EXPUNGING RESOLUTION: MR. CLAY, MR. CALHOUN, MR. WEBSTER: LAST
SCENE: RESOLUTION PASSED, AND EXECUTED.
Saturday, the 14th of January, the democratic senators agreed to
have a meeting, and to take their final measures for passing the
expunging resolution. They knew they had the numbers; but they also
knew that they had adversaries to grapple with to whom might be
applied the proud motto of Louis the Fourteenth: "Not an unequal
match for numbers." They also knew that members of the party were in
the process of separating from it, and would require conciliating.
They met in the night at the then famous restaurant of Boulanger,
giving to the assemblage the air of a convivial entertainment. It
continued till midnight, and required all the moderation, tact and
skill of the prime movers to obtain and maintain the union upon
details, on the success of which the fate of the measure depended.
The men of conciliation were to be the efficient men of that night;
and all the winning resources of Wright, Allen of Ohio and Linn of
Missouri, were put into requisition. There were serious differences
upon the mode of expurgation, while agreed upon the thing; and
finally obliteration, the favorite of the mover, was given up;
and the mode of expurgation adopted which had been proposed in
the resolutions of the General Assembly of Virginia; namely, to
inclose the obnoxious sentence in a square of black lines--an oblong
square: a compromise of opinions to which the mover agreed upon
condition of being allowed to compose the epitaph--"Expunged by the
order of the Senate." The agreement which was to lead to victory
was then adopted, each one severally pledging himself to it, that
there should be no adjournment of the Senate after the resolution
was called until it was passed; and that it should be called
immediately after the morning business the Monday ensuing. Expecting
a protracted session, extending through the day and night, and
knowing the difficulty of keeping men steady to their work and in
good humor, when tired and hungry, the mover of the proceeding took
care to provide, as far as possible, against such a state of things;
and gave orders that night to have an ample supply of cold hams,
turkeys, rounds of beef, pickles, wines and cups of hot coffee,
ready in a certain committee room near the Senate chamber by four
o'clock on the afternoon of Monday.
The motion to take up the subject was made at the appointed
time, and immediately a debate of long speeches, chiefly on the
other side, opened itself upon the question. It was evident that
consumption of time, delay and adjournment, was their plan. The
three great leaders did not join in the opening; but their place
was well supplied by many of their friends, able speakers--some
effective, some eloquent: Preston of South Carolina; Richard H.
Bayard and John M. Clayton of Delaware; Crittenden of Kentucky;
Southard of New Jersey; White of Tennessee; Ewing of Ohio. They
were only the half in number, but strong in zeal and ability,
that commenced the contest three years before, reinforced by Mr.
White of Tennessee. As the darkness of approaching night came on,
and the great chandelier was lit up, splendidly illuminating the
chamber, then crowded with the members of the House, and the
lobbies and galleries filled to their utmost capacity by visitors
and spectators, the scene became grand and impressive. A few
spoke on the side of the resolution--chiefly Rives, Buchanan,
Niles--and with an air of ease and satisfaction that bespoke a quiet
determination, and a consciousness of victory. The committee room
had been resorted to in parties of four and six at a time, always
leaving enough on watch: and not resorted to by one side alone.
The opposition were invited to a full participation--an invitation
of which those who were able to maintain their good temper readily
availed themselves; but the greater part were not in a humor to eat
any thing--especially at such a feast. The night was wearing away:
the expungers were in full force--masters of the chamber--happy--and
visibly determined to remain. It became evident to the great
opposition leaders that the inevitable hour had come: that the
damnable deed was to be done that night: and that the dignity of
silence was no longer to them a tenable position. The battle was
going against them, and they must go into it, without being able
to re-establish it. In the beginning, they had not considered the
expunging movement a serious proceeding: as it advanced they still
expected it to miscarry on some point: now the reality of the
thing stood before them, confronting their presence, and refusing
to "down" at any command. They broke silence, and gave vent to
language which bespoke the agony of their feelings, and betrayed the
revulsion of stomach with which they approached the odious subject.
Mr. Calhoun said:
"No one, not blinded by party zeal, can possibly be insensible
that the measure proposed is a violation of the constitution.
The constitution requires the Senate to keep a journal; this
resolution goes to expunge the journal. If you may expunge a
part, you may expunge the whole; and if it is expunged, how is
it kept? The constitution says the journal shall be kept; this
resolution says it shall be destroyed. It does the very thing
which the constitution declares shall not be done. That is the
argument, the whole argument. There is none other. Talk of
precedents? and precedents drawn from a foreign country? They
don't apply. No, sir. This is to be done, not in consequence
of argument, but in spite of argument. I understand the case.
