CHAPTER II.

ONE CAUSE OF THE SITUATION.--A PART OF "WOMAN'S MISSION" CONSIDERED.

The question, How may work and culture be combined? was recently

submitted, in my hearing, to a highly intelligent lady. She answered

with a sigh, "It can't be done. I've tried it; but, as things are now,

it can't be done." By "as things are now" she meant, with the

established ideas regarding dress, food, appearance, style, and the

objects for which woman should spend her time and herself. Suppose we

investigate the causes of the present state of things, which, as being

a hinderance to culture, is to us so unsatisfactory. A little

reflection will enable us to discover several. Chief among them all, I

think, is one which may require close inspection before it is

recognized to be such. It seems to me that the great underlying

cause--the cause of all the other causes--is the want of insight, the

unenlightemnent, which prevails concerning, not what woman's mission

is, but the ways and means by which she is to accomplish it. Let us

consider this.

Those who claim the right of defining it never can say often enough

that the true, mission of woman is to train up her children rightly,

and to make home happy; and no doubt we all agree with them. But have

we, or have they, a full sense of what woman requires to fit her even

for the first of these duties? Suppose a philosopher in disguise on a

tour of observation from some distant isle or planet should favor us

with a visit. He finds himself, we will say, on a spot not a hundred

miles from New York or Boston or Chicago. Among the objects which

attract his attention are the little children drawn along in their

little chaises.

"Are these beautiful creatures of any value?" he asks of a bystander.

"Certainly. They are the hope of the country. They will grow up into

men and women who will take our places."

"I suppose there is no danger of their growing up any other than the

right kind of men and women, such as your country needs?"

"On the contrary, there is every danger. Evil influences surround them

from their birth. These beautiful creatures have in them the

possibilities of becoming mean, base, corrupt, treacherous, deceitful,

cruel, false, revengeful; of becoming, in fact, unworthy and repulsive

in many ways. Why, all our criminals, our drunkards, liars, thieves,

burglars, murderers, were once innocent little children like these!"

"And whether these will become like those, or not, depends on chance?"

"Oh, no! It depends largely on training, especially on early training.

Children are like wax to receive impressions, like marble to retain

them."

"Are they constituted pretty nearly alike, so that the treatment which

is best for one is best for all?"

"By no means. Even those in the same family are often extremely

unlike. They have different temperaments, dispositions, propensities.

Some require urging, others checking. Some do better with praise,

others without; the same of blame. It requires thought and discernment

to know what words to speak, how many to speak, and when to speak

them. In fact, a child's nature is a piece of delicate, complex

machinery, and each one requires a separate study; for, as its springs

of action are concealed, the operator is liable at any time to touch

the wrong one."

"And mistakes here will affect a child through its whole lifetime?"

"They will affect it through all eternity."

"But who among you dare make these early impressions which are to be

so enduring? Who are the operators on these delicate and complex

pieces of mental machinery?"

"Oh! the mothers always have the care of the children. This is their

mission,--the chief duty of their lives."

"But how judicious, how comprehensive, must be the course of education

which will fit a person for such an office!"

"Do you think so? Hem! Well, it is not generally considered that a

woman who is going to marry and settle down to family life needs much

education."

"You mean, doubtless, that she only receives the special instruction

which her vocation requires."

"Special instruction?"

"Yes. If woman's special vocation is the training of children, of

course she is educated specially with a view to that vocation."

"Well, I never heard of such a kind of education. But here is one of

our young mothers: she can tell you all about it."

We will suppose, now, that our philosopher is left with the young

mother, who names over what she learned at the "institute."

"And the training of children--moral, intellectual, and physical--was

no doubt made a prominent subject of consideration."

"Training of children? Oh, no! That would have been a curious kind of

study."

"Where, then, were you prepared for the duties of your mission?"

"What mission do you mean?"

"Your mission of child-training."

"I had no preparation."

"No preparation? But are you acquainted with the different

temperaments a child may have, and the different combinations of them?

Are you competent to the direction and culture of the intellectual and

moral nature? Have you skill to touch the hidden springs of action?

Have you, thus uninstructed, the power, the knowledge, the wisdom,

requisite for guiding that mighty force, a child's soul?"

"Alas! there is hardly a day that I do not feel my ignorance on all

these points."

"Are there no sources from which knowledge may be obtained? There must

be books written on these subjects."

"Possibly; but I have no time to read them."

"No time?--no time to prepare for your chief mission?"

"It is our mission only in print. In real life it plays an extremely

subordinate part."

"What, then, in real life, is your mission?"

"Chiefly cooking and sewing."

"Your husband, then, does not share the common belief in regard to

woman's chief duty."

"Oh, yes! I have heard him express it many a time; though I don't

think he comprehends what a woman needs in order to do her duty by her

children. But he loves them dearly. If one should die he would be

heart-broken."

"Is it a common thing here for children to die?"

"I am grieved to say that nearly one-fourth die in infancy."

"And those who live,--do they grow up in full health and vigor?"

"Oh, indeed they do not! Why, look at our crowded hospitals! Look at

the apothecaries' shops at almost, every corner. Look at the

advertisements of medicines. Don't you think there's meaning in these,

and a meaning in the long rows of five-story swell-front houses

occupied by physicians, and a meaning in the people themselves?

There's scarcely one of them but has some ailment."

"But is this matter of health subject to no laws?"

"The phrase, 'laws of health,' is a familiar one, but I don't know

what those laws are."

"Mothers, then, are not in the habit of teaching them to their

children?"

"They are not themselves acquainted with them."

"Perhaps this astonishing ignorance has something to do with the

fearful mortality among infants. Do not husbands provide their wives

with books and other means of information on this subject?"

"Generally speaking, they do nothing of the kind."

"And does not the subject of hygienic laws, as applied to the rearing

of children, come into the courses of study laid out for young women!"

"No, indeed. Oh, how I wish it had!--and those other matters you

mentioned. I would give up every thing else I ever learned for the

sake of knowing how to bring up my children, and how to keep them in

health."

"The presidents and professors of your educational institutions,--do

they share the common belief as to woman's mission?"

"Oh, yes! They all say that the chief business of woman is to train up

her children."

(_Philosopher's solo_.)

"There seems to be blindness and stupidity somewhere among these

people. From what they say of the difficulty of bringing up their

children, it must take an archangel to do it rightly; still they do

not think a woman who is married and settles down to family life needs

much education! Moreover, in educating young women, that which is

universally acknowledged to be the chief business of their lives

receives not the least attention."

If our philosopher continued his inquiries into the manners and

customs of our country, he must have felt greatly encouraged; for he

would have found that it is only in this one direction that we show

such blindness and stupidity. He would have found that in every other

occupation we demand preparation. The individual who builds our ships,

cuts our coats, manufactures our watches, superintends our machinery,

takes charge of our cattle, our trees, our flowers, must know how,

must have been especially prepared for his calling. It is only

character-moulding, only shaping the destinies of immortal beings, for

which we demand neither preparation nor a knowledge of the business.

It is only of our children that we are resigned to lose nearly

one-fourth by death, "owing to ignorance and injudicious nursery

management." Were this rate of mortality declared to exist among our

domestic animals, the community would be aroused at once.

A Domestic Problem : Work and Culture in the Household · 第 2 / 11 章