Another source of happiness to him in these last days was his sense of

power. This was a part of his artistic nature; and I believe that he

enjoyed to the full the feeling of being able to give people what they

wanted, to enchant, interest, move, and sway them. This is to some

natures a great temptation, because they come to desire applause, and to

hunger for tangible signs of their influence. But Hugh was marvellously

saved from this, partly by a real modesty which was not only never

marred, but which I used to think increased with the years. There is a

story of William Morris, that he could read aloud his own poetry, and at

the end of a fine stanza would say: "That's jolly!" with an entire

freedom from conceit, just as dispassionately as he could praise the

work of another. I used to feel that when Hugh mentioned, as I have

heard him do, some course of sermons that he was giving, and described

the queue which formed in the street, and the aisles and gangways

crowded with people standing to hear him, that he did so more

impersonally than anyone I had ever heard, as though it were a

delightful adventure, and more a piece of good luck than a testimony to

his own powers.

[Illustration: ROBERT HUGH BENSON

IN 1912. AGED 40]

It was the same with his books; he wished them to succeed and enjoyed

their success, while it was an infinite delight to him to write them.

But he had no egotism of a commonplace sort about him, and he never

consciously tried to succeed. Success was just the reverberating echo of

his own delight.

And thus I do not look upon him as one who had bent and curbed his

nature by stern self-discipline to do work of a heavy and distasteful

kind; nor do I think that his dangerous devotion to work was the fierce

effort of a man who would have wished to rest, yet felt that the time

was too short for all that he desired to do. I think it was rather the

far more fruitful energy of one who exulted in expressing himself, in

giving a brilliant and attractive shape to his ideas, and who loved,

too, the varieties and tendencies of human nature, enjoyed moulding and

directing them, and flung himself with an intense joy of creation into

all the work which he found ready to his hand.

XXI

TEMPERAMENT

Hugh never seemed to me to treat life in the spirit of a mystic or a

dreamer, with unshared and secret experiences, withdrawing into his own

ecstasy, half afraid of life, rapt away into interior visions. Though he

had a deep curiosity about mystical experiences, he was never a mystic

in the sense that he had, as great mystics seem to have had, one shell

less, so to speak, between him and the unseen. He lived in the visible

and tangible world, loving beautiful secrets; and he was a mystic only

in the sense that he had an hourly and daily sense of the presence of

God. He wished to share his dreams and to make known his visions, to

declare the glory of God and to show His handiwork. He found the world

more and more interesting, as he came to know it, and in the light of

the warm welcome it gave him. He had a keen and delicate apprehension of

spiritual beauty, and the Mass became to him a consummation of all that

he held most holy and dear. He had recognised a mystical presence in the

Church of England, but he found a supernatural presence in the Church of

Rome; yet he had, too, the instinct of the poet, to translate into form

and substance his inmost and sweetest joy, and to lavish it upon others.

No one dares to speak of great poets and seers as men who have profaned

a mystery by making it known. The deeper that the poet's sense of beauty

is, the more does he thirst to communicate it. It is far too divine and

tremendous to be secretly and selfishly enjoyed.

It is possible, of course, that Hugh may have given to those who did not

see him constantly in everyday familiar intercourse, the sense of a

courteous patience and a desire to do full justice to a claim. Still

more may he have given this impression on social occasions and at

conventional gatherings. Interviews and so-called festivities were apt

to be a weariness to him, because they seemed so great an expenditure of

time and force for very scanty results; but I always felt him to be one

of the most naturally courteous people I have ever seen. He hated to be

abrupt, to repel, to hurt, to wound feelings, to disappoint; yet on such

occasions his natural courtesy was struggling with a sense of the waste

of time involved and the interruptions caused. I remember his writing to

me from the Catholic rectory when he was trying to finish a book and to

prepare for a course of sermons, and lamenting that he was "driven

almost mad" by ceaseless interviews with people who did not, he

declared, want criticism or advice, but simply the luxury of telling a

long story for the sake of possible adulation. "I am quite ready to see

people," he added, "if only they would ask me to appoint a time, instead

of simply flinging themselves upon me whenever it happens to be

convenient to them."

I do not think he ever grudged the time to people in difficulties when

he felt he could really help and save. That seemed to him an opportunity

of using all his powers; and when he took a soul in hand, he could

display a certain sternness, and even ruthlessness, in dealing with it.

