only alternative. When the compact was

concluded, Marguerite was taken from the convent where for five years

she had lived as a boarder and scholar, and commenced her married life

and her course in the fashionable world at the same time. The match

was far more fortunate than such matches then generally proved to be.

Marguerite's husband was passionately attached to her, and that

attachment was returned. The Marquis was a friend of Baron d'Holbach,

and soon after his marriage introduced his wife to him. Among all the

beauties of Paris the Marchioness was one of the most lovely and

fascinating. Her features were remarkably beautiful, and the bloom and

clearness of her complexion were such as absolutely to render

necessary the old comparison of the rose and the lily to do them

justice. To these were added a voluptuous figure, agreeable manners,

the graces and vivacity of wit, and the still more enduring

attractions of good humor, purity, and benevolence. A female like her

could not but be dear to all who enjoyed her intimacy, and a strong

friendship sprang up between her and Baron d'Holbach. Greatly pleased

with him at first, Marguerite was afterwards as greatly shocked. When

their intercourse had become so familiar as to permit that frankness

and freedom of conversation which prevails among intimate friends, she

discovered that the Baron was an unbeliever in the Christian dogmas

which she had learned at the convent, where, in consequence of her

mother's death, she had been educated. She had been taught that an

Infidel was a monster in all respects, and she was astounded to find

unbelievers in men so agreeable in manners and person, and so profound

in learning, as d'Holbach, Diderot, d'Alembert, and others. She could

deny neither their goodness nor their intellectual qualities, and

while she admired the individuals she shuddered at their incredulity.

Especially did she mourn over Baron d'Holbach. He had a wife as

charming as herself, formerly the lovely Mademoiselle d'Aine, whose

beautiful features and seductive figure presented

"A combination, and a form, indeed,

Where every god did seem to set his seal."

Nothing was more natural than that two such women should imbibe the

deepest tenderness for each other. But alas! the Baron's wife was

tainted with her husband's heresies; and yet in their home did the

Marchioness see all the domestic virtues exemplified, and beheld that

sweet harmony and unchangeable affection for which the d'Holbachs

were eminently distinguished among their acquaintances, and which was

remarkable from its striking contrast with the courtly and Christian

habits of the day. At a loss what to do, the Marchioness consulted her

confessor, and was advised to withdraw entirely from the society of

the Baron and his wife, unless she was willing to sacrifice all her

hopes of heaven, and to plunge headlong down to hell. Her natural good

sense and love of her friends struggled with her monastic education

and reverence for the priests. The conflict rendered her miserable;

and unable to enjoy happiness, she brooded over her wishes and her

terrors. In this state of mind she at length wrote a touching letter

to the Baron, and laid open her situation, requesting him to comfort,

console, and enlighten her. Such was the origin of the book now

presented in an English dress to the reader. It accomplished its

purpose with the Marchioness de Vermandois, and afterwards its author

concluded to publish the work, in hopes it might be equally useful to

others.

The _Letters_ were _written_ in 1764, when d'Holbach was in the

forty-second year of his age. Twelve different works he had before

written and published, and all without the affix of his name. _Eleven_

were upon mineralogy, the arts and the sciences, and _one_ only upon

theology. That _one_ had been secretly printed in 1761, at Nancy, with

the imprint of London, and was _honored_ with a parliamentary statute

condemning its publication and forbidding its sale or circulation.

