TO THE REV. JOHN ARMSTRONG.

Madeley, June 1, 1822.

My dear Friend,

IT afforded me great pleasure to see, on Tuesday last, your kind friend,

Colonel Arthur [now Sir George Arthur, Bart. and Governor of Bombay], who

arrived at Liverpool on the preceding Friday. He was accompanied by his

lady, three children, and two servants, all of them in good health,

though Mrs. Arthur and the children bore the usual paleness which

Europeans so readily discover in the countenances of West Indian

residents. I felt much gratified by the colonel’s urbanity of manners,

and had great pleasure in showing him and his lady all the lions of the

place. He seemed greatly to like our neat church and rural quiet

churchyard, and the very ground appeared in his view to be more than

ordinarily consecrated by the residence of the venerable Fletcher. He

gave me much interesting detail respecting Honduras, its church, its

schools, its people, and its minister; and of the last, he forgot not to

mention his difficulties, his battles, and his eventual successes. He

spoke also of his health, and described him (though perhaps he would not

in this respect receive any great superabundance of thanks for his

pains), as being peculiarly suited to bear all the labours of his arduous

post, and that a change of place, however it might recreate the spirit,

was by no means necessary for the continuance of his health. Now, I need

scarcely tell you that all this was very refreshing to my spirit. I am

not permitted to see you, and yet such have been the singular

circumstances which have brought me in contact with those who have long

lived in the Bay of Honduras, that I have been favoured with details

almost as lively and circumstantial as an actual visit could have

afforded me. And all the accounts strengthen in me the conviction that

my endeared friend is in his own real, identical, proper post—the one by

Heaven’s signature stamped with appointment and approbation too. May the

Saviour who has appointed and approved, still bind him to it by his

constraining love!

The colonel was very kind in his inquiries respecting William; I sent to

Mr. Thurgar for him, and the counsels he gave him were very affectionate

and appropriate. He left with him a sovereign when he parted from us.

He seemed particularly anxious for his welfare, and was very desirous of

gleaning everything encouraging that he might have the satisfaction of

communicating it to you—a satisfaction evidently very strong.

Last night, I received a letter from that very excellent and very pious

man, Mr. Francis Hall, who resided some months in my parish, as the

companion of the New Zealanders, and who went with them to New Zealand.

His whole conduct, while among us, left an indelible impression of the

genuine piety which so humbly but gracefully dwelt within him. Every

recollection of the dear good man is refreshing to my spirit. But I

wander from my point. I received from him, yesterday, a letter which

ought to make us all truly thankful that we have been providentially kept

here, instead of being suffered to go, as we had once intended, along

with himself or others to this inhospitable shore. He begins with

congratulating us on this point, and illustrates his congratulation with

such a narration of discouragement, connected with the state of the

mission, as would convince every unprejudiced mind that a family such as

mine has no business there. A time possibly may come when the signs may

become more favourable; but certainly they are most discouraging now.

I hope I am thankful to God, as the only source of our good, for the

state of things in my own parish. To say there was an outpouring of the

Spirit upon us, would be using language by far too strong, and yet some

gracious drops have descended—the dew has been resting upon us. Our

classes increase—the public means are better attended; our Sunday schools

are more than doubled, and a spirit of hearing generally prevails. And I

feel the more grateful for all this, as I have all along expected that a

seven years’ residence among them would produce a listlessness and

indifference bordering on satiety; but, though this term is now attained

within a few days, yet there seems no want of attention and no diminution

in interest. The hearts of the dear people are still given to me, and,

as such, they still bear with and love me. And if old things are said in

their hearing, they appear to come home to them with a new power, and

that power I would gratefully acknowledge is from above: to the grace,

therefore, of my Redeemer, I would ascribe the praise. And I do still

cherish a hope that, so long as he shall be pleased to continue me here,

he will graciously command that the barrel of meal shall not waste, nor

the cruse of oil fail; that neither matter nor unction shall be wanting

in my humble ministrations. Humble they, indeed, are and always will be:

the little treasure which I bear, is in an earthen, a cracked earthen

vessel. But I hope I am still content, so long as the excellency of the

power may be seen of God and not of man. Here, my dear friend, is the

grand point—we nothing; Christ all. Oh, blessed feeling! Never are we

so truly happy as when we most fully realize it.

