My researches convince me, however, that only in rare cases does male

conception occur in the early menstrual flow, i.e., from the third day

to the sixth day of the period. The greater majority of _normal_ male

conceptions occur between the eighth and fifteenth day, counting from the

very beginning of the period. _The twelfth day is certainly the fruitful

day_, par excellence, _for the conception of male offspring_, experience

having afforded conclusive proof that the ovum proceeding from the right

ovary is then at the height of its receptivity. It must, however, be

borne in mind that a boy can only be conceived every alternate month, one

month being fruit_ful_ and one fruit_less_. This is further dealt with

in a subsequent chapter. In my formula I have always given the fifth day

after cessation of the period as the most likely date, allowing a full

seven days for the duration of the menstrual period. The reason for

allowing seven days to elapse before risking pregnancy is, that, although

the actual flow may only last three or four days, the uterus remains in

a perturbed state for a whole week, and the ensuing muscular flabbiness

is not propitious to really healthy offspring. It is interesting to refer

to the Law of the Talmud, which goes to prove that the fourteenth day was

largely utilized by the Jews. The direction in Leviticus is “But if she

be cleansed of her issue, then shall she number to herself seven days,

and after that she shall be clean, and on the eighth day”[18]....

I have known many cases where male-conception occurred on the fifteenth,

sixteenth and seventeenth days respectively from the beginning of the

period. One happened for certain on the eighteenth day, though this is

exceptional. Such belatedness may easily cause a meeting of two ova, as

it were, in the so-called “blank week”; one a male ovum and the other a

female, which may possibly have been thrown into the tube as early as ten

days before menstruation. If these two happen to be fertilised on the

same day, or within two days of each other, the result will probably be

the conception of mixed twins.

Generally, however, the disappointed ovum, if unfertilised, perishes

on or about the fifteenth day, for its life, unlike that of the

spermatozoon, is only a matter of days. With the ovum thus dead the

uterus is unable, for the next six or eight weeks, to conceive a male

child, since, before the next male ovum is due, the fruitless month must

elapse.

If, on the other hand, fertilisation takes place, the uterus closes up

entirely, jealously guarding the precious ovum that has now become a

male embryo. From the first month of conception the embryo is alive, and

its sex fully determined. It is an amazing fact that many people still

believe that sex can be determined any time after pregnancy until the

child quickens. Again and again I have been asked how to change the sex

of an unborn infant that was well on its way. People seem to think that

a wave of the magic wand, a special diet, or some form of treatment can

transform a full-blown girl-embryo into a boy fœtus, or vice versa!

It is equally childish to imagine that the embryo does not enjoy vitality

from the first moment of its existence. The virtue which proceeds from

the fertilisation of this germ has such prodigious power that the

whole being of the woman, in mind and body, undergoes a subtle change.

Many women are affected in various ways almost immediately. Some are

the victims of nausea and vomiting which last either for the first

two or three months, or for the whole time of gestation, and are most

distressing and difficult to alleviate. Others suffer acutely from

heartburn, cramp, undue salivation, and other disabilities.

As regards the movements of a fœtus, they may be detected by a doctor

long before the mother discerns them. Possibly she will not feel them

until the fifth month or sixth month of pregnancy, especially if she is

of a passive and lymphatic nature. The quickening occurs earlier with

boys than with girls. Hippocrates maintained that as a rule the male is

felt at three months and the female at four, on account of the greater

strength of the male.[19] Dr. Hamilton knew of quickening in the eleventh

week.[20] Denman says “quickening may happen from the tenth to the

twenty-fifth week, but it occurs most commonly about the sixteenth.”[21]

I have found in the majority of cases that with boy-pregnancies it occurs

at sixteen weeks and with girl-pregnancies at seventeen or eighteen.

“Quickening” is caused by a change in the position of the uterus, which,

on account of its increased weight, suddenly rises above the pelvis, thus

enabling the movements of the fœtus to be discerned for the first time.

