CHAPTER V.

NARROW ESCAPES FROM PREMATURE BURIAL.

ALMOST every intelligent and observant person you converse with,

if the subject is introduced, has either known or heard of narrow

escapes of premature burial within his or her own circle of friends

or acquaintances; and it is no exaggeration to say that such cases

are numbered by thousands. It is to be hoped that the number of

timely discoveries vastly exceed those actually interred in a state

of suspended animation; but as no investigation of grave-yards or

cemeteries (which effectually conceal their own tragedies) has ever

taken place in England until the remains are reduced to dust, and

rarely in other countries, one cannot be sure that this optimistic view

is correct. The following cases of narrow escape appear to rest upon

trustworthy evidence.

An apparent suspension of life, following a serious illness, is usually

considered a satisfactory proof of the reality of the expected death;

but these conditions cannot always be relied upon. Cases are on record

where the objects of such simulacra of death appear, if let alone, to

gather the essence of renewed vitality, and return to consciousness.

The _Undertakers’ and Funeral Directors’ Journal_ of May, 1888, has a

case in point.

[A RESUSCITATED HUMORIST.]

“Mrs. Lockhart, of Birkhill, who died in 1825, used to relate to

her grandchildren the following anecdote of her ancestor, Sir

William Lindsay, of Covington, towards the close of the seventeenth

century:--‘Sir William was a humorist, and noted, moreover, for

preserving the picturesque appendage of a beard at a period when the

fashion had long passed away. He had been extremely ill, and life

was at last supposed to be extinct, though, as it afterwards turned

out, he was merely in a “dead faint” or trance. The female relatives

were assembled for the “chesting”--the act of putting a corpse into a

coffin, with the entertainment given on such melancholy occasions--in

a lighted chamber in the old tower of Covington, where the “bearded

knight” lay stretched upon his bier. But when the servants were

about to enter to assist at the ceremonies, Isabella Somerville, Sir

William’s great-granddaughter, and Mrs. Lockhart’s grandmother, then

a child, creeping close to her mother, whispered into her ear, “The

beard is wagging! the beard is wagging!” Mrs. Somerville, upon this,

looked to the bier, and observing indications of life in the ancient

knight, made the company retire, and Sir William soon came out of his

faint. Hot bottles were applied and cordials administered, and in

the course of the evening he was able to converse with his family.

They explained that they had believed him to be actually dead, and

that arrangements had even been made for his funeral. In answer to

the question, “Have the folks been warned?” (_i.e._, invited to the

funeral) he was told that they had--that the funeral day had been

fixed, an ox slain, and other preparations made for entertaining the

company. Sir William then said, “All is as it should be; keep it a

dead secret that I am in life, and let the folks come.” His wishes

were complied with, and the company assembled for the burial at the

appointed time. After some delay, occasioned by the non-arrival of

the clergyman, as was supposed, and which afforded an opportunity of

discussing the merits of the deceased, the door suddenly opened, when,

to their surprise and terror, in stepped the knight himself, pale in

countenance and dressed in black, leaning on the arm of the minister

of the parish of Covington. Having quieted their alarm and explained

matters, he called upon the clergyman to conduct an act of devotion,

which included thanksgiving for his recovery and escape from being

buried alive. This done, the dinner succeeded. A jolly evening, after

the manner of the time, was passed, Sir William himself presiding over

the carousals.’”

Dr. J. B. Vigné, in his “Memoire sur les Inhumations Précipitées,”

Paris, 1839, narrates the following:-- “Mr. B., an inhabitant of

Poitiers, fell suddenly into a state resembling death; every means

for bringing him back to life were used without interruption; from

continued dragging, his two little fingers were dislocated, and the

soles of his feet were burnt; but, all these having produced no

sensation in him, he was thought decidedly dead. As they were on the

point of placing him in his coffin, some one recommended that he should

be bled in both arms and feet at the same time, which was immediately

done, and with such success that, to the astonishment of all, he

recovered from his apparent state of death. When he had entirely

recovered his senses, he declared that he had heard every word that had

been said, and that his only fear was that he would be buried alive.”

APPARENT DEATH IN PREGNANCY.

Hufeland (one of the greatest authorities on the subject in Germany),

in his essay upon the uncertainty of the signs of death, tells of a

case of the wife of Professor Camerer, of Tübingen, who was hysterical,

and had a fright in the sixth month of her pregnancy, which brought

on convulsions (eclampsia), which continued for four hours, when she

seemed to die completely. Two celebrated physicians, besides three

others of less note, regarded the case as ended in death, as all the

recognised signs of death were present. However, attempts to revive

her were at once resorted to, and were continued for five hours, when

all the medical attendants, except one, gave the case up, and left.

The physician who remained pulled off a blister-plaster that had

been put on one of the feet, when the lady gave feeble signs of life

by twitchings about the mouth. The doctor then renewed his efforts

to revive her, by various stimulating means, and by burning, and by

pricking the spine; but all in vain, for after her slight evidences of

revival, she seemed to die unmistakably. She lay in a state of apparent

death for six days, but there was a small space over the heart where a

little warmth could be detected by the hand, and on this account the

burial was put off. On the seventh day she opened her eyes, and slowly

revived, but was completely unconscious of all that had happened. She

then gave birth to a dead child, and soon thereafter recovered her

health completely.

* * * * *

[MORE CAREFUL EXAMINATION REQUIRED.]

From the _Lancet_, November 27, 1858, p. 561.

“THE DEAD ALIVE.

“It seems to be always desirable to obtain a contemporary record

of all unusual phenomena. It is so more especially where they are

of a somewhat indefinite character, and scarcely susceptible of

exaggeration. We know of none which are more so than the cases of

‘trance.’ These examples are both sufficiently unusual to deserve a

passing record, and sufficiently mysterious in their character to call

for a more careful investigation than it has hitherto been possible to

accord to them. We transcribe the facts of a recent instance, as they

are circumstantially detailed, and, no doubt, some of the surgeons of

Coventry will be able to afford their testimony as to the degree of

correspondence of this narrative with their observations. “The girl,

whose name is Amelia Hinks, is twelve or thirteen years of age, and

resides with her parents in Bridge Street, Nuneaton. She had lately

appeared to be sinking under the influence of some ill-explained

disorder, and about three weeks since, as her friends imagined, she

died. The body was removed to another room. It was rigid and icy cold.

It was washed and laid out with all due funeral train. The limbs were

decently placed, the eyelids closed and penny-pieces laid over them.

The coffin was ordered. For more than forty-eight hours the supposed

corpse lay beneath the winding-sheet, when it happened that her

grandfather, coming from Leamington to assist in the last mournful

ceremonies, went to see the corpse. The old man removed a penny-piece,

and he thought that the corpse winked! There was a convulsive movement

of the lid. This greatly disturbed his composure; for, though he had

heard that she died with her eyes open, he was unprepared for this

palpebral signal of her good understanding with death. A surgeon is

said to have been summoned, who at first treated the matter as a

delusion, but subsequently ascertained stethoscopically that there

was still slight cardiac pulsation. The body was then removed to a

warm room, and gradually the returning signs of animation became

unequivocal. When speech was restored, the girl described many things

which had taken place since her supposed death. She knew who had

closed her eyes and placed the coppers thereon. She also heard the

order given for her coffin, and could repeat the various remarks made

over her as she lay in her death-clothes. She refused food, though in

a state of extreme debility. She has since shown symptoms of mania,

and is now said to have relapsed into a semi-cataleptic condition. The

parents are ‘creditable people,’ and there is no apparent ruse in this

unusually romantic history, which is causing considerable excitement

in Nuneaton and its neighbourhood.”

* * * * *

From the _Lancet_, December 18, 1858, p. 642.

“‘THE DEAD ALIVE.’

“(To the Editor of the _Lancet_.)

“Sir,--An article, ‘The Dead Alive,’ in your impression of the 27th

ultimo, demands of me a veritable statement of the case alluded to.

The subject of the inquiry is still living, and for some time past has

afforded me scope for observation.

[THE DEAD ALIVE.]

