CHAPTER XV

_Terry's Finish_

Terry had given Marie life, and she had finally used this vitality to

free herself from him and his too exigent idealism. The result of his

relation to her seems from this point of view pathetically ironical; but

it is only a symbol of the ironical pathos of his relation to society in

general; he and his kind act as a stimulant and a tonic to the society

which rejects and crushes them. The anarchist is in a double sense the

victim of society. He is, in the first place, generally a "labour"

victim, is generally the maimed result of our factory system; and, in

the second place, his philosophy, needed by society, reacts against

himself and turns the world against him. So he is a double victim, a

reiterated social sacrifice.

When I went to Chicago this last time I found Terry, as I have said,

despondent and disillusioned; and intensely savage in his rejection, not

only of capitalistic society, but apparently of all society. In a way,

he had left his old moorings, the "proletariat" no longer appealed to

him. This mood was not a part of his philosophy: it was an expression of

his disappointment, of his disillusionment. He talked about his own life

and Marie's with an almost brutal frankness. He seemed to take a sad

pleasure in stripping the illusion of human worth and beauty to the bare

bones. In spite of his words, in spite of his previous letters, it

seemed clear to me that Marie had not lost her hold on him entirely, and

that he deeply felt her defection. Through her he had failed socially

and personally. Around her much of his life, intellectual and personal,

had been wound. Lingeringly he talked of her, of her qualities; he

seemed to try to steel himself against all need of human relation;

incidentally he rejected me and other friends, finding us wanting.

Marie, too, was not perfect, and must be "passed up"; but his mind

rested, in spite of himself, on this woman and his life with her. Some

of the things he said and wrote to me about this time indicate his

present mood toward me, Marie, the anarchists, proletariat, and the

world in general.

A year or two ago he wrote me: "No one, very close to me geographically,

can ever get much out of me. This is a family trait and is too deep for

me. So don't be downcast if we should ever meet again and you should

find me as stoical as some crustacean of the past. Some such

antediluvian feeling animates me to take advantage of your distance and

clamour up out of the depths."

He did, indeed, "clamour up out of the depths" very eloquently, but when

I saw him in Chicago I found that I had somehow "lost touch," like the

rest of the world, with him. He felt it and wrote me:

"While you were in Italy, I sent you a letter in which I represented

myself as one clamouring up out of the depths of his being to you who

might understand. Now I sincerely and deeply regret having made this

attempt with you. In the same letter I predicted that your return might

find me back in the depths of my being, where I belong. I regret I did

not stay there when you came along. This feeling is due to no fault of

yours or mine; but points to the fact that I must become still more

exclusive and circumspect."

Of Marie he wrote: "This attachment between two human beings is in all

circumstances very terrible. The bond between Marie and myself was as

strong as death, and partly so because of our great and essential

differences. The first night we spent together struck one of the deep

things in our discord. I was too nervous and sensitive to touch her that

night, and in the morning she bitterly reproached me. The first book

that really aroused her to the meaning of life was '_Mademoiselle de

Maupin_.' Deeper than this difference was her galling interference in my

affairs which never prompted me to meddle in hers. And her failure to

appreciate or reciprocate my respect for the integrity of her

personality is the hardest blow she can ever give to me. I have the same

fatal charge to make against almost all men; the exceptions are so few

and doubtful that I doubt whether I can ever gain from another that

intense receptive attitude which I am willing to bestow. Fortunately for

me, this illusion that there are such intense perceivers re-creates

itself out of the veriest dust and dross of humanity. Like Shelley's

'Cloud,' my illusion may change, but it cannot die. Now I am in a state

of mind when I am willing to let everything go by default--everything

except my last illusion, that I can never let myself out to anyone. To

Marie--and to you--and one or two others--I have been sorely tempted to

lay myself out--but not even the moon can seduce me to reveal myself. My

dead and buried self is my first and last seduction. This is crazy, of

course, but I am heartily sick of all the 'sense' I know or can know. I

believe, however, that I have lived so close to the 'truth' that its

shadow has been cast over all my life. If, in the last analysis, all is

illusion, I shall stick to the most powerful one--myself. My feeling for

Marie arises largely from the fact that she is an expression of the

irreparable part of my life--of its deepest essence.

