In the first year of William and Mary an act was passed "For exempting

Protestant Dissenters from penalties of certain laws, on condition only

that meeting-houses should be certified to the Bishop or Archdeacon

or Justices at Quarter Sessions." In 1693 (the first year of the

Sessions order book) "The wallhouse in the parish of Hanbury, and in

the possession of Dame Ann Rouse," was certified to be "a meeting-house

according to ye new Act of Parliament." Also "a house adjoining the

foldyard of Mr. Blick, at Bromsgrove." 1695. The house of Henry Hanson,

of Grafton Flyford, a place for religious worship. 1696. The house of

John Emes, Bishampton, a meeting-house for dissenting Protestants.

1697. The house of John Scott, of Stourbridge, and the house of

William Dugard, of Dodderhill. 1700. The house of Humfrey Potter, of

Bromsgrove. 1702. Samuel Windle (place of residence not stated) "upon

petition is allowed to have ye word of God preached in his house;"

and a house at Dudley licensed on the petition of John Stokes. 1703.

Ordered that "The house of Peter Payton, at Tenbury, be set apart for

the worship of God for dissenters from ye church, according to the

prayer of a petition for ye p'pose." 1704. The house of Mary Greene,

widow, in Little Witley, called the New-house; and the house of John

Sparry, at Belbroughton. 1705. Dwelling-houses of Henry Hunt, Cradley;

James Thompson and William Tilt, Bromsgrove; Thomas Taylor, Hartlebury;

and John Taylor, Chaddesley. 1715. House of Samuel Cater, Stourbridge;

and of Jos. Harrison, Thomas Reynolds, John Reynolds, Mary Payton,

and Arthur Radnall, of Bewdley; also that of John Carpenter, jun.,

Bromsgrove. 1720. The house of Richard Windle, Inkberrow. 1723. The

house of Ann Thomas, of Pershore, "licensed for Anabaptists." 1733.

House of John Harris, of Birlingham; and "a newly-erected house at

Upton mentioned in the certificate of R. Baskerville and Thomas Skey;"

also "the house at Bewdley wherein Thomas Watson and William Carter now

dwell." 1735. Ordered, "That the barn and court-yard thereto belonging,

now in the occupation of John Williams, at Tenbury, be licensed for

Quakers." 1744. The house of Thomas Baker, at Himbleton, licensed

for Baptists; and that of William Sadler, at Halesowen, for ditto.

1757. House of Joshua Kettleby, Church Street, Kidderminster, for

Anabaptists; and in 1760, that of James Hill Baker, Black Star Street,

Kidderminster, for Presbyterians. 1773. A tenement at Bartley Green,

Northfield, licensed for dissenters; and a building in the occupation

of G. Parsons, Mill Street, Stourbridge; also "a chapel lately erected

in the hamlet of Westencot, Bredon, certified as a place of religious

worship for Baptists." 1787. The house of John Harwood, of Moseley,

licensed for Baptists; and one at Birmingham occupied by Benjamin

Bedford, for Protestant dissenters; also the house of William Purser,

at Welland; a Baptist meeting-house in New Street, Dudley; and a

building in Mill Street, Evesham. In the year 1791, Robert Berkeley of

Spetchley, T. Hornyold the younger of Blackmore Park, John Baynham of

Purshall Hall, clerk, Thomas Parker of Heath Green, Beoley, and Mary

Williams, of Little Malvern, subscribed certificates that they had set

apart rooms in their respective houses for Roman Catholic worship.

1792. A building in Gilson's Lane, Blockley, certified for dissenters.

1796. Andrew Robinson, clerk, of Grafton Manor, set apart a room for

Roman Catholic worship; and Richard Cornthwaite, clerk, of Harvington

Hall, Chaddesley, ditto ditto.

The Civil Wars.

The year 1643, so distressing to the city of Worcester, when a great

portion of the heavy levies on the citizens, for defence against the

Parliament army, could not be raised, was nearly to the same extent

a cause of pecuniary embarrassment to the county at large. At the

April Sessions of 1643 the grand jury ordered "that the £3000 ordered

last Sessions to be paid monthly towards the payment of his majesty's

forces sent and raised for the defence of this county be continued

till next Sessions, and paid over by John Baker, gen. collector to

Sir William Russell, High Sheriff of the county and Governor of the

city." But considerable difficulty appears to have been experienced in

the collection. Here follows a picture of those critical times, worth

preserving:

"The information of Edward Raynolls, of Kitherminster, taken

uppon oath the 28th of March, 1651, before Gervase Bucke and

John Latham, Esqs., two of the Justices of the Peace for the

county aforesaid.