“I have only been waiting for a termination of the case, either in

convalescence or death, to enable me to give to the profession,

through your valuable columns, a full and truthful history of this

rare and curious case, replete with interest. The exaggerated

statement which has gone the round of the press has produced such

great curiosity in this immediate neighbourhood that I have been

applied to by many parties, professional and non-professional, to be

permitted to see the case, the parents of the patient having refused

admittance to all strangers.

“The case having extended over a long period, and fearing a detailed

account might occupy too much of your valuable space, I have condensed

the matter as much as possible; but should the profession consider

the case worthy of a more enlarged history, I will gladly, at some

future period, meet their wishes, as far as my rough notes, aided by

my memory, will supply it.

“In August, 1858, I was requested to visit Miss Amelia Hincks, aged

twelve years and nine months, daughter of a harness-maker, and

residing with her parents in Bridge Street, Nuneaton. She was supposed

to be suffering from pulmonary consumption.... On October 18, about

half-past three a.m., she apparently died. She is said to have groaned

heavily, waved her hands (which was a promised sign for her mother

to know that the hour of her departure was come), turned her head

a little to the light, dropped her jaw, and _died_. In about half

an hour after her supposed departure she was washed, and attired in

clean linen, the jaw was tied by a white handkerchief, penny-pieces

laid over her eyes, her hands, semi-clenched, placed by her side,

and her feet tied together by a piece of tape. She was then carried

into another room, laid on a sofa, and covered over with a sheet. She

appeared stiff and cold, two large books were placed on her feet, and

I have no doubt she was considered to be a sweet corpse.

“About nine a.m., the grandfather of the supposed dead went into the

death-chamber to give a last kiss to his grandchild, when he fancied

he saw a convulsive movement of the eyelid, he having raised one of

the coins. He communicated this fact to the parents and mourning

friends, but they ridiculed the old man’s statement, and said the

movement of the eyelids was owing to the nerves working after death.

Their theory, however, did not satisfy the experienced man of eighty

years, and he could not reconcile himself to her death. As soon as

I reached home, after having been out in the country all night, I

was requested to see the child, to satisfy the old man that she was

really dead. About half-past ten a.m. I called; and immediately

on my entrance into the chamber I perceived a tremulous condition

of the eyelids, such as we frequently see in hysterical patients.

The penny-pieces had been removed by the grandfather. I placed a

stethoscope over the region of the heart, and found that organ

performing its functions perfectly and with tolerable force. I then

felt for a radial pulse, which was easily detected, beating feebly,

about seventy-five per minute. The legs and arms were stiff and cold,

and the capillary circulation was so congested as at first sight to

resemble incipient decomposition. I carefully watched the chest, which

heaved quietly but almost imperceptibly; and immediately unbandaged

the maiden, and informed her mourning parents that she was not dead.

Imagine their consternation! The passing-bell had rung, the shutters

were closed, the undertaker was on his way to measure her for her

coffin, and other necessary preparations were being made for her

interment. [The writer then proceeds to give interesting details as to

the treatment of the case, and the means taken to promote recovery.]

“RICHARD BIRD MASON, M.R.C.S., L.S.A.

“Bridge Street, Nuneaton, December 14, 1858.”

From the _Lancet_, March 5, 1859, p. 254.

“TRANCE.

“Another case of trance is reported, in addition to those which we

have lately recorded. A widow named Aufray, about sixty years of age,

of St. Agnan de Cenuières (Eure), long seriously ill, became suddenly

worse, grew cold and motionless, and, as it was thought, dead. She

was laid out, the coffin ordered, and the church bell tolled. She

recovered consciousness just before the funeral was to take place.”

THE QUESTION OF PREMATURE BURIAL BEFORE THE FRENCH SENATE.

[FRENCH CASES.]

The _Medical Times_, London, 1866, vol. i., p. 258, under the heading

“Buried Alive” remarks as follows:--“The abundance of other topics

hinders us at present from saying more than a few words on the

conditions under which there may be real danger of burial before life

is quite extinct. Now, we will only reproduce the cases reported by

Cardinal Archbishop Donnet, in the French Senate, in a discussion

on a petition that the time between death and burial should be

lengthened. We will add one instance, which we have heard on the best

authority:--About thirty years ago, a young woman of eighteen, daughter

of Madame Laligand, living in the Rue des Tonnelliers, at Beaune,

in Burgundy, was supposed to have died. The ordinary measures were

taken for interment. The body was put in a coffin, and taken to the

church; the funeral service was said, and the _cortége_ set out for

the cemetery; but on the road between the church and the cemetery the

supposed dead recovered power of motion and speech, was removed from

the coffin, put to bed, recovered, married, and lived eighteen years

afterwards. She said she retained her consciousness during the whole

of her supposed death, and had counted the nails that were driven

into her coffin. Statements such as these, and such as those made by

the Archbishop, will surely be subjected to the ordeal of a French

scientific commission, and we may suspend our judgment for the present.

To return to his Eminence. He said he had the very best reasons for

believing that the victims of hasty interments were more numerous than

people supposed. He considered the rules and regulations prescribed by

the law very judicious; but, unfortunately, they were, particularly in

the country, not always executed as they should be, nor was sufficient

importance attached to them. In the village he was stationed in as

an assistant-curate in the first period of his sacerdotal life, he

saved two persons from being buried alive. The first an aged man, who

lived twelve hours after the hour prescribed for his interment by the

municipal officer; the second was a man who was quite restored to life.

In both cases a trance more prolonged than usual was taken for actual

death. The other instances, says the _Times’_ correspondent, I give in

the words of the Archbishop:--

“‘The next case that occurred to me was at Bordeaux. A young lady, who

bore one of the most distinguished names in the Department, had passed

through what was supposed the last agony, and, as apparently all was

over, the father and mother were torn away from the heartrending

spectacle. As God willed it, I happened to pass the door of the house

at the moment, when it occurred to me to call and inquire how the

young lady was going on. When I entered the room, the nurse, finding

the body breathless, was in the act of covering the face, and, indeed,

there was every appearance that life had departed. Somehow or other,

it did not seem to me so certain as to the bystanders. I lady not to

give up all hope--that I was come to cure her, and that I was about

to pray by her side. “You do not see me,” I said, “but you hear what

I am saying.” My presentiments were not unfounded. The word of hope I

uttered reached her ear and effected a marvellous change, or, rather,

called back the life that was departing. The young girl survived; she

is now a wife, and mother of children, and this day is the happiness

of two most respectable families.’

“The Archbishop mentioned another instance of a similar revival in a

town in Hungary during the cholera of 1831, which he heard that day

from one of his colleagues of the Senate, as they were mounting the

staircase. But the last related is so interesting, and made such a

sensation, that it deserves to be repeated in his own words:--

[CARDINAL DONNET’S EXPERIENCE.]

“‘In the summer of 1826, on a close summer day, in a church which was

exceedingly crowded, a young priest, who was in the act of preaching,

was suddenly seized with giddiness in the pulpit. The words he was

uttering became indistinct; he soon lost the power of speech, and

sank down on the floor. He was taken out of the church and carried

home. All was thought to be over. Some hours after, the funeral bell

was tolled, and the usual preparations made for the interment. His

eyesight was gone: but if he could see nothing, like the young lady I

have alluded to he could hear, and I need not say that what reached

his ears was not calculated to reassure him. The doctor came, examined

him, and pronounced him dead; and after the usual inquiries as to

his age and the place of his birth, etc., gave permission for his

interment next morning. The venerable bishop, in whose cathedral the

young priest was preaching when he was seized with the fit, came to

his bedside to recite the “De Profundis.” The body was measured for

the coffin. Night came on, and you will easily feel how inexpressible

was the anguish of the living being in such a situation. At last,

amid the voices murmuring around him, he distinguished that of one

whom he had known from infancy. That voice produced a marvellous

effect and superhuman effort. Of what followed I need say no more

than that the seemingly dead man stood next day in the same pulpit.