"A year ago to-day, on the thirteenth of August," he wrote, "occurred my

first, last, and only breakaway from the best pal I have ever hoped to

have, Marie. Now that it has passed, I see it in its proper proportions,

just as if it had happened to someone else, but to one as near and dear

to me as myself. I have broken away from the Mob, too. My sympathy for

what is called the People has been worn down to a mere thread that might

easily be broken and turn me against them. When one has been stoned

long enough, one may easily turn into something as hard as stone itself.

I am like the knight of old, turned inside out. I am developing a

coating of internal mail, as so many of the attacks come from within.

But worse than attacks from within or without is the sordid security and

mental inertia of all the people about me: they are strangling me just

as surely as if they put a rope around my neck. By day they hurry on

like ghosts about their business, and by night they gather in the little

tombs of many rooms they call their homes.

"You may call it madness, this my cutting off of all things. I know that

I have kept off madness a long while now. I have shrunk from 'business'

to social anarchy and pure beings, from these again I have shrunk to

books and poetry, from these again into the solitude of myself where

only I am really at home. Though I have lost my general bearings, I

still stand at the helm of myself. I am going to pieces on the rocks of

the world, but I still inhabit the realm of the soul.

"When I could no longer see my ideals rise out of my work, I quit that

work; for then the work was no longer an expression of myself. This is

the origin of all modern problems. A man stands to his job because of

the visions that come to him only when at work. He sees in imagery his

own possibilities arise out of the thing on which he is at work, and

easily links himself to his fellows. Thus does the worker make of his

eternal cerebral rehearsals an endless chain of imaged solidarity

binding him in a maze from which he can never think his way out. The

fixed gaze of those who try to grasp the abstract is proof of this.

"When I could no longer see my ideals arise out of human solidarity, I

quit my fanatical belief in the possibility of a Utopia. So that now I

am not even an anarchist. I am ready to pass it all up."

When I saw Terry for the last time, and found him in this almost crazy

crisis of extreme individualism, where he hopelessly "passed up"

everything--human society, love and friendship, all the things his warm

and loving Irish heart really desired, I felt that here indeed was a

complete expression of the spirit of revolt. It was so extreme that I

and no one else could follow him in it. It had passed beyond the point

where social rebellion may be useful or stimulating or suggestive

poetically and had reached the sad absurdity of all extreme attitudes.

One lesson Terry's proud and strenuous soul has never learned: that the

deeper and simpler things in social growth we must take on faith. We

cannot demand an ideal reason or justification for all social

organisation, for the ways that human beings have of living together.

The elementary social forms at least must be instinctively and blindly

accepted. To go beyond in one's rejection the anarchism of the social

communist into what is called individualistic anarchism is mere

egotistic madness and has as its only value the possible poetry of a

unified personal expression. Into this it was that Terry fell, and of

course he could find no support for it except in his own soul, which

could not bear the strain. No soul could, for, struggle as we may, we

are largely social and cannot stand alone. Terry's life well shows the

sympathetic source of social rebellion and its justification, but it

also shows the ultimate sterility of its extreme expression.

The latest word I have about Marie is that she is at work "keeping

house for a respectable family" in San Francisco. Her experience in

camping-out seems to have rendered her normal to, for her, an extreme

degree. Going to work certainly represented as radical a reaction from

Terry and his philosophy as well could be imagined. A friend of mine in

San Francisco writes of her: "She is now to all appearances a good,

respectable girl. She wants to live a new life, is working hard, and is

trying to break away from smoking. Sometimes she feels the restraint

severely, and comes to our house where she knows she can smoke and

express herself. She is in better health, and I think now is in close

enough touch with nature not to want to go back for nourishment to ideas

and the slum."

The latest word I have from Terry shows him faithful to the

end--faithful to his character and his mood:

"There is a rumour that Marie has got a job at general housework. This

gave me the blues--after all our life together, this the end! I'd rather

have her do general prostitution, with the chance of having an

occasional rest in the hospital. But perhaps her drudgery will kill her

enthusiasm for 'vita nuova!'

"I should have answered your letter had I not been suffering from an old

malady of mine which is accompanied by such mental depression that I

could not answer the communication of even a lost soul. I had to seek

surcease in my old remedy of hasheesh and chloroform, which was a change

from suffering to stupidity. But I shall not swell the cosmic chorus of

woe by raising my cracked voice against impending fate. I am more and

more alone, more and more conscious of a growing something that is

keeping me apart from all whom I can possibly avoid."