Christian hatred bestowed upon it the additional honor of causing it

to be burned in the streets of Paris by the public executioner. But

the prudence of the author protected his life. He attributed the book

to a dead man, who had been known to entertain sceptical views. It was

entitled CHRISTIANITY UNVEILED, and bore on its title page the name of

BOULANGER. This was d'Holbach's first contribution to Infidel

literature, and the second similar work written by him was the LETTERS

TO EUGENIA. These were the preludes to more than a quarter of a

hundred different productions numbering among them such books as _Good

Sense_, _The System of Nature_, _Ecce Homo_, _Priests Unmasked_, &c.,

&c., all printed anonymously or pseudonymously at his own expense,

without a possibility of pecuniary advantage, and with such

extraordinary secrecy as to show that he was actuated by no desire of

literary fame. It was love of truth alone that impelled d'Holbach to

write. Brilliant, profound, eloquent and excellent as were his

writings, attracting notice as they did from the civil and religious

powers, commented upon as they were by such men as Voltaire and

Frederick the Great, admired as they were by that class who felt and

combated the evils of tyranny as well as of religion, of kings as well

as of priests,--that class who almost drew their life from the books

of him and his compeers,--he was never seduced from the rule he

originally laid down for his literary conduct.

A very few persons he was obliged to trust in order to get his

writings printed, and but for that fact Baron d'Holbach would now only

be known as a gentleman of great wealth, extensive benevolence, and

uncommon liberality, as a man of profound learning and agreeable

colloquial powers, as the bountiful friend of men of letters, as the

soother of the distressed, as the protector of the miserable, and as

the affectionate husband and father. So much of him we should have

known; but that he was the author of those books which roused

intolerant priests and corrupt magistrates, consistories and

parliaments, monarchs and philosophers, the people and their

oppressors,--that he was the Archimedes that thus moved the

world,--would not have been known had he not employed another

philosopher, by the name of Naigeon, to carry his manuscripts to

Amsterdam, and to direct their printing by Marc-Michel Rey. It was

Naigeon who carried the manuscript of the LETTERS TO EUGENIA to

Holland, together with a number of others by the same author, which

also appeared during the year 1768,--an eventful year in the history

of Infidel progress. The _Letters_ were carefully revised by d'Holbach

before they were sent to press. All the passages of a purely personal

character were omitted, some new matter was incorporated, and some

sentences were added purposely to keep the author and the lady he

addressed in impenetrable obscurity. To raise the veil from a man of

so much worth and genius, as well as to carry out his idea of doing

good, is one of the reasons which have led to the present preparation

and publication of this book.

A. C. M.

CONTENTS.

LETTER I.

Of the Sources of Credulity, and of the Motives which should

lead to an Examination of Religion, Page 1

LETTER II.

Of the Ideas which Religion gives us of the Divinity, 29

LETTER III.

An Examination of the Holy Scriptures, of the Nature of the

Christian Religion, and of the Proofs upon which Christianity is

founded, 46

LETTER IV.

Of the fundamental Dogmas of the Christian Religion, 76

LETTER V.

Of the Immortality of the Soul, and of the Dogma of another

Life, 91

LETTER VI.

Of the Mysteries, Sacraments, and Religious Ceremonies of

Christianity, 120

LETTER VII.

Of the pious Rites, Prayers, and Austerities of Christianity, 136

LETTER VIII.

Of Evangelical Virtues and Christian Perfection, 154

LETTER IX.

Of the Advantages contributed to Government by Religion, 184

LETTER X.

Of the Advantages Religion confers on those who profess it, 211

LETTER XI.

Of Human or Natural Morality, 233

LETTER XII.

Of the small Consequence to be attached to Men's Speculations,

and the Indulgence which should be extended to them, 255

LETTERS TO EUGENIA.

LETTER I.

Of the Sources of Credulity, and of the Motives which should lead

to an Examination of Religion.