During the first three months or so the uterus seems to be flatter with

a male pregnancy than with a female. This condition prevails up to the

time of quickening, when the very opposite occurs. The explanation of

this is simple. When the male ovum leaves the ovary and, after the

menstrual flow, is fertilised, it finds little or no preparation for its

nutriment in the decidua, from which it is to derive its support. Hence

its inception is characterised by considerably less spontaneous vitality

and development. The female ovum, on the other hand, starts its embryo

existence with all the unwasted accumulations of a uterus which has not

discharged its contents for three weeks or more. But, as the pregnancy

advances, the male embryo makes up for lost time, and thrives apace on

the more generous supply of nutrition provided by the larger male ovary.

With advanced male pregnancies, too, there is generally a distinct

protuberance on the right side in front. The weight of the fœtus is

thrown towards the right, and a characteristic of male-pregnancy is that

it allows of a freer walk and less awkward bearing. A lady pregnant with

a boy, describes her condition as follows:

I am very large, but it is all in front. I am so nervous lest

it should be another girl, but the movements are certainly on

the right side.

Another lady who subsequently gave birth to a son, wrote:

I feel all the violent kicking on the right side and I have

cramps down my right thigh.

The male sex of a child often tends to cause an extension of the term of

gestation beyond its natural limits. This is mainly due in my opinion

to the larger size and greater elasticity of the right horn of the

uterus, and also to the superior powers of nutriment of the larger ovary.

Although quickening occurs earlier in male-pregnancy than female, the

movements of the female embryo are generally quicker and less powerful.

We may certainly conclude that Nature intended women to produce more boys

than girls, and that, with this end in view:

1. She provided the girl-child with more male ova in her right organ than

female ova in her left.

2. She rendered easier the fertilisation of the right side ovary by

placing the right cornu of the uterus, the tube and the ovary, in the

more attainable position in the pelvis.

3. She made the right ovary and tube larger than the left and provided

more seminal fluid for them to carry.

These facilities for the increase of males are the more necessary and

desirable when we consider:

1. The greater tendency to abortion with male-pregnancies.

2. The great care which must be exercised with first children, if they be

boys.

3. The lack of proper means for rearing male prematures born under seven

months.

4. The extra attention that is always required by boy-children in the

way of feeding, warmth, and such necessary treatment as circumcision.

When we have overcome these disabilities, we shall have made a very

definite step forward. But even so we shall not be able to obtain a

reasonable proportion of males and females until proper use is made

of the simple law of determination, with which I have dealt, however

imperfectly, in this chapter.

[Illustration: FRUITFUL MONTH NORMAL STATE]

Now, for the benefit of the uninitiated and for those unacquainted with

medical terms, I intend to make a brief and simple summary of the points

outlined, so that any woman who desires to have male issue can make

personal use of them.

Union should occur from the third day to the tenth day after cessation of

period. The fifth day after the period or in other words, the twelfth day

from its commencement, is the most certain date for conception.

It will be noticed by the careful reader that the times mentioned are of

a very limited duration. My motto is “safety first,” but I do not wish to

imply that other dates are wholly impossible for male conception.

To make sure of not having female issue marital relation must be avoided

for ten days before each period and for three days after.

X

THE “BLANK WEEK”

“Great Nature spoke; observant man obeyed.”—POPE.

Having dealt with the workings of the right ovary, perhaps the simplest

plan to follow now would be to examine the action of the uterine organs

from day to day throughout the lunar month in their proper order. It is

not very generally understood that the lunar month of every woman holds

a “blank week,” or kind of close-time, during which no conception can

occur. Yet this is true of all normal women who function regularly, and

the exceptions merely go to prove the rule. Thus, _given that the menses

be regular_, and counting from the first day of the period, a blank week

exists from the sixteenth to the twenty-first day of the lunar month.

During that time both ovaries, male and female, are temporarily in

a state of apparently complete inactivity. This is what actually

happens. In the first week of the lunar month, counting from the period

of menstruation, the ovum is discharged. Then follow eight days of

expectancy, when fertilisation may have taken place, but after that the

womb becomes atrophied, and from that time (i.e. the sixteenth to the

twenty-first day) provided she be regular, a woman may safely consider

herself immune from fertilisation. If more wives were aware of this fact,

many would take advantage of the “immunity” to shield themselves from a

too large or too rapid increase of family. In contrast with the drawbacks

of so-called “preventive measures,” this is a harmless and innocent means

of prevention offered by natural laws.