That young priest, gentlemen, is the same man who is now speaking

before you, and who, more than forty years after that event, implores

those in authority, not merely to watch vigilantly over the careful

execution of the legal prescriptions with regard to interments, but

to enact fresh ones in order to prevent the recurrence of irreparable

misfortunes.’”

To this report of the _Medical Times_ it may be added that the

petition of M. de Carnot furnished statistics showing the frequency of

these terrible disasters, and suggested various preventive measures,

including the establishment of mortuaries, a longer interval between

death and burial, and the application of scientific methods of

restoration where decomposition is not manifest. The reality of the

terrible dangers, as pointed out by Cardinal Donnet, was confirmed by

Senators Tourangin and Viscount de Baral, in the recital of other cases

of premature interment.

When the subject was revived in the Senate on January 29, 1869--on

which occasion five petitions were presented, urging important reforms,

and detailing other cases of premature interment,--Cardinal Donnet

again took part in the debate, and urged that no burial should be

permitted without the signature of a doctor or officer of health, as

well as the written authorisation of the Mayor, so that the fact of

death might always be verified. The Cardinal then furnished particulars

of another recent case of premature interment in l’Est, and recalled

the fact that one of their honourable colleagues of the Senate, M. le

Comte de la Rue, had had a narrow escape from live sepulture.

The several petitions were forwarded to the Minister of the Interior,

but nothing was done to remedy the evil.

From the _Lancet_, June 2, 1866, p. 611.

“ON SUSPENDED ANIMATION.

“In the course of the address delivered by Dr. Brewer to the Guardians

of St. George’s at St. James’s Hall, he adverted to the ‘laying-out’

case at St. Pancras.... Dr. Brewer ... dwelt upon the question of

suspended animation in a passage which really deserves to be quoted....

[CASE REPORTED BY DR. BREWER.]

“‘I have been more than once under a condition of apparently suspended

respiration, and with circumstances less comfortable than those

related of this babe; and yet, active as is my brain, and sensitive

as is my body, I remember as well as though it were but yesterday

that, on being restored to consciousness, no feeling of discomfort

of any kind attended my experience on either occasion. It is under

the truth to say I have known a score of cases of those who have been

supposed dead being reanimated. It is not many months ago a friend of

mine, a rector of a suburban parish, was pronounced by his medical

attendant to be dead. His bed was arranged, and the room left in its

silence. His daughter had re-entered and sat at the foot, and the

solemn toll of his own church bell was vibrating through the chamber,

when a hand drew aside the closed curtain, and a voice came from the

occupant of the bed--“Elizabeth, my dear, what is that bell tolling

for?” The daughter’s response was, perhaps, an unfortunate one: “_For

you, papa._” Schwartz, the first eminent Indian missionary, was roused

from his supposed death by hearing his favourite hymn sung over him

previous to the last rites being performed, and his resuscitation made

known by his joining in the verse.’”

Dr. B. W. Richardson quotes a case in the _Lancet_, 1888, vol.

ii., p. 1179, of a man who, in 1869, was rendered cataleptic by a

lightning-stroke, and who narrowly escaped living burial.

Dr. Moore Russell Fletcher in his work on “Suspended Animation,” p. 26,

says:--

“In June, 1869, a girl in Cleveland, Ohio, was taken ill, and after a

short sickness died, and was laid out for burial; but as her mother

insisted that she was not dead, efforts were made for some time to

restore her to life, but in vain. Her mother, however, refused to let

her be buried; and on the fifth day after that set for the funeral

the slamming of a door aroused her, so that she recovered. She stated

that, during most of the eight days which she lay there, she was

conscious and heard what was said, although wholly unable to make the

least motion.”

Dr. M. S. Tanner in a letter to the _New York Times_, January 18, 1880,

mentions two cases where persons awakened from trance at the moment of

sepulture described in turn what their feelings had been. Said one:--

“Have you ever felt the paralysing influence of a horrible nightmare?

If you have had such experience, then you are prepared to conceive of

the mental agonies I endured when I realised that my friends believed

me dead, and were making preparations for my burial. The hours and

days of mental struggle spent in the vain endeavour to break loose

from the vice-like grasp of this worse than horrible nightmare was a

hell of torment such as no tongue can describe or pen portray.”

[VERDICT OF FOURTEEN PHYSICIANS.]

The other instance mentioned by Dr. Tanner is that of Dr. Johnson of

St. Charles, Illinois, who in the hearing of Dr. Tanner, and in the

presence of a large audience in Harrison’s Hall, Minneapolis, stated

that when a young man he was prostrated with a fever. He swooned away,

apparently dead. His attending physician said he was dead. His father

was faithless and unbelieving, and refused to bury him. He lay in this

condition, apparently dead, fourteen days. The attending physician

brought other physicians to examine the apparently lifeless form, and

all stated unqualifiedly, “He is dead.” Some fourteen physicians, among

them many eminent professors, examined the body, and there was no

ambiguity in the expression of their conclusion that the boy was dead.

But the father still turned a deaf ear to all entreaties to prepare

the body for the grave. Public feeling was at last aroused. The health

officer and other city officers, acting in their official capacity, and

by the advice of physicians, peremptorily demanded that the body be

interred without delay. On the fourteenth day the father yielded under

protest; preparations were made for the funeral, when the emotions of

the still living subject, who was conscious of all transpiring around

him, were so intense as to be the means of his deliverance. He awoke

from his trance.

From the _Lancet_, June 7, 1884, p. 1058.

“IMPORTANT SUGGESTION FROM AN M.D.

“(To the Editor of the _Lancet_.)

“Sir,--Without venturing to express an opinion on the case mentioned

by the Rev. D. Williams[5] in the _Lancet_ of the 24th inst., I

would beg to say that I have no doubt in my own mind but that people

are sometimes ‘buried alive.’ An instance has come to my knowledge

where this catastrophe was only avoided by a mere accident. A lady,

about forty-five years of age, the wife of a clergyman in a northern

county, was taken ill, and after some time, as was supposed, died.

The funeral was delayed, and so was the closing of the coffin, in

consequence of the absence of a son of the lady from home. When the

boy arrived, the kissing, wailing, and commotion roused the supposed

dead woman, and brought her to consciousness in her coffin. This

lady would most probably have been buried alive were it not that the

obsequies were delayed on account of the circumstance mentioned.

“Now, may not cases more or less similar to this sometimes occur, with

the catastrophe of ‘buried alive’ added to them? But no such case

could happen if it were made compulsory that the interment of a body

should not be allowed to take place until after decomposition had set

in, as attested by a medical man.

“I am, Sir, yours truly,

“WM. O’NEILL, M.D.

“Lincoln, May 26, 1884.”

It is not always safe to conclude that persons enfeebled by age, or

exhausted by long and severe illness, and pronounced dead by the

attendant doctor, are really so. _The Undertakers’ Journal_, August 23,

1886, has the following:--

“It appears that George O. Daniels, of Clinton, Kentucky, had been ill

for several months, and at length, to all appearance, died. The body

was put in a coffin, where it remained for twenty hours, awaiting the

arrival of relatives to attend the funeral. At midnight the watchers

who surrounded the coffin were startled by a deep groan emanating from

it, and all but one, a German of the name of Wabbeking, rushed from

the room. Wabbeking remained, and as the groans continued he raised

the coffin-lid and saw that Daniels was alive. Seizing the body he

placed it upright. A few spasmodic gasps, a shudder, and the corpse

spoke. The relatives returned to find the man sitting in a chair, and

conversing with reasonable strength. Mr. Daniels claims to have been

perfectly conscious of everything which passed around him, but says he

was unable to move a muscle. He heard the sobs of his relatives when

he was pronounced dead by the doctors, and noticed the preparations

for the funeral. He is about eighty years of age.”

The same journal for July 23, 1888, reports the following under the

head of

“RETURNED TO LIFE TWICE.

[RETURNED TO LIFE TWICE.]