I know perfectly well the gentlemen have no liberty to vote
otherwise. They are coerced by an exterior power. They try,
indeed, to comfort their conscience by saying that it is the
will of the people, and the voice of the people. It is no such
thing. We all know how these legislative returns have been
obtained. It is by dictation from the White House. The President
himself, with that vast mass of patronage which he wields, and
the thousand expectations he is able to hold up, has obtained
these votes of the State Legislatures; and this, forsooth, is
said to be the voice of the people. The voice of the people!
Sir, can we forget the scene which was exhibited in this chamber
when that expunging resolution was first introduced here? Have
we forgotten the universal giving way of conscience, so that the
senator from Missouri was left alone? I see before me senators
who could not swallow that resolution; and has its nature
changed since then? Is it any more constitutional now than it
was then? Not at all. But executive power has interposed. Talk
to me of the voice of the people? No, sir. It is the combination
of patronage and power to coerce this body into a gross and
palpable violation of the constitution. Some individuals, I
perceive, think to escape through the particular form in which
this act is to be perpetrated. They tell us that the resolution
on your records is not to be expunged, but is only to be
endorsed 'Expunged.' Really, sir, I do not know how to argue
against such contemptible sophistry. The occasion is too solemn
for an argument of this sort. You are going to violate the
constitution, and you get rid of the infamy by a falsehood. You
yourselves say that the resolution is expunged by your order.
Yet you say it is not expunged. You put your act in express
words. You record it, and then turn round and deny it.
"But why do I waste my breath? I know it is all utterly vain.
The day is gone; night approaches, and night is suitable to
the dark deed we meditate. There is a sort of destiny in this
thing. The act must be performed; and it is an act which will
tell on the political history of this country for ever. Other
preceding violations of the constitution (and they have been
many and great) filled my bosom with indignation, but this fills
it only with grief. Others were done in the heat of party.
Power was, as it were, compelled to support itself by seizing
upon new instruments of influence and patronage; and there were
ambitious and able men to direct the process. Such was the
removal of the deposits, which the President seized upon by a
new and unprecedented act of arbitrary power; an act which gave
him ample means of rewarding friends and punishing enemies.
Something may, perhaps, be pardoned to him in this matter, on
the old apology of tyrants--the plea of necessity. But here
there can be no such apology. Here no necessity can so much as
be pretended. This act originates in pure, unmixed, personal
idolatry. It is the melancholy evidence of a broken spirit,
ready to bow at the feet of power. The former act was such a one
as might have been perpetrated in the days of Pompey or Cæsar;
but an act like this could never have been consummated by a
Roman Senate until the times of Caligula and Nero."
Mr. Calhoun was right in his taunt about the universal giving way
when the resolution was first introduced--the solitude in which the
mover was then left--and in which solitude he would have been left
to the end, had it not been for his courage in reinstating the word
expunge, and appealing to the people.
Mr. Clay commenced with showing that he had never believed in the
reality of the proceeding until now; that he had considered the
resolution as a thing to be taken up for a speech, and laid down
when the speech was delivered; and that the last laying down, at the
previous session, was the end of the matter. He said:
"Considering that he was the mover of the resolution of March,
1834, and the consequent relation in which he stood to the
majority of the Senate by whose vote it was adopted, he had
felt it to be his duty to say something on this expunging
resolution; and he had always intended to do so when he should
be persuaded that there existed a settled purpose of pressing it
to a final decision. But it had been so taken up and put down at
the last session--taken up one day, when a speech was prepared
for delivery, and put down when it was pronounced--that he had
really doubted whether there existed any serious intention of
ever putting it to the vote. At the very close of the last
session, it will be recollected that the resolution came
up, and in several quarters of the Senate a disposition was
manifested to come to a definitive decision. On that occasion
he had offered to waive his right to address the Senate, and
silently to vote upon the resolution; but it was again laid upon
the table; and laid there for ever, as the country supposed,
and as he believed. It is, however, now revived; and, sundry
changes having taken place in the members of this body, it would
seem that the present design is to bring the resolution to an
absolute conclusion."
Then, after an argument against the expurgation, which, of
necessity, was obliged to be a recapitulation of the argument in
favor of the original condemnation of the President, he went on
to give vent to his feelings in expressions not less bitter and
denunciatory of the President and his friends than those used by Mr.
Calhoun, saying:
"But if the matter of expunction be contrary to the truth of the
case, reproachful for its base subserviency, derogatory from
the just and necessary powers of the Senate, and repugnant
to the constitution of the United States, the manner in which
it is proposed to accomplish this dark deed is also highly
exceptionable. The expunging resolution, which is to blot out or
enshroud the four or five lines in which the resolution of 1834
stands recorded, or rather the recitals by which it is preceded,
are spun out into a thread of enormous length. It runs, whereas,
and whereas, and whereas, and whereas, and whereas, &c., into
a formidable array of nine several whereases. One who should
have the courage to begin to read them, unaware of what was to
be their termination, would think that at the end of such a
tremendous display he must find the very devil."
