CHAPTER XXXIV

There are five reasons why instruction should not begin with

Metaphysics, but should at first be restricted to pointing out what is

fitted for notice and what may be made manifest to the multitude.

First Reason.—The subject itself is difficult, subtle and profound,

“Far off and exceeding deep, who can find it out?” (Eccles. vii. 24).

The following words of Job may be applied to it: “Whence then cometh

wisdom? and where is the place of understanding?” (Job xxviii. 20).

Instruction should not begin with abstruse and difficult subjects. In

one of the similes contained in the Bible, wisdom is compared to water,

and amongst other interpretations given by our Sages of this simile,

occurs the following: He who can swim may bring up pearls from the

depth of the sea, he who is unable to swim will be drowned, therefore

only such persons as have had proper instruction should expose

themselves to the risk.

Second Reason.—The intelligence of man is at first insufficient; for he

is not endowed with perfection at the beginning, but at first possesses

perfection only in potentiâ, not in fact. Thus it is said, “And man is

born a wild ass” (Job xi. 12). If a man possesses a certain faculty in

potentiâ, it does not follow that it must become in him a reality. He

may possibly remain deficient either on account of some obstacle, or

from want of training in practices which would turn the possibility

into a reality. Thus it is distinctly stated in the Bible, “Not many

are wise” (ib., xxxii. 9); also our Sages say, “I noticed how few were

those who attained to a higher degree of perfection” (B. T. Succah

45a). There are many things which obstruct the path to perfection, and

which keep man away from it. Where can he find sufficient preparation

and leisure to learn all that is necessary in order to develop that

perfection which he has in potentiâ?

Third Reason.—The preparatory studies are of long duration, and man, in

his natural desire to reach the goal, finds them frequently too

wearisome, and does not wish to be troubled by them. Be convinced that,

if man were able to reach the end without preparatory studies, such

studies would not be preparatory but tiresome and utterly superfluous.

Suppose you awaken any person, even the most simple, as if from sleep,

and you say to him, Do you not desire to know what the heavens are,

what is their number and their form; what beings are contained in them;

what the angels are; how the creation of the whole world took place;

what is its purpose, and what is the relation of its various parts to

each other; what is the nature of the soul; how it enters the body;

whether it has an independent existence, and if so, how it can exist

independently of the body; by what means and to what purpose, and

similar problems. He would undoubtedly say “Yes,” and show a natural

desire for the true knowledge of these things; but he will wish to

satisfy that desire and to attain to that knowledge by listening to a

few words from you. Ask him to interrupt his usual pursuits for a week,

till he learn all this, he would not do it, and would be satisfied and

contented with imaginary and misleading notions; he would refuse to

believe that there is anything which requires preparatory studies and

persevering research.

You, however, know how all these subjects are connected together; for

there is nothing else in existence but God and His works, the latter

including all existing things besides Him; we can only obtain a

knowledge of Him through His works; His works give evidence of His

existence, and show what must be assumed concerning Him, that is to

say, what must be attributed to Him either affirmatively or negatively.

It is thus necessary to examine all things according to their essence,

to infer from every species such true and well established propositions

as may assist us in the solution of metaphysical problems. Again, many

propositions based on the nature of numbers and the properties of

geometrical figures, are useful in examining things which must be

negatived in reference to God, and these negations will lead us to

further inferences. You will certainly not doubt the necessity of

studying astronomy and physics, if you are desirous of comprehending

the relation between the world and Providence as it is in reality, and

not according to imagination. There are also many subjects of

speculation, which, though not preparing the way for metaphysics, help

to train the reasoning power, enabling it to understand the nature of a

proof, and to test truth by characteristics essential to it. They

remove the confusion arising in the minds of most thinkers, who

confound accidental with essential properties, and likewise the wrong

opinions resulting therefrom. We may add, that although they do not

form the basis for metaphysical research, they assist in forming a

correct notion of these things, and are certainly useful in many other

things connected with that discipline. Consequently he who wishes to

attain to human perfection, must therefore first study Logic, next the

various branches of Mathematics in their proper order, then Physics,

and lastly Metaphysics. We find that many who have advanced to a

certain point in the study of these disciplines become weary, and stop;

that others, who are endowed with sufficient capacity, are interrupted

in their studies by death, which surprises them while still engaged

with the preliminary course. Now, if no knowledge whatever had been

given to us by means of tradition, and if we had not been brought to

the belief in a thing through the medium of similes, we would have been

bound to form a perfect notion of things with their essential

characteristics, and to believe only what we could prove: a goal which

could only be attained by long preparation. In such a case most people

would die, without having known whether there was a God or not, much

less that certain things must be asserted about Him, and other things

denied as defects. From such a fate not even “one of a city or two of a

family” (Jer. iii. 14) would have escaped.