"You need not consult me at all, but if you do you must carry out

exactly what I tell you," he could say; but he did grudge time and

attention given to mild sentimentalists, who were not making any way,

but simply dallying with tragic emotions excitedly and vainly.

This courtesy was part of a larger quality, a certain knightly and

chivalrous sense, which is best summed up in the old word "gentleman." A

priest told me that soon after Hugh's death he had to rebuke a tipsy

Irishman, who was an ardent Catholic and greatly devoted to Hugh. The

priest said, "Are you not ashamed to think that Monsignor's eye may be

on you now, and that he may see how you disgrace yourself?" To which,

he said, the Irishman replied, with perhaps a keener insight into Hugh's

character than his director, "Oh no, I can trust Monsignor not to take

advantage of me. I am sure that he will not come prying and spying

about. He always believed whatever I chose to tell him, God bless him!"

Hugh could be hard and unyielding on occasions, but he was wholly

incapable of being suspicious, jealous, malicious, or spiteful. He made

friends once with a man of morbid, irritable, and resentful tendencies,

who had continued, all his life, to make friends by his brilliance and

to lose them by his sharp, fierce, and contemptuous animosities. This

man eventually broke with him altogether, and did his best by a series

of ingenious and wicked letters to damage Hugh's character in all

directions. I received one of those documents and showed it to Hugh. I

was astonished at his courage and even indifference. I myself should

have been anxious and despondent at the thought of such evil innuendoes

and gross misrepresentations being circulated, and still more at the

sort of malignant hatred from which they proceeded. Hugh took the letter

and smiled. "Oh," he said, "I have put my case before the people who

matter, and you can't do anything. He is certainly mad, or on the verge

of madness. Don't answer it--you will only be drenched with these

communications. I don't trouble my head about it." "But don't you mind?"

I said. "No," he said, "I'm quite callous! Of course I am sorry that he

should be such a beast, but I can't help that. I have done my best to

make it up--but it is hopeless." And it was clear from the way he

changed the subject that he had banished the whole matter from his mind.

At a later date, when the letters to him grew more abusive, I was told

by one who was living with him, that he would even put one up on his

chimney-piece and point it out to visitors.

I always thought that he had a very conspicuous and high sort of

courage, not only in facing disagreeable and painful things, but in not

dwelling on them either before or after. This was never more entirely

exemplified than by the way he faced his operation, and indeed, most

heroically of all, in the way in which he died. There was a sense of

great adventure--there is no other word for it--about that, as of a man

going on a fateful voyage; a courage so great that he did not even lose

his interest in the last experiences of life. His demeanour was not

subdued or submissive; he did not seem to be asking for strength to bear

or courage to face the last change. He was more like the happy warrior

"Attired

With sudden brightness, as a man inspired."

[Illustration: ROBERT HUGH BENSON

IN 1912. AGED 41]

He did not lose control of himself, nor was he carried helplessly down

the stream. He was rather engaged in a conflict which was not a losing

one. He had often thought of death, and even thought that he feared it;

but now that it was upon him he would taste it fully, he would see what

it was like. The day before, when he thought that he might live, there

was a pre-occupation over him, as though he were revolving the things he

desired to do; but when death came upon him unmistakably there was no

touch of self-pity or impressiveness. He had just to die, and he devoted

his swift energies to it, as he had done to living. I never saw him so

splendid and noble as he was at that last awful moment. Life did not ebb

away, but he seemed to fling it from him, so that it was not as the

death of a weary man sinking to rest, but like the eager transit of a

soldier to another part of the field.

"Could it have been avoided?" I said to the kind and gentle doctor who

saw Hugh through the last days of his life, and loved him very tenderly

and faithfully. "Well, in one sense, 'yes,'" he replied. "If he had

worked less, rested more, taken things more easily, he might have lived

longer. He had a great vitality; but most people die of being

themselves; and we must all live as we are made to live. It was

Monsignor's way to put the work of a month into a week; he could not do

otherwise--I cannot think of Monsignor as sitting with folded hands."