“The following details are given by the Cincinnati correspondent of

the _New York Herald_ from Memphis, Tennessee:--Mrs. Dicie Webb keeps

a grocery store on Beale Street, and is well known to hundreds. Two

years ago John Webb, a son of Mrs. Webb, married Sarah Kelly, a pretty

girl, to whom the mother-in-law became greatly attached. Before one

year of their married life had passed, Mrs. Webb, jun., was stricken

with consumption, and on several occasions came near dying. About a

month ago the young woman became very anxious to visit her parents in

Henderson County, and she was taken there. At first she appeared much

improved, and hopes were felt that her life might be preserved through

the summer, but two weeks ago last Tuesday a telegram announced her

death, and the husband hurried to her parents’ home. Three days later

he returned with the corpse. The mother-in-law pleaded so hard for a

sight of the dead woman, that finally, despite the belief that the

body was badly decomposed, it was decided to open the coffin. While

looking at the placid face Mrs. Webb was terrified at beholding the

eyelids of the dead woman slowly opening. The eyes did not have the

stony stare of death, nor the intelligent gleam of life. Mrs. Webb

was unable to utter a sound. She could not move, but stood gazing at

the gruesome sight. Her horror was increased when the supposed corpse

slowly sat upright and, in an almost inaudible voice, said, ‘Oh,

where am I?’ At this the weeping woman screamed. Friends who rushed

into the room were almost paralysed at the sight, and fled shrieking.

But one bolder than the others returned and spoke to the woman, who

asked to be laid on the bed. Hastily she was taken from the coffin

and cared for. In the course of the day the resurrected woman fully

regained her mental powers. The day following she related a wonderful

story. She said she was cognisant of all that occurred, and did not

lose consciousness until she was put aboard the train for Memphis.

Soon after being placed in her mother-in-law’s house she came to her

senses and knew all that was passing. While her mother-in-law was

looking at her she made a supreme effort to speak. Mrs. Webb lived a

number of days, when she again apparently died. The doctors pronounced

her dead, and she was once more placed in the coffin. While the

mother-in-law was taking her final farewell she heard a voice whisper,

‘Mother, don’t cry.’ Looking into the girl’s face, she saw the same

look that she had noticed before. She called for help, and several

women responded. Some one cried, ‘Shake her; she’s not dead.’ In the

excitement of the moment, the women, it is thought, shook the life out

of the poor consumptive, and last Saturday she was buried. The family

and friends have endeavoured to keep the matter quiet.”

The _Daily Telegraph_, January 26, 1889, reports:--

“A NARROW ESCAPE.

“A Rochester correspondent telegraphs that a woman named Girvin,

living at Burham, near Rochester, has just had a narrow escape of

being buried alive. She fell into a kind of trance, which was mistaken

for death. The coffin was ordered, and the usual preparations made for

a funeral. But while a number of the relatives were gathered at the

bedside bewailing their bereavement, the supposed corpse startled them

by suddenly rising up in bed and asking what was the matter. The woman

is making good progress towards convalescence.”

And on July 6, 1889, the same journal says:--

[A CASE AT ST. LEONARDS.]

“Our St. Leonards correspondent telegraphs:--About a week ago the wife

of a well-known tradesman in St. Leonards fell ill, and on Monday

night last the doctor gave his opinion that she could not live through

the next day. On Tuesday morning at ten o’clock the doctor pronounced

his patient dead, the nurse who was in attendance confirming the

opinion. The intimation of death naturally created great distress

among the friends of the woman, who was laid out in grave-clothes,

washed, and prepared for burial, and, being a Roman Catholic, a

crucifix was placed in her hand as she lay on her bier. When it was

announced that the woman was dying, a priest was sent for; but he

could not attend, as he was out of the town at the time.

“About a quarter to ten on Tuesday night the nurse entered the room

without a light for the purpose of getting something which she knew

where to find. Whilst in the darkened chamber she was startled to

hear a slight cry proceeding from the bed where the body lay, and

she rushed from the room in a terrible fright. The widower, hearing

the scream of fright, rushed into the chamber with a light, and was

astounded to find that his wife had raised herself up in the bed on

her elbow. She faintly uttered the words, ‘Where am I?’ and again

relapsed into a heavy sleep. The opportunity was seized of changing

the shroud for proper habiliments, and in about an hour and a half

she woke again perfectly conscious. Next morning she was told of what

had occurred, but was quite ignorant of everything that had passed,

thinking she had only had a long sleep. She is now doing well, and it

is hoped she will soon be restored to health and strength. The doctor

describes the case as the most remarkable he has ever met with in his

experience.”

Dr. Frederick A. Floyer, of Mortimer, Berks, published the

following-case in the _Tocsin_, November 1, 1889, vol. i., p. 84, under

the head of “Premature Burial”:--

“A narrow escape of this was recently communicated direct to the

writer, and as it has some extremely important bearings on the value

of what are usually considered to be evidences of death, we give it as

told by the survivor, who is still alive in the form of a cheery and

intelligent old lady in the fullest possession of her faculties and

memory.

“Herself the wife of a medical officer attached to the--th Regiment,

she was stationed at---- Island, where at the age of twenty-eight she

was safely confined. Shortly after this she was walking out with an

attendant when she was taken suddenly ill with a painful spasm of the

heart--what appears to have been an attack of angina pectoris--and was

conveyed in-doors and propped up with pillows, suffering great pain,

and although medical attendance was summoned, nothing was of avail,

and she died--at least in the opinion of those around her, who paid

the proper attention to what they regarded as a corpse. It was the

custom there to bury at sundown any one who died during the day. We

understand that in warm countries it is difficult to close the eyelids

properly, and so this lady, lying motionless and rigid, contemplated

with perfectly clear perception, but with an utter indifference, the

bringing in of the coffin and the necessary preparations for her

interment; she remembers her children coming to take a last look at

her, and then being taken down stairs.

“She would never have lived to tell the story but for an accident,

which happened in this way. Her nurse, who was much attached to her,

was stroking her face and the muscles of her jaw, and presently

declared she heard a sound of breathing. Medical assistance was

summoned, and the mirror test applied, but the surface was undimmed.

Then, to make sure, they opened a vein in each arm, but no blood

flowed. No limb responded to stimulus, and they declared that the nurse

was mistaken, and that the body was dead beyond doubt.

“But the nurse persisted in her belief and in her attentions, and did

succeed in establishing a sign of life. Then mustard applications to

her feet and to the back of her neck, and burnt feathers applied to her

nostrils, which she remembered burning her nose, completed her return

to consciousness.”

* * * * *

From the _Pall Mall Gazette_, May 11, 1891.

[CERTIFICATE OF APOPLEXY.]

“NARROW ESCAPE FROM BEING BURIED ALIVE.

“A Penn Station telegram to Dalziel says:--A singular case of

simulation of death from fright occurred here on Saturday. Mrs.

Sarseville, the wife of a farmer in this county, was in the cow-house

attending to the dairy work when she saw a nest of squirming snakes

through a hole in the plank floor. She fell to the ground apparently

lifeless with fright. Help was summoned, and she was carried into the

house. Before the physician arrived Mrs. Sarseville had begun to turn

black, and he pronounced her dead, giving a certificate, in which he

assigned apoplexy as the cause. During the night Mrs. Sarseville’s

daughter sat beside the coffin of her mother, lamenting her death.

Just before daybreak she was startled to see the body move. She was

more shocked when her mother opened her eyes and sat bolt upright in

her coffin. The supposed corpse was no less startled than the girl

to find herself dressed in grave-clothes and lying in a coffin. Help

was summoned, and the lady helped out of her narrow bed and into

her ordinary clothes. She took breakfast with the family yesterday

morning, and seemed none the worse for her ghastly experience.”

From the _British Medical Journal_, March 12, 1892, p. 577.

“A NARROW ESCAPE FROM PREMATURE BURIAL.

“The _Temps_ publishes a case of premature burial prevented by the

daughter of the supposed dead man, who, on kissing her father,

perceived that his body was not cold. The funeral _cortége_ was

on the point of starting. Suitable measures restored the man to

consciousness, and he opened his eyes and uttered one or two words.

His condition is serious, but he is alive. This incident occurred at

Vagueray, near Lyons.”

From the _Echo_, London, May 13, 1893.