"Hee saith and doth informe that Edward Broad of Duncklin,

Esq., about the time of the beginning of the warre betwixt

the late kinge and the Parliament did raise a troope of horse

for his sonne Edmond to engage in the king's service. That

afterwards about the time when Sir Gilbert Garret, the gov'nor

of Worcester for the kinge went to beseige Sturton Castle--a

garrison for the Parliament--the said Edward Broade sollicited

and earnestly pressed the contry thereaboute to rise together

and to goe along with the said Sir Gilbert Garrett, telling

and threatening divers of the country people that they should

be hanged at their owne doores if they would not goe with him

against the said Castle: That many of the country people came

in to the said Edward Broade accordingly and hee was himselfe

captaine over them and furnished them with arms and amunition

and marched before them to Sturton Castle and continued before

that Castle untill the governor whoe held the same for the

Parliament was inforced, beinge overpowred by the enemye to

yeeld yt upp. That afterwards, about 7 dayes before Sir Henry

Lyngum did rise against the Parliament and surprised and tooke

the county troope of Hereford, the said Edward Broade spake

to this informer, beinge his tenant and his warriner, to goe

to John Brancill, dwelling at Kidderminster, beinge a joyner

and well skilled in stockinge of guns, to come with all speede

to stock gunnes for him. And willing this informer alsoe

himselfe to be in redinesse. And this informer askinge him

what use there would be for soe many gunnes the said Edward

Broade answered there would be use for them verry speedily,

and further said that Mr. Hugh Vicaridge of Comberton and Mr.

Thomas Wannerton, other Roundheaded Rogues, should be hanged

to beginn withall. And the said Brancill came to Duncklyn

accordingly, but how many gunnes he stocked this informer

knoweth not. And afterwards when the newes was fresh that Sir

Henry Lingin had surprised the Hereford county troope, the said

Edward Broade asked this informer whether Sir Henry Lyngin

was gone, whereunto this informer answering that hee did not

know, the said Edward Broade replyed and said Sir Henry Lingin

was not as good as his word; and about a weeke after Sir Henry

Lingin was surprised the said Edward Broade hid divers gunnes

which hee had provided as aforesaid under a rick of hay and

afterwards remooved them thence and hid them under a corne mowe

in one of the barnes att Duncklin where they weare seene within

a yeare and a halfe last past by one Thomas Lovell, a workman

belonging to that house, as he tould this informer.

"And this informer doth further informe upon his oath that

about a year last past beinge att Bridgnorth in company with

Edward Powys, of the citty of Worcester, bookbinder, and others

drinking together, hee this informer heard the said Powys begin

A health to the good proceeding of the king's army in Scotland,

likewise A health to the queene his mother, and the third

health to the confusion of the Parliament, and that hee began

all these 3 healths together, but none of the company would

pledge the same, some of them answering that they would drinke

to ye conversion but not to the confusion of any. And that

Steephen Dowty of the Morphe and his servant William Lawde were

then in company, and further doth not informe."

"Articles" were "exhibited" (that is, an information was laid) in the

year 1655, against Walter Moyle, of Ombersley, yeoman, for being a

profane man, and for that "one day he publicly drank the health of the

devil, and fell down as one dead, to ye amazement and terrour of ye

beholders; and that in the time of the late war he did threaten his

neighbours, when the king's forces were in rendevouze at Oddingley

Heath, with plunder unlesse they would repaire in armes to that

randezvooze."

On the 5th of October, 1685, John Bartlam, of Whitbourne, laid an

information that "in hay harvest last (before this neighbourhood heard

that Monmouth was routed), this informant, riding upon the road near

Knightsford bridge, there met a man that tould him that Monmouth was

then the head man in England, and that it was in every man's mouth in

Worcester, and that any man might speak it, and that he would proclaim

it at Knightsford bridge (as he had at Broadheath, Martley, and other

places, as he came along), although it was so near Captain Clent's;

and that if any one questioned it he would be at Knightsford bridge

to answer it; that his name was Kent, and he lived in Powick's Lane,

Worcester." In 1687, Thomas Knight, of Castlemorton, was summoned to

appear at the Sessions, and to give evidence against Charles Jakeman

for drinking the Duke of Monmouth's health.