I am unable, Madam, to express the grievous sentiments that the

perusal of your letter produced in my bosom. Did not a rigorous duty

retain me where I am, you would see me flying to your succor. Is it,

then, true that Eugenia is miserable? Is even she tormented with

chagrin, scruples, and inquietudes? In the midst of opulence and

grandeur; assured of the tenderness and esteem of a husband who adores

you; enjoying at court the advantage, so rare, of being sincerely

beloved by every one; surrounded by friends who render sincere homage

to your talents, your knowledge, and your tastes,--how can you suffer

the pains of melancholy and sorrow? Your pure and virtuous soul can

surely know neither shame nor remorse. Always so far removed from the

weaknesses of your sex, on what account can you blush? Agreeably

occupied with your duties, refreshed with useful reading and

entertaining conversation, and having within your reach every

diversity of virtuous pleasures, how happens it that fears, distastes,

and cares come to assail a heart for which every thing should procure

contentment and peace? Alas! even if your letter had not confirmed it

but too much, from the trouble which agitates you I should have

recognized without difficulty the work of superstition. This fiend

alone possesses the power of disturbing honest souls, without calming

the passions of the corrupt; and when once she gains possession of a

heart, she has the ability to annihilate its repose forever.

Yes, Madam, for a long time I have known the dangerous effects of

religious prejudices. I was myself formerly troubled with them. Like

you I have trembled under the yoke of religion; and if a careful and

deliberate examination had not fully undeceived me, instead of now

being in a state to console you and to reassure you against yourself,

you would see me at the present moment partaking your inquietudes, and

augmenting in your mind the lugubrious ideas with which I perceive you

to be tormented. Thanks to Reason and Philosophy, an unruffled

serenity long ago irradiated my understanding, and banished the

terrors with which I was formerly agitated. What happiness for me if

the peace which I enjoy should put it in my power to break the charm

which yet binds you with the chains of prejudice?

Nevertheless, without your express orders, I should never have dared

to point out to you a mode of thinking widely different from your

own, nor to combat the dangerous opinions to which you have been

persuaded your happiness is attached. But for your request I should

have continued to enclose in my own breast opinions odious to the most

part of men accustomed to see nothing except by the eyes of judges

visibly interested in deceiving them. Now, however, a sacred duty

obliges me to speak. Eugenia, unquiet and alarmed, wishes me to

explore her heart; she needs assistance; she wishes to fix her ideas

upon an object which interests her repose and her felicity. I owe her

the truth. It would be a crime longer to preserve silence. Although my

attachment for her did not impose the necessity of responding to her

confidence, the love of truth would oblige me to make efforts to

dissipate the chimeras which render her unhappy.

I shall proceed then, Madam, to address you with the most complete

frankness. Perhaps at the first glance my ideas may appear strange;

but on examining them with still further care and attention, they will

cease to shock you. Reason, good faith, and truth cannot do otherwise

than exert great influence over such an intellect as yours. I appeal,

therefore, from your alarmed imagination to your more tranquil

judgment; I appeal from custom and prejudice to reflection and reason.

Nature has given you a gentle and sensible soul, and has imparted an

exquisitely lively imagination, and a certain admixture of melancholy

which disposes to despondent revery. It is from this peculiar mental

constitution that arise the woes that now afflict you. Your goodness,

candor, and sincerity preclude your suspecting in others either fraud

or malignity. The gentleness of your character prevents your

contradicting notions that would appear revolting if you deigned to

examine them. You have chosen rather to defer to the judgment of

others, and to subscribe to their ideas, than to consult your own

reason and rely upon your own understanding. The vivacity of your

imagination causes you to embrace with avidity the dismal delineations

which are presented to you; certain men, interested in agitating your

mind, abuse your sensibility in order to produce alarm; they cause you

to shudder at the terrible words, _death_, _judgment_, _hell_,

_punishment_, and _eternity_; they lead you to turn pale at the very

name of an inflexible _judge_, whose absolute decrees nothing can

change; you fancy that you see around you those demons whom he has

made the ministers of his vengeance upon his weak creatures; thus is

your heart filled with affright; you fear that at every instant you

may offend, without being aware of it, a capricious God, always

threatening and always enraged. In consequence of such a state of

mind, all those moments of your life which should only be productive

of contentment and peace, are constantly poisoned by inquietudes,

scruples, and panic terrors, from which a soul as pure as yours ought

to be forever exempt. The agitation into which you are thrown by these

fatal ideas suspends the exercise of your faculties; your reason is

misled by a bewildered imagination, and you are afflicted with

perplexities, with despondency, and with suspicion of yourself. In

this manner you become the dupe of those men who, addressing the

imagination and stifling reason, long since subjugated the universe,

and have actually persuaded reasonable beings that their reason is

either useless or dangerous.