“ALMOST BURIED WHILE ALIVE.

“Limoges, May 13.

“A woman has just had a narrow escape of being buried alive here. She

was subject to epileptic fits, and during one of these a few days ago

was pronounced to be dead. The arrangements for interment were made in

due course, and as the coffin was being borne into the church some of

the mourners said they heard a knocking inside. The party listened,

and distinct taps were heard. No time was lost in wrenching off the

lid of the coffin. It was then found that the woman was alive and

conscious, although terribly frightened at the awful ordeal through

which she had passed. A doctor was quickly in attendance, and under

his direction the supposed corpse was removed from the coffin and

placed on a litter for conveyance home again.”

The _Undertakers’ Journal_, July 22, 1893, says:--

“Charles Walker was supposed to have died suddenly at St. Louis a

few days ago, and a burial certificate was obtained in due course

from the coroner’s office. The body was lying in the coffin, and the

relatives took a farewell look at the features, and withdrew as the

undertaker’s assistants advanced to screw down the lid. One of the

undertaker’s men noticed, however, that the position of the body in

the coffin seemed to have undergone some slight change, and called

attention to the fact. Suddenly, without any warning, the ‘corpse’ sat

up in the coffin and gazed round the room. A physician was summoned,

restoratives were applied, and in half an hour the supposed corpse was

in a warm bed, sipping weak brandy and water, taking a lively interest

in the surroundings. Heart-failure had produced a species of syncope

resembling death that deceived even experts.”

From the _Undertakers’ Journal_, August 22, 1893.

“SNATCHED FROM DEATH AT THE GRAVESIDE.

“A marvellous case of suspended animation is described from the

British colony of Lagos, where an old woman named Oseni came to

life when she was at the cemetery about to be buried. The mourners

had assembled at the cemetery, and, in accordance with the Mahomedan

rule, the body was lifted from the coffin to be buried, when several

distinct coughs were given by the supposed corpse. She was at once

released from the clothes which bound her, and the old woman, to the

surprise and amazement of those present, sat upright and opened her

eyes. Some gruel was then procured, of which she partook with evident

relish.”

From the _Daily Telegraph_, London, December 12, 1893.

[FOUR DAYS’ APPARENT DEATH.]

“A LADY NEARLY BURIED ALIVE.

“Berlin, December 11.

“From Militsch, in Silesia, an extraordinary case of trance is

reported. It seems that, owing to the grave not being in readiness,

some delay occurred in the burial of a lady, the wife of a major in

the army, who to all appearance had died. On the fourth day after

the lady’s supposed death the maid was placing fresh flowers round

the coffin, when she was much startled at seeing the body move, and

finally assume an erect position. The lady had evidently been in a

state of coma during the past four days, and narrowly escaped being

buried alive.”

The _Banner of Light_, Boston, July 28, 1894, quotes the following case

of apparent sudden death from the _Boston Post_:--

“COFFINED ALIVE!

“Sprakers, a village not far from Rondout, N.Y., was treated to a

sensation Tuesday, July 10, by the supposed resurrection from the dead

of Miss Eleanor Markham, a young woman of respectability, who to all

appearance had died on Sunday, July 8.

“Miss Markham about a fortnight ago complained of heart trouble, and

was treated by Dr. Howard. She grew weaker gradually, and on Sunday

morning apparently breathed her last, to the great grief of her

relatives, by whom she was much beloved. The doctor pronounced her

dead, and furnished the usual burial certificate.

“Undertaker Jones took charge of the funeral arrangements. On account

of the warm weather it was decided that the interment should take

place Tuesday, and in the morning Miss Markham was put in the coffin.

“After her relatives had taken the last look on what they supposed was

their beloved dead, the lid of the coffin was fastened on, and the

undertaker and his assistant took it to the hearse waiting outside.

As they approached the hearse a noise was heard, and the coffin was

put down and opened in short order. Behold! there was poor Eleanor

Markham lying on her back, her face white and contorted, and her eyes

distended.

“‘My God!’ she cried, in broken accents. ‘Where am I? You are burying

me alive.’ ‘Hush! child,’ said Dr. Howard, who happened to be present.

‘You are all right. It is a mistake easily rectified.’

“The girl was then taken into the house and placed on the bed,

when she fainted. While the doctor was administering stimulating

restoratives the trappings of woe were removed, and the hearse drove

away with more cheerful rapidity than a hearse was ever driven before.

* * * * *

“‘I was conscious all the time you were making preparations to bury

me,’ she said, ‘and the horror of my situation is altogether beyond

description. I could hear everything that was going on, even a whisper

outside the door, and although I exerted all my will-power, and made

a supreme physical effort to cry out, I was powerless.... At first I

fancied the bearers would not hear me, but when I felt one end of the

coffin falling suddenly, I knew that I had been heard.’

“Miss Markham is on a fair way to recovery, and what is strange is

that the flutterings of the heart that brought on her illness are

gone.”

From the _Echo_, January 18, 1895.

“MISTAKEN FOR DEAD--A WOMAN’S AWFUL EXPERIENCE.

“An extraordinary affair is reported from Heap Bridge, Heywood.

Yesterday a woman was supposed to have died, and she was washed, laid

out, and measured for her coffin, a piece of linen being placed over

her mouth. Eight hours later, however, as two women were engaged in

the room, the supposed corpse blew the linen away, and raised herself

up in bed. The two women were terribly frightened, and in their hasty

retreat both tumbled downstairs, and are now suffering from slight

injuries, as well as shock. Some time elapsed before any one else

could be induced to enter the house, but eventually several persons

went in together, and found the woman still sitting up in bed. She

was exceedingly weak. Later, however, she succumbed, and the doctor

expressed the opinion that her death was accelerated by shock. During

the night the woman conversed with her son, who had carried her

upstairs for dead, and told him of the awful sensation she felt whilst

unable to speak during the washing and laying out of her body.”

The following letter appeared in the London _Daily Chronicle_ of

September 24, 1895:--

[A HUSBAND’S PROMISE.]

“BURIED ALIVE.

“Sir,--To your interesting correspondence on ‘Buried Alive,’ I would

add the following, which I had directly from the mouth of one who but

for the faithfulness of her husband would probably have been added to

the number. I knew her quite well. She was the daughter of a physician

in my native town, and her husband was a professor of music, and I

will tell the incident as nearly as I can remember in her own words.

She said:--‘I had in my early married life a dread of there being any

mistake made about my death, and begged my husband that, should he

survive me, he would watch my body himself, which he promised he would

do. Some time after this, I was overtaken by a most terrible attack

of fever, succeeded by entire exhaustion, and I, as my attendants

believed, died, and was accordingly laid out for burial. My good

husband was true to his promise, and he, with my sister, watched the

corpse, and in the night they perceived some indication of returning

life, and of course means were used for restoration.’

“I cannot be quite sure how many years she lived after, but she had

brought up at the time I speak of a family of four sons and one

daughter, and she lived to a good old age.--Yours truly,

“CASSANDRA M----.

“September 18.”

Speaking on the subject of premature burial the other day, a well-known

London publisher told the author that he personally knew a lady, the

daughter of a British Consul, who had been taken for dead on two

separate occasions. On the first occasion the lady had been placed in

her coffin, and the lid screwed down ready for interment. A friend who

had known the supposed deceased called to condole with the family,

and said:--“I should like to have a last look at dear L---- if you

will only permit me.” The lid was accordingly removed, and the visitor

detected, as it seemed to her, signs of life in her friend; she was

taken out of her coffin, put in a warm bath, and recovered. Some years

later the same lady fell into a cataleptic state after a fever, and

was taken for dead. Preparations had been made for the funeral in

both instances, but delayed beyond the usual time for interment. She

returned to consciousness, and is now living.

Dr. Moore Russell Fletcher in “Suspended Animation and the Danger of

Burying Alive,” p. 62, writes:--

“‘Seven hours in a coffin added ten years to my life,’ was the remark

of Martin Strong, of Twelfth Street, Philadelphia, some time after

quitting the coffin in which his family had placed him for burial,

after Dr. Cummings had given a certificate of his death. Frank Stoop,

of Clarinda, Iowa, was laid out for burial not long since, a physician

having certified to his death; but fortunately he awoke from his state

of coma in time to save his life.”