INDEX

Barnes, Monsignor, 154

Bashkirtseff, Marie, quoted, 249

Bec, Bishop Anthony, 18

Belloc, Mr., 183

Benson, Archbishop (father), 15-17, 20, 46-47, 56, 63, 82, 86, 91, 116;

characteristics, 34-39;

letters quoted, 53-55, 71-74;

ordains his son, 87;

death, 97

---- Mrs. (mother), 19, 28, 74-80, 108, 120, 128, 146, 149-150, 182, 209;

quoted, 31-32, 118-119, 227;

visit to Egypt, 98

---- Fred (brother), 16, 26-27, 34, 68, 80, 184, 209

---- Maggie (sister), 16, 28, 40, 98, 120, 126, 184, 196, 217

---- Martin (brother), 16, 57;

death, 35

---- Nelly (sister), 16, 27, 40;

death, 79-80

Beth (nurse), 20-24, 39, 106;

letter quoted, 23

Bradley, Dr., 200, 201;

quoted, 260-261

_By What Authority_, 114

Carlyle, Thomas, quoted, 147

Carter, Archbishop William, 91

_Confessions of a Convert, The_, 47, 114, 130, 140

_Conventionalists, The_, 186

Cornish, Mr., 42

_Coward, The_, 181

Decemviri _Club_, 156

Donaldson, Archbishop St. Clair, 91, 95

Edward VII; King, 114

Elizabeth, Queen, 179

Eton, influence of, 48-51

---- Mission, 89 seq., 99, 134-136, 236, 238

George V, H. M. King, 98

Gladstone, W. E., 98

---- Mrs., 98

Gore, Bishop, 103, 108-109, 130

Gorman, Father, 194

Halifax, Lord, 128

Hare Street, 168 seq., 189, 193, 210, 227;

village, 12

_Hill of Trouble, The_, 177

Hogg, Sir James McGarel (afterwards Lord Magheramorne), 32

Hormead Mission, 168

Hornby, Provost, 149

House of the Resurrection. _See_ under Mirfield Community

Job, quoted, 49

John Inglesant, 75, 85

Johnson, Dr., quoted, 150, 175

Jowett, B., 150

Kenmare, Lord, 172

Leith, Dr., 67

_Light Invisible, The_, 106, 177, 187, 240

Lindsay, Ken, 168-169

Lyttelton, Edward, 44

Maclagan, Archbishop, 103

Marshall (family), 190

Martin, Sir George, 58

Mason, Canon Arthur, 34, 80, 88

Maturin, Father, 96, 100

Meynell, Mr., 245

Mirfield Community, 103-104, 130, 137, 227, 239

Morris, William, 250

Murray, Prof., 199

Norway, King of, 98

Parsons, Rev. Mr., 16

Peel, Sidney, 50

Penny, Mr., 19

Persia, Shah of, 55

Pippet, Gabriel, 13, 168

Pitt Club, 156

Potter, Norman, 171

Reeman, Joseph, 14, 193

Reeve, Rev. John, 34, 128

_Richard Raynal, Solitary_, 178, 181, 185, 187

Ritual, 60-63

Roddy, _collie_, 126-128, 217

St. Hugh, 17

---- Monastery of, 129

Salford Cathedral, 209

Scott, Canon, 161

Selborne, Lord, quoted, 54

Sessions, Dr., 168

Sharrock, Canon, 173, 196, 199, 205, 207

Sidgwick, Arthur, 20

---- Henry (uncle), 20, 71, 73, 223

---- Mrs. (grandmother), 20

---- Nora (Mrs. Henry Sidgwick) (aunt), 73, 121

---- William (uncle), 20

Skarratt, Rev. Mr., 101

Spiers, Mr., 54-55

Stanmore, Lord, 95

Stevenson, R. L., 121

_Streets and Lanes of the City_, 79

Tait, Miss Lucy, 120

Temple, Archbishop, 103

Tennyson's "Mort d'Arthur," 179

Todd, Dr., Ross, 193

Tyrell, Father, 144

Vaughn, Dean, 81-84

Vaughn, Mrs., 83-85

Victoria, Queen, 114, 153

Wales, Prince and Princess of, 54

Walpole, Bishop G. H. S., 34

Warre, Dr., 46

Watson, Bishop, 154

Watt, Father, 168

Wellington College, 15, 19, 20

Westcott, Bishop, 86

Westminster, Cardinal Archbishop of, 209

Whitaker, Canon G. H., 34

Wilkinson, Bishop, 48, 128, 150

Woodchester Dominican Convent, 146

Wordsworth, Bishop John, 128

Wren, Mr., 52

Hugh: Memoirs of a Brother · 第 10 / 10 段