Such is, Madam, the constant language of the apostles of superstition,

whose design has always been, and will always continue to be, to

destroy human reason in order to exercise their power with impunity

over mankind. Throughout the globe the perfidious ministers of

religion have been either the concealed or the declared enemies of

reason, because they always see reason opposed to their views. Every

where do they decry it, because they truly fear that it will destroy

their empire by discovering their conspiracies and the futility of

their fables. Every where upon its ruins they struggle to erect the

empire of fanaticism and imagination. To attain this end with more

certainty, they have unceasingly terrified mortals with hideous

paintings, have astonished and seduced them by marvels and mysteries,

embarrassed them by enigmas and uncertainties, surcharged them with

observances and ceremonies, filled their minds with terrors and

scruples, and fixed their eyes upon a future, which, far from

rendering them more virtuous and happy here below, has only turned

them from the path of true happiness, and destroyed it completely and

forever in their bosoms.

Such are the artifices which the ministers of religion every where

employ to enslave the earth and to retain it under the yoke. The human

race, in all countries, has become the prey of the priests. The

priests have given the name of _religion_ to systems invented by them

to subjugate men, whose imagination they had seduced, whose

understanding they had confounded, and whose reason they had

endeavored to extinguish.

It is especially in infancy that the human mind is disposed to receive

whatever impression is made upon it. Thus our priests have prudently

seized upon the youth to inspire them with ideas that they could never

impose upon adults. It is during the most tender and susceptible age

of men that the priests have familiarized the understanding of our

race with monstrous fables, with extravagant and disjointed fancies,

and with ridiculous chimeras, which, by degrees, become objects that

are respected and that are feared during life.

We need only open our eyes to see the unworthy means employed by

_sacerdotal policy_ to stifle the dawning reason of men. During their

infancy they are taught tales which are ridiculous, impertinent,

contradictory, and criminal, and to these they are enjoined to pay

respect. They are gradually impregnated with inconceivable mysteries

that are announced as sacred truths, and they are accustomed to

contemplate phantoms before which they habitually tremble. In a word,

measures are taken which are the best calculated to render those

blind who do not consult their reason, and to render those base who

constantly shudder whenever they recall the ideas with which their

priests infected their minds at an age when they were unable to guard

against such snares.

Recall to mind, Madam, the dangerous cares which were taken in the

convent where you were educated, to sow in your mind the germs of

those inquietudes that now afflict you. It was there that they began

to speak to you of fables, prodigies, mysteries, and doctrines that

you actually revere, while, if these things were announced to-day for

the first time, you would regard them as ridiculous, and as entirely

unworthy of attention. I have often witnessed your laughter at the

simplicity with which you formerly credited those tales of sorcerers

and ghosts, that, during your childhood, were related by the nuns who

had charge of your education. When you entered society where for a

long time such chimeras have been disbelieved, you were insensibly

undeceived, and at present you blush at your former credulity. Why

have you not the courage to laugh, in a similar manner, at an infinity

of other chimeras with no better foundation, which torment you even

yet, and which only appear more respectable, because you have not

dared to examine them with your own eyes, or because you see them

respected by a public who have never explored them? If my Eugenia is

enlightened and reasonable upon all other topics, why does she

renounce her understanding and her judgment whenever religion is in

question? In the mean time, at this redoubtable word her soul is

disturbed, her strength abandons her, her ordinary penetration is at

fault, her imagination wanders, she only sees through a cloud, she is

unquiet and afflicted. On the watch against reason, she dares not call

that to her assistance. She persuades herself that the best course for

her to take is to allow herself to follow the opinions of a multitude

who never examine, and who always suffer themselves to be conducted by

blind or deceitful guides.