Unfortunately every woman is _not_ normal, and there are some who may

never benefit from a “blank week.” This occurs where the period is

habitually too early, often as much as a week or ten days before it is

due. In such cases the “blank week” has been trespassed upon, the next

period is already on its way, and no respite has been allowed to the

harassed uterus. Such indications point to a state of weakness sometimes

no more than temporary, and, with proper treatment and care may in time

be remedied. But such a condition frequently denotes serious ill-health,

such as anæmia, which, if allowed to continue, will cause much trouble.

It is also at the root of many abortions.

On the other hand, where the period is retarded for two or three days,

or more, the “blank” week may develop into a close-time of ten days or

a fortnight. This state of affairs is usually beneficial both to the

uterus, and to the general health of the individual. It should, in fact,

be stated that the “late” period is a sign of strength, and as long as

it is not attended by any other troubles, or by distressing “white

discharges” in between the periods, should cause no kind of anxiety.

Most healthy young girls are “late” for many years after menstruation

begins, and sometimes go on for four months without a period. These girls

I have found to be quite healthy and normal, enjoying easy confinements

in married life, in contrast to those who are perpetually troubled by

“early” or even “regular to the day” courses and by an over-profuse

catamenial flow.

[Illustration: FRUITFUL MONTH SHEWING BLANK WEEK OBLITERATED BY PERIOD

COMMENCING A WEEK TOO SOON]

It is the latter class of women who are far more susceptible to the

fertilisation of the female ova. With persons of rarer and “late”

periods, the very opposite conditions prevail. To take a few instances,

a woman I know had but one day of actual “flow” every six weeks and

invariably relied on a “blank” of twenty days. She gave birth to seven

boys, but not a single daughter. Again a certain French peasant woman

only had a day’s period every two months; her family consisted of three

boys and no girls. An American lady, who gave birth to eight sons and one

girl, had a period regularly every five weeks, lasting half a day only.

Her first-born was the girl, and it was remarkable that, in early married

life, she had been more “regular” with scanty periods.

A lady wanting a son wrote to me as follows:

I fear my periods are very irregular—always three weeks late. I

have never had a mishap and am very healthy and robust.

She had two boys in succession.

Another wrote:

I am very regular, but invariably “late,” 32 days being the

usual time.

She had sons only.

Another letter runs thus:

Before the birth of my girl I was always very regular at 28

days; now somehow I am always “late.”

Her three following children were boys.

I could give innumerable cases in further support of this contention.

In a like manner my available evidence goes to prove the tendency to

girl-pregnancies among women of profuse and “early” periods. This is

readily understood, when one considers how easily the “blank” week may

cease to exist, obliterated by the over-active left ovary, so that the

unfortunate wife becomes the mother of an unlooked-for girl. Every

alternate month the danger is present, and, though often avoided, may

sooner or later cause the advent of a daughter.

A lady writes thus:

My periods are very profuse and always too early; I long for a

son, but have had only four girls.

Another writes:

I never have more than ten days entirely free ... but my

confinements have been quite normal ... I have two little girls.

With the women of rare and scant menstruation, on the other hand, the

“blank” week is very real and reliable.

Lady A. wrote to me as follows:

What you tell me about the blank week I have heard discussed,

and some of my friends make use of it.... Twenty years ago,

Lady E., a very old friend of mine, said to me in private:

“Now, my dear, I do wish you would warn my niece not to have

any more children. She is shocked at the idea of preventives,

but were you to tell her all about the ‘blank week,’ as my

mother told me, I am sure she would make full use of it.”

The mere fact of the right ovary remaining quiescent till its appointed

time proves that the _male_ ovary is probably the healthiest and the most

likely to produce ova for fertilisation. The right ovary unless diseased

is _never_ too early. This is chiefly due to its being naturally stronger

and more self-contained, and discharging its ovum _after_ the period has

actually begun. Where the periods are too early, it will be generally

found that one ovary works quicker than the other, and that this ovary is

the _left_.

