CHAPTER XVI.

ORDNANCE, ARMS AND EXPLOSIVES.

Although the progress in the invention of fire-arms of all descriptions

seems slow during the ages preceding the 19th century, yet it will be

found on investigation that no art progressed faster. No other art was

spurred to activity by such strong incentives, and none received the

same encouragement and reward for its development. The art of war was

the trade of kings and princes, and princely was the reward to the

subject who was the first to invent the most destructive weapon. Under

such high patronage most of the ideas and principles of ordnance now

prevailing were discovered or suggested, but were embodied for the most

part in rude and inefficient contrivances.

The art waited for its success on the development of other arts, and on

the mental expansion and freedom giving rise to scientific investigation

and results.

The cannon and musket themselves became the greatest instruments for the

advancement of the new civilisation, however much it was intended

otherwise by their kingly proprietors, and the new civilisation returned

the compliment through its trained intellects by giving to war its

present destructive efficiency.

To this efficiency, great as the paradox may seem, Peace holds what

quiet fields it has, or will have, until most men learn to love peace

and hate the arts of war.

As to the Chinese is given the credit for the invention of gunpowder, so

they must also be regarded as the first to throw projectiles by its

means. But their inventions in these directions may be classed as

fireworks, and have no material bearing on the modern art of Ordnance.

It is supposed that the word “cannon,” is derived from the same root as

“cane,” originally signifying a hollow reed; and that these hollow reeds

or similar tubes closed at one end were used to fire rockets by powder.

It is also stated that the practice existed among the Chinese as early

as 969 A. D. of tying rockets to their arrows to propel them to greater

distances, as well as for incendiary purposes.

This basic idea had percolated from China through India to the Moors and

Arabs, and in the course of a few centuries had developed into a crude

artillery used by the Moors in the siege of Cordova in 1280. The

Spaniards, thus learning the use of the cannon, turned the lesson upon

their instructors, when under Ferdinand IV. they took Gibraltar from the

Moors in 1309. Then the knowledge of artillery soon spread throughout

Europe. The French used it at the siege of Puy Guillaume in 1338, and

the English had three small guns at Crecy in 1346. These antique guns

were made by welding longitudinal bars of iron together and binding them

by iron rings shrunk on while hot. Being shaped internally and

externally like an apothecary’s mortar, they were called mortars or

bombards. Some were breech-loaders, having a removable chamber at the

breech into which the charge of powder was inserted behind the ball. The

balls were stone. These early cannon, bombards, and mortars were mounted

on heavy solid wooden frames and moved with great difficulty from place

to place. Then in the fifteenth century they commenced to make

wrought-iron cannon, and hollow projectiles, containing a bursting

charge of powder to be exploded by a fuse lit before the shell was

fired. In the next century cannon were cast.

The Hindoos, when their acquaintance was made by the Europeans, were as

far advanced as the latter in cannon and fire-arms. One cannon was found

at Bejapoor, in India, cast of bronze, bearing date 1548, and called the

“Master of the Field,” which weighed 89,600 pounds, and others of

similar size of later dates. Great cast bronze guns of about the same

weight as the Hindoo guns were also produced at St. Petersburg, Russia,

in the sixteenth century.

Many and strange were the names given by Europeans to their cannon in

the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries to denote their size and the

weight of the ball they carried: such as the Assick, the Bombard, the

Basilisk, the cannon Royal, or Carthoun, the Culverin, Demi-culverin,

Falcon, Siren, Serpentine, etc.

The bombards in the fifteenth century were made so large and heavy,

especially in France, that they could not be moved without being taken

apart.

When the heavy, unwieldy bombards with stone balls were used, artillery

was mostly confined to castles, towns, forts, and ships. When used in

the field they were dragged about by many yokes of oxen. But in the

latter part of the fifteenth century, when France under Louis XI. had

learned to cast lighter brass cannon, to mount them on carriages that

could be drawn by four or six horses, and which carriages had trunnions

in which the cannon were swung so as to be elevated or depressed, and

cast-iron projectiles were used instead of stones, field artillery took

its rise, and by its use the maps of the world were changed. Thus with

their artillery the French under Charles VIII., the successor of Louis

XI., conquered Italy.

