The hydrogen at the cathode is developed by the secondary action

2Na + 2H2O = 2NaOH + H2.

Many organic compounds can be prepared by taking advantage of

secondary actions at the electrodes, such as reduction by the cathodic

hydrogen, or oxidation at the anode (see ELECTROCHEMISTRY).

It is possible to distinguish between double salts and salts of

compound acids. Thus J.W. Hittorf showed that when a current was

passed through a solution of sodium platino-chloride, the platinum

appeared at the anode. The salt must therefore be derived from an

acid, chloroplatinic acid, H2PtCl6, and have the formula Na2PtCl6, the

ions being Na and PtCl6", for if it were a double salt it would

decompose as a mixture of sodium chloride and platinum chloride and

both metals would go to the cathode.

_Early Theories of Electrolysis._--The obvious phenomena to be explained

by any theory of electrolysis are the liberation of the products of

chemical decomposition at the two electrodes while the intervening

liquid is unaltered. To explain these facts, Theodor Grotthus

(1785-1822) in 1806 put forward an hypothesis which supposed that the

opposite chemical constituents of an electrolyte interchanged partners

all along the line between the electrodes when a current passed. Thus,

if the molecule of a substance in solution is represented by AB,

Grotthus considered a chain of AB molecules to exist from one electrode

to the other. Under the influence of an applied electric force, he

imagined that the B part of the first molecule was liberated at the

anode, and that the A part thus isolated united with the B part of the

second molecule, which, in its turn, passed on its A to the B of the

third molecule. In this manner, the B part of the last molecule of the

chain was seized by the A of the last molecule but one, and the A part

of the last molecule liberated at the surface of the cathode.

Chemical phenomena throw further light on this question. If two

solutions containing the salts AB and CD be mixed, double decomposition

is found to occur, the salts AD and CB being formed till a certain part

of the first pair of substances is transformed into an equivalent amount

of the second pair. The proportions between the four salts AB, CD, AD

and CB, which exist finally in solution, are found to be the same

whether we begin with the pair AB and CD or with the pair AD and CB. To

explain this result, chemists suppose that both changes can occur

simultaneously, and that equilibrium results when the rate at which AB

and CD are transformed into AD and CB is the same as the rate at which

the reverse change goes on. A freedom of interchange is thus indicated

between the opposite parts of the molecules of salts in solution, and it

follows reasonably that with the solution of a single salt, say sodium

chloride, continual interchanges go on between the sodium and chlorine

parts of the different molecules.

These views were applied to the theory of electrolysis by R.J.E.

Clausius. He pointed out that it followed that the electric forces did

not cause the interchanges between the opposite parts of the dissolved

molecules but only controlled their direction. Interchanges must be

supposed to go on whether a current passes or not, the function of the

electric forces in electrolysis being merely to determine in what

direction the parts of the molecules shall work their way through the

liquid and to effect actual separation of these parts (or their

secondary products) at the electrodes. This conclusion is supported also

by the evidence supplied by the phenomena of electrolytic conduction

(see CONDUCTION, ELECTRIC, S II.). If we eliminate the reverse

electromotive forces of polarization at the two electrodes, the

conduction of electricity through electrolytes is found to conform to

Ohm's law; that is, once the polarization is overcome, the current is

proportional to the electromotive force applied to the bulk of the

liquid. Hence there can be no reverse forces of polarization inside the

liquid itself, such forces being confined to the surface of the

electrodes. No work is done in separating the parts of the molecules

from each other. This result again indicates that the parts of the

molecules are effectively separate from each other, the function of the

electric forces being merely directive.

_Migration of the Ions._--The opposite parts of an electrolyte, which

work their way through the liquid under the action of the electric

forces, were named by Faraday the ions--the travellers. The changes of

concentration which occur in the solution near the two electrodes were

referred by W. Hittorf (1853) to the unequal speeds with which he

supposed the two opposite ions to travel. It is clear that, when two

opposite streams of ions move past each other, equivalent quantities are

liberated at the two ends of the system. If the ions move at equal

rates, the salt which is decomposed to supply the ions liberated must be

taken equally from the neighbourhood of the two electrodes. But if one

ion, say the anion, travels faster through the liquid than the other,

the end of the solution from which it comes will be more exhausted of

salt than the end towards which it goes. If we assume that no other

cause is at work, it is easy to prove that, with non-dissolvable

electrodes, the ratio of salt lost at the anode to the salt lost at the

cathode must be equal to the ratio of the velocity of the cation to the

velocity of the anion. This result may be illustrated by fig. 2. The

black circles represent one ion and the white circles the other. If the

black ions move twice as fast as the white ones, the state of things

after the passage of a current will be represented by the lower part of

the figure. Here the middle part of the solution is unaltered and the

number of ions liberated is the same at either end, but the amount of

salt left at one end is less than that at the other. On the right,

towards which the faster ion travels, five molecules of salt are left,

being a loss of two from the original seven. On the left, towards which

the slower ion moves, only three molecules remain--a loss of four. Thus,

the ratio of the losses at the two ends is two to one--the same as the

ratio of the assumed ionic velocities. It should be noted, however, that

another cause would be competent to explain the unequal dilution of the

two solutions. If either ion carried with it some of the unaltered salt

or some of the solvent, concentration or dilution of the liquid would be

produced where the ion was liberated. There is reason to believe that in

certain cases such complex ions do exist, and interfere with the results

of the differing ionic velocities.

[Illustration: FIG. 2.]

Hittorf and many other observers have made experiments to determine the

unequal dilution of a solution round the two electrodes when a current

passes. Various forms of apparatus have been used, the principle of them

all being to secure efficient separation of the two volumes of solution

in which the changes occur. In some cases porous diaphragms have been

employed; but such diaphragms introduce a new complication, for the

liquid as a whole is pushed through them by the action of the current,

the phenomenon being known as electric endosmose. Hence experiments

without separating diaphragms are to be preferred, and the apparatus may

be considered effective when a considerable bulk of intervening solution

is left unaltered in composition. It is usual to express the results in

terms of what is called the migration constant of the anion, that is,

the ratio of the amount of salt lost by the anode vessel to the whole

amount lost by both vessels. Thus the statement that the migration

constant or transport number for a decinormal solution of copper

sulphate is 0.632 implies that of every gramme of copper sulphate lost

by a solution containing originally one-tenth of a gramme equivalent per

litre when a current is passed through it between platinum electrodes,

0.632 gramme is taken from the cathode vessel and 0.368 gramme from the

anode vessel. For certain concentrated solutions the transport number is

found to be greater than unity; thus for a normal solution of cadmium

iodide its value is 1.12. On the theory that the phenomena are wholly

due to unequal ionic velocities this result would mean that the cation

like the anion moved against the conventional direction of the current.

