INTRODUCTION

I

Is it, as Henry Adams suggests, a fiction that society educates itself

or aims at a conscious purpose? In Europe at all events, as he points

out, society has not done so. European society at the present time

is old. Its youth was not more conscious than that of the average

man whose character is formed by the blows and punches of fate. But

in America society is young and at least self-conscious. Comparative

peace surrounds it: experience of similarly thinking nations is at its

service. With these advantages can it consciously form a new and finer

civilization within itself, with new values from the experience of the

old European civilization and values, now of doubtful worth? America,

intellectually, is of European descent. Her language, her law, are

not alien to those of the old world. When, therefore, one asks if her

society can educate itself toward a conscious purpose, one must not

answer that question with the experiences of Asiatic civilizations in

mind.

Since 1914, it has been very clear that a new energy has begun to stir

in America. It is as if the mass of the people has begun to realize

itself not as a congregation of settlers, farmers and prospectors,

but as a nation capable of an ideal somewhat different in spirit from

those which, as it can perceive from its newspapers, animate the

nations of Europe. In other words, America has begun to realize that

she is capable of at any rate desiring an independent ideal worthy of

attainment.

It is not in the works of such writers as Emerson, Whitman, Henry

Adams, and Edwin Arlington Robinson, nor in the works of the younger

writers who seek inspiration outside the sphere of American life, that

one finds this realization actively leading American public thought. It

is in such, at first sight, unusual forms of philosophical expression

as acts of law, social customs, and even newspaper articles. There one

hears the voice of the American nation beginning to assert that the old

codes which it inherited from Europe have come under its criticism.

This criticism, one feels, arises from a definite and conscious

comparison of an inherited ideal with one which is being gradually

formulated by the whole nation.

In order to follow an ideal of this particular and, one might say,

personal kind, it is necessary that the nation which seeks after it

should, in the first place, attempt to know itself. One sees that, in

every way, America today tries by self-expression to realize her own

character. In the East, in the West, particularly in the Middle West,

every individual who is not wholly absorbed in making money or in

furthering the material welfare of his country attempts at some time

during his life to say what he thinks of the world as he sees it. His

world is not an old world of traditions. There is no traditional way of

expressing his thoughts about it ready to his hand, nor is every man

a great literary artist. He has had, therefore, to invent a form of

expression that is not too great a tax upon his powers.

Few men or women are capable of sustaining their energies through

the length of a novel or of a work of philosophy, and fewer have the

gift of poetry. It would seem, therefore, that almost of necessity

the American people has adopted the short story as its particular

form of art: not the sketch nor the episodic tale, but a fairly long

and systematically constructed piece of writing in which primarily

it liberates its own feelings, and by which secondarily it tells a

tale. The American short story, therefore, has an immense and peculiar

interest and value. One feels in it the striving of a nation to express

itself, and thereby to come to a knowledge of its own character, in

order completely and consciously to follow an ideal which it hopes to

set before itself.

But whether through the evolutions of human life it is possible to

follow a fixed ideal, whether it is possible for a whole nation

consciously to mould its future, whether even it is possible for a

people to realize its own character clearly enough to be able to impose

a philosophy upon it, only the future can tell. One is inclined

to think that it is impossible, but that does not detract from the

extraordinary interest which the phenomenon of a nation seeking

self-realization arouses.

Whatever the result of America’s conscious attempt at self-education

may be, the record of it, in the form at any rate of the short

story, whether good or bad, will be of the greatest value to future

generations.

The best short stories of 1925, and the yearbook of the American short story · 第 19 / 141 题