In the sixteenth century Europe was busy in adopting these and other

changes. Cannon were made of all sizes and calibres, but were not

arranged in battle with much precision. Case shot were invented in

Germany but not brought into general use. Shells were invented by the

Italians and fired from mortars, but their mode of construction was

preserved in great secrecy. The early breech-loaders had been discarded,

as it was not known how to make the breech gas-tight, and the explosions

rendered the guns more dangerous to their users than to the enemy.

In the seventeenth century Holland began to make useful mortar shells

and hand grenades. Maurice and Henry Frederick of Nassau, and Gustave

Adolphus, made many improvements in the sizes and construction of

cannon. In 1674, Coehorn, an officer in the service of the Prince of

Orange, invented the celebrated mortar which bears his name, and the use

of which has continued to the present time. The Dutch also invented the

howitzer, a short gun in which the projectiles could be introduced by

hand. About the same time Comminges of France invented mortars which

threw projectiles weighing 550 pounds. In this part of that century also

great improvements were made under Louis XIV. Limbers, by which the

front part of the gun carriage was made separable from the cannon part

and provided with the ammunition chest; the prolonge, a cord and hook by

which the gun part could be moved around by hand; and the elevating

screw, by which the muzzle of the gun could be raised or

depressed,--were invented.

In the early part of the eighteenth century it was thought by

artillerists in England that the longer the gun the farther it would

carry. One, called “Queen Ann’s Pocket Piece” still preserved at Dover,

is twenty-five feet long and carries a ball only twenty-five pounds in

weight. It was only after repeated experiments that it was learned that

the shorter guns carried the projectile the greatest distance.

The greatest improvements in the eighteenth century were made by

Gribeauval, the celebrated French artillerist, about 1765. He had guns

made of such material and of such size as to adapt them to the different

services to which they were to be put, as field, siege, garrison, and

sea coast. He gave greater mobility to the system by introducing

six-pound howitzers, and making gun carriages lighter; he introduced the

system of fixed ammunition, separate compartments in the gun carriages

for the projectiles, and the charges of powder in paper or cloth bags or

cylinders; improved the construction of the elevating screw, adapted the

tangent scale, formed the artillery into horse batteries, and devised

new equipments and a new system of tactics.

It was with Gribeauval’s improved system that “Citizen Bonaparte, young

artillery officer,” took Toulon; with which the same young “bronze

artillery officer” let go his great guns in the Cul-de-Sac Dauphin

against the church of St. Roch; on the Port Royal; at the Theatre de la

Republique; “and the thing we specifically call French Revolution is

blown into space by it, and became a thing that was.”

It was with this system that this same young officer won his first

brilliant victories in Italy. When the fruit of these victories had been

lost during his absence he reappeared with his favorite artillery, and

on the threshold of the century, in May 1800, as “First Consul of the

Republic” re-achieved at Marengo the supremacy of France over Austria.

As to _small arms_, as before suggested, they doubtless had their origin

in the practice of the Chinese in throwing fire balls from bamboo

barrels by the explosion of light charges of powder, as illustrated to

this day in what are known as “Roman Candles.” Fire-crackers and

grenades were also known to the Chinese and the Greeks.

Among ancient fire-arms the principal ones were the arquebus, also

bombardelle, and the blunderbuss. They were invented in the fourteenth

century but were not much used until the fifteenth century. These guns

for the most part were so heavy that they had to be rested on some

object to be fired. The soldiers carried a sort of tripod for this

purpose. The gun was fired by a slow-burning cord, a live coal, a lit

stick, or a long rod heated at one end, and called a match. The

blunderbuss was invented in Holland. It was a large, short,

funnel-shaped muzzle-loader, and loaded with nails, slugs, etc. The

injuries and hardships suffered by the men who used it, rather than by

the enemy, rendered its name significant. Among the earliest fire-arms

of this period one was invented which was a breech-loader and revolver.