That a body carrying a positive electric charge should move against the

direction of the electric intensity is contrary to all our notions of

electric forces, and we are compelled to seek some other explanation. An

alternative hypothesis is given by the idea of complex ions. If some of

the anions, instead of being simple iodine ions represented chemically

by the symbol I, are complex structures formed by the union of iodine

with unaltered cadmium iodide--structures represented by some such

chemical formula as I(CdI2), the concentration of the solution round the

anode would be increased by the passage of an electric current, and the

phenomena observed would be explained. It is found that, in such cases

as this, where it seems necessary to imagine the existence of complex

ions, the transport number changes rapidly as the concentration of the

original solution is changed. Thus, diminishing the concentration of the

cadmium iodine solution from normal to one-twentieth normal changes the

transport number from 1.12 to 0.64. Hence it is probable that in cases

where the transport number keeps constant with changing concentration

the hypothesis of complex ions is unnecessary, and we may suppose that

the transport number is a true migration constant from which the

relative velocities of the two ions may be calculated in the matter

suggested by Hittorf and illustrated in fig. 2. This conclusion is

confirmed by the results of the direct visual determination of ionic

velocities (see CONDUCTION, ELECTRIC, S II.), which, in cases where the

transport number remains constant, agree with the values calculated from

those numbers. Many solutions in which the transport numbers vary at

high concentration often become simple at greater dilution. For

instance, to take the two solutions to which we have already referred,

we have--

+----------------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+-----+-----------+

|Concentration | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.02|0.01 normal|

|Copper sulphate transport numbers | 0.72 | 0.714| 0.696| 0.668| 0.643| 0.632| 0.626| 0.62| .. |

|Cadmium iodide " " | 1.22 | 1.18 | 1.12 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.59|0.56 |

+----------------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+-----+-----------+

It is probable that in both these solutions complex ions exist at fairly

high concentrations, but gradually gets less in number and finally

disappear as the dilution is increased. In such salts as potassium

chloride the ions seem to be simple throughout a wide range of

concentration since the transport numbers for the same series of

concentrations as those used above run--

Potassium chloride--

0.515, 0.515, 0.514, 0.513, 0.509, 0.508, 0.507, 0.507, 0.506.

The next important step in the theory of the subject was made by F.

Kohlrausch in 1879. Kohlrausch formulated a theory of electrolytic

conduction based on the idea that, under the action of the electric

forces, the oppositely charged ions moved in opposite directions through

the liquid, carrying their charges with them. If we eliminate the

polarization at the electrodes, it can be shown that an electrolyte

possesses a definite electric resistance and therefore a definite

conductivity. The conductivity gives us the amount of electricity

conveyed per second under a definite electromotive force. On the view of

the process of conduction described above, the amount of electricity

conveyed per second is measured by the product of the number of ions,

known from the concentration of the solution, the charge carried by each

of them, and the velocity with which, on the average, they move through

the liquid. The concentration is known, and the conductivity can be

measured experimentally; thus the average velocity with which the ions

move past each other under the existent electromotive force can be

estimated. The velocity with which the ions move past each other is

equal to the sum of their individual velocities, which can therefore be

calculated. Now Hittorf's transport number, in the case of simple salts

in moderately dilute solution, gives us the ratio between the two ionic

velocities. Hence the absolute velocities of the two ions can be

determined, and we can calculate the actual speed with which a certain

ion moves through a given liquid under the action of a given potential

gradient or electromotive force. The details of the calculation are

given in the article CONDUCTION, ELECTRIC, S II., where also will be

found an account of the methods which have been used to measure the

velocities of many ions by direct visual observation. The results go to

show that, where the existence of complex ions is not indicated by

varying transport numbers, the observed velocities agree with those

calculated on Kohlrausch's theory.

_Dissociation Theory._--The verification of Kohlrausch's theory of ionic

velocity verifies also the view of electrolysis which regards the

electric current as due to streams of ions moving in opposite directions

through the liquid and carrying their opposite electric charges with

them. There remains the question how the necessary migratory freedom of

the ions is secured. As we have seen, Grotthus imagined that it was the

electric forces which sheared the ions past each other and loosened the

chemical bonds holding the opposite parts of each dissolved molecule

together. Clausius extended to electrolysis the chemical ideas which

looked on the opposite parts of the molecule as always changing partners

independently of any electric force, and regarded the function of the

current as merely directive. Still, the necessary freedom was supposed

to be secured by interchanges of ions between molecules at the instants

of molecular collision only; during the rest of the life of the ions

they were regarded as linked to each other to form electrically neutral

molecules.

In 1887 Svante Arrhenius, professor of physics at Stockholm, put forward

a new theory which supposed that the freedom of the opposite ions from

each other was not a mere momentary freedom at the instants of molecular

collision, but a more or less permanent freedom, the ions moving

independently of each other through the liquid. The evidence which led

Arrhenius to this conclusion was based on van 't Hoff's work on the

osmotic pressure of solutions (see SOLUTION). If a solution, let us say

of sugar, be confined in a closed vessel through the walls of which the

solvent can pass but the solution cannot, the solvent will enter till a

certain equilibrium pressure is reached. This equilibrium pressure is

called the osmotic pressure of the solution, and thermodynamic theory

shows that, in an ideal case of perfect separation between solvent and

solute, it should have the same value as the pressure which a number of

molecules equal to the number of solute molecules in the solution would

exert if they could exist as a gas in a space equal to the volume of the

solution, provided that the space was large enough (i.e. the solution

dilute enough) for the intermolecular forces between the dissolved

particles to be inappreciable. Van 't Hoff pointed out that measurements

of osmotic pressure confirmed this value in the case of dilute solutions

of cane sugar.

Thermodynamic theory also indicates a connexion between the osmotic

pressure of a solution and the depression of its freezing point and its

vapour pressure compared with those of the pure solvent. The freezing

points and vapour pressures of solutions of sugar are also in conformity

with the theoretical numbers. But when we pass to solutions of mineral

salts and acids--to solutions of electrolytes in fact--we find that the

observed values of the osmotic pressures and of the allied phenomena are

greater than the normal values. Arrhenius pointed out that these

exceptions would be brought into line if the ions of electrolytes were

imagined to be separate entities each capable of producing its own

pressure effects just as would an ordinary dissolved molecule.

Two relations are suggested by Arrhenius' theory. (1) In very dilute

solutions of simple substances, where only one kind of dissociation is

possible and the dissociation of the ions is complete, the number of

pressure-producing particles necessary to produce the observed osmotic

effects should be equal to the number of ions given by a molecule of the

salt as shown by its electrical properties. Thus the osmotic pressure,

or the depression of the freezing point of a solution of potassium

chloride should, at extreme dilution, be twice the normal value, but of

a solution of sulphuric acid three times that value, since the potassium

salt contains two ions and the acid three. (2) As the concentration of

the solutions increases, the ionization as measured electrically and the

dissociation as measured osmotically might decrease more or less

together, though, since the thermodynamic theory only holds when the

solution is so dilute that the dissolved particles are beyond each

other's sphere of action, there is much doubt whether this second

relation is valid through any appreciable range of concentration.

