XIX

_Conclusions_

Almost no exclusively 17th century artifacts were found at Marlborough;

at least, there were very few sherds or objects that could not have

originated equally well in the 18th century. The exceptions are the

following: Westerwald blue-and-white stoneware with gray-buff paste;

several sherds of delft and other tin-enameled ware, late 17th century

in type, and an early 17th-century terra cotta pipestem. Otherwise, we

find a scattering of things belonging to types that occurred in both

centuries: North Devon gravel-tempered ware, which was imported both in

the late 17th and early 18th centuries; yellow-and-brown "combed" ware,

which elsewhere occurs most commonly in 18th century contexts; pewter

trifid-handle spoons, the form of which dates from about 1690 but which

may have been cast at a later date in an old mold (a wavy-end spoon in

the style of 1710 may also have been cast later). Fragments of an

onion-shaped wine bottle may date from the first decade of the 18th

century, but the presence of such bottles in the Rosewell trash pit

shows that bottles, being too precious to throw away, were kept around

until they were broken--in the case of Rosewell for 60 or 70 years. Thus

the Marlborough sherds cannot be excluded from the Mercer period. The

same may be said of a late 17th-century type of fork. Thus, there is

virtually no evidence of the Port Town occupation, especially as the few

17th-century artifacts that were found may well have belonged to the

Mercers rather than to Marlborough's previous occupants.

The ceramics and glass are the most readily datable artifacts, and

these coincide almost altogether with the period of John Mercer's

lifetime. Common earthenwares are predominantly Tidewater and Buckley

types, with a scattering of others, most of which are recurrent among

other Virginia and Maryland historic-site artifacts. No distinct type

emerges to suggest that there may have been a local Stafford potter.

Common stonewares occur in such a variety of types that no source or

date can be attributed, although there is some evidence of the work of

William Rogers' shop in Yorktown. Westerwald stonewares are

predominantly of the blue-and-gray varieties commonest in the second

quarter of the 18th century.

There is only a small quantity of delftware, but a great deal of Chinese

porcelain. Evidences are that the first kinds of English refined wares,

such as drab stoneware, Nottingham stoneware, and agateware, were used

at Marlborough, thus pointing to an awareness of current tastes and

innovations. The large quantity of white salt-glazed ware suggests that,

although it was a cheap commercial product, it was regarded as handsome

and congenial to the environment of a plantation house that was

maintained in formal style.

Except for the white salt-glazed ware, which was probably acquired in

the 1760's, most of the table ceramics date from about 1740 to 1760.

Bottles and the few datable table-glass fragments are also primarily

from this period. Creamwares and late 18th- and early 19th-century

whitewares diminish sharply in numbers, reflecting a more austere life

at Marlborough in its descent to an overseer's quarters. Later

19th-century wares are insignificant in quantity or in their relation to

the history of Marlborough. Tool and hardware forms are less diagnostic.

Most of them correspond to ledger entries and to the 1771 inventory, so,

without contradictory evidence, they may be assumed to date from John

Mercer's period.

In general, the artifacts illustrate the best of household equipment

available in 18th-century Virginia, and the tools and hardware indicate

the extensiveness of the plantation's activities and its heavy reliance

on blacksmith work.

The Cultural History of Marlborough, Virginia An Archeological and Historical Investigation of the Port Town for Stafford County and the Plantation of John Mercer, Including Data Supplied by Frank M. Setzler and Oscar H. Darter · 第 234 / 290 题