The breech had four chambers and was rotated by hand on an arbour

parallel to the barrel. The extent of its use is not learned. To ignite

the powder the “wheel-lock” and “snap-haunce” were invented by the

Germans in the sixteenth century. The wheel lock consisted of a furrowed

wheel and was turned by the trigger and chain against a fixed piece of

iron on the stock to excite sparks which fell on to the priming. The

snap-haunce, a straight piece of furrowed steel, superseded the

wheel-lock. The sixteenth century had got well started before the

English could be induced to give up the cross-bow and arrow, and adopt

the musket. After they had introduced the musket with the snap-haunce

and wooden ramrod, it became known, in the time of Queen Elizabeth, as

the “Brown Bess.”

The “old flint-lock” was quite a modern invention, not appearing until

the seventeenth century. It was a bright idea to fix a piece of flint

into the cock and arrange it to strike a steel cap on the priming pan

when the trigger was fired; and it superseded the old match, wheel-lock,

and snap-haunce. The flint-lock was used by armies well into the

nineteenth century, and is still in private use in remote localities. As

the arquebus succeeded the bow and arrow, so the musket, a smooth and

single-barrel muzzle-loader with a flint-lock and a wooden ramrod,

succeeded the arquebus. Rifles, which were the old flint-lock muskets

with their barrels provided with spiral grooves to give the bullet a

rotary motion and cause it to keep one point constantly in front during

its flight, is claimed as the invention of Augustin Kutler of Germany in

1520, and also of Koster of Birmingham, England, about 1620. Muskets

with straight grooves are said to have been used in the fifteenth

century.

The rifle with a long barrel and its flint-lock was a favourite weapon

of the American settler. It was made in America, and he fought the

Indian wars and the war of the Revolution with it.

It would not do to conclude this sketch of antique cannon and fire-arms

without referring to Puckle’s celebrated English patent No. 418, of May

15, 1718, for “A Defence.” The patent starts out with the motto:

“Defending King George, your Country, and Lawes,

Is defending Yourselves and Protestant Cause.”

It proceeds to describe a “Portable Gun or Machine” having a single

barrel, with a set of removable chambers which are charged with bullets

before they are placed in the gun, a handle to turn the chambers to

bring each chamber in line with the barrel, a tripod on which the gun is

mounted and on which it is to be turned, a screw for elevating and

turning the gun in different directions, a set of square chambers “for

shooting square bullets against Turks,” a set of round chambers “for

shooting round bullets against the Christians;” and separate drawings

show the square bullets for the Turks and the round bullets for the

Christians. History is silent as to whether Mr. Puckle’s patent was put

in practice, but it contained the germs of some modern inventions.

Among the first inventions of the century was a very important one made

by a clergyman, the Rev. Mr. Forsyth, a Scotchman, who in 1803 invented

the percussion principle in fire-arms. In 1807 he patented in England

detonating powder and pellets which were used for artillery. About 1808

General Shrapnel of the English army invented the celebrated shell known

by his name. It then consisted of a comparatively thin shell filled with

bullets, having a fuse lit by the firing of the gun, and adapted to

explode the shell in front of the object fired at. This fuse was

superseded by one invented by General Bormann of Belgium, which greatly

added to the value of case shot.

In 1814 Joshua Shaw of England invented the percussion cap. Thus, by the

invention of the percussion principle by Forsyth, and that little copper

cylinder of Shaw, having a flake of fulminating powder inside and

adapted to fit the nipple of a gun and be exploded by the fall of the

hammer, was sounded the death knell of the old flint-locks with which

the greatest battles of the world had been and were at that time being

fought. The advantages gained by the cap were the certain and

instantaneous fire, the saving in time, power, and powder obtained by

making smaller the orifice through which the ignition was introduced,

and the protection from moisture given by the covering cap. And yet so

slow is the growth of inventions sometimes that all Europe continued to

make the flint-locks for many years after the percussion cap was

invented; and General Scott, in the war between the United States and

Mexico in 1847, declined to give the army the percussion cap musket. The

cap suggested the necessity and invention of machines for making them

quickly and in great quantities.

The celebrated “Colt’s” revolver was invented by Colonel Samuel Colt of

the United States, in 1835. He continued to improve it, and in 1851

exhibited it at the World’s Fair, London, where it excited great

surprise and attention. Since then the revolver has become a great

weapon in both private and public warfare. The next great inventions in

small arms were the readoption and improvement of the breech-loader, the

making of metallic cartridges, the magazine gun, smokeless powder and

other explosives, to which further reference will be made.

