PHOTOGRAPHIC NOTES AND QUERIES.

_Photographic Collodion_ (Vol. vii., p. 314.).--In a former

communication I pointed out the wide differences in the various

manipulations prescribed for making the photographic _gun cotton_ by

several photographers: differences most perplexing to persons of small

leisure, and who are likely to lose half the opportunities of a

photographic season, whilst puzzling over these diversities of

proceeding. Suffer me now to entreat some one to whom all may look up

(perhaps your kind and experienced correspondent DR. DIAMOND will do

this service, so valuable to young photographers) to clear up the

differences I will now "make a note of," viz. as to the amount of dry

photographic gun cotton to be used in forming the prepared collodion.

On comparing various authors, and _reducing_ their directions to a

standard of _one ounce of ether_, I find the following differences:

viz., DR. DIAMOND (Vol. vi., p. 277.) prescribes _about_ three grains of

gun cotton; Mr. Hennah (_Directions, &c._, p. 5.) about seven grains;

the Count de Montizon (_Journ. of Phot. Soc._, p. 23.) eight grains;

whilst Mr. Bingham (_Supplement to Phot. Manip._, p. 2.) directs about

_thirty-four_ grains! in each case to a single ounce of ether.

These differences are too wide to come within even Mr. Archer's "long

range," that "the proportions ... must depend entirely upon the strength

and the thickness required ... the skill of the operator and the season

of the year." (Archer's _Manual_, p. 17.)

Notes and Queries, Number 182, April 23, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 81 / 133 题