At present, measurements of freezing point are more convenient and

accurate than those of osmotic pressure, and we may test the validity of

Arrhenius' relations by their means. The theoretical value for the

depression of the freezing point of a dilute solution per

gramme-equivalent of solute per litre is 1.857 deg. C. Completely

ionized solutions of salts with two ions should give double this number

or 3.714 deg., while electrolytes with three ions should have a value of

5.57 deg.

The following results are given by H.B. Loomis for the concentration of

0.01 gramme-molecule of salt to one thousand grammes of water. The salts

tabulated are those of which the equivalent conductivity reaches a

limiting value indicating that complete ionization is reached as

dilution is increased. With such salts alone is a valid comparison

possible.

_Molecular Depressions of the Freezing Point._

_Electrolytes with two Ions._

Potassium chloride 3.60

Sodium chloride 3.67

Potassium hydrate 3.71

Hydrochloric acid 3.61

Nitric acid 3.73

Potassium nitrate 3.46

Sodium nitrate 3.55

Ammonium nitrate 3.58

_Electrolytes with three Ions._

Sulphuric acid 4.49

Sodium sulphate 5.09

Calcium chloride 5.04

Magnesium chloride 5.08

At the concentration used by Loomis the electrical conductivity

indicates that the ionization is not complete, particularly in the case

of the salts with divalent ions in the second list. Allowing for

incomplete ionization the general concordance of these numbers with the

theoretical ones is very striking.

The measurements of freezing points of solutions at the extreme dilution

necessary to secure complete ionization is a matter of great difficulty,

and has been overcome only in a research initiated by E.H. Griffiths.[3]

Results have been obtained for solutions of sugar, where the

experimental number is 1.858, and for potassium chloride, which gives a

depression of 3.720. These numbers agree with those indicated by theory,

viz. 1.857 and 3.714, with astonishing exactitude. We may take

Arrhenius' first relation as established for the case of potassium

chloride.

The second relation, as we have seen, is not a strict consequence of

theory, and experiments to examine it must be treated as an

investigation of the limits within which solutions are dilute within the

thermodynamic sense of the word, rather than as a test of the soundness

of the theory. It is found that divergence has begun before the

concentration has become great enough to enable freezing points to be

measured with any ordinary apparatus. The freezing point curve usually

lies below the electrical one, but approaches it as dilution is

increased.[4]

Returning once more to the consideration of the first relation, which

deals with the comparison between the number of ions and the number of

pressure-producing particles in dilute solution, one caution is

necessary. In simple substances like potassium chloride it seems evident

that one kind of dissociation only is possible. The electrical phenomena

show that there are two ions to the molecule, and that these ions are

electrically charged. Corresponding with this result we find that the

freezing point of dilute solutions indicates that two pressure-producing

particles per molecule are present. But the converse relation does not

necessarily follow. It would be possible for a body in solution to be

dissociated into non-electrical parts, which would give osmotic pressure

effects twice or three times the normal value, but, being uncharged,

would not act as ions and impart electrical conductivity to the

solution. L. Kahlenberg (_Jour. Phys. Chem._, 1901, v. 344, 1902, vi.

43) has found that solutions of diphenylamine in methyl cyanide possess

an excess of pressure-producing particles and yet are non-conductors of

electricity. It is possible that in complicated organic substances we

might have two kinds of dissociation, electrical and non-electrical,

occurring simultaneously, while the possibility of the association of

molecules accompanied by the electrical dissociation of some of them

into new parts should not be overlooked. It should be pointed out that

no measurements on osmotic pressures or freezing points can do more than

tell us that an excess of particles is present; such experiments can

throw no light on the question whether or not those particles are

electrically charged. That question can only be answered by examining

whether or not the particles move in an electric field.

The dissociation theory was originally suggested by the osmotic pressure

relations. But not only has it explained satisfactorily the electrical

properties of solutions, but it seems to be the only known hypothesis

which is consistent with the experimental relation between the

concentration of a solution and its electrical conductivity (see

CONDUCTION, ELECTRIC, S II., "Nature of Electrolytes"). It is probable

that the electrical effects constitute the strongest arguments in favour

of the theory. It is necessary to point out that the dissociated ions of

such a body as potassium chloride are not in the same condition as

potassium and chlorine in the free state. The ions are associated with

very large electric charges, and, whatever their exact relations with

those charges may be, it is certain that the energy of a system in such

a state must be different from its energy when unelectrified. It is not

unlikely, therefore, that even a compound as stable in the solid form as

potassium chloride should be thus dissociated when dissolved. Again,

water, the best electrolytic solvent known, is also the body of the

highest specific inductive capacity (dielectric constant), and this

property, to whatever cause it may be due, will reduce the forces

between electric charges in the neighbourhood, and may therefore enable

two ions to separate.

This view of the nature of electrolytic solutions at once explains many

well-known phenomena. Other physical properties of these solutions, such

as density, colour, optical rotatory power, &c., like the

conductivities, are _additive_, i.e. can be calculated by adding

together the corresponding properties of the parts. This again suggests

that these parts are independent of each other. For instance, the colour

of a salt solution is the colour obtained by the superposition of the

colours of the ions and the colour of any undissociated salt that may be

present. All copper salts in dilute solution are blue, which is

therefore the colour of the copper ion. Solid copper chloride is brown

or yellow, so that its concentrated solution, which contains both ions

and undissociated molecules, is green, but changes to blue as water is

added and the ionization becomes complete. A series of equivalent

solutions all containing the same coloured ion have absorption spectra

which, when photographed, show identical absorption bands of equal

intensity.[5] The colour changes shown by many substances which are used

as indicators (q.v.) of acids or alkalis can be explained in a similar

way. Thus para-nitrophenol has colourless molecules, but an intensely

yellow negative ion. In neutral, and still more in acid solutions, the

dissociation of the indicator is practically nothing, and the liquid is

colourless. If an alkali is added, however, a highly dissociated salt of

para-nitrophenol is formed, and the yellow colour is at once evident. In

other cases, such as that of litmus, both the ion and the undissociated

molecule are coloured, but in different ways.

Electrolytes possess the power of coagulating solutions of colloids such

as albumen and arsenious sulphide. The mean values of the relative

coagulative powers of sulphates of mono-, di-, and tri-valent metals

have been shown experimentally to be approximately in the ratios

1:35:1023. The dissociation theory refers this to the action of electric

charges carried by the free ions. If a certain minimum charge must be

collected in order to start coagulation, it will need the conjunction of

6n monovalent, or 3n divalent, to equal the effect of 2n tri-valent

ions. The ratios of the coagulative powers can thus be calculated to be

1:x:x^2, and putting x = 32 we get 1:32:1024, a satisfactory agreement

with the numbers observed.[6]

The question of the application of the dissociation theory to the case

of fused salts remains. While it seems clear that the conduction in this

case is carried on by ions similar to those of solutions, since

Faraday's laws apply equally to both, it does not follow necessarily

that semi-permanent dissociation is the only way to explain the

phenomena. The evidence in favour of dissociation in the case of

solutions does not apply to fused salts, and it is possible that, in

their case, a series of molecular interchanges, somewhat like Grotthus's

chain, may represent the mechanism of conduction.