A Traveller's Passport.

The following document, included among the rolls, is dated 1680, from

Whitehall:

"Dame Mary Yate, having asked his majesty's permission to

pass beyond the seas, for the recovery of her health, his

majesty was most graciously pleased to grant her request,

under the usual clauses and provisoes, according to which ye

said Dame Mary Yate having given security not to enter into

any plott or conspiracy against his majesty or his realms,

or behave herself in any such manner as may be prejudicial

to his majesty's government, or the religion here by law

established, and that she will not repaire to the city of

Roome, or return unto this kingdome without first acquainting

one of his majesty's principal secretaries of state, and

obtaining leave for the same, in pursuance of his majesty's

commands in council hereby will and require you to permit and

suffer the said Dame Mary Yate to imbarque with her trunkes of

apparel and other necessaries not prohibited at any port of

this kingdom, and from thence to pass beyond the seas, provided

that shee departe this kingdom within 14 days after the date

hereof"--April 14.

If the above refers to the celebrated Lady Mary Yate (a daughter of the

house of Pakington) who is commemorated on a monument in Chaddesley

Church as having died in 1696, at the age of 86, she must have been 70

years old when these precautions were taken by the Government against

the poor old lady attempting to invade the country or to comfort the

Pope with her presence and support. Dame Mary Yate was no doubt a Roman

Catholic, and the permission above referred to was granted under the

7th section of the statute 3rd James I, chap. 5, which was virtually

repealed by the statute 43rd George III, chap. 30, which exempted

Roman Catholics from all the penalties and restrictions mentioned and

enjoined in the older acts, if in one of the Courts at Westminster

or at the Quarter Sessions they made a declaration which to them was

unobjectionable.

Bridges and Highways.

Upton bridge seems to have been a nuisance to the county ever since

the time of the Civil Wars, when one of its arches was destroyed for

purposes of defence. Frequent complaint was made of its dilapidations,

and in 1757 the Sessions ordered that a frigate should be bought "for

carrying workmen, stone, and other purposes, about the said repairs."

Mr. Sheward was appointed superintendent of the said bridge in 1775, at

the salary of one guinea a year.

A presentment was made in 1661, that "the causeways and horse bridges

leading from the city of Worcester to London, and towards the city

of Gloucester, which ought, as wee humbly conceave, to be mayntayned

and repaired by the Dean and Chapter, are very defective and out

of repaire." About five years later the capitular body were again

presented "for not repairing a certain causeway leading from a certain

messuage called or known by the name of ye Three Crowns, St. Peter's,

to a place called Red Hill Cross, in the said parish, and soe from

thence to a place called Whitton Pound, thence to a place called Staple

Cross in the parish of Norton, being the London road, and likewise

one other causeway leading from the newly-erected inn called ye White

House, through the parish of St. Peter's, at a place called Clarken

Lipp, in the parish of Kempsey, being the road leading to Bristol."

And for the third time, in 1689, the Dean and Chapter were presented

"for not repairing their causeways from outside Sidbury gate to the

further end of Clarkenlip, upon ye Gloster road." In the Townsend

Manuscript (elsewhere alluded to) it is recorded that "by virtue of

a commission dated March, 1652, out of Chancery for charitable uses,

the Commissioners sat on the 12th January, 1653, and by the oaths of

12 men on the inquiry, did order and decree that the several manors

and lands of the Dean and Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Worcester

were charged by way of repriz. for the payment of £40 yearly towards

the repayres of the several highways therein expressed, and should so

continue for ever. The like for £106. 13s. 4d. for 40 poor schollers

of the grammar school at the Colledg unto every of them four marks per

annum, the high master 40 marks, the under master 10 marks, £52. 10s.

per ann. towards ye releefe of ten poore old men, and £40 yerely to

the poore of Worcester and St. Michael's, by 7s. 3d. in money and 7s.