To return to cannons:--In 1812 Colonel Bomford, an American officer,

invented what is called the “Columbiad,” a kind of cannon best adapted

for sea-coast purposes. They are long-chambered pieces, combining

certain qualities of the gun, howitzer and mortar, and capable of

projecting shells and solid shot with heavy charges of powder at high

angles of elevation, and peculiarly adapted to defend narrow channels

and sea-coast defences. A similar gun was invented by General Paixhans

of the French army in 1822. The adoption of the Paixhans long-chambered

guns, designed to throw heavy shells horizontally as well as at a slight

elevation and as easily as solid shot, was attended with great results.

Used by the French in 1832, in the quick victorious siege of Antwerp, by

the allies at Sebastopol, where the whole Russian fleet was destroyed in

about an hour, and in the fight of the Kearsarge and the doomed Alabama

off Cherbourg in the American civil war, it forced inventors in the

different countries to devise new and better armour for the defence of

ships. This was followed by guns of still greater penetrative power.

Then as another result effected by these greater guns came the passing

away of the old-fashioned brick and stone forts as a means of defence.

In an interesting address by Major Clarence E. Dutton of the Ordnance

Department, U.S.A., at the Centennial Patent Congress at Washington in

1891, he thus stated what the fundamental improvements were that have

characterised the modern ordnance during the century:

1. The regulation and control of the action of gunpowder in such a

manner as to exert less strain upon the gun, and to impart more energy

to the projectile.

2. To so construct the gun as to transfer a portion of the strain from

the interior parts of the walls which had borne too much of it, to the

exterior parts which had borne too little, thus nearly equalising the

strain throughout the entire thickness of the walls.

3. To provide a metal which should be at once stronger and safer than

any which had been used before.

In the United States General Rodman, “one of the pioneers of armed

science,” commenced about 1847 a series of investigations and

experiments on the power and action of gunpowder and the strains

received by every part of the gun by the exploding gases, of very great

importance; and in this matter he was assisted greatly by Dr. W. E.

Woodbridge, who invented an ingenious apparatus termed a “piezometer,”

or a pressure measurer, by which the pressure of the gases at the

various parts of the gun was determined with mathematical certainty.

Dr. Woodbridge also added greatly to the success of rifled cannon. The

success in rifling small arms, by which an elongated ball is made to

retain the same end foremost during its flight, led again to the

attempts of rifling cannon for the same purpose, which were finally

successful. But this success was due not to the spiral grooves in the

cannon bore, but in attachments to the ball compelling it to follow the

course of the grooves and giving it the proper initial movement. The

trouble with these attachments was that they were either stripped off,

or stripped away, by the gun spirals. Woodbridge in 1850 overcame the

difficulty by inventing an improved _sabot_, consisting of a ring

composed of metal softer than the projectile or cannon, fixed on the

inner end of the projectile and grooved at its rear end, so that when

the gun is fired and the ball driven forward these grooves expand,

acting valvularly to fill the grooves in the gun, thus preventing the

escape of the gases, while the ring at the same time is forced forward

on to the shell so tightly and forcibly that the projectile is

invariably given a rotary motion and made to advance strictly in the

line of axis of the bore, and in the same line during the course of its

flight. This invention in principle has been followed ever since,

although other forms have been given the sabot, and it is due to this

invention that modern rifled cannon have been so wonderfully accurate in

range and efficient in the penetrating and destructive power both on sea

and land.

Woodbridge also invented the _wire-wound cannon_, and a machine for

winding the wire upon the gun, thus giving the breach part, especially,

immense strength.

In England, among the first notable and greater inventors in ordnance

during the latter half of the century, a period which embraces the

reduction to practice of the most wonderful and successful inventions in

weapons of war which the world had up to that time seen, are Lancaster,

who invented the elliptical bore; Sir William Armstrong, who, commencing

in 1885, constructed a gun built of wrought-iron bars twisted into coils

and applied over a steel core and bound by one or more wrought-iron

rings, all applied at white heat and shrunk on by contraction due to

cooling, by which method smooth-bore, muzzle-loading cannon of immense

calibre, one weighing one hundred tons, were made. They were followed by

Armstrong, inventor of breech-loaders; Blakely, inventor of cannon made

of steel tubes and an outer jacket of cast iron; and Sir Joseph

Whitworth, inventor of most powerful steel cannon and compressed steel

projectiles.