An interesting relation appears when the electrolytic conductivity of

solutions is compared with their chemical activity. The readiness and

speed with which electrolytes react are in sharp contrast with the

difficulty experienced in the case of non-electrolytes. Moreover, a

study of the chemical relations of electrolytes indicates that it is

always the electrolytic ions that are concerned in their reactions. The

tests for a salt, potassium nitrate, for example, are the tests not for

KNO3, but for its ions K and NO3, and in cases of double decomposition

it is always these ions that are exchanged for those of other

substances. If an element be present in a compound otherwise than as an

ion, it is not interchangeable, and cannot be recognized by the usual

tests. Thus neither a chlorate, which contains the ion ClO3, nor

monochloracetic acid, shows the reactions of chlorine, though it is, of

course, present in both substances; again, the sulphates do not answer

to the usual tests which indicate the presence of sulphur as sulphide.

The chemical activity of a substance is a quantity which may be measured

by different methods. For some substances it has been shown to be

independent of the particular reaction used. It is then possible to

assign to each body a specific coefficient of affinity. Arrhenius has

pointed out that the coefficient of affinity of an acid is proportional

to its electrolytic ionization.

The affinities of acids have been compared in several ways. W. Ostwald

(_Lehrbuch der allg. Chemie_, vol. ii., Leipzig, 1893) investigated

the relative affinities of acids for potash, soda and ammonia, and

proved them to be independent of the base used. The method employed

was to measure the changes in volume caused by the action. His results

are given in column I. of the following table, the affinity of

hydrochloric acid being taken as one hundred. Another method is to

allow an acid to act on an insoluble salt, and to measure the quantity

which goes into solution. Determinations have been made with calcium

oxalate, CaC2O4+H2O, which is easily decomposed by acids, oxalic acid

and a soluble calcium salt being formed. The affinities of acids

relative to that of oxalic acid are thus found, so that the acids can

be compared among themselves (column II.). If an aqueous solution of

methyl acetate be allowed to stand, a slow decomposition goes on. This

is much quickened by the presence of a little dilute acid, though the

acid itself remains unchanged. It is found that the influence of

different acids on this action is proportional to their specific

coefficients of affinity. The results of this method are given in

column III. Finally, in column IV. the electrical conductivities of

normal solutions of the acids have been tabulated. A better basis of

comparison would be the ratio of the actual to the limiting

conductivity, but since the conductivity of acids is chiefly due to

the mobility of the hydrogen ions, its limiting value is nearly the

same for all, and the general result of the comparison would be

unchanged.

+-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+

| Acid. | I. | II. | III. | IV. |

+-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+

| Hydrochloric | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |

| Nitric | 102 | 110 | 92 | 99.6 |

| Sulphuric | 68 | 67 | 74 | 65.1 |

| Formic | 4.0 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 1.7 |

| Acetic | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.4 |

| Propionic | 1.1 | .. | 0.3 | 0.3 |

| Monochloracetic | 7.2 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 4.9 |

| Dichloracetic | 34 | 18 | 23.0 | 25.3 |

| Trichloracetic | 82 | 63 | 68.2 | 62.3 |

| Malic | 3.0 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 |

| Tartaric | 5.3 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 |

| Succinic | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 |

+-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+

It must be remembered that, the solutions not being of quite the same

strength, these numbers are not strictly comparable, and that the

experimental difficulties involved in the chemical measurements are

considerable. Nevertheless, the remarkable general agreement of the

numbers in the four columns is quite enough to show the intimate

connexion between chemical activity and electrical conductivity. We

may take it, then, that only that portion of these bodies is

chemically active which is electrolytically active--that ionization is

necessary for such chemical activity as we are dealing with here, just

as it is necessary for electrolytic conductivity.

The ordinary laws of chemical equilibrium have been applied to the

case of the dissociation of a substance into its ions. Let x be the

number of molecules which dissociate per second when the number of

undissociated molecules in unit volume is unity, then in a dilute

solution where the molecules do not interfere with each other, xp is

the number when the concentration is p. Recombination can only occur

when two ions meet, and since the frequency with which this will

happen is, in dilute solution, proportional to the square of the ionic

concentration, we shall get for the number of molecules re-formed in

one second yq^2 where q is the number of dissociated molecules in one

cubic centimetre. When there is equilibrium, xp = yq^2. If [mu] be the

molecular conductivity, and [mu]_([oo]) its value at infinite

dilution, the fractional number of molecules dissociated is

[mu]/[mu]_([oo]), which we may write as [alpha]. The number of

undissociated molecules is then 1 - [alpha], so that if V be the

volume of the solution containing 1 gramme-molecule of the dissolved

substance, we get

q = [alpha]/V and p = (1 - [alpha])/V,

hence x(1 - [alpha])V = ya^2/V^2,

[alpha]^2 x

and -------------- = -- = constant = k.

V(1 - [alpha]) y

This constant k gives a numerical value for the chemical affinity, and

the equation should represent the effect of dilution on the molecular

conductivity of binary electrolytes.

In the case of substances like ammonia and acetic acid, where the

dissociation is very small, 1 - [alpha] is nearly equal to unity, and

only varies slowly with dilution. The equation then becomes

[alpha]^2/V = k, or [alpha] = [root](Vk), so that the molecular

conductivity is proportional to the square root of the dilution.

Ostwald has confirmed the equation by observation on an enormous

number of weak acids (_Zeits. physikal. Chemie_, 1888, ii. p. 278;

1889, iii. pp. 170, 241, 369). Thus in the case of cyanacetic acid,

while the volume V changed by doubling from 16 to 1024 litres, the

values of k were 0.00 (376, 373, 374, 361, 362, 361, 368). The mean

values of k for other common acids were--formic, 0.0000214; acetic,

0.0000180; monochloracetic, 0.00155; dichloracetic, 0.051;

trichloracetic, 1.21; propionic, 0.0000134. From these numbers we can,

by help of the equation, calculate the conductivity of the acids for

any dilution. The value of k, however, does not keep constant so

satisfactorily in the case of highly dissociated substances, and

empirical formulae have been constructed to represent the effect of

dilution on them. Thus the values of the expressions [alpha]^2/(1 -

[alpha][root]V) (Rudolphi, _Zeits. physikal. Chemie_, 1895, vol. xvii.

p. 385) and [alpha]^3/(1 - [alpha])^2V (van 't Hoff, ibid., 1895, vol.

xviii. p. 300) are found to keep constant as V changes. Van 't Hoff's

formula is equivalent to taking the frequency of dissociation as

proportional to the square of the concentration of the molecules, and

the frequency of recombination as proportional to the cube of the

concentration of the ions. An explanation of the failure of the usual

dilution law in these cases may be given if we remember that, while

the electric forces between bodies like undissociated molecules, each

associated with equal and opposite charges, will vary inversely as the

fourth power of the distance, the forces between dissociated ions,

each carrying one charge only, will be inversely proportional to the

square of the distance. The forces between the ions of a strongly

dissociated solution will thus be considerable at a dilution which

makes forces between undissociated molecules quite insensible, and at

the concentrations necessary to test Ostwald's formula an electrolyte

will be far from dilute in the thermodynamic sense of the term, which

implies no appreciable intermolecular or interionic forces.