8d. in bread to be distributed weekly; and it was ordered, 3 June,

10 Car., for the Clerk of the Peace to see the £40 for the Dean and

Chapter to be imployed for the use of the causeys, one from Worcester

to Redhill Cross, and the other towards Kempsey, and he to pay the same

to the surveyors." The Dean and Chapter were liable to repair these

roads _ratione tenuræ_, that is by reason of their being the owners of

certain lands. These roads are now repaired by the turnpike tolls; but

if the tolls became inadequate, and the Dean and Chapter were before

liable to the repair, they would still continue to to be so now.

The Plague.

Redditch is stated as having been visited with this scourge in 1625,

when the poor people being thrown out of work, it was ordered, under

the statute of 1st James I, that Bromsgrove pay 12s. per week,

Belbroughton 6s., Cofton Hackett 1s., Northfield 4s., Kingsnorton 9s.,

Alvechurch 5s., Beoley 6s., Feckenham 7s., Inkberrow 5s., Stoke Prior

4s., Upton Warren and Cookesey 3s. towards the relief of the said poor.

Theatres.

Were somewhat numerous in the county towards the close of the last

century. It is recorded in 1789, that, "upon the application of John

Boles Watson, of Cheltenham, comedian, ordered that a licence be

granted for the performance of such tragedies, comedies, interludes,

operas, plays, or farces, as now are or hereafter shall be acted,

performed, or represented at either of the patent or licenced theatres

in the city of Westminster, or shall have been submitted to the

inspection of the Lord Chamberlain of the King's household for the

time being, in the town of Stourbridge for the space of sixty days."

William Meill, of Worcester, comedian, who in 1794 held the theatres of

Worcester, Wolverhampton, Ludlow, Shrewsbury, and Stourbridge, obtained

similar licences for Bromsgrove and Malvern.

Compositions to the King's Household.

On the 20th of November, 1613, a certificate was sent down from

Whitehall to "our very loving friends, the Justices of the Peace and

compounders for the county of Worcester," which, after the usual

"heartey commendations," &c., set forth that "Thomas Gunner, his

Majesty's servant, under-tacker for the countie of Worcester, hath

delivered for the service of his Majestie and his most hon. house,

for the compost of the 11th yere of his Highnes raigne, 20 fatt oxen,

20 fatt muttons, 20 stirks, and 40 lambs, all good and serviceable,

and soe wee bid you heartily farewell." There were two certificates

in the year 1640--the one "that Thomas Hill, your undertaker for the

composition of lambes, hath, on behalfe of the country, delivered into

the office of his Majesty's Poultry at the Court, the full number of

150 lambes," due for the year ending the last day of September; and the

other, for 20 fat oxen, 200 fat muttons, and 20 stirks, due for the

year ending the last day of December. Nash states that the purveyance

for this county in 1660 was--20 oxen, or a composition of £4 a head,

to be paid June 16th; 200 muttons, or 6s. 8d. a head, paid July 10th;

150 lambs, or 1s. a head, August 15th; and 20 stirks, or 10s. a head,

October 8th.

These compositions arose out of the prerogative of purveyance. Mr. John

Bruce, F.S.A., in his "Verney Papers," published by the Camden Society

(p. 86), says:

"The prerogative of purveyance was one of those ancient rights

of sovereignty which in practice were most annoying to the

people. It consisted of the power of taking, at certain fixed

low prices and with or without the consent of the owner, for

the use of the royal household, any provisions which an officer

called a purveyor thought proper to select. With that wisdom

which distinguished the government of Queen Elizabeth, we find

that this ancient right was not harshly enforced, but made the

subject of a clear arrangement, which avoided in practice all

the heartburnings and contentions which are sure to follow from

carrying out an indefinite authority."

The powers of purveyance having been suspended during the time of

the Commonwealth, Charles II at his Restoration consented to resign

entirely these branches of his revenue and power, and they were

abolished by the statute 12th Charles II, chap. 24, Parliament

granting him in lieu an excise duty on beer and ale of 15d. a barrel

and a proportionate sum for other liquors. But temporary acts were

subsequently passed suspending this statute in favour of the King's

royal progresses, and in favour of the navy and ordnance.

Worcestershire Manuscripts.

THE DINELEY MANUSCRIPTS.