And then coming to the conclusion, he concentrated his wrath and
grief in an apostrophizing peroration, which lacked nothing but
verisimilitude to have been grand and affecting. Thus:
"But why should I detain the Senate, or needlessly waste my
breath in fruitless exertions. The decree has gone forth. It
is one of urgency, too. The deed is to be done--that foul deed
which, like the blood-stained hands of the guilty Macbeth,
all ocean's waters will never wash out. Proceed, then, with
the noble work which lies before you, and, like other skilful
executioners, do it quickly. And when you have perpetrated it,
go home to the people, and tell them what glorious honors you
have achieved for our common country. Tell them that you have
extinguished one of the brightest and purest lights that ever
burnt at the altar of civil liberty. Tell them that you have
silenced one of the noblest batteries that ever thundered in
defence of the constitution, and bravely spiked the cannon.
Tell them that, henceforward, no matter what daring or
outrageous act any President may perform, you have for ever
hermetically sealed the mouth of the Senate. Tell them that he
may fearlessly assume what powers he pleases, snatch from its
lawful custody the public purse, command a military detachment
to enter the halls of the capitol, overawe Congress, trample
down the constitution, and raze every bulwark of freedom; but
that the Senate must stand mute, in silent submission, and not
dare to raise its opposing voice. That it must wait until a
House of Representatives, humbled and subdued like itself, and
a majority of it composed of the partisans of the President,
shall prefer articles of impeachment. Tell them, finally, that
you have restored the glorious doctrines of passive obedience
and non-resistance. And, if the people do not pour out their
indignation and imprecations, I have yet to learn the character
of American freemen."
Mr. Webster spoke last, and after a pause in the debate which
seemed to indicate its conclusion; and only rose, and that slowly,
as the question was about to be put. Having no personal griefs in
relation to General Jackson like Mr. Calhoun and Mr. Clay, and with
a temperament less ardent, he delivered himself with comparative
moderation, confining himself to a brief protest against the act;
and concluding, in measured and considered language, with expressing
his grief and mortification at what he was to behold; thus:
"We have seen, with deep and sincere pain, the legislatures of
respectable States instructing the senators of those States
to vote for and support this violation of the journal of the
Senate; and this pain is infinitely increased by our full
belief, and entire conviction, that most, if not all these
proceedings of States had their origin in promptings from
Washington; that they have been urgently requested and insisted
on, as being necessary to the accomplishment of the intended
purpose; and that it is nothing else but the influence and power
of the executive branch of this government which has brought
the legislatures of so many of the free States of this Union
to quit the sphere of their ordinary duties, for the purpose
of co-operating to accomplish a measure, in our judgment,
so unconstitutional, so derogatory to the character of the
Senate, and marked with so broad an impression of compliance
with power. But this resolution is to pass. We expect it. That
cause, which has been powerful enough to influence so many State
legislatures, will show itself powerful enough, especially with
such aids, to secure the passage of the resolution here. We
make up our minds to behold the spectacle which is to ensue.
We collect ourselves to look on, in silence, while a scene is
exhibited which if we did not regard it as a ruthless violation
of a sacred instrument, would appear to us to be little elevated
above the character of a contemptible farce. This scene we shall
behold; and hundreds of American citizens, as many as may crowd
into these lobbies and galleries, will behold it also: with what
feelings I do not undertake to say."
Midnight was now approaching. The dense masses which filled every
inch of room in the lobbies and the galleries, remained immovable.
No one went out: no one could get in. The floor of the Senate was
crammed with privileged persons, and it seemed that all Congress
was there. Expectation, and determination to see the conclusion,
was depicted upon every countenance. It was evident there was to
be no adjournment until the vote should be taken--until the deed
was done; and this aspect of invincible determination, had its
effect upon the ranks of the opposition. They began to falter
under a useless persistence, for they alone now did the speaking;
and while Mr. Webster was yet reciting his protest, two senators
from the opposite side, who had been best able to maintain their
equanimity, came round to the author of this View, and said "This
question has degenerated into a trial of nerves and muscles. It
has become a question of physical endurance; and we see no use in
wearing ourselves out to keep off for a few hours longer what has
to come before we separate. We see that you are able and determined
to carry your measure: so call the vote as soon as you please. We
shall say no more." Mr. Webster concluded. No one rose. There was a
pause, a dead silence, and an intense feeling. Presently the silence
was invaded by the single word "question"--the parliamentary call
for a vote--rising from the seats of different senators. One blank
in the resolve remained to be filled--the date of its adoption. It
was done. The acting president of the Senate, Mr. King, of Alabama,
then directed the roll to be called. The yeas and nays had been
previously ordered, and proceeded to be called by the secretary of
the Senate, Mr. Asbury Dickens. Forty-three senators were present,
answering: five absent. The yeas were:
"Messrs. Benton, Brown, Buchanan, Dana, Ewing of Illinois,
Fulton, Grundy, Hubbard, King of Alabama, Linn, Morris,
Nicholas, Niles, Page, Rives, Robinson, Ruggles, Sevier,
Strange, Tallmadge, Tipton, Walker, Wall, Wright.