In Germany, Friedrich Krupp at Essen, Prussia, invented and introduced

such improvements in breech-loading cannon as revolutionised the

manufacture of that species of ordnance, and established the foundation

of the greatest ordnance works in the world. The first of his great

breech-loading steel guns was exhibited at the Paris Exhibition in 1867.

A Krupp gun finished at Essen in the 70’s was then the largest steel gun

the world had ever seen. It weighed seventy-two tons, and was thirty-two

feet long. The charge consisted of 385 pounds of powder, the shell

weighed 1,660 pounds, having a bursting charge of powder of 22 pounds,

and a velocity of 1,640 feet per second. It was estimated that if the

gun were fired at an angle of 43° the shell would be carried a distance

of fifteen miles. It was in the Krupp guns, and also in the Armstrong

breech-loaders, that a simple feature was for the first time introduced

which proved of immense importance in giving great additional expansive

force to the explosion of the powder. This was an increase in the size

of the powder chamber so as to allow a vacant space in it unfilled with

powder.

In the United States, Rodman, commencing in 1847, and Dahlgren in 1850,

and Parrott in 1860, invented and introduced some noticeable

improvements in cast-iron, smooth-bore, and rifled cannon.

In France General Paixhans and Colonel Treuille de Beaulieu improved the

shells and ordnance.

The latest improvements in cannon indicate that the old smooth-bore

muzzle-loader guns are to be entirely superseded by breech-loaders, just

as in small arms the muzzle-loading musket has given way to the

breech-loading rifle.

A single lever is now employed, a single turn of which will close or

open the breech, and when opened expel the shell by the same movement.

Formerly breech-loaders were confined to the heaviest ordnance; now they

are a part of the lightest field pieces.

As to the operation of those immense guns above referred to, which

constitute principally sea-coast defences and the heavy armament for

forts, gun carriages have been invented whereby the huge guns are

quickly raised from behind immense embrasures by pneumatic or hydraulic

cylinders, quickly fired (the range having been before accurately

ascertained) and then as quickly lowered out of sight, the latter

movement being aided by the recoil action of the gun.

It is essential that the full force of the gases of explosion shall be

exerted against the base of the projectile, and therefore all escape of

such gases be prevented. To this end valuable improvements in _gas

checks_ have been made,--one kind consisting of an annular canvas sack

containing asbestos and tallow placed between the front face of the

breech block and a mushroom-shaped piece, against which the explosion

impinges.

As among projectiles and shells for cannon those have been invented

which are loaded with dynamite or other high explosive, a new class of

_Compressed air ordnance_ has been started, in which air or gas is used

for the propelling power in place of powder, whereby the chances of

exploding such shells in the bore of the gun are greatly lessened.

The construction of metals, both for cannon to resist most intense

explosives and for plates to resist the penetration of the best

projectiles, have received great attention. They are matters pertaining

to metallurgy, and are treated of under that head. The strife still

continues between impenetrable armour plate and irresistible

projectiles. Within the last decade or so shells have been invented with

the design simply to shatter or fracture the plate by which the way is

broken for subsequent shots. Other shells have been invented carrying a

high explosive and capable of penetrating armour plates of great

thickness, and exploding after such penetration has taken place.

A great accompaniment to artillery is “The Range Finder,” a telescopic

apparatus for ascertaining accurately the location and distance of

objects to be fired at.

Returning to _small arms_,--at the time percussion caps were invented in

England, 1803-1814, John H. Hall of the United States invented a

breech-loading rifle. It was in substance an ordinary musket cut in two

at the breech, with the rear piece connected by a hinge and trunnion to

the front piece, the bore of the two pieces being in line when clamped,

and the ball and cartridge inserted when the chamber was thrown up. A

large number were at once manufactured and used in the U.S. Army. A

smaller size, called _carbines_, were used by the mounted troops. After

about twenty years’ use these guns began to be regarded as dangerous in

some respects, and their manufacture and use stopped, although the

carbines continued in use to some extent in the cavalry. A

breech-loading rifle was also invented by Colonel Pauly of France in

1812, and improved by Dreyse in 1835; also in Norway in 1838, and in a

few years adopted by Sweden as superior to all muzzle-loading arms.