Among the valuable manuscripts in existence relating to this county are

the Dineley, Jeffries, and Townsend, besides those of Dr. Prattenton,

now in possession of the Society of Antiquaries. To preserve these,

with a view to publication, should be an object of solicitude to

all literary men of the county. The Dineley Manuscripts (now in the

possession of Sir T. E. Winnington, Bart., M.P.) consist of three

volumes, written between 1670 and 1680 by Thomas Dineley, Esq., a

member of one of the oldest Worcestershire families. One of the volumes

contains accounts of his visits to many churches in this county as also

to adjacent towns and about a dozen cathedrals; pen and ink sketches of

monuments, coats of arms, dresses, &c., many of them exquisitely done;

copies of inscriptions, both quaint and curious; tracings of pedigrees,

&c.; showing the compiler to have been a gentleman well versed in

ecclesiastical antiquities, a classical scholar, acquainted with

heraldry, and an accurate draughtsman. The second volume is entitled

"Observations in a Voyage in the Kingdom of France, being a collection

of several monuments, inscriptions, draughts of towns, &c."--date 1675;

and the latter part of this volume is devoted to a similar description

of Ireland, with a curious dissertation on the manners and customs of

the Irish. The filthy habits of that people in the seventeenth century

are treated of in rather broad language, not adapted for the present

day. The third volume has the following title: "The Jovrnall of my

Traveils through the Low-Countreys, Anno D'ni 1674." It appears that

in December, 1671, Mr. Dineley went in the suite of "Sir G. Downing,

Knt. and Bart., Ambassador from his most sacred Ma'tie to ye States

Generall of the United Provinces." His journal is written in a minute

but beautiful caligraphy, and denotes habits of judicious observation.

In his notice of the town of Dort, in Holland, he alludes to the great

abundance of salmon, and mentions a custom which I had long thought was

by no means confined to our own city of Worcester: he observes, "It is

sayd that prentices and maid servants, before they enter into service,

indent not to be oblig'd to eat salmon above twice a week;" and in his

account of the Irish (chapter on Limerick) Mr. Dineley alludes to a

"salmon weire, out of town, having a castle without timber or nayle, in

the middle of the river," where the custom was "to grant tickets for

salmon gratis to all strangers who will eat them upon the place; this

the corpora'con is obliged to, though they set it for £200 per ann." In

some commonplace notes at the end of the volume is the following entry:

"Hops among other things brought into England 15 Hen. 8.

wherefore this rithme--

"Turkeyes, carps, hops, pickerel, and beer,

Came into England all in one year."

There is another of Mr. Dineley's volumes in the collection of the Duke

of Beaufort, at Badminton; it describes a tour through Wales with the

President of the Marches, an ancestor of the Duke's. It is mentioned in

Blakeway's History of Shrewsbury.

THE JEFFRIES MANUSCRIPTS.

Henry Jeffries (who died in 1709), the last heir male and proprietor

of the manor of Clifton-on-Teme, was a man of some learning, and left

a manuscript memorandum book in which he had jotted down his own

observations _de omnibus rebus_, and generally in so easy and familiar

a way as to render them agreeable as well as instructive. This relic

likewise belongs to Sir Thomas Winnington, one of whose ancestors

married the heiress of the Jeffries family about a century and a half

ago. Specimens of its multifarious contents are given in vol. ii of

"The Rambler in Worcestershire," from which they appear to be invested

with great local interest to the neighbourhood of Clifton, Stanford,

and Shelsey, as also to the general antiquary.

DIARY OF MISTRESS JOYCE JEFFRIES.

There is also a Manuscript Diary of Miss Joyce Jeffries in the

possession of Sir T. Winnington. The diary contains an account of the

state of domestic life among the upper classes, during the reign of

Charles I, in the counties of Worcester and Hereford, and relates to

Ham Castle, in the parish of Clifton-on-Teme, where this lady resided,

and the siege of the city of Hereford, where she also possessed a

residence, during the calamities of civil war. It is hoped that the

Manuscript will be published, and no one can be found more able for the

task of editor than the Rev. J. Webb, of Tretire, near Ross, who has

already published a most valuable work, of local as well as general

interest, on the Household Roll of Bishop Swinfield of Hereford, of

which I have given an abstract further on.

Notes and Queries for Worcestershire · 第 10 / 25 段