"NAYS.--Messrs. Bayard, Black, Calhoun, Clay, Crittenden,
Davis, Ewing of Ohio, Hendricks, Kent, Knight, Moore, Prentiss,
Preston, Robbins, Southard, Swift, Tomlinson, Webster, White."
The passage of the resolution was announced from the chair. Mr.
Benton rose, and said that nothing now remained but to execute
the order of the Senate; which he moved be done forthwith. It was
ordered accordingly. The Secretary thereupon produced the original
manuscript journal of the Senate, and opening at the page which
contained the condemnatory sentence of March 28th, 1834, proceeded
in open Senate to draw a square of broad black lines around the
sentence, and to write across its face in strong letters these
words: "Expunged by order of the Senate, this 16th day of March,
1837." Up to this moment the crowd in the great circular gallery,
looking down upon the Senate, though sullen and menacing in their
looks, had made no manifestation of feeling; and it was doubtless
not the intention of Mr. Webster to excite that manifestation when
he referred to their numbers, and expressed his ignorance of the
feeling with which they would see the deed done which he so much
deprecated. Doubtless no one intended to excite that crowd, mainly
composed, as of usual since the bank question began, of friends of
that institution; but its appearance became such that Senator Linn,
colleague of Senator Benton, Mr. George W. Jones, since senator
from Iowa, and others sent out and brought in arms; other friends
gathered about him; among them Mrs. Benton, who, remembering what
had happened to General Jackson, and knowing that, after him, her
husband was most obnoxious to the bank party, had her anxiety
sufficiently excited to wish to be near him in this concluding scene
of a seven years' contest with that great moneyed power. Things were
in this state when the Secretary of the Senate began to perform the
expunging process on the manuscript journal. Instantly a storm of
hisses, groans, and vociferations arose from the left wing of the
circular gallery, over the head of Senator Benton. The presiding
officer promptly gave the order, which the rules prescribe in such
cases, to clear the gallery. Mr. Benton opposed the order, saying:
"I hope the galleries will not be cleared, as many innocent
persons will be excluded, who have been guilty of no violation
of order. Let the ruffians who have made the disturbance
alone be punished: let them be apprehended. I hope the
sergeant-at-arms will be directed to enter the gallery, and
seize the ruffians, ascertaining who they are in the best way
he can. Let him apprehend them and bring them to the bar of
the Senate. Let him seize the bank ruffians. I hope that they
will not now be suffered to insult the Senate, as they did when
it was under the power of the Bank of the United States, when
ruffians, with arms upon them, insulted us with impunity. Let
them be taken and brought to the bar of the Senate. Here is one
just above me, that may easily be identified--the bank ruffians!"
Mr. Benton knew that he was the object of this outrage, and
that the way to treat these subaltern wretches was to defy and
seize them, and have them dragged as criminals to the bar of the
Senate. They were congregated immediately over his head, and had
evidently collected into that place. His motion was agreed to. The
order to clear the galleries was revoked; the order to seize the
disturbers was given, and immediately executed by the energetic
sergeant-at-arms, Mr. John Shackford, and his assistants. The
ringleader was seized, and brought to the bar. This sudden example
intimidated the rest; and the expunging process was performed in
quiet. The whole scene was impressive; but no part of it so much so
as to see the great leaders who, for seven long years had warred
upon General Jackson, and a thousand times pronounced him ruined,
each rising in his place, with pain and reluctance, to confess
themselves vanquished--to admit his power, and their weakness--and
to exhale their griefs in unavailing reproaches, and impotent
deprecations. It was a tribute to his invincibility which cast into
the shade all the eulogiums of his friends. The gratification of
General Jackson was extreme. He gave a grand dinner to the expungers
(as they were called) and their wives; and being too weak to sit at
the table, he only met the company, placed the "head-expunger" in
his chair, and withdrew to his sick chamber. That expurgation! it
was the "crowning mercy" of his civil, as New Orleans had been of
his military, life!