Terry is nearing his logical end, while Marie is still struggling for

life, life given her in the beginning by this strange man, whose

influence was then to take it away from her; and from this, like the

world, she rebelled. "Anarchism" she embraced as long as it enhanced her

being; as long as this deeply emotional philosophy added to the fulness

of her life, she saw its meaning and its use; when it finally tended to

sterilise her new existence, its "pragmatic" value was nothing.

This is the test of all social theory: How It Works Out. In Marie's

case, as in the case of many proletarians, it worked out well, as a

general civilising and consoling philosophy, for a time, but when

carried to an "idealistic" extreme, it tended rapidly towards general

death--from which all live things react. So it was with Marie: she left

her "poisonous" Terry and sought for another vitalising experience.

Goethe said that the best government is that which makes itself

superfluous. Terry's spiritual influence on Marie, important for her in

the beginning as rendering her self-respecting and mentally ambitious,

had become superfluous. But it had been of great value to the girl. So,

too, with our society. The extreme rebellious attitude educates

us--sometimes to the point where rebellion is superfluous.

THE END

_The_

Autobiography _of a_ Thief

A true story of the life of a criminal

taken down and edited by Mr. Hapgood.

_Cloth. 349 pp. $1.25 postpaid._

COMMENTS OF THE CRITICS

"The book as a whole impresses the reader as an accurate

presentation of the thief's personal point of view, a vivid

picture of the society in which he lived and robbed and of

the influences, moral and political, by which he was

surrounded. The story indeed has something of the quality of

Defoe's 'Colonel Jacque'; it is filled with convincing

details."--_New York Evening Post._

"To one reader at least--one weary reader of many books

which seem for the most part 'flat, stale and

unprofitable'--this is a book that seems eminently 'worth

while.' Indeed, every word of the book, from cover to cover,

is supremely, vitally interesting. Most novels are tame

beside it, and few recent books of any kind are so rich in

suggestiveness."--_Interior._

"What is the value of such an autobiography of a thief as

Mr. Hapgood has given us? It is this. Professional crime is

one of the overprosperous branches of industry in our large

cities. As a nation we are casting around for means to check

it, or, in other words, to divert the activities of the

professional criminals into some other industry in which

these men can satisfy their peculiar talents and at the same

time get a living with less inconvenience to the mass of

citizens. The criminal, being as much a human being as the

rest of us, must be known as he is before we can either

influence him personally or legislate for him effectually.

If we treat him as we would the little girl who stole her

brother's candy mice or as the man who under great stress of

temptation yields to the impulse to steal against his

struggling will, we will fail, for we overlook the very

essence of the matter--his professionalism. It is safe to

say that perusal of Mr. Hapgood's book will help many a

student of criminology to find his way through the current

tangle of statistics, reform plans, analyses of 'graft' and

what not, by the very light of humanity that is in

it."--_Chicago Record-Herald._

"The manner and style of 'The Autobiography of a Thief' is

that which attracts even the fastidious lovers of

literature. It is the life-story of a real thief

unmistakably impressive in its force and truth. As a matter

of course, the book is on the hinge of a novel, but it

contains the gem and sparkle of genuineness and its

complication has the flavor of accuracy."--_New Orleans

Item._

"It is not only a powerful plea for the reform of abuses in

our penitentiaries, but it is an extraordinary revelation of

the life of a criminal from his birth up, and an explanation

of the conditions which impelled him first to crime and

later to attempted reformation."--_New York Herald._

"The truth found in 'The Autobiography of a Thief' is not

only stranger but far more interesting than much of the

present day fiction. The autobiography of 'Light-fingered

Jim' is absorbing, in many pages startling, in its

graphicness.... In spite of its naturalness, daring and

directness, the work has a marked literary style--a finish

that could not have been given by an unexperienced hand. But

this adds to rather than detracts from the charm of the

book."--_Philadelphia Public Ledger._

"No more realistic book has been written for a long time

than Hutchins Hapgood's 'The Autobiography of a Thief.' No

books on criminology and no statistics regarding penal

institutions can carry the weight of truth and conviction

which this autobiography conveys."--_Chicago Chronicle._

"As a study in sociology it is splendid; as a human story it

will hold attention, every page of it."--_Nashville

American._

"It is a clear and graphic insight into the lives of the

lower world and is written with impressive force. It is a

remarkable addition to the literature of the

season."--_Grand Rapids Herald._

"An illuminating and truly instructive book, and one of

terrible fascination."--_Christian Endeavor World._

"As a contribution to the study of sociology as illustrated

from life and not from mere text-books, the story recorded

by Mr. Hapgood will be welcomed by all philanthropic

people."--_New York Observer._

"It is an absorbing story of the making of a criminal, and

is rightly classed by the publishers as a 'human document.'