AN ARMY SURGEON’S PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.

[DR. CHEW’S EXPERIENCES.]

Dr. R. G. S. Chew, of Calcutta, writing to the author, says:--“In

1873 I was a student in the Bishop’s High School, Poonah (Bombay

Presidency), where I used to be generally at the head of my class,

and when competing for the Science Prizes I was fully determined to

take the first prize or none. The Reverend---- Watson, Rector of St.

Mary’s Church and Chaplain to our school, knew my disposition, and

cautioned me against being too sanguine, lest disappointment might

tell very keenly. The disappointment came, and with it much nervous

excitability. Shortly after this (Christmas, 1873) my favourite sister

was seized with convulsions that carried her off. From the moment of

her decease to nearly a month after her interment I entirely lost the

power of speech. On the day of the funeral I was parched with thirst,

but could not drink, as the water seemed to choke me. My eyes were

burning and my head felt like bursting, but I could neither sob nor

cry. I felt quite dazed, and followed the procession to the cemetery,

where I stood motionless by the open grave; but as soon as they lowered

the little coffin into its resting-place I threw myself headlong into

the grave and fainted away. Some one pulled me out and carried me

home, where I lay in a sort of stupor for nine days, during which Dr.

Donaldson attended me most patiently, and I regained consciousness,

but was too weak to even sit up in bed. On the 16th January, 1874, I

felt a peculiar sensation as of something filling up my throat--no

swelling, no pain nor anything that pointed to throat affection--and

this getting worse and worse, in spite of everything, I _died_, as was

supposed, on the 18th of January, 1874, and was laid out for burial,

as the most careful examination failed to show the slightest traces of

life. I had been in this state for twenty hours, and in another three

hours would have been closed up for ever, when my eldest sister, who

was leaning over the head of my coffin crying over me, declared she

saw my lips move. The friends who had come to take their last look at

me tried to persuade her it was only fancy, but, as she persisted,

Dr. Donaldson was sent for to convince her that I was really dead.

For some unexplained reason he had me taken out of the coffin and

examined very carefully from head to foot. Noticing a peculiar, soft

fluctuating swelling at the base of my neck, just where the clavicles

meet the sternum, he went to his brougham, came back with his case of

instruments, and, before any one could stop him or ask what he was

going to do, laid open the tumour and plunged in a tracheotomy tube,

when a quantity of pus escaped, and, releasing the pressure on the

carotids and thyroid, was followed by a rush of blood and some movement

on my part that startled the doctor. Restoratives were used, and I was

slowly nursed back to life; but the tracheotomy tube (I _still_ carry

the scar) was not finally removed till September, 1875.”

“APPARENT DEATH FROM A FALL.

(_Communicated to the author by Dr. Chew._)

[APPARENT DEATH FROM A FALL.]

“A sowar--_i.e._, native trooper--of the 7th regiment of cavalry, in

1878, carrying despatches at Nowshera, was thrown from his horse,

and, falling with his head against a sharp stone in the road, rolled

on to his back, in which position he was found some six or seven

hours after, and conveyed to the morgue of the European Depôt Hospital

pending removal to the ‘lines’ of his own corps. There was very

little hæmorrhage, and the stone was still wedged in between the

temporo-parietal suture. Cardiac sounds and respiratory murmurs could

not be detected. The limbs were perfectly rigid, and there was a good

deal of cadaveric ecchymosis to be distinctly seen. Nothing would have

convinced any one that the sowar was still alive, and Surgeons-Major

Hunter, Gibson, and Briggs, Apothecary S. Pollock, Assistant-Surgeon

J. Lewis and myself _verily_ believed he was stone-dead. As ‘cause of

death’ is what the army is exceedingly particular about, Surgeon-Major

Hunter removed the impacted stone and lifted out portions of the

fractured bone (prior to holding a proper _post-mortem_), when to the

surprise of all of us ‘the corpse’ deliberately closed its eyes (which

were staring open when the body was first brought in), and there was

a slight serous hæmorrhage. On noticing this, the sowar’s head was

trephined--no chloroform or other anæsthetic being used--some more

fragments of bone and a large blood-clot that pressed on the brain were

removed, and as the sowar repeatedly flinched under this operation,

a stimulant was poured down his throat, and he was removed to his

regimental hospital, from which he was discharged ‘well’ some six

months and a half later. After this he did good service in the Afghan

and Egyptian campaigns.”

“APPARENT DEATH FROM CHOLERA.

“The cases of collapse and apparent death during epidemics of cholera

are very numerous, as will be seen by reference to medical literature.

We have now before us particulars of cases from the _Calcutta Journal

of Medicine_ for 1869, vol. ii., p. 383, where Dr. Charles Londe, of

Paris, observes that patients pronounced dead of cholera have been

repeatedly seen to move. See also, for Italy, _Lancet_, 1884, vol. ii.,

p. 655.

“A correspondent, signing himself T.E.N., in _To-Day_, October 12,

1895, says:--‘When acting as special correspondent to the _Evening

Herald_ in Hamburg during the cholera plague, I met a gentleman who

had been passed for dead and placed in the mortuary to await burial.

When the porters entered some hours later to remove the hundred or so

bodies, they found this gentleman sitting up in great pain, and very

much frightened. He was placed in a ward and recovered. About the same

time a little girl came to life actually at the graveside. She had been

brought in one of several four-horse vans that conveyed bodies for

interment in the Ohlsdorff grave-yard. Fortunately for her, she had

not been placed in a coffin, the exigencies of the time rendering it

impossible to provide caskets for the dead. When the disease began to

die out, the people found time to ask--“Can it be possible that life

remains in any of the bodies buried?” That the doctors in the latter

days cut the ulnar arteries of all subjects before passing them for

dead is full of significance.’”

[CASES COMMUNICATED BY DR. CHEW.]

The three following cases were communicated to the author, during

his sojourn in Calcutta, by Dr. Chew, in the early part of this year

(1896):--

“In March, 1877, Assistant-Surgeons H. A. Borthwick, S. Blake, H. B.

Rogers, and myself received orders to proceed from Rawal Pindi by

bullock-train to Peshawur to join the various regiments we were to

be posted to for duty. We had just passed a place called Rati when

Borthwick showed strong symptoms of cholera, from which he suffered

all that night. The nearest hospital was twenty-five miles behind us,

and though we had neither medicines nor sick-room comforts with us, we

had no alternative but to journey onwards, because the train-drivers

(Indians) refused to turn back, and if we did return to Rawal Pindi we

would have been court-martialled for disobeying lawful commands and

coming back without orders to do so. Travelling by bullock-train is

very slow work, and far from a comfortable mode of transit; however,

we were obliged to make the best of it, and early next morning

Borthwick was cold, stiff, and seemingly dead. Here was a fine state

of affairs--the nearest cantonment, which we had no expectation of

reaching (_i.e._, Nowshera) before nine p.m., was thirty-six miles

off, and by the time we arrived at it, it would have been too late to

approach the authorities, while Peshawur, our destination, was another

twenty-nine miles further off. Dispose of the body we dared not, and we

had no choice but to continue our route. All that day there was not a

movement or other sign to show that life was not extinct, and affairs

seemed no better by five p.m. next day, when we reached Peshawur. The

apparent corpse was lifted out of the bullock-train and carried into

the hospital dispensary (where a strong fire was blazing) preparatory

to papers being signed and arrangements made for its final disposal.

Whether it was the heat of the fire before which he was placed, or

whether the vibriones had produced an antitoxin, I am not prepared to

argue; but _we do know_ that Borthwick recovered consciousness while

lying on the bed in that dispensary, and that he whom we mourned as

dead returned to life. He served in the same military stations with me

in the North-West Frontier till 1880, when he accompanied me to the

Calcutta Medical College, where we parted company in February, 1882,

I bound for Egypt and he for frontier duty. At first we corresponded

regularly, but since 1885 we lost touch of each other.”