We all unite in kind love to yourself and Mrs. A., and I remain,

My dear Friend,

Yours ever sincerely,

G. M.

* * * * *

The friend to whom the following extract of a letter to the editor

refers, was one whom Mr. Mortimer had strongly urged to turn his

attention towards the service of the sanctuary. The extract exhibits so

beautiful a picture of a good man that I cannot prevail upon myself to

omit it, and yet, not to offend the retiring feelings of the excellent

individual alluded to—he being yet alive—I suppress his name, though to

himself and some few of his friends the name will not be unknown. I hope

he will forgive me this wrong which I have committed for the sake of

others. In a note which the editor received from this gentleman,

forwarding to him several of the letters which he had received from Mr.

Mortimer, he says,

“‘In honour preferring one another,’ seemed to be one of his (Mr.

M.’s) constant rules of action. For myself, I may most unaffectedly

say, that while I feel grateful to God for the affection of such a

friend for so many years, I equally feel my own utter unworthiness of

such a privilege and blessing.”

“Two evenings ago, I received a letter from my excellent friend, —,

late of —. He has at length applied for orders, and was admitted

deacon, two Sundays since, by the venerable Bishop of Norwich. Mr.

Horne of Christ Church, Newgate-street, whose work on the Scriptures

you have no doubt seen reviewed, was admitted by the Bishop of London

three years since, and these two together with myself were a trio of

friends meeting in Mr. Butterworth’s class. Orders were at one time

the furthest from all our thoughts, and yet have we been gradually

led forward, and the third has at length joined us in the blessed and

honourable employ. I much regret that he did not break through his

snares and impediments when, about seven years ago, I strongly urged

him to the point; for he would then have not only spent seven more

years in the more immediate work of the sanctuary, but would have

saved himself many painful exercises and many severe losses.

* * * * *

“But oh, how I admire the man! If he shone in prosperity, how much

more in adversity! No murmur ever escapes him. He does, indeed,

glorify his God in the fires. His altered circumstances make no

alteration in the man, unless, indeed, they have induced greater

spirituality of mind, more complete deadness to the world, and more

unreserved surrender of all his affections and powers to the service

of his God. But here I am backward to speak; for he shone so

conspicuously before, that I find it difficult to determine which is

stronger of the two lights, both so strong that few could bear with

them a momentary comparison. Oh, may _our_ lights, my dear friend,

so shine in every alteration of our circumstances, that we also may,

like him, bring glory to our God!”

At the beginning of the year 1823, it pleased God to deprive the church

of the valuable labours’ of the Rev. John Eyton, Vicar of Wellington, to

whom Mr. Mortimer was exceedingly attached. About seven weeks before his

removal, he left home with the intention of wintering at the Isle of

Wight, but the weather becoming very cold he was obliged to remain at

Portsmouth. The children being all at home, he did not wish Mrs. Eyton

to accompany him; but a few days before his death, she received an

intimation that he wished to see her, and though she set off the very day

she received this information, she did not arrive till some hours after

his departure. In reference to this painful event, Mr. Mortimer, in a

letter to his sister, says,

“The death of Mr. Eyton has filled us with a degree of consternation

and surprise which I find it difficult to express. In what a

changing world do we live, and how many evils does that part of our

punishment “death” introduce among us. Prayer seems at present our

only refuge, especially with regard to his bereaved people. The

delicate and very difficult duty of preaching the funeral sermon has

been assigned to me: the flesh would dispose me to decline were I to

attend to its dictates; but I dare not listen. I owe so much to my

endeared and highly honoured friend, that I feel I must proceed. Let

me, however, entreat the assistance of your prayers.”

Some time during last year Mr. Mortimer was induced to undertake the

editorship of a monthly publication for young persons. He refers to this

engagement in the following letter:—

The Life and Letters of the Rev. George Mortimer, M.A. Rector of Thornhill, in the Diocese of Toronto, Canada West · 第 67 / 172 题