To reestablish peace in your mind, dear Madam, cease to despise

yourself; entertain a just confidence in your own powers of mind, and

feel no chagrin at finding yourself infected with a general and

involuntary epidemic from which it did not depend on you to escape.

The good Abbe de St. Pierre had reason when he said that _devotion was

the small pox of the soul_. I will add that it is rare the disease

does not leave its pits for life. Indeed, see how often the most

enlightened persons persist forever in the prejudices of their

infancy! These notions are so early inculcated, and so many

precautions are continually taken to render them durable, that if any

thing may reasonably surprise us, it is to see any one have the

ability to rise superior to such influences. The most sublime geniuses

are often the playthings of superstition. The heat of their

imagination sometimes only serves to lead them the farther astray, and

to attach them to opinions which would cause them to blush did they

but consult their reason. Pascal constantly imagined that he saw hell

yawning under his feet; Mallebranche was extravagantly credulous;

Hobbes had a great terror of phantoms and demons;[3] and the immortal

Newton wrote a ridiculous commentary on the vials and visions of the

Apocalypse. In a word, every thing proves that there is nothing more

difficult than to efface the notions with which we are imbued during

our infancy. The most sensible persons, and those who reason with the

most correctness upon every other matter, relapse into their infancy

whenever religion is in question.

[3] On this subject see Bayle's _Dict. Crit._, art. _Hobbes_, Rem. N.

Thus, Madam, you need not blush for a weakness which you hold in

common with almost all the world, and from which the greatest men are

not always exempt. Let your courage then revive, and fear not to

examine with perfect composure the phantoms which alarm you. In a

matter which so greatly interests your repose, consult that

enlightened reason which places you as much above the vulgar, as it

elevates the human species above the other animals. Far from being

suspicious of your own understanding and intellectual faculties, turn

your just suspicion against those men, far less enlightened and honest

than you, who, to vanquish you, only address themselves to your lively

imagination; who have the cruelty to disturb the serenity of your

soul; who, under the pretext of attaching you only to heaven, insist

that you must sunder the most tender and endearing ties; and in fine,

who oblige you to proscribe the use of that beneficent reason whose

light guides your conduct so judiciously and so safely.

Leave inquietude and remorse to those corrupt women who have cause to

reproach themselves, or who have crimes to expiate. Leave superstition

to those silly and ignorant females whose narrow minds are incapable

of reasoning or reflection. Abandon the futile and trivial ceremonies

of an objectionable devotion to those idle and peevish women, for

whom, as soon as the transient reign of their personal charms is

finished, there remains no rational relaxation to fill the void of

their days, and who seek by slander and treachery to console

themselves for the loss of pleasures which they can no longer enjoy.

Resist that inclination which seems to impel you to gloomy meditation,

solitude, and melancholy. Devotion is only suited to inert and

listless souls, while yours is formed for action. You should pursue

the course I recommend for the sake of your husband, whose happiness

depends upon you; you owe it to the children, who will soon,

undoubtedly, need all your care and all your instructions for the

guidance of their hearts and understandings; you owe it to the friends

who honor you, and who will value your society when the beauty which

now adorns your person and the voluptuousness which graces your figure

have yielded to the inroads of time; you owe it to the circle in which

you move, and to the world which has a right to your example,

possessing as you do virtues that are far more rare to persons of your

rank than devotion. In fine, you owe happiness to yourself; for,

notwithstanding the promises of religion, you will never find

happiness in those agitations into which I perceive you cast by the

lurid ideas of superstition. In this path you will only encounter

doleful chimeras, frightful phantoms, embarrassments without end,

crushing uncertainties, inexplicable enigmas, and dangerous reveries,

which are only calculated to disturb your repose, to deprive you of

happiness, and to render you incapable of occupying yourself with that

of others. It is very difficult to make those around us happy when we

are ourselves miserable and deprived of peace.

