Rationality, reason, and the scale of things

The dynamics of change in scientific and philosophic thinking is

not independent of the underlying structure of the pragmatics

that leads to the civilization of illiteracy. Both involve

rationality, which connects human practical experiences to

consistent inferences (sometimes seen as logical conclusion)

and to the ability to predict events (in nature or society),

even to influence and control them. Rationality is connected to

efficiency insofar as it is applied in the selection of means

appropriate to accomplishing goals; or it serves as an

instrument for evaluation of the premises leading to a selected

course of action. In short, rationality is goal oriented. Reason,

in turn, is value oriented; it guides practical experiences of

human self-constitution in the direction of appropriateness.

Rationality and reason are interconditioned. Right and wrong,

good and bad, are the axes along which human action and emotion

can be diagrammed in the matrix of living and working that they

constituted under the guise of literacy.

The process through which human rationality and reason become

characteristics of human self-constitution is long and tortuous.

People defining themselves in different pragmatic contexts enter

into a network of interdependency. At a very small scale of

human existence and activity, rationality and reason were

indistinguishable. They began to differentiate early on, already

during hunting and gathering. But during the long experience of

settlement and taking care of plants and animals, they grew aware

of the distinction between what they were doing and how. With the

culture of artifacts, to which tools belong, reason and

rationality took separate paths. With the advent of science, in

its most primitive forms, documented in ancient China, Egypt,

India, and Greece, rationality and reason often conflicted.

Things can be right, without being good at the same time. There

is a rationality-goal oriented: how to get more goods, how to

avoid losses-with the appearance of reason-actions to please

forces supposed to control nature or matter. Parallel to

science, magic manifested itself through alchemy, astrology, and

numerology, all focused on the attempt to harmonize human beings,

constituted in practical experiences focused on goodness, with

the world housing them. In some cultures, rationality resulted

in the propensity to face, change, and eventually dominate

nature-that is, to submit the environment to a desired order.

Reason aimed at finding practical grounds for harmony with

nature.

After the phase of orality, writing served both of them equally.

It made language a mold for new experiences, a container for

storing knowledge, and an effective means for the practical

experience of evaluation and self-evaluation. The overwhelming

majority of human accomplishments leading to the possibility and

necessity of literacy were connected to the experience of human

self-constitution in writing. The science and philosophy upon

which the scientific revolution and the revival of humanities (in

particular philosophy) of the 16th and 17th centuries took place

are deeply rooted in the pragmatics that made writing necessary.

This revolution is usually summarized through three main

accomplishments. First: a new picture of the universe,

scientifically expressed in heliocentric astronomy and

philosophically a turning point in understanding the role of the

human being in this world. Second: the mathematical description

of motion. Third: the new conceptual framework of mechanics. As

impressive as they are, their meaning is revealed in the fact

that the Industrial Revolution was actually triggered by the

scientific and humanistic renewal embodied in these

accomplishments. The change from an agrarian economy,

appropriate to a relatively reduced scale of population and

work, to industrial production changed efficiency by orders of

magnitude corresponding to those of the critical mass reached

by humankind. All the characteristics of this new

pragmatics-sequentiality, linearity, centralism, determinism

(mechanical in nature), clear-cut distinctions,

interdependencies-contributed to the establishment of literacy.

The Civilization of Illiteracy · 第 132 / 217 题