THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 1872.

The following letter was written on receiving a request from a

committee of colored voters for advice as to their action at the

presidential election of 1872.

AMESBURY, 9th mo. 3d, 1872.

DEAR FRIENDS,--I have just received your letter of the 29th ult. asking

my opinion of your present duty as colored voters in the choice between

General Grant and Horace Greeley for the presidency. You state that you

have been confused by the contradictory advice given you by such friends

of your people as Charles Sumner on one hand, and William L. Garrison and

Wendell Phillips on the other; and you ask me, as one whom you are

pleased to think "free from all bias," to add my counsel to theirs.

I thank you for the very kind expression of your confidence and your

generous reference to my endeavors to serve the cause of freedom; but I

must own that I would fain have been spared the necessity of adding to

the already too long list of political epistles. I have felt it my duty

in times past to take an active part--often very distasteful to me--in

political matters, having for my first object the deliverance of my

country from the crime and curse of slavery. That great question being

now settled forever, I have been more than willing to leave to younger

and stronger hands the toils and the honors of partisan service. Pained

and saddened by the bitter and unchristian personalities of the canvass

now in progress, I have hitherto held myself aloof from it as far as

possible, unwilling to sanction in the slightest degree the criminations

and recriminations of personal friends whom I have every reason to love

and respect, and in whose integrity I have unshaken confidence. In the

present condition of affairs I have not been able to see that any special

action as an abolitionist was required at my hands. Both of the great

parties, heretofore widely separated, have put themselves on

substantially the same platform. The Republican party, originally

pledged only to the non-extension of slavery, and whose most illustrious

representative, President Lincoln, avowed his willingness to save the

Union without abolishing slavery, has been, under Providence, mainly

instrumental in the total overthrow of the detestable system; while the

Democratic party, composed largely of slave-holders, and, even at the

North, scarcely willing to save the Union at the expense of the slave

interest upon which its success depended, shattered and crippled by the

civil war and its results, has at last yielded to the inexorable logic of

events, abandoned a position no longer tenable, and taken its "new

departure" with an abolitionist as its candidate. As a friend of the

long-oppressed colored man, and for the sake of the peace and prosperity

of the country, I rejoice at this action of the Democratic party. The

underlying motives of this radical change are doubtless somewhat mixed

and contradictory, honest conviction on the part of some, and party

expediency and desire of office on the part of others; but the change

itself is real and irrevocable; the penalty of receding would be swift

and irretrievable ruin. In any point of view the new order of things is

desirable; and nothing more fully illustrates "the ways that are dark and

the tricks that are vain" of party politics than the attempt of professed

friends of the Union and equal rights for all to counteract it by giving

aid and comfort to a revival of the worst characteristics of the old

party in the shape of a straight-out Democratic convention.

As respects the candidates now before us, I can see no good reason why

colored voters as such should oppose General Grant, who, though not an

abolitionist and not even a member of the Republican party previous to

his nomination, has faithfully carried out the laws of Congress in their

behalf. Nor, on the other hand, can I see any just grounds for distrust

of such a man as Horace Greeley, who has so nobly distinguished himself

as the advocate of human rights irrespective of race or color, and who by

the instrumentality of his press has been for thirty years the educator

of the people in the principles of justice, temperance, and freedom.

Both of these men have, in different ways, deserved too well of the

country to be unnecessarily subjected to the brutalities of a

presidential canvass; and, so far as they are personally concerned, it

would doubtless have been better if the one had declined a second term of

uncongenial duties, and the other continued to indite words of wisdom in

the shades of Chappaqua. But they have chosen otherwise; and I am

willing, for one, to leave my colored fellow-citizens to the unbiased

exercise of their own judgment and instincts in deciding between them.

The Democratic party labors under the disadvantage of antecedents not

calculated to promote a rapid growth of confidence; and it is no matter

of surprise that the vote of the emancipated class is likely to be

largely against it. But if, as will doubtless be the case, that vote

shall be to some extent divided between the two candidates, it will have

the effect of inducing politicians of the rival parties to treat with

respect and consideration this new element of political power, from self-

interest if from no higher motive. The fact that at this time both

parties are welcoming colored orators to their platforms, and that, in

the South, old slave-masters and their former slaves fraternize at caucus

and barbecue, and vote for each other at the polls, is full of

significance. If, in New England, the very men who thrust Frederick

Douglass from car and stage-coach, and mobbed and hunted him like a wild

beast, now crowd to shake his hand and cheer him, let us not despair of

seeing even the Ku-Klux tarried into decency, and sitting "clothed in

their right minds" as listeners to their former victims. The colored man

is to-day the master of his own destiny. No power on earth can deprive

him of his rights as an American citizen. And it is in the light of

American citizenship that I choose to regard my colored friends, as men

having a common stake in the welfare of the country; mingled with, and

not separate from, their white fellow-citizens; not herded together as a

distinct class to be wielded by others, without self-dependence and

incapable of self-determination. Thanks to such men as Sumner and Wilson

and their compeers, nearly all that legislation can do for them has

already been done. We can now only help them to help themselves.

Industry, economy, temperance, self-culture, education for their

children,--these things, indispensable to their elevation and progress,

are in a great measure in their own hands.

You will, therefore, my friends and fellow-citizens, pardon me if I

decline to undertake to decide for you the question of your political

duty as respects the candidates for the presidency,--a question which you

have probably already settled in your own minds. If it had been apparent

to me that your rights and liberties were really in danger from the

success of either candidate, your letter would not have been needed to

call forth my opinion. In the long struggle of well-nigh forty years, I

can honestly say that no consideration of private interest, nor my

natural love of peace and retirement and the good-will of others, have

kept me silent when a word could be fitly spoken for human rights. I

have not so long acted with the class to which you belong without

acquiring respect for your intelligence and capacity for judging wisely

for yourselves. I shall abide your decision with confidence, and

cheerfully acquiesce in it.

If, on the whole, you prefer to vote for the reelection of General Grant,

let me hope you will do so without joining with eleventh-hour friends in

denouncing and reviling such an old and tried friend as Charles Sumner,

who has done and suffered so much in your behalf. If, on the other hand,

some of you decide to vote for Horace Greeley, you need not in so doing

forget your great obligations to such friends as William Lloyd Garrison,

Wendell Phillips, and Lydia Maria Child. Agree or disagree with them,

take their advice or reject it, but stand by them still, and teach the

parties with which you are connected to respect your feelings towards

your benefactors.

The Works of John Greenleaf Whittier, Volume VII, Complete The Conflict with Slavery, Politics and Reform, the Inner Life, and Criticism · 第 35 / 83 题