As regards the privileged few, “the remnant whom the Lord calls” (Joel

iii. 5), they only attain the perfection at which they aim after due

preparatory labour. The necessity of such a preparation and the need of

such a training for the acquisition of real knowledge, has been plainly

stated by King Solomon in the following words: “If the iron be blunt,

and he do not whet the edge, then must he put to more strength; and it

is profitable to prepare for wisdom” (Eccles. x. 10); “Hear counsel,

and receive instruction, that thou mayest be wise in thy latter end”

(Prov. xix. 20).

There is still another urgent reason why the preliminary disciplines

should be studied and understood. During the study many doubts present

themselves, and the difficulties, or the objections raised against

certain assertions, are soon understood, just as the demolition of a

building is easier than its erection; while, on the other hand, it is

impossible to prove an assertion, or to remove any doubts, without

having recourse to several propositions taken from these preliminary

studies. He who approaches metaphysical problems without proper

preparation is like a person who journeys towards a certain place, and

on the road falls into a deep pit, out of which he cannot rise, and he

must perish there; if he had not gone forth, but had remained at home,

it would have been better for him.

Solomon has expatiated in the book of Proverbs on sluggards and their

indolence, by which he figuratively refers to indolence in the search

after wisdom. He thus speaks of a man who desires to know the final

results, but does not exert himself to understand the preliminary

disciplines which lead to them, doing nothing else but desire. “The

desire of the slothful killeth him; for his hands refuse to labour. He

coveteth greedily all the day long; but the righteous giveth, and

spareth not” (Prov. xxi. 25, 26); that is to say, if the desire killeth

the slothful, it is because he neglects to seek the thing which might

satisfy his desire, he does nothing but desire, and hopes to obtain a

thing without using the means to reach it. It would be better for him

were he without that desire. Observe how the end of the simile throws

light on its beginning. It concludes with the words “but the righteous

giveth, and spareth not”; the antithesis of “righteous” and “slothful”

can only be justified on the basis of our interpretation. Solomon thus

indicates that only such a man is righteous who gives to everything its

due portion; that is to say, who gives to the study of a thing the

whole time required for it, and does not devote any part of that time

to another purpose. The passage may therefore be paraphrased thus: “And

the righteous man devotes his ways to wisdom, and does not withhold any

of them.” Comp. “Give not thy strength unto women” (Prov. xxxi. 3).

The majority of scholars, that is to say, the most famous in science,

are afflicted with this failing, viz., that of hurrying at once to the

final results, and of speaking about them, without treating of the

preliminary disciplines. Led by folly or ambition to disregard those

preparatory studies, for the attainment of which they are either

incapable or too idle, some scholars endeavour to prove that these are

injurious or superfluous. On reflection the truth will become obvious.

The Fourth Reason is taken from the physical constitution of man. It

has been proved that moral conduct is a preparation for intellectual

progress, and that only a man whose character is pure, calm and

steadfast, can attain to intellectual perfection; that is, acquire

correct conceptions. Many men are naturally so constituted that all

perfection is impossible; e.g., he whose heart is very warm and is

himself very powerful, is sure to be passionate, though he tries to

counteract that disposition by training; he whose testicles are warm,

humid, and vigorous, and the organs connected therewith are surcharged,

will not easily refrain from sin, even if he makes great efforts to

restrain himself. You also find persons of great levity and rashness,

whose excited manners and wild gestures prove that their constitution

is in disorder, and their temperament so bad that it cannot be cured.