When the solutions of two substances are mixed, similar considerations

to those given above enable us to calculate the resultant changes in

dissociation. (See Arrhenius, loc. cit.) The simplest and most

important case is that of two electrolytes having one ion in common,

such as two acids. It is evident that the undissociated part of each

acid must eventually be in equilibrium with the free hydrogen ions,

and, if the concentrations are not such as to secure this condition,

readjustment must occur. In order that there should be no change in

the states of dissociation on mixing, it is necessary, therefore, that

the concentration of the hydrogen ions should be the same in each

separate solution. Such solutions were called by Arrhenius

"isohydric." The two solutions, then, will so act on each other when

mixed that they become isohydric. Let us suppose that we have one very

active acid like hydrochloric, in which dissociation is nearly

complete, another like acetic, in which it is very small. In order

that the solutions of these should be isohydric and the concentrations

of the hydrogen ions the same, we must have a very large quantity of

the feebly dissociated acetic acid, and a very small quantity of the

strongly dissociated hydrochloric, and in such proportions alone will

equilibrium be possible. This explains the action of a strong acid on

the salt of a weak acid. Let us allow dilute sodium acetate to react

with dilute hydrochloric acid. Some acetic acid is formed, and this

process will go on till the solutions of the two acids are isohydric:

that is, till the dissociated hydrogen ions are in equilibrium with

both. In order that this should hold, we have seen that a considerable

quantity of acetic acid must be present, so that a corresponding

amount of the salt will be decomposed, the quantity being greater the

less the acid is dissociated. This "replacement" of a "weak" acid by a

"strong" one is a matter of common observation in the chemical

laboratory. Similar investigations applied to the general case of

chemical equilibrium lead to an expression of exactly the same form as

that given by C.M. Guldberg and P. Waage, which is universally

accepted as an accurate representation of the facts.

The temperature coefficient of conductivity has approximately the same

value for most aqueous salt solutions. It decreases both as the

temperature is raised and as the concentration is increased, ranging

from about 3.5% per degree for extremely dilute solutions (i.e.

practically pure water) at 0 deg. to about 1.5 for concentrated

solutions at 18 deg. For acids its value is usually rather less than for

salts at equivalent concentrations. The influence of temperature on the

conductivity of solutions depends on (1) the ionization, and (2) the

frictional resistance of the liquid to the passage of the ions, the

reciprocal of which is called the ionic fluidity. At extreme dilution,

when the ionization is complete, a variation in temperature cannot

change its amount. The rise of conductivity with temperature, therefore,

shows that the fluidity becomes greater when the solution is heated. As

the concentration is increased and un-ionized molecules are formed, a

change in temperature begins to affect the ionization as well as the

fluidity. But the temperature coefficient of conductivity is now

generally less than before; thus the effect of temperature on ionization

must be of opposite sign to its effect on fluidity. The ionization of a

solution, then, is usually diminished by raising the temperature, the

rise in conductivity being due to the greater increase in fluidity.

Nevertheless, in certain cases, the temperature coefficient of

conductivity becomes negative at high temperatures, a solution of

phosphoric acid, for example, reaching a maximum conductivity at 75 deg.

C.

The dissociation theory gives an immediate explanation of the fact that,

in general, no heat-change occurs when two neutral salt solutions are

mixed. Since the salts, both before and after mixture, exist mainly as

dissociated ions, it is obvious that large thermal effects can only

appear when the state of dissociation of the products is very different

from that of the reagents. Let us consider the case of the

neutralization of a base by an acid in the light of the dissociation

theory. In dilute solution such substances as hydrochloric acid and

potash are almost completely dissociated, so that, instead of

representing the reaction as

HCl + KOH = KCl + H2O,

we must write

+ - + - + -

H + Cl + K + OH = K + Cl + H2O.

The ions K and Cl suffer no change, but the hydrogen of the acid and the

hydroxyl (OH) of the potash unite to form water, which is only very

slightly dissociated. The heat liberated, then, is almost exclusively

that produced by the formation of water from its ions. An exactly

similar process occurs when any strongly dissociated acid acts on any

strongly dissociated base, so that in all such cases the heat evolution

should be approximately the same. This is fully borne out by the

experiments of Julius Thomsen, who found that the heat of neutralization

of one gramme-molecule of a strong base by an equivalent quantity of a

strong acid was nearly constant, and equal to 13,700 or 13,800 calories.

In the case of weaker acids, the dissociation of which is less complete,

divergences from this constant value will occur, for some of the

molecules have to be separated into their ions. For instance, sulphuric

acid, which in the fairly strong solutions used by Thomsen is only about

half dissociated, gives a higher value for the heat of neutralization,

so that heat must be evolved when it is ionized. The heat of formation

of a substance from its ions is, of course, very different from that

evolved when it is formed from its elements in the usual way, since the

energy associated with an ion is different from that possessed by the

atoms of the element in their normal state. We can calculate the heat of

formation from its ions for any substance dissolved in a given liquid,

from a knowledge of the temperature coefficient of ionization, by means

of an application of the well-known thermodynamical process, which also

gives the latent heat of evaporation of a liquid when the temperature

coefficient of its vapour pressure is known. The heats of formation thus

obtained may be either positive or negative, and by using them to

supplement the heat of formation of water, Arrhenius calculated the

total heats of neutralization of soda by different acids, some of them

only slightly dissociated, and found values agreeing well with

observation (_Zeits. physikal. Chemie_, 1889, 4, p. 96; and 1892, 9, p.

339).

_Voltaic Cells._--When two metallic conductors are placed in an

electrolyte, a current will flow through a wire connecting them provided

that a difference of any kind exists between the two conductors in the

nature either of the metals or of the portions of the electrolyte which

surround them. A current can be obtained by the combination of two

metals in the same electrolyte, of two metals in different electrolytes,

of the same metal in different electrolytes, or of the same metal in

solutions of the same electrolyte at different concentrations. In

accordance with the principles of energetics (q.v.), any change which

involves a decrease in the total available energy of the system will

tend to occur, and thus the necessary and sufficient condition for the

production of electromotive force is that the available energy of the

system should decrease when the current flows.