“REVIVAL IN A MORTUARY IN INDIA.

“Sergeant J. Clements Twining, of H.M.’s 109th regiment of British

infantry, located at Dinapoor in 1876, was brought in an unconscious

state to the hospital, supposed to be suffering from _coup de soleil_.

Everything that could be done was ineffectually tried to rouse him from

coma, and he was removed to the dead-house to wait _post-mortem_ next

morning. At two a.m. the sentry on the dead-house came rushing down

to the dispensary (about four hundred and fifty yards off) declaring

that he had seen and heard a ghost in the dead-house, to which myself

and the compounder and dresser on duty at once proceeded, to find that

Clements Twining, who was now partially conscious, was lying on the

dead-house flags groaning most piteously--he had rolled off the table

on to the floor. He returned to health, and in 1877 accompanied his

regiment to England, where I met him at Woolwich in 1883, and he asked

me to corroborate his story of ‘returning to life’ to certain of his

acquaintances who had refused to believe him.”

[THE USE OF MORTUARIES.]

“CHOLERA CORPSES REVIVED IN A MORTUARY.

“When the East Norfolk regiment was out cholera-dodging in 1878,

Colour-Sergeant T. Hall and Corporal W. Bellomy were sent into

cantonments for burial as cholera corpses in the Nowshera Cemetery.

There was some delay in the interment owing to a difficulty in

obtaining the wood necessary for their coffins, so both bodies

were placed in the dead-house, which was generously sprinkled with

disinfectants to ward off the risk of contagion. First Hall and then

Bellomy regained consciousness, and were duly returned to duty. The

following year Bellomy was ‘invalided’ to England, where I understand

he now enjoys the best of health.”

“Shortly after the Afghan war of 1878, Surgeon-Major T. Barnwell and

I were told off to take a large number of time-expired men, invalids,

and wounded, to Deolali on their way to England. Some of the wounded

were in a very critical state, necessitating great care; one man

in particular, Trooper Holmes of the 10th Hussars, who had an ugly

bullet-wound running along his left thigh and under the groin. Our only

means of transport for these poor fellows was the ‘palki’ or doolie

carried by four bearers at a curious swinging pace. When we got to

Nowshera, Holmes seemed on a fair way to recovery, but the swinging

of the doolie seemed too much for him, and he grew weaker day by day

till we got to Hassan Abdool, when we could not rouse him to take

some nourishment before starting on the march, and to all appearance

he seemed perfectly dead; but, as there was neither the time nor

convenience to hold a _post-mortem_, we carried the body on to ‘John

Nicholson,’ where, the same difficulties being in the way, and no

facilities for burial, we were obliged to put the _post-mortem_ off for

another day, and convey the corpse to Rawal Pindi rest camp, where we

laid him on the floor of the mortuary tent and covered him over with a

tarpaulin. This was his salvation, as next morning (_i.e._, the third

day succeeding his ‘death’), when we raised the tarpaulin to hold the

_post-mortem_, some hundreds of field mice (these tracts are _noted_

for them) rushed out, and we noticed that Holmes was breathing, though

very slowly--five or six respirations to the minute--and there were a

few teeth marks where the mice had attacked his calves. To prevent a

relapse by the jolting on further marches, we handed him over to the

station hospital staff, who pulled him round, and then forwarded him to

the headquarters of his regiment at Meerut.”

A lady, distinguished alike for her literary gifts as well as for her

philanthropy, sends me the following:--

“I am much obliged to you for sending me ‘Perils.’ It is a terrible

subject, and one that has haunted me all my life, insomuch that I have

never made a will without inserting a clause requiring my throat to be

cut before I am put underground. Of course one can have no reliance

on doctors whatever, and I have myself known a case in which a very

eminent one insisted on a coffin being screwed down because the corpse

looked so life-like and full of colour that the friends could not help

indulging in hopes.

[CASES IN IRELAND.]

“My great grandmother, after whom I am called, a famous heiress, was

a notable case of narrow escape. As a girl she passed into a state of

apparent death, and a great funeral was ordered for her. Among the

guests came a young girl friend, who insisted that she was not dead,

and raised such a stir that the funeral was postponed, and time was

allowed to pass till the marvel became that there were no signs of

change. I could never ascertain how long this comatose state lasted

before she recovered; but she _did_ recover, so thoroughly that after

her marriage with Richard Trench, of Garbuly, she became the mother

of twenty-two children. Obviously this was no case of a feeble,

hysterical, cataleptic subject. I will enclose photograph taken from a

miniature of her in a ring in my possession.

“There was another case, well known in Ireland in my youth, of a

Colonel Howard, who had a fine place (I think it was called Castle

Howard) in Wicklow. He was supposed to be dead, and a lead coffin

was actually made with his name and date of death on it; after which

Colonel Howard came to life, and had the plate of the coffin fixed over

his kitchen chimney as a warning to his servants not to bury people in

a hurry.”

Dr. Colin S. Valentine, LL.D., Principal of the Medical Missionary

Training College, Agra, N.W.P., told the author during his visit to

Agra, February, 1896, that Captain Young, an officer in the regiment of

which he (Dr. Valentine) was at that time army surgeon, who had been

dreadfully mauled while tiger-hunting in Madras, was laid out for dead,

and all the arrangements were made for his funeral at six o’clock that

evening, when consciousness returned, and he lived for twenty years

after.

In a lecture on “Signs of Death and Disposal of the Dead,” delivered by

Dr. A. Stephenson at Nottingham, January 9, 1896, the lecturer said “he

once attended a girl living in that locality who was in a trance. All

the preparations were made for her funeral, and the grave ordered. She

remained in a trance three days, and her mother was annoyed because he

would not sign her death-certificate. On the third day she slowly rose

and recovered. The girl would have been buried unless he had had a very

great fear of her being buried alive.”[6]

From the London _Echo_, March 3, 1896.

“NARROW ESCAPE OF A GREEK-ORTHODOX METROPOLITAN.

“A letter from Constantinople, in the _Politische Korrespondenz_,

gives a remarkable case of an apparent death which would have ended

in a premature burial but for the high ecclesiastical position of the

person concerned. On the 3rd of this month, Nicephorus Glycas, the

Greek-Orthodox Metropolitan of Lesbos, an old man in his eightieth

year, after several days of confinement to his bed, was reported by

the physician to be dead. The supposed dead bishop, in accordance

with the rules of the Orthodox Church, was immediately clothed in

his episcopal vestments, and placed upon the Metropolitan’s throne

in the great church of Methymni, where the body was exposed to the

devout faithful during the day, and watched by relays of priests day

and night. Crowds streamed into the church to take a last look at

their venerable chief pastor. On the second night of “the exposition

of the corpse,” the Metropolitan suddenly started up from his seat

and stared round him with amazement and horror at all the panoply

of death amidst which he had been seated. The priests were not less

horrified when the ‘dead’ bishop demanded what they were doing with

him? The old man had simply fallen into a death-like lethargy, which

the incompetent doctors had hastily concluded to be death. He is now

as hale and hearty as can well be expected from an octogenarian. But

here it is that the moral comes in. If Nicephorus Glycas had been a

layman he would most certainly have been buried alive. Fortunately for

him the Canon Law of the Orthodox Church does not allow a bishop to be

buried earlier than the third day after his death; whereas a layman,

according to the ancient Eastern custom, is generally buried about

twelve hours after death has been certified. The excitement which has

been aroused by the prelate’s startling resurrection may tend to set

men thinking more seriously about the frequent probability of the

cruel horror of the interment of living persons.”

The above-mentioned facts have been authenticated for the author by Dr.

Franz Hartmann, of Hallein, Austria.

NARROW ESCAPES OF SMALL-POX PATIENTS.

Many physicians who dispute the frequency of premature burials admit

that the liability to such catastrophes is considerable during

epidemics of small-pox, where extreme exhaustion, amounting to a

suspension of life, is distinguishable from actual death only by

patient and prolonged observation.

From the _Lancet_, June 21, 1884, p. 1150:--

“SUSPENDED ANIMATION AFTER SMALL-POX.