About 1841 the celebrated “Needle Gun” was invented in Prussia, and its

superiority over all muzzle-loaders was demonstrated in 1848 in the

first Schleswig-Holstein war.

_Cartridges_, in which the ball and powder were secured together in one

package, were old in artillery, as has been shown, but their use for

small arms is a later invention. _Metallic_ cartridges, made of sheet

metal with a fulminate cap in one end and a rim on the end of the shell

by which it could be extracted after the explosion, were invented by

numerous persons in Europe and America during the evolution of the

breech-loader. Combined metal case and paper patented in England in

1816, and numerous wholly metallic cartridge shells were patented in

England, France, and United States between 1840 and 1860. M. Lefaucheux

of France, in the later period, devised a metal _gas check_ cartridge

which was a great advance.

A number of inventors in the United States besides Hall had produced

breech-loading small arms before the Civil War of 1861, but with the

exception of Colt’s revolver and Sharp’s carbine, the latter used by the

cavalry to a small extent, none were first adopted in that great

conflict. Later, the Henry or Winchester breech-loading rifle and the

Spencer magazine gun were introduced and did good service. But the whole

known system of breech-loading small arms was officially condemned by

the U.S. Military authorities previous to that war. The absence of

machines to make a suitable cartridge in large quantities and vast

immediate necessities compelled the authorities to ignore the tested

Prussian and Swedish breech-loaders and those of their own countrymen

and to ransack Europe for muskets of ancient pattern. These were worked

by the soldiers under the ancient tactics, of load, ram, charge and

fire, until a stray bullet struck the ramrod, or the discharge of a few

rammed cartridges so over-heated the musket as to thereby dispense with

the soldier and his gun for further service in that field. However,

private individuals and companies continued to invent and improve, and

the civil war in America revolutionised the systems of warfare and its

weapons. The wooden walls of the navies disappeared as a defence after

the conflict between the Monitor and the Merrimac, and muzzle-loading

muskets became things of the past.

Torpedoes, both stationary and movable, then became a successful weapon

of warfare. Soon after that war, and when the United States had adopted

the Springfield breech-loading rifle, the works at Springfield were

equipped with nearly forty different machines, each for making a

separate part of a gun in great quantities. Many of these had been

invented by Thomas Blanchard forty years before. That great inventor of

labour-saving machinery had then designed machines for the shaping and

making of gun stocks and for forming the accompanying parts. Blanchard

was a contemporary of Hall, and Hall, to perfect his breech-loader, was

the first to invent machines for making its various parts. His was the

first interchangeable system in the making of small arms.

Army officers had come to regard “the gun as only the casket while the

cartridge is the jewel;” and to this end J. G. Gill at the U.S. Arsenal

at Frankford, Philadelphia, devised a series of cartridge-making

machines which ranked among the highest triumphs of American invention.

The single breech-loader is now being succeeded by the magazine gun, by

which a supply of cartridges in a chamber is automatically fed into the

barrel. The Springfield, has been remodelled as a magazine loader. Among

later types of repeating rifles, known from the names of their

inventors, are the “Krag-Jorgensen,” and the “Mauser,” and the crack of

these is heard around the world. Modern rifles are rendered more deadly

by the fact that they can be loaded and fired in a recumbent position,

and with smokeless powder, by which the soldier and his location remain

concealed from his foe.

The recoil of the gun in both large and small arms is now utilised to

expel the fired cartridge shell, and to withdraw a fresh one from its

magazine and place it in position in the chamber. _Compressed air and

explosive gases_ have been used for the same purpose. A small _electric

battery_ has been placed in the stock to explode the cartridge when the

trigger is pulled.

Sporting guns have kept pace with other small arms in improvements, and

among modern forms are those which discharge in alternative succession

the two barrels by a single trigger. Revolvers have been improved and

the Smith and Wesson is known throughout the world.