Thus it is possible for three weeks to elapse after one period, four

after the next or two weeks one time, three and a half the next and so

on. If it happens that the male ovary is also “early,” after years of

irregularity, this is because of a “_reflex_” activity, resulting from

the insistent stimulus of the left side.

Generally speaking, just as a tendency to constipation bespeaks in any

given person better health than proneness to diarrhœa, so the longer

“blank” week and the “later” period prove more strength in a woman than

the “early” and profuse menstruation. The latter trouble needs drastic

treatment; the former responds to gentle coaxing and modifying.

Having thus shown the existence of a “blank” week, which provides

_immunity from conception_ to every female enjoying normal health and

regular menstruation, we now arrive at the twenty-first day of a woman’s

lunar month. Adhering to my programme, let us proceed to examine what

occurs, in every normal woman, after the completion of the third week of

this fruitful month.

I hope my readers will be clear in their minds, in so far as we have

arrived at the point already demonstrated.

(1) When male children are safely and easily begotten.

(2) When the blank week affords nature’s means of repose to the organs of

procreation.

XI

FOR A GIRL

“And binding nature fast in fate

Left free the human will.”—POPE.

On the twenty-first day of a woman’s lunar month a change occurs in the

uterus. Activity commencing in the left ovary affects the whole being in

a greater or lesser degree. Slight pains are experienced in the back, and

the sensitive and highly strung feel a tenderness in the left breast and

left thigh, as in the same way during the next month such pains may be

felt on the right side. The left ovary has become restive, and, already

seven days, and sometimes nine, before her “flow” is due, has ruptured

the Graafian follicle, setting free the female ovum. This premature

rupture of the vesicle, with the bursting of the Graafian follicle, is

brought about by the actual formation of the “female” ovary, and, its

development being less than and its retentive qualities inferior to those

of the right side, the female ovum is often launched as much as nine

days before its menstrual flow is due. The life of this ovum, like that

of all ova, is from eight to fifteen days, and, in a normal woman, it is

receptive to fertilisation from the twenty-first to the twenty-eight day

of the lunar month which terminates with the next period.

Thus in all normal cases, the twenty-first day of the lunar month, or the

_seventh day before the next period is the most likely day for conception

of the female offspring_. Healthy and regular cases are in a large

majority; indeed, among native women, untouched by modern civilisation,

they are probably the general rule.

A lady writes:

I have three little girls ... and they were all started _before

the period_.... I seem never to be able to conceive at any

other time.

Another says:

I was told that boys were conceived _seven days before the

period_. I tried this method, but _it was a girl_.

Herein lies the true explanation of the fact that nearly all first

children, who are not “prematures,” and born within the first nine and

a half months of marriage, are girls. The bride generally arranges that

her wedding shall take place the second week, after the period is safely

over. She thus carefully selects for her marriage a date, at least ten

days after the expiration of menstruation; which, if it happens to be the

fruitful month, will fall in with the girl-conception time. And, if she

conceives, _her first child is bound to be a girl_.

In order to make sure of my ground, and in deference to the expressed

wishes of many gynæcologists, I have taken statistics relating to this

over a number of years, running into a thousand cases, with the result

that 80 per cent. confirm my dicta—than which there could hardly be

better proof. If to these statistics is added the fact of the greater

activity of the left ovary in young womanhood, I submit that the

combination of conditions renders my statement of the facts almost

irrefutable.

There are many women who can only conceive a girl on the last three

days before the period is due, showing that in their case the ovum is

discharged shortly before the flow starts. Other women again are unable

to conceive at any time except on the very day the period is actually

due—I know of many such; they all had _girls_ and never a son. But in all

these cases I have found a certain morbidity of the uterine condition,

combined with a tendency to hysteria and nervous disorders.

The closely impending flow, though not yet present, must render

the existence of the germ precarious, and is usually conducive to

bearing-down sensations at the menstrual times. This is often accompanied

by a slight “show,” which may cause alarm, though not necessarily in any

way a serious matter.