“Sir,--I send you privately names and addresses by means of which you

can test, if you please, the accuracy of the following statements,

which I forward for insertion in your journal:--

[APPARENT DEATHS AFTER SMALL-POX.]

“Some years since, a young man who had been attacked by small-pox

was declared by the medical man to be dead, and was laid out for

burial. The nurse, however, on paying a visit to the supposed corpse,

thinking there was something uncorpse-like about its appearance, put

a wine-glass over the mouth, and returning in a quarter of an hour,

found it dimmed with breath. He was resuscitated, and, so far as I

am aware, is still living. He would now be about forty-five. He is a

farmer.

“A mother and her baby were ill of small-pox, and seemed likely to

die. The grandmother, however, made the nurse promise that if death

appeared to ensue, and even if the medical man pronounced either or

both to be dead, she would put additional blankets on the one or

both, and leave them so till her (the grandmother’s) return, which

would not be till the next day. They both appeared to die, and were

declared dead by the doctor; but the nurse did as she had promised,

and the next day when the grandmother returned, they were both alive,

and were both living not very long since.

“Some twenty years ago, I was told that about forty years previously

a young man, in a parish where I was acquainted, was put in a coffin

as a person dead of small-pox; but when the bell was tolling for his

funeral, and he was about to be ‘screwed down,’ he got up and vacated

the coffin, and lived several years afterwards.

“In a town where I was brought up, a woman was nearly buried alive

through having gone into a trance on being frightened by a young lady

who had put on a white sheet and pretended to be a ‘ghost.’ For years

she was liable to long spells of insensibility, from which nothing

could rouse her.

“The haste with which small-pox corpses are disposed of nowadays is to

be deprecated. They are usually buried within twelve hours of their

supposed death, and the cases I first mentioned show with what very

probable results. The only sure proof of death is decomposition, and

a law ought to be passed forbidding burial until signs of it have

appeared. Not very long since I was in a church-yard where a drain

was being made round the church, and was not a little struck by the

horrified look of a labourer who came to the vicar and stated that

they had come on a skull face downward, which, he said, put it beyond

doubt that the person it had belonged to had turned in his coffin

after burial.--I am, Sir, yours faithfully,

“B. A.

“June 18, 1884.”

The _Undertakers’ Journal_, May 22, 1895, has the following:--

[REV. HARRY JONES’ CASES.]

“The Reverend Harry Jones, in his reminiscences, and as a London

clergyman, declares his conviction that in times of panic from fatal

epidemics it is not unlikely that some people are buried alive.

Mr. Jones recalls a case within his knowledge of a young woman

pronounced to be dead from cholera, and actually laid out for the

usual collecting cart to call from the undertakers, when a neighbour

happened to come in and lament over her. The story continues thus:

‘And is poor Sarah really dead?’ she cried. ‘Well,’ said her mother,

‘she is, and she will soon be fetched away; but if you can do anything

you may do it.’ Acting on this permission the practical neighbour set

about rubbing Sarah profusely with mustard. Sarah sat up, stung into

renovated life, and so far recovered as to marry; ‘and I myself,’ says

Mr. Jones, ‘christened four or five of her children in the course of

the next few years.’ In another case, within Mr. Jones’ parochial

experiences in London, a man employed as potman lay _in extremis_. A

doctor was called in, who said ‘Turn him on his face, and I will put

a thick strip of flannel soaked in spirits of wine down his spine. We

will see what that will do.’ A sister brought a store of flannel, the

doctor soaked it in spirit, and prepared to apply it as he proposed.

First, however, he placed the soaking mass in a heap (almost as big as

a small hassock) in the middle of his back. Meanwhile the sister leant

forward with a candle and accidently set the hassock on fire. ‘This,’

adds the anecdotist, ‘woke the potman up;’ and not very long ago the

doctor told me he had seen him in a street near the Oxford Circus.”

From the _Daily Chronicle_, September 19, 1895.

“Sir,--I infer from the following facts that numbers of persons are

buried alive after being supposed to have succumbed to small-pox.

“Some years ago, at St. Paul’s, Belchamp, near Clare, a young man who

had been down with the small-pox was pronounced to be dead, and was

put into a coffin, which, fortunately, was left unclosed until after

the bell began to toll for his funeral, when he rose and stepped out.

He lived for many years after. In the same neighbourhood no less

than three other similar cases occurred, saving that the undertakers

were not so far forward in their work. Each of these would have been

buried alive but for the facts that in one case the nurse, having

suspicions, put a wine-glass over the mouth of the person (who had

been already ‘laid out’), and on returning in a quarter of an hour

found it dimmed with breath; and that in the other case the mother

of a mother, who with her baby was declared by the doctor to be dead,

had blankets heaped on them, and after a while had the satisfaction of

seeing them revive. Two of these three persons are, I believe, still

living, and would be just past middle-age. I enclose their names for

your private perusal, that you may verify my statements if desired.

The first-mentioned case happened about seventy years ago, but I heard

of it from residents in the neighbourhood about forty years after it

occurred.

“Nowadays as soon as a small-pox patient is supposed to be dead, he

or she is enclosed in a coffin and hurried off to the church-yard or

cemetery the ensuing night--at least this is the practice in country

places. I have no doubt that many have been buried alive.--Yours

faithfully,

“EX-CURATE.

“September 18.”

Brigade-Surgeon W. Curran cites from the _Revue des Deux Mondes_,

April, 1873, in his Eighth Paper, entitled “Buried Alive,” as follows:--

[IMPORTANCE OF CAREFUL EXAMINATION.]

“On the 15th of October, 1842, a farmer who lived in the suburbs of

Neufchâtel (Lower Seine) went to sleep in his hay-loft in the midst of

some newly mown hay. As he did not get up at the usual hour the next

morning, his wife went to call him, and found him dead. When the time

for his funeral arrived, some twenty-four or thirty hours subsequently,

those who were charged with the burial put the body on a bier, and

having placed this on the ladder that communicated between the ground

and the loft, they allowed it to slide down. All of a sudden one of

the rungs of this ladder gave way, and the bier, falling through, was

dashed violently on the pavement below. The shock, which might have

been fatal to a live person, proved to be the ‘saving clause’ of our

supposed dead one; and fortunately, too, the attendants had not, as

so commonly happens in such contingencies, absconded; on the contrary,

responding without delay to the requirements of the situation, they

quickly realised the gravity of the crisis, and, unbinding the shrouds

of the farmer, they soon restored him to consciousness and life. He was

able, we are further told, to resume his ordinary duties in a few days

afterwards.”[7]

The _Undertakers’ and Funeral Directors’ Journal_, January 22, 1889,

says:--

“Mr. J. W. Smith, of 158 River Avenue, Alleghany” has just had, for

instance, a remarkably narrow escape of prematurely putting his family

in mourning, and one which will, we may be sure, be a very disagreeable

recollection for him during the rest of his existence. After a visit to

the Pittsburg Opera House one night, Mr. Smith was found lying ‘stiff

and cold’ behind the stove in the dining-room, and apparently dead. A

superficial examination by Dr. M’Cready confirmed the worst fears of

Mrs. Smith, but subsequently the doctor sought carefully for any little

spark of life which might lurk unseen, and, very fortunately for Mr.

Smith, found it. But, beyond that, nothing could be accomplished; no

effort to restore animation produced the slightest effect. Two other

physicians were then summoned; but neither attempts at bleeding, the

use of ‘mustard baths,’ nor the application of electricity, could

rouse Mr. Smith after his visit to the opera. For three weeks he lay

insensible, and when he regained consciousness a fever followed. This

event, and some others of a similar character which are occasionally

heard of, show that the examination of persons apparently dead should

always be undertaken by an efficient person, and by no means in a

perfunctory manner.”

The late Madame Blavatsky was subject to death-like trances, and Dr.

Franz Hartmann informs me that she would have been buried alive if

Colonel Olcott had not telegraphed to let her have time to awaken.

Premature Burial and How It May Be Prevented · 第 5 / 23 章