GROWING BURDENS, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND DEBTS

Meanwhile, Mercer had announced his intention to publish a new edition

of the _Abridgment_. In doing so, he adopted a hostile, testy approach

that was unusual even in 18th-century advertising. Implying that he was

doing a favor to an ungrateful populace, he stated in the Virginia

_Gazette_ on August 16, 1751, "I have been prevail'd upon to print it,

if I have a prospect of saving myself, though the Treatment I met from

the Subscribers to the last had determined me never to be again

concerned in an Undertaking of this Kind." On the following February 20,

he announced in the _Gazette_ that if there were 600 subscribers by the

last of the next General Court he would send the copy to press. If not,

he would return the money to those who had subscribed, "which I should

not have troubled myself with, if I could have thought of any other

Expedient to secure myself against the base Usage I met with from the

Subscribers to my former _Abridgment_, who left above 1200 of them on my

Hands." This kind of advertising had its predictable response:

publication of the new _Abridgment_ was postponed indefinitely.

The first suggestion that all was not well in Mercer's financial affairs

was given in an advertisement in the _Gazette_ on April 10, 1752. In

this he noted that he had agreed to pay the debts of one Francis

Wroughton, a London merchant, out of Wroughton's effects. However,

although Wroughton's effects had not materialized, he promised to make

payment anyway, "notwithstanding a large Ballance due to myself." He

concluded, "Besides Mr. _Wroughton's_ Debts, I have some of my own (and

not inconsiderable) to pay, therefore I hope that such Gentlemen as are

indebted to me will, without putting me to the Blush which a Dunn will

occasion, discharge their Debts...."

Perhaps to alleviate these difficulties, he had advertised in the

Gazette on the previous March 15 that he would lease "3,000 Acres of

extraordinary good fresh Land, in Fairfax and Prince William," but there

is no evidence that he was successful.

Signs of irritability became increasingly noticeable. In 1753 he

outraged his fellow justices at Stafford court--so much so that they

brought charges against him before the Executive Council "for

misbehavior as a Justice."[123] It was decided that, although "his

Conduct had been in some Respects blameable, particularly by his

Intemperance, opprobrious Language on the Bench, and indecent Treatment

of the other Justices, ... that in Consideration of his having been a

principal Instrument in a due Administration of Justice, and expediting

the Business of the County, it has been thought proper to continue him

Judge of the Court."[124]

A growing burden of debt, in contrast to the prosperity of the preceding

decade, clearly affected Mercer's attitude, as we can see in a Gazette

advertisement on November 7, 1754: "I will not undertake any new, or

finish any old Cause, 'til I receive my Fee, or Security for it to my

liking: And I hope such Gentlemen as for above these seven years past

have put me off with Promises every succeeding General Court will think

it reasonable now to discharge their accounts." Concurrent with

indebtedness was an almost annual increase in the size of his family. In

1752 Grace Fenton Mercer was born, the next year Mungo Roy, and in 1754

Elinor.

At the same time, he still pursued the restless activity that

characterized his earlier years. On July 24, 1753, Mercer went "to

Balthrop's, Smith's Ordin^{ry} & Vaulx's,"[125] a distance of 27 miles,

during which he "Overset." On the 25th he went on eight miles farther

"to Col^o Phil Lee's"[126] for a three-day meeting of the Ohio Company,

then went the whole 35 miles home on the 28th. On September 6 he was

called eight miles away "to Boyd's hole on Inquest as Coroner & home by

4 in the morn^g," while the next day he was "at home. Son Mungo Roy born

ab^t 2 in the morning." On the 19th Mungo Roy was christened. Four days

later he went 15 miles to Fredericksburg for the christening of William

Dick's son Alexander, returning home the next day. The following day

Mercer journeyed 14 miles and back to "Holdbrook's Survey" by way of

Mountjoy's, and repeated the trip the next day, stopping at Major

Hedgman's[127] coming and going. On October 5 he made a three-day trip

to Williamsburg, covering the distance in stretches of 16, 52, and 42

miles per day, respectively. He went by way of Port Royal, where he "Met

M^r Wroughton," presumably the London merchant whose creditors he had

agreed to pay. The second day took him by way of King William

courthouse. On the return on November 4-6, he came via Chiswell's

Ordinary[128] and New Kent courthouse (which he noted had "Burnt"),

covering a total of 110 miles.

On June 3, 1754, his clerk reported to duty, according to a journal

entry: "Rogers came here at £50 p^r annum." Rogers remained in Mercer's

employ until 1768.

Mercer seems to have been driving himself to the limit, not to achieve

success as in the prior decades, but rather to hold secure what he

already had. The specter of debt now hung over him, as it did over

nearly every planter, under the increasing burdens of the French and

Indian War. The 17th-century wisdom of William Fitzhugh and Robert

Beverley in seeking to lead the colony away from complete dependence

upon tobacco was apparent to those who would remember. Marlborough,

although still technically a town, was now in reality a tobacco

plantation, and Mercer, despite his status as a lawyer, was as

irretrievably committed to the success or failure of tobacco as was

Fitzhugh 70 years earlier. The hard years were now upon all, and, like

his equally hard-pressed debtors, Mercer was suffering from them.

The Cultural History of Marlborough, Virginia An Archeological and Historical Investigation of the Port Town for Stafford County and the Plantation of John Mercer, Including Data Supplied by Frank M. Setzler and Oscar H. Darter · 第 120 / 290 题