In order that the current should be maintained, and the electromotive

force of the cell remain constant during action, it is necessary to

ensure that the changes in the cell, chemical or other, which produce

the current, should neither destroy the difference between the

electrodes, nor coat either electrode with a non-conducting layer

through which the current cannot pass. As an example of a fairly

constant cell we may take that of Daniell, which consists of the

electrical arrangement--zinc | zinc sulphate solution | copper sulphate

solution | copper,--the two solutions being usually separated by a pot

of porous earthenware. When the zinc and copper plates are connected

through a wire, a current flows, the conventionally positive electricity

passing from copper to zinc in the wire and from zinc to copper in the

cell. Zinc dissolves at the anode, an equal amount of zinc replaces an

equivalent amount of copper on the other side of the porous partition,

and the same amount of copper is deposited on the cathode. This process

involves a decrease in the available energy of the system, for the

dissolution of zinc gives out more energy than the separation of copper

absorbs. But the internal rearrangements which accompany the production

of a current do not cause any change in the original nature of the

electrodes, fresh zinc being exposed at the anode, and copper being

deposited on copper at the cathode. Thus as long as a moderate current

flows, the only variation in the cell is the appearance of zinc sulphate

in the liquid on the copper side of the porous wall. In spite of this

appearance, however, while the supply of copper is maintained, copper,

being more easily separated from the solution than zinc, is deposited

alone at the cathode, and the cell remains constant.

It is necessary to observe that the condition for change in a system is

that the total available energy of the whole system should be decreased

by the change. We must consider what change is allowed by the mechanism

of the system, and deal with the sum of all the alterations in energy.

Thus in the Daniell cell the dissolution of copper as well as of zinc

would increase the loss in available energy. But when zinc dissolves,

the zinc ions carry their electric charges with them, and the liquid

tends to become positively electrified. The electric forces then soon

stop further action unless an equivalent quantity of positive ions are

removed from the solution. Hence zinc can only dissolve when some more

easily separable substance is present in solution to be removed pari

passu with the dissolution of zinc. The mechanism of such systems is

well illustrated by an experiment devised by W. Ostwald. Plates of

platinum and pure or amalgamated zinc are separated by a porous pot, and

each surrounded by some of the same solution of a salt of a metal more

oxidizable than zinc, such as potassium. When the plates are connected

together by means of a wire, no current flows, and no appreciable amount

of zinc dissolves, for the dissolution of zinc would involve the

separation of potassium and a gain in available energy. If sulphuric

acid be added to the vessel containing the zinc, these conditions are

unaltered and still no zinc is dissolved. But, on the other hand, if a

few drops of acid be placed in the vessel with the platinum, bubbles of

hydrogen appear, and a current flows, zinc dissolving at the anode, and

hydrogen being liberated at the cathode. In order that positively

electrified ions may enter a solution, an equivalent amount of other

positive ions must be removed or negative ions be added, and, for the

process to occur spontaneously, the possible action at the two

electrodes must involve a decrease in the total available energy of the

system.

Considered thermodynamically, voltaic cells must be divided into

reversible and non-reversible systems. If the slow processes of

diffusion be ignored, the Daniell cell already described may be taken as

a type of a reversible cell. Let an electromotive force exactly equal to

that of the cell be applied to it in the reverse direction. When the

applied electromotive force is diminished by an infinitesimal amount,

the cell produces a current in the usual direction, and the ordinary

chemical changes occur. If the external electromotive force exceed that

of the cell by ever so little, a current flows in the opposite

direction, and all the former chemical changes are reversed, copper

dissolving from the copper plate, while zinc is deposited on the zinc

plate. The cell, together with this balancing electromotive force, is

thus a reversible system in true equilibrium, and the thermodynamical

reasoning applicable to such systems can be used to examine its

properties.

Now a well-known relation connects the available energy of a reversible

system with the corresponding change in its total internal energy.

The available energy A is the amount of external work obtainable by an

infinitesimal, reversible change in the system which occurs at a

constant temperature T. If I be the change in the internal energy, the

relation referred to gives us the equation

A = I + T(dA/dT),

where dA/dT denotes the rate of change of the available energy of the

system per degree change in temperature. During a small electric

transfer through the cell, the external work done is Ee, where E is

the electromotive force. If the chemical changes which occur in the

cell were allowed to take place in a closed vessel without the

performance of electrical or other work, the change in energy would be

measured by the heat evolved. Since the final state of the system

would be the same as in the actual processes of the cell, the same

amount of heat must give a measure of the change in internal energy

when the cell is in action. Thus, if L denote the heat corresponding

with the chemical changes associated with unit electric transfer, Le

will be the heat corresponding with an electric transfer e, and will

also be equal to the change in internal energy of the cell. Hence we

get the equation

Ee = Le + Te(dE/dT) or E = L + T(dE/dT),

as a particular case of the general thermodynamic equation of

available energy. This equation was obtained in different ways by J.

Willard Gibbs and H. von Helmholtz.

It will be noticed that when dE/dT is zero, that is, when the

electromotive force of the cell does not change with temperature, the

electromotive force is measured by the heat of reaction per unit of

electrochemical change. The earliest formulation of the subject, due

to Lord Kelvin, assumed that this relation was true in all cases, and,

calculated in this way, the electromotive force of Daniell's cell,

which happens to possess a very small temperature coefficient, was

found to agree with observation.

When one gramme of zinc is dissolved in dilute sulphuric acid, 1670

thermal units or calories are evolved. Hence for the electrochemical

unit of zinc or 0.003388 gramme, the thermal evolution is 5.66

calories. Similarly, the heat which accompanies the dissolution of one

electrochemical unit of copper is 3.00 calories. Thus, the thermal

equivalent of the unit of resultant electrochemical change in

Daniell's cell is 5.66 - 3.00 = 2.66 calories. The dynamical

equivalent of the calorie is 4.18 X 10^7 ergs or C.G.S. units of work,

and therefore the electromotive force of the cell should be 1.112 X

10^8 C.G.S. units or 1.112 volts--a close agreement with the

experimental result of about 1.08 volts. For cells in which the

electromotive force varies with temperature, the full equation given

by Gibbs and Helmholtz has also been confirmed experimentally.

As stated above, an electromotive force is set up whenever there is a

difference of any kind at two electrodes immersed in electrolytes. In

ordinary cells the difference is secured by using two dissimilar metals,

but an electromotive force exists if two plates of the same metal are

placed in solutions of different substances, or of the same substance at

different concentrations. In the latter case, the tendency of the metal

to dissolve in the more dilute solution is greater than its tendency to

dissolve in the more concentrated solution, and thus there is a decrease

in available energy when metal dissolves in the dilute solution and

separates in equivalent quantity from the concentrated solution. An

electromotive force is therefore set up in this direction, and, if we

can calculate the change in available energy due to the processes of the

cell, we can foretell the value of the electromotive force. Now the

effective change produced by the action of the current is the

concentration of the more dilute solution by the dissolution of metal in

it, and the dilution of the originally stronger solution by the

separation of metal from it. We may imagine these changes reversed in

two ways. We may evaporate some of the solvent from the solution which

has become weaker and thus reconcentrate it, condensing the vapour on

the solution which had become stronger. By this reasoning Helmholtz

showed how to obtain an expression for the work done. On the other hand,

we may imagine the processes due to the electrical transfer to be

reversed by an osmotic operation. Solvent may be supposed to be squeezed

out from the solution which has become more dilute through a

semi-permeable wall, and through another such wall allowed to mix with

the solution which in the electrical operation had become more

concentrated. Again, we may calculate the osmotic work done, and, if the

whole cycle of operations be supposed to occur at the same temperature,

the osmotic work must be equal and opposite to the electrical work of

the first operation.