Such persons can never attain to perfection; it is utterly useless to

occupy oneself with them on such a subject [as Metaphysics]. For this

science is, as you know, different from the science of Medicine and of

Geometry, and, from the reason already mentioned, it is not every

person who is capable of approaching it. It is impossible for a man to

study it successfully without moral preparation; he must acquire the

highest degree of uprightness and integrity, “for the froward is an

abomination to the Lord, but His secret is with the righteous” (Prov.

iii. 32). Therefore it was considered inadvisable to teach it to young

men; nay, it is impossible for them to comprehend it, on account of the

heat of their blood and the flame of youth, which confuses their minds;

that heat, which causes all the disorder, must first disappear; they

must have become moderate and settled, humble in their hearts, and

subdued in their temperament; only then will they be able to arrive at

the highest degree of the perception of God, i.e., the study of

Metaphysics, which is called Maʻaseh Mercabah Comp. “The Lord is nigh

unto them that are of a broken heart” (Ps. xxxiv. 18); “I dwell in the

high and lofty place, with him also that is of a contrite and humble

spirit; to revive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of

the contrite ones” (Isa. lvii. 15).

Therefore the rule, “the headings of the sections may be confided to

him,” is further restricted in the Talmud, in the following way: The

headings of the sections must only be handed down to an Ab-bet-din

(President of the Court), whose heart is full of care, i.e., in whom

wisdom is united with humility, meekness, and a great dread of sin. It

is further stated there: “The secrets of the Law can only be

communicated to a counsellor, scholar, and good orator.” These

qualities can only be acquired if the physical constitution of the

student favour their development. You certainly know that some persons,

though exceedingly able, are very weak in giving counsel, while others

are ready with proper counsel and good advice in social and political

matters. A person so endowed is called “counsellor” and may be unable

to comprehend purely abstract notions, even such as are similar to

common sense. He is unacquainted with them, and has no talent whatever

for them; we apply to him the words: “Wherefore is there a price in the

hand of a fool to get wisdom, seeing he hath no heart to it?” (Prov.

xvii. 16). Others are intelligent and naturally clear-sighted, able to

convey complicated ideas in concise and well chosen language,—such a

person is called “a good orator,” but he has not been engaged in the

pursuit of science, or has not acquired any knowledge of it. Those who

have actually acquired a knowledge of the sciences, are called “wise in

arts” (or “scholars”); the Hebrew term for “wise in arts”—ḥakam

ḥarashim—has been explained in the Talmud as implying, that when such a

man speaks, all become, as it were, speechless.

Now, consider how, in the writings of the Rabbis, the admission of a

person into discourses on metaphysics is made dependent on distinction

in social qualities, and study of philosophy, as well as on the

possession of clear-sightedness, intelligence, eloquence, and ability

to communicate things by slight allusions. If a person satisfies these

requirements, the secrets of the Law are confided to him. In the same

place we also read the following passage:—R. Jochanan said to R.

Elasar, “Come, I will teach you Maʻaseh Mercabah.” The reply was, “I am

not yet old,” or in other words, I have not yet become old, I still

perceive in myself the hot blood and the rashness of youth. You learn

from this that, in addition to the above-named good qualities, a

certain age is also required. How, then, could any person speak on

these metaphysical themes in the presence of ordinary people, of

children, and of women!

Fifth Reason.—Man is disturbed in his intellectual occupation by the

necessity of looking after the material wants of the body, especially

if the necessity of providing for wife and children be superadded; much

more so if he seeks superfluities in addition to his ordinary wants,

for by custom and bad habits these become a powerful motive. Even the

perfect man to whom we have referred, if too busy with these necessary

things, much more so if busy with unnecessary things, and filled with a

great desire for them—must weaken or altogether lose his desire for

study, to which he will apply himself with interruption, lassitude, and

want of attention. He will not attain to that for which he is fitted by

his abilities, or he will acquire imperfect knowledge, a confused mass

of true and false ideas. For these reasons it was proper that the study

of Metaphysics should have been exclusively cultivated by privileged

persons, and not entrusted to the common people. It is not for the

beginner, and he should abstain from it, as the little child has to

abstain from taking solid food and from carrying heavy weights.

The guide for the perplexed · 第 34 / 83 章