It is absorbing alike to the reader who reads for the

diversion of reading and to those who are really thoughtful

students of the forces which are working in the life round

about them."--_Brooklyn Life._

"Those in whom the sense of human oneness and social

responsibility is strong will be intensely interested in

these genuine experiences and in the naive, if perverted,

viewpoint of a pick-pocket, thief and burglar who has served

three terms in State's prison."--_Booklovers' Library._

"It may be that 'Jim' puts things strongly sometimes, but

the spirit of truth at least is plain in every chapter of

the book. That, in general, it is the real thing is the

feeling the reader has after he has finished with 'The

Autobiography of a Thief.' It is not a pleasant book; it is

anything but a book such as the young person should receive

as a birthday gift. It is a book however which the man

anxious to keep track of life in this country should read

and ponder over."--JOSIAH FLYNT, _in the Bookman_.

DUFFIELD AND COMPANY

36 EAST 21ST ST. NEW YORK

* * * * *

"_The_ Spirit _of_ Labor"

_$1.25 Net_

"A straightforward narrative which has the tremendous

advantage of disclosing more things about the greater life

of Chicago--and more which are not generally known to the

more sheltered classes--than any book of its size ever

written. Those who wish to be written down as loving their

fellow-men should read this volume with care. It is a real

book, and worth anybody's while."--_The Interior, Chicago._

"Much of the story is set down in this man's own words, and

the whole is made vividly interesting and really meaningful

by the author's broad understanding and sincerity of

purpose."--_Life, New York._

"Mr. Hapgood's portrayal of the American workingman is a

'moving picture' in two senses of this equivocal phrase. It

is kinetoscopic, first of all, in its lifelikeness and the

convincing reality of the actions it pictures. Then, again,

it is emotionally moving; for the character of Anton, the

big, honest, alert and energetic Chicago laborer, can hardly

fail to arouse in the reader intense admiration, lively

sympathy and not a little amusement free from all cynicism

and class feeling. In 'The Spirit of Labor' we are brought

into living contact with the men and women we meet on the

streets, the great American public with whom every business

man, every pastor and every politician has daily to reckon.

Teamsters, masons, unionists, saloonkeepers, policemen,

wash-women, newsboys, walking delegates, waitresses, ward

heelers, local bosses, anarchists--the procession seems

endless and the medley beyond all hope of disentanglement.

But it is real life and no parade of puppets."--_New York

Tribune._

"We cannot doubt, however, that Anton is a true type and

represents a large portion of the men of this land with whom

workers and students in social matters must meet. The book

deals intimately with the questions arising between labor

and capital, and is especially interesting in its analysis

of the Chicago spirit as it relates to these matters."--_The

Christian Advocate, New York._

"The story of Anton and his socialistic, anarchistic, and

trade union comrades is a faithful and photographic picture

of aspects of the urban activity of vast multitudes of

industrials combining to assist each one in his fellow in

the struggle for existence and fullness of life. The forces

revealed are full of danger, the temper is ugly, the manners

are always urbane, the judgment not always well informed,

the range of knowledge often limited; but there is wondrous

power, vigor, and the chaotic promise of a better and larger

morality than anything the churches yet have taught, or the

mere book students have ever dreamed. Miss Jane Addams has

discovered this larger morality in seeming coarseness and

evil, and Mr. Hapgood has given us glimpses of it in the

biography of his man of toil and rebellion. The Philistine

needs the Anarchist to wake him, as Hume did Kant, from his

dogmatic slumbers, and the Philistine may (let us hope

rarely) wear cap and gown."--_The Dial, Chicago._

+--------------------------------------------------------------+

| Transcriber's Notes: |

| |

| Page 54: woman amended to women |

| Page 97: acount amended to account |

| Page 102: interst amended to interest |

| Page 145: pamplets amended to pamphlets |

| Page 148: envolved _sic_ |

| Page 154: senstive amended to sensitive |

| Page 166: inconsistences amended to inconsistencies |

| Page 172: beause amended to because |

| Page 241: concious amended to conscious |

| |

| Punctuation has been standardised. |

| |

| Where a word is hyphenated and unhyphenated an equal number |

| of times, both versions have been retained: pickpocket/ |

| pick-pocket; upstairs/up-stairs. |

+--------------------------------------------------------------+

An Anarchist Woman · 第 15 / 15 章