The result of the investigation shows that the electrical work Ee is

given by the equation

_

/ p2

Ee = | vdp,

_/ p1

where v is the volume of the solution used and p its osmotic pressure.

When the solutions may be taken as effectively dilute, so that the gas

laws apply to the osmotic pressure, this relation reduces to

nrRT c1

E = ---- log_[epsilon] --

ey c2

where n is the number of ions given by one molecule of the salt, r the

transport ratio of the anion, R the gas constant, T the absolute

temperature, y the total valency of the anions obtained from one

molecule, and c1 and c2 the concentrations of the two solutions.

If we take as an example a concentration cell in which silver plates

are placed in solutions of silver nitrate, one of which is ten times

as strong as the other, this equation gives

E = 0.060 X 10^8 C.G.S. units

= 0.060 volts.

W. Nernst, to whom this theory is due, determined the electromotive

force of this cell experimentally, and found the value 0.055 volt.

The logarithmic formulae for these concentration cells indicate that

theoretically their electromotive force can be increased to any extent

by diminishing without limit the concentration of the more dilute

solution, log c1/c2 then becoming very great. This condition may be

realized to some extent in a manner that throws light on the general

theory of the voltaic cell. Let us consider the arrangement--silver |

silver chloride with potassium chloride solution | potassium nitrate

solution | silver nitrate solution | silver. Silver chloride is a very

insoluble substance, and here the amount in solution is still further

reduced by the presence of excess of chlorine ions of the potassium

salt. Thus silver, at one end of the cell in contact with many silver

ions of the silver nitrate solution, at the other end is in contact with

a liquid in which the concentration of those ions is very small indeed.

The result is that a high electromotive force is set up, which has been

calculated as 0.52 volt, and observed as 0.51 volt. Again, Hittorf has

shown that the effect of a cyanide round a copper electrode is to

combine with the copper ions. The concentration of the simple copper

ions is then so much diminished that the copper plate becomes an anode

with regard to zinc. Thus the cell--copper | potassium cyanide solution

| potassium sulphate solution--zinc sulphate solution | zinc--gives a

current which carries copper into solution and deposits zinc. In a

similar way silver could be made to act as anode with respect to

cadmium.

It is now evident that the electromotive force of an ordinary chemical

cell such as that of Daniell depends on the concentration of the

solutions as well as on the nature of the metals. In ordinary cases

possible changes in the concentrations only affect the electromotive

force by a few parts in a hundred, but, by means such as those indicated

above, it is possible to produce such immense differences in the

concentrations that the electromotive force of the cell is not only

changed appreciably but even reversed in direction. Once more we see

that it is the total impending change in the available energy of the

system which controls the electromotive force.

Any reversible cell can theoretically be employed as an accumulator,

though, in practice, conditions of general convenience are more sought

after than thermodynamic efficiency. The effective electromotive force

of the common lead accumulator (q.v.) is less than that required to

charge it. This drop in the electromotive force has led to the belief

that the cell is not reversible. F. Dolezalek, however, has attributed

the difference to mechanical hindrances, which prevent the equalization

of acid concentration in the neighbourhood of the electrodes, rather

than to any essentially irreversible chemical action. The fact that the

Gibbs-Helmholtz equation is found to apply also indicates that the lead

accumulator is approximately reversible in the thermodynamic sense of

the term.

_Polarization and Contact Difference of Potential._--If we connect

together in series a single Daniell's cell, a galvanometer, and two

platinum electrodes dipping into acidulated water, no visible chemical

decomposition ensues. At first a considerable current is indicated by

the galvanometer; the deflexion soon diminishes, however, and finally

becomes very small. If, instead of using a single Daniell's cell, we

employ some source of electromotive force which can be varied as we

please, and gradually raise its intensity, we shall find that, when it

exceeds a certain value, about 1.7 volt, a permanent current of

considerable strength flows through the solution, and, after the initial

period, shows no signs of decrease. This current is accompanied by

chemical decomposition. Now let us disconnect the platinum plates from

the battery and join them directly with the galvanometer. A current will

flow for a while in the reverse direction; the system of plates and

acidulated water through which a current has been passed, acts as an

accumulator, and will itself yield a current in return. These phenomena

are explained by the existence of a reverse electromotive force at the

surface of the platinum plates. Only when the applied electromotive

force exceeds this reverse force of polarization, will a permanent

steady current pass through the liquid, and visible chemical

decomposition proceed. It seems that this reverse electromotive force of

polarization is due to the deposit on the electrodes of minute

quantities of the products of chemical decomposition. Differences

between the two electrodes are thus set up, and, as we have seen above,

an electromotive force will therefore exist between them. To pass a

steady current in the direction opposite to this electromotive force of

polarization, the applied electromotive force E must exceed that of

polarization E', and the excess E - E' is the effective electromotive

force of the circuit, the current being, in accordance with Ohm's law,

proportional to the applied electromotive force and represented by (E -

E')/R, where R is a constant called the resistance of the circuit.

When we use platinum electrodes in acidulated water, hydrogen and oxygen

are evolved. The opposing force of polarization is about 1.7 volt, but,

when the plates are disconnected and used as a source of current, the

electromotive force they give is only about 1.07 volt. This

irreversibility is due to the work required to evolve bubbles of gas at

the surface of bright platinum plates. If the plates be covered with a

deposit of platinum black, in which the gases are absorbed as fast as

they are produced, the minimum decomposition point is 1.07 volt, and the

process is reversible. If secondary effects are eliminated, the

deposition of metals also is a reversible process; the decomposition

voltage is equal to the electromotive force which the metal itself gives

when going into solution. The phenomena of polarization are thus seen to

be due to the changes of surface produced, and are correlated with the

differences of potential which exist at any surface of separation

between a metal and an electrolyte.

Many experiments have been made with a view of separating the two

potential-differences which must exist in any cell made of two metals

and a liquid, and of determining each one individually. If we regard the

thermal effect at each junction as a measure of the potential-difference

there, as the total thermal effect in the cell undoubtedly is of the sum

of its potential-differences, in cases where the temperature coefficient

is negligible, the heat evolved on solution of a metal should give the

electrical potential-difference at its surface. Hence, if we assume

that, in the Daniell's cell, the temperature coefficients are negligible

at the individual contacts as well as in the cell as a whole, the sign

of the potential-difference ought to be the same at the surface of the

zinc as it is at the surface of the copper. Since zinc goes into

solution and copper comes out, the electromotive force of the cell will

be the difference between the two effects. On the other hand, it is

commonly thought that the single potential-differences at the surface of

metals and electrolytes have been determined by methods based on the use

of the capillary electrometer and on others depending on what is called

a dropping electrode, that is, mercury dropping rapidly into an

electrolyte and forming a cell with the mercury at rest in the bottom of

the vessel. By both these methods the single potential-differences found

at the surfaces of the zinc and copper have opposite signs, and the

effective electromotive force of a Daniell's cell is the sum of the two

effects. Which of these conflicting views represents the truth still

remains uncertain.