If you will even slightly make observations upon those about you, you

will find abundant proofs of what I advance. The most religious

persons are rarely the most amiable or the most social. Even the most

sincere devotion, by subjecting those who embrace it to wearisome and

crippling ceremonies, by occupying their imaginations with lugubrious

and afflicting objects, by exciting their zeal, is but little

calculated to give to devotees that equality of temper, that sweetness

of an indulgent disposition, and that amenity of character, which

constitute the greatest charms of personal intercourse. A thousand

examples might be adduced to convince you that devotees who are the

most occupied in superstitious observances to please God are not

those women who succeed best in pleasing those by whom they are

surrounded. If there seems to be occasionally an exception to this

rule, it is on the part of those who have not all the zeal and fervor

which is exacted by their religion. Devotion is either a morose and

melancholy passion, or it is a violent and obstinate enthusiasm.

Religion imposes an exclusive and entire regard upon its slaves. All

that an acceptable Christian gives to a fellow-creature is a robbery

from the Creator. A soul filled with religious fervor fears to attach

itself to things of the earth, lest it should lose sight of its

jealous God, who wishes to engross constant attention, who lays it

down as a duty to his creatures that they should sacrifice to him

their most agreeable and most innocent inclinations, and who orders

that they should render themselves miserable here below, under the

idea of pleasing him. In accordance with such principles, we generally

see devotees executing with much fidelity the duty of tormenting

themselves and disturbing the repose of others. They actually believe

they acquire great merit with the Sovereign of heaven by rendering

themselves perfectly useless, or even a scourge to the inhabitants of

the earth.

I am aware, Madam, that devotion in you does not produce effects

injurious to others; but I fear that it is only more injurious to

yourself. The goodness of your heart, the sweetness of your

disposition, and the beneficence which displays itself in all your

conduct, are all so great that even religion does not impel you to

any dangerous excesses. Nevertheless, devotion often causes strange

metamorphoses. Unquiet, agitated, miserable within yourself, it is to

be feared that your temperament will change, that your disposition

will become acrimonious, and that the vexatious ideas over which you

have so long brooded will sooner or later produce a disastrous

influence upon those who approach you. Does not experience constantly

show us that religion effects changes of this kind? What are called

_conversions_, what devotees regard as special acts of divine grace,

are very often only lamentable revolutions by which real vices and

odious qualities are substituted for amiable and useful

characteristics. By a deplorable consequence of these pretended

miracles of grace we frequently see sorrow succeed to enjoyment, a

gloomy and unhappy state to one of innocent gayety, lassitude and

chagrin to activity and hilarity, and slander, intolerance, and zeal

to indulgence and gentleness; nay, what do I say? cruelty itself to

humanity. In a word, superstition is a dangerous leaven, that is

fitted to corrupt even the most honest hearts.

Do you not see, in fact, the excesses to which fanaticism and zeal

drive the wisest and best meaning men? Princes, magistrates, and

judges become inhuman and pitiless as soon as there is a question of

the interests of religion. Men of the gentlest disposition, the most

indulgent, and the most equitable, upon every other matter, religion

transforms to ferocious beasts. The most feeling and compassionate

persons believe themselves in conscience obliged to harden their

hearts, to do violence to their better instincts, and to stifle

nature, in order to show themselves cruel to those who are denounced

as enemies to their own manner of thinking. Recall to your mind,

Madam, the cruelties of nations and governments in alternate

persecutions of Catholics or Protestants, as either happened to be in

the ascendant. Can you find reason, equity, or humanity in the

vexations, imprisonments, and exiles that in our days are inflicted

upon the Jansenists? And these last, if ever they should attain in

their turn the power requisite for persecution, would not probably

treat their adversaries with more moderation or justice. Do you not

daily see individuals who pique themselves upon their sensibility

unblushingly express the joy they would feel at the extermination of

persons to whom they believe they owe neither benevolence nor

indulgence, and whose only crime is a disdain for prejudices that the

vulgar regard as sacred, or that an erroneous and false policy

considers useful to the state? Superstition has so greatly stifled all

sense of humanity in many persons otherwise truly estimable, that they

have no compunctions at sacrificing the most enlightened men of the

nation because they could not be the most credulous or the most

submissive to the authority of the priests.