The idea of _Machine Guns_, or _Mitrailleuses_, was not a new one, as we

have seen from Puckle’s celebrated patent of 1718. Also history mentions

a gun composed of four breech-loading tubes of small calibre, placed on

a two-wheeled cart used in Flanders as early as 1347, and of four-tubed

guns used by the Scotch during the civil war in 1644. The machine gun

invented by Dr. Gatling of the United States during the Civil War and

subsequently perfected, has become a part of the armament of every

civilised nation. The object of the gun is to combine in one piece the

destructive effect of a great many, and to throw a continuous hail of

projectiles. The gun is mounted on a tripod; the cartridges are

contained in a hopper mounted on the breech of the gun and are fed from

locks into the barrels (which are usually five or ten in number) as the

locks and barrels are revolved by a hand crank. As the handle is turned

the cartridges are first given a forward motion, which thrusts them into

the barrels, closes the breech and fires the cartridges in succession,

and then a backward motion which extracts the empty shells. The gun

weighs one hundred pounds and firing may be kept up with a ten-barreled

gun at one thousand shots a minute.

The _Hotchkiss_ revolving cannon is another celebrated American

production named from its inventor, and constructed to throw heavier

projectiles than the Gatling. It also has revolving barrels and great

solidity in the breech mechanism. It has been found to be of great

service in resisting the attacks of torpedo boats. It is adapted to fire

long-range shells with great rapidity and powerful effect, and is

exceedingly efficient in defence of ditches and entrenchments.

_Explosives._--The desire to make the most effective explosives for

gunnery led to their invention not only for that purpose but for the

more peaceful pursuit of blasting. _Gun Cotton_, that mixture of nitric

acid and cotton, made by Schönbein in 1846, and experimented with for a

long time as a substitute for gunpowder in cannon and small arms and

finally discarded for that purpose, is now being again revived, but used

chiefly for blasting. This was followed by the discovery of

nitro-glycerine, a still more powerful explosive agent--too powerful and

uncontrollable for guns as originally made. They did not supersede

gunpowder, but smokeless powders have come, containing nitro-cellulose,

or nitro-glycerine rendered plastic, coherent and homogeneous, and

converted into rods or grains of free running powder, to aid the

breech-loaders and magazine guns, while the high explosives, gun-cotton,

nitro-glycerine, dynamite, dualine, etc., have become the favorite

agencies for those fearful offensive and defensive weapons, the

_Torpedoes_. From about the time of the discovery of gunpowder,

stationary and floating chambers and mines of powder, to be discharged

in early times by fuses (later by percussion or electricity), have

existed, but modern inventions have rendered them of more fearful

importance than was ever dreamed of before this century. The latest

invention in this class is the _submarine torpedo boat_, which, moving

rapidly towards an enemy’s vessel, suddenly disappears from sight

beneath the water, and strikes the vessel at its lowest or most

vulnerable point.

To the inquiry as to whether all this vast array of modern implements of

destruction is to lessen the destruction of human life, shorten war,

mitigate its horrors and tend toward peace, there can be but one answer.

All these desirable results have been accomplished whenever the new

inventions of importance have been used. “Warlike Tribes” have been put

to flight so easily by civilised armies in modern times that such tribes

have been doubted as possessing their boasted or even natural courage.

Nations with a glorious past as to bravery but with a poor armament have

gone down suddenly before smaller forces armed with modern ordnance. The

results would have been reversed, and the derision would have proceeded

from the other side, if the conditions had been reversed, and those

tribes and brave peoples been armed with the best weapons and the

knowledge of their use. The courage of the majority of men on the

battle-field is begot of confidence and enthusiasm, but this confidence

and enthusiasm, however great the cause, soon fail, and discretion

becomes the better part of valour, if men find that their weapons are

weak and useless against vastly superior arms of the enemy. The

slaughter and destruction in a few hours with modern weapons may not be

more terrible than could be inflicted with the old arms by far greater

forces at close quarters in a greater length of time in the past, but

the end comes sooner; and the prolongation of the struggle with renewed

sacrifices of life, and the long continued and exhausting campaigns,

giving rise to diseases more destructive than shot or shell, are thereby

greatly lessened, if not altogether avoided.

Inventions in the century · 第 16 / 31 章