OUR DUMB RELATIONS. (1886.)

IT was said of St. Francis of Assisi, that he had attained, through the

fervor of his love, the secret of that deep amity with God and His

creation which, in the language of inspiration, makes man to be in league

with the stones of the field, and the beasts of the field to be at peace

with him. The world has never been without tender souls, with whom the

golden rule has a broader application than its letter might seem to

warrant. The ancient Eastern seers recognized the rights of the brute

creation, and regarded the unnecessary taking of the life of the humblest

and meanest as a sin; and in almost all the old religions of the world

there are legends of saints, in the depth of whose peace with God and

nature all life was sacredly regarded as the priceless gift of heaven,

and who were thus enabled to dwell safely amidst lions and serpents.

It is creditable to human nature and its unperverted instincts that

stories and anecdotes of reciprocal kindness and affection between men

and animals are always listened to with interest and approval. How

pleasant to think of the Arab and his horse, whose friendship has been

celebrated in song and romance. Of Vogelwied, the Minnesinger, and his

bequest to the birds. Of the English Quaker, visited, wherever he went,

by flocks of birds, who with cries of joy alighted on his broad-brimmed

hat and his drab coat-sleeves. Of old Samuel Johnson, when half-blind

and infirm, groping abroad of an evening for oysters for his cat. Of

Walter Scott and John Brown, of Edinburgh, and their dogs. Of our own

Thoreau, instinctively recognized by bird and beast as a friend. Emerson

says of him: "His intimacy with animals suggested what Thomas Fuller

records of Butler, the apologist, that either he had told the bees

things, or the bees had told him. Snakes coiled round his legs; the

fishes swam into his hand; he pulled the woodchuck out of his hole by his

tail, and took foxes under his protection from the hunters."

In the greatest of the ancient Hindu poems--the sacred book of the

Mahabharata--there is a passage of exceptional beauty and tenderness,

which records the reception of King Yudishthira at the gate of Paradise.

A pilgrim to the heavenly city, the king had travelled over vast spaces,

and, one by one, the loved ones, the companions of his journey, had all

fallen and left him alone, save his faithful dog, which still followed.

He was met by Indra, and invited to enter the holy city. But the king

thinks of his friends who have fallen on the way, and declines to go in

without them. The god tells him they are all within waiting for him.

Joyful, he is about to seek them, when he looks upon the poor dog, who,

weary and wasted, crouches at his feet, and asks that he, too, may enter

the gate. Indra refuses, and thereupon the king declares that to abandon

his faithful dumb friend would be as great a sin as to kill a Brahmin.

"Away with that felicity whose price is to abandon the faithful!

Never, come weal or woe, will I leave my faithful dog.

The poor creature, in fear and distress, has trusted in my power to

save him;

Not, therefore, for life itself, will I break my plighted word."

In full sight of heaven he chooses to go to hell with his dog, and

straightway descends, as he supposes, thither. But his virtue and

faithfulness change his destination to heaven, and he finds himself

surrounded by his old friends, and in the presence of the gods, who thus

honor and reward his humanity and unselfish love.

The Works of John Greenleaf Whittier, Volume VII, Complete The Conflict with Slavery, Politics and Reform, the Inner Life, and Criticism · 第 52 / 83 题