In a word, devotion is only calculated to fill the heart with a bitter

rancor, that banishes peace and harmony from society. In the matter

of religion, every one believes himself obliged to show more or less

ardor and zeal. Have I not often seen you uncertain yourself whether

you ought to sigh or smile at the self-depreciation of devotees

ridiculously inflamed by that religious vanity which grows out of

sectarian conventionalities? You also see them participating in

theological quarrels, in which, without comprehending their nature or

purport, they believe themselves conscientiously obliged to mingle. I

have a hundred times seen you astounded with their clamors, indignant

at their animosity, scandalized at their cabals, and filled with

disdain at their obstinate ignorance. Yet nothing is more natural than

these outbreaks; ignorance has always been the mother of devotion. To

be a devotee has always been synonymous to having an imbecile

confidence in priests. It is to receive all impulsions from them; it

is to think and act only according to them; it is blindly to adopt

their passions and prejudices; it is faithfully to fulfil practices

which their caprice imposes.

Eugenia is not formed to follow such guides. They would terminate by

leading her widely astray, by dazzling her vivid imagination, by

infecting her gentle and amiable disposition with a deadly poison. To

master with more certainty her understanding, they would render her

austere, intolerant, and vindictive. In a word, by the magical power

of superstition and supernatural notions, they would succeed, perhaps,

in transforming to vices those happy dispositions that nature has

given you. Believe me, Madam, you would gain nothing by such a

metamorphosis. Rather be what you really are. Extricate yourself as

soon as possible from that state of incertitude and languor, from that

alternative of despondency and trouble, in which you are immersed. If

you will only take your reason and virtue for guides, you will soon

break the fetters whose dangerous effects you have begun to feel.

Assume the courage, then, I repeat it, to examine for yourself this

religion, which, far from procuring you the happiness it promised,

will only prove an inexhaustible source of inquietudes and alarms, and

which will deprive you, sooner or later, of those rare qualities which

render you so dear to society. Your interest exacts that you should

render peace to your mind. It is your duty carefully to preserve that

sweetness of temper, that indulgence, and that cheerfulness, by which

you are so much endeared to all those who approach you. You owe

happiness to yourself, and you owe it to those who surround you. Do

not, then, abandon yourself to superstitious reveries, but collect all

the strength of your judgment to combat the chimeras which torment

your imagination. They will disappear as soon as you have considered

them with your ordinary sagacity.

Do not tell me, Madam, that your understanding is too weak to sound

the depths of theology. Do not tell me, in the language of our

priests, that the truths of religion are mysteries that we must adopt

without comprehending them, and that it is necessary to adore in

silence. By expressing themselves in this manner, do you not see they

really proscribe and condemn the very religion to which they are so

solicitous you should adhere? Whatever is supernatural is unsuited to

man, and whatever is beyond his comprehension ought not to occupy his

attention. To adore what we are not able to know, is to adore nothing.

To believe in what we cannot conceive, is to believe in nothing. To

admit without examination every thing we are directed to admit, is to

be basely and stupidly credulous. To say that religion is above

reason, is to recognize the fact that it was not made for reasonable

beings; it is to avow that those who teach it have no more ability to

fathom its depths than ourselves; it is to confess that our reverend

doctors do not themselves understand the marvels with which they daily

entertain us.

Letters to Eugenia; Or, A Preservative Against Religious Prejudices · 第 1 / 18 段