_Diffusion of Electrolytes and Contact Difference of Potential between

Liquids._--An application of the theory of ionic velocity due to W.

Nernst[7] and M. Planck[8] enables us to calculate the diffusion

constant of dissolved electrolytes. According to the molecular theory,

diffusion is due to the motion of the molecules of the dissolved

substance through the liquid. When the dissolved molecules are uniformly

distributed, the osmotic pressure will be the same everywhere throughout

the solution, but, if the concentration vary from point to point, the

pressure will vary also. There must, then, be a relation between the

rate of change of the concentration and the osmotic pressure gradient,

and thus we may consider the osmotic pressure gradient as a force

driving the solute through a viscous medium. In the case of

non-electrolytes and of all non-ionized molecules this analogy

completely represents the facts, and the phenomena of diffusion can be

deduced from it alone. But the ions of an electrolytic solution can move

independently through the liquid, even when no current flows, as the

consequences of Ohm's law indicate. The ions will therefore diffuse

independently, and the faster ion will travel quicker into pure water in

contact with a solution. The ions carry their charges with them, and, as

a matter of fact, it is found that water in contact with a solution

takes with respect to it a positive or negative potential, according as

the positive or negative ion travels the faster. This process will go on

until the simultaneous separation of electric charges produces an

electrostatic force strong enough to prevent further separation of ions.

We can therefore calculate the rate at which the salt as a whole will

diffuse by examining the conditions for a steady transfer, in which the

ions diffuse at an equal rate, the faster one being restrained and the

slower one urged forward by the electric forces. In this manner the

diffusion constant can be calculated in absolute units (HCl = 2.49, HNO3

= 2.27, NaCl = 1.12), the unit of time being the day. By experiments on

diffusion this constant has been found by Scheffer, and the numbers

observed agree with those calculated (HCl = 2.30, HNO3 = 2.22, NaCl =

1.11).

As we have seen above, when a solution is placed in contact with water

the water will take a positive or negative potential with regard to the

solution, according as the cation or anion has the greater specific

velocity, and therefore the greater initial rate of diffusion. The

difference of potential between two solutions of a substance at

different concentrations can be calculated from the equations used to

give the diffusion constants. The results give equations of the same

logarithmic form as those obtained in a somewhat different manner in the

theory of concentration cells described above, and have been verified by

experiment.

The contact differences of potential at the interfaces of metals and

electrolytes have been co-ordinated by Nernst with those at the surfaces

of separation between different liquids. In contact with a solvent a

metal is supposed to possess a definite solution pressure, analogous to

the vapour pressure of a liquid. Metal goes into solution in the form of

electrified ions. The liquid thus acquires a positive charge, and the

metal a negative charge. The electric forces set up tend to prevent

further separation, and finally a state of equilibrium is reached, when

no more ions can go into solution unless an equivalent number are

removed by voltaic action. On the analogy between this case and that of

the interface between two solutions, Nernst has arrived at similar

logarithmic expressions for the difference of potential, which becomes

proportional to log (P1/P2) where P2 is taken to mean the osmotic

pressure of the cations in the solution, and P1 the osmotic pressure of

the cations in the substance of the metal itself. On these lines the

equations of concentration cells, deduced above on less hypothetical

grounds, may be regained.

_Theory of Electrons._--Our views of the nature of the ions of

electrolytes have been extended by the application of the ideas of the

relations between matter and electricity obtained by the study of

electric conduction through gases. The interpretation of the phenomena

of gaseous conduction was rendered possible by the knowledge previously

acquired of conduction through liquids; the newer subject is now

reaching a position whence it can repay its debt to the older.

Sir J.J. Thomson has shown (see CONDUCTION, ELECTRIC, S III.) that the

negative ions in certain cases of gaseous conduction are much more

mobile than the corresponding positive ions, and possess a mass of about

the one-thousandth part of that of a hydrogen atom. These negative

particles or corpuscles seem to be the ultimate units of negative

electricity, and may be identified with the electrons required by the

theories of H.A. Lorentz and Sir J. Larmor. A body containing an excess

of these particles is negatively electrified, and is positively

electrified if it has parted with some of its normal number. An electric

current consists of a moving stream of electrons. In gases the electrons

sometimes travel alone, but in liquids they are always attached to

matter, and their motion involves the movement of chemical atoms or

groups of atoms. An atom with an extra corpuscle is a univalent negative

ion, an atom with one corpuscle detached is a univalent positive ion. In

metals the electrons can slip from one atom to the next, since a current

can pass without chemical action. When a current passes from an

electrolyte to a metal, the electron must be detached from the atom it

was accompanying and chemical action be manifested at the electrode.

BIBLIOGRAPHY.--Michael Faraday, _Experimental Researches in

Electricity_ (London, 1844 and 1855); W. Ostwald, _Lehrbuch der

allgemeinen Chemie_, 2te Aufl. (Leipzig, 1891); _Elektrochemie_

(Leipzig, 1896); W Nernst, _Theoretische Chemie_, 3te Aufl.

(Stuttgart, 1900; English translation, London, 1904); F. Kohlrausch

and L. Holborn, _Das Leitvermogen der Elektrolyte_ (Leipzig, 1898);

W.C.D. Whetham, _The Theory of Solution and Electrolysis_ (Cambridge,

1902); M. Le Blanc, _Elements of Electrochemistry_ (Eng. trans.,

London, 1896); S. Arrhenius, _Text-Book of Electrochemistry_ (Eng.

trans., London, 1902); H.C. Jones, _The Theory of Electrolytic

Dissociation_ (New York, 1900); N. Munroe Hopkins, _Experimental

Electrochemistry_ (London, 1905); Luphe, _Grundzuge der Elektrochemie_

(Berlin, 1896).

Some of the more important papers on the subject have been reprinted

for Harper's _Series of Scientific Memoirs in Electrolytic Conduction_

(1899) and the _Modern Theory of Solution_ (1899). Several journals

are published specially to deal with physical chemistry, of which

electrochemistry forms an important part. Among them may be mentioned

the _Zeitschrift fur physikalische Chemie_ (Leipzig); and the _Journal

of Physical Chemistry_ (Cornell University). In these periodicals will

be found new work on the subject and abstracts of papers which appear

in other physical and chemical publications. (W. C. D. W.)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Ehud" to "Electroscope" Volume 9, Slice 2 · 第 34 / 43 题