Here let me state most definitely for the benefit of those mothers

who desire female issue, that the great majority of girl-infants are

conceived _on the seventh or eighth day before the period is due_, those

being by far the most actively receptive days for female pregnancies. It

is the seventh day that I have always advocated in my formula, and on

that day, in all normal cases, the strongest girl-babies are conceived.

It must be remembered by those wishing to profit by my formula that

a girl can be conceived only every alternate month, one month being

fruitful and one fruitless.

It is not difficult to find out which month is fruitful, but it is

perhaps wiser to avoid confusing the issue by making calculations with

regard to this contingency.

In order to avoid male issue relations must not take place for ten days

after each period.

XII

THE FREAK OVARY

Those readers who have followed the argument so far will have gathered

from the last chapter the nature of my claim that every normal and

healthy woman is able to conceive a girl according to the method

indicated. But it is now necessary to touch on the small percentage of

women coming under a different category.

It must be repeated that the normal state of every woman is to have one

fruitful month followed by one fruitless. The fruitless month affords

occasion for conception of both sexes, whereas I am satisfied from the

investigation of a very large number of cases that complete immunity from

pregnancy exists every other month. These quiescent weeks can easily be

discerned by any normal woman, who experiences during that period a

sense of partial lack of sexual activity. Thus, out of every eight weeks,

the functions have five week’s respite, which affords the recuperative

advantages demanded by nature. And so just as there is a blank or

fruitless week in the fruit_ful_ month, so there is also a fruitless

month in alternation with the fruitful one.

And now we have to discuss a condition of the left ovary which may result

in conception taking place during the earlier days of the fruitless

month. I refer to the freak action of the “left” ovary. Much confusion

of thought and biological error have been caused by this condition, the

result of an over-strained civilisation and the increasing artificiality

of our mode of life.

In some women, and for some unexplained reason, the left ovary takes

upon itself an added activity equal to that of the right ovary, while

at the same time the functions of the latter decline until finally it

ceases to contribute anything to the reproduction-life of the woman.

The left ovary, having acquired so much importance, becomes, as it were,

unbalanced with the weight of its responsibilities and runs amok. The

ovum is discharged about the twenty-first day, as we have explained

before, but instead of dying as the result of non-impregnation, it

actually remains in the womb and lives during the whole time of the

succeeding period and may even live for several days after this is over.

Thus there is now the risk of the ovum becoming fertilised during the

early days of a fruitless month, and this state of affairs is entirely

due to the condition I have called a “freak” ovary.

Such an activity, foreign to its natural state, may be temporary or

lasting according to its subsequent functional history. The result of

such investigations as have been made appear to show that among _natives_

of comparatively uncivilised lands, this action of the so-called “freak”

ovary is practically non-existent—all the evidence obtainable points to

their immunity from the effects of such ovarian breaches of the usual

procedure have come to my notice.

And now we are negotiating the rock on which so many enquirers have

foundered whilst seeking the causation of sex. The existence of the

“freak” ovary has apparently exploded the simple formula of “Boys after,

girls before.” The formula would have held good but for the fact of the

freak ovary being too common to be overlooked. The vitality of this ovum

interfering with the so-called “fruitless month,” in which every _normal_

woman is safe from conception, is most disturbing, and, in the early

years of my work, this abnormality caused me much trouble. Now that I

have solved the problem I regard this factor as the corner-stone upon

which rests the whole structure of my discovery.

Subtle and yet so definite when revealed, the distinct operations of

each ovary have given me the key to the explanation of a very baffling

question. The month in the ordinary course should be fruitless, because,

had the left ovary _menstruated_ and thrown out its ovum seven days or

more _before the flow_, it would by the actual day of the period have

lost its vitality, and, if unfertilised, been carried off by the flow

itself. In its turn the right ovary, when due to menstruate, would leave

quiescent the uterus until the actual moment of the period, and discharge

its ovum _after_ the third day of the flow, or even later.

Sex at choice · 第 4 / 7 段