CHAPTER VIII.

Neglected and distrusted by the sovereign whom he had delivered,

Sobieski found consolation in detailing his victory, his spoil, and his

wrongs alike to his wife. We find the great soldier again, in the full

flush of his victory, writing indefatigably to his _Mariette_. It is on

the night of the 13th, in the Vizier's late quarters, in the camp still

cumbered with the slaughter of the combatants and of prisoners. The loss

had been heavy in the fighting upon both sides, he tells us; and such an

estimate, formed at such a moment by the victorious general, by far

outweighs the accounts by which the French above all tried to minimize

the slaughter made, and with it the greatness of the victory won.[26]

He begins his letter: "God be blessed for ever. He has given victory to

our people; He has given them such a triumph that past ages have not

seen the like." All around, the explosions of the Turkish ammunition,

fired by the plunderers from city and army, "make a din like the last

judgment." He plunges into a description of the riches that the camp

contains. "The Vizier has made me his heir; he has done everything _en

galant homme_." "You cannot say to me, 'You are no warrior,' as the

Tartar women say to their husbands when they return empty-handed." "For

two nights and a day plunder has gone on at will; even the townsfolk

have taken their share, and I am sure that there is enough left for

eight days more. The plunder we got at Choczim was nothing to this."

There was a touch of the barbaric chieftain in the Polish king, and he

keenly enjoyed not merely the victory, but the spoil which he had won.

At the end of the seventeenth century, the character of this general of

the school of Montecuculi, this admirer of Condé, recalls to us at once

the ardour of a crusader, and the affectionate rapacity of a

moss-trooper, reserving the richest plunder of a foray to deck his wife

at home. He exults in the belts and in the watches studded with jewels,

the stuffs and the embroideries which are to adorn his wife's boudoir.

But he is still bent on action. "We must march to-morrow for Hungary,"

he says, "and start at the double, to escape the smell of the camp and

its refuse, with the thousands of bodies of men and of animals lying

unburied."

One letter, at least, he had despatched before writing to his wife. He

knew well the feelings with which the King of France would regard the

salvation of the Empire, and the setting free of the attention of

Germany to be directed to his own designs. In Sobieski's own words to

his wife, he thus reveals his triumph over the French king, whose

intrigues had been ceaselessly directed to prevent his coming: "I have

written to the King of France; I have told him that it was to him

especially, as to the Most Christian King, that I felt bound to convey

the information of the battle that we have won, and of the safety of

Christendom." This letter remained unanswered. It is said that the

proofs of Louis' dealings with the Turks had at that moment passed into

the hands of the victors, amid the plunder of the Vizier's quarters.

No sooner had Louis heard that the intrigues of his agents had failed,

and that Sobieski was actually in the field, than his armies were let

loose upon the Spanish Netherlands. Unable to anticipate the victory at

Vienna, the French revenged it by seizing Courtrai and Dixmunde in the

autumn, and bombarding Luxemburg before the end of the year. The French

nobility had been forbidden to hasten to the defence of Christendom; and

now were inclined to depreciate, at least in words, the victory they had

not shared.

Amidst the general chorus of admiration and of thankfulness which rose

from Europe, in France, and in France alone, were the deeds of Sobieski

slighted. He had cut in pieces not only the Turks, but the prophecies

which had filled Paris of the approaching downfall of the house of

Austria. The allies of that house took a bolder tone; Spain talked of

the declaration of that war against Louis which he had provoked for so

long; the United Provinces listened to the warlike councils of the

Prince of Orange; the Emperor spoke decidedly of succouring all his

friends.

Far different was to be the progress of Louis' aggressions upon Germany,

now that the overmastering fear of Turkish invasion was done away with,

and the Turkish hold upon Hungary loosened. The alliance of Laxenberg

and the other leagues were now to ripen into the great confederacy of

Augsburg and the Grand Alliance.

Upon the Ottoman power the effect of the victory was decisive. Turkish

rule in Hungary had received a blow from which it never recovered. It is

true that Sobieski, advancing rashly with his cavalry alone, shortly

involved himself in a disaster, near the bridge of the Danube, opposite

Gran. The king himself had to ride for his life from the Turkish

horsemen. The check, however, was avenged by the complete destruction of

the force which had inflicted it; and the fortress of Gran, the most

important place upon that side of Hungary, became the prize of the

conqueror.

The views of Sobieski embraced the reduction of Buda, and, perhaps, of

the whole of Hungary, in this campaign. But this was forbidden by the

lateness of the season, still more by the jealousy of the Emperor. The

king warred against the Turks, but not against the Hungarians. He

sympathized with their efforts to regain their liberties, and strove to

reconcile rather than to subdue Tekeli. Leopold was fearful of the

establishment of a Polish interest in the country, and showed a studied

neglect of his allies. But had other causes allowed, the insubordination

of the Poles would have prevented further conquests. The Polish

nobility, the political masters of their king, were foremost in

clamouring for a return to their native country. A prolonged career of

conquest was impossible at the head of such a State and army. The hopes

of a Hungarian alliance died away. Tekeli, after much hesitation,

refused to enter into the negotiations which the king proposed; and

reluctantly the deliverer of Christendom withdrew through Upper Hungary

into Poland again, reducing some towns upon the road, but leaving his

great work half done. His army melted in his hands. The tardy

Lithuanians, too late for the fighting, arrived to add to his vexation

in Moravia, where they disgraced their country by pillaging the people

whom they had not helped to save.

But Sobieski was not alone in suffering from the Emperor's ingratitude.

Starhemberg, the defender of the city, was deservedly rewarded; but most

of the others, from Lorraine downwards, who had participated in the

battle, had little recompense for their services. Even the ardour of the

Elector of Bavaria was for a time cooled by the coolness of the Emperor,

though he returned again to the service of his future father-in-law. The

Elector of Saxony, Waldeck, and others left the scene of the campaign to

enjoy their triumph, or to plunge into other enterprises; but under

Lorraine, and a series of generals, culminating in that Eugene of Savoy,

who had seen his first service at Vienna, the Turks were driven foot by

foot from Hungary. Kara Mustapha shortly paid for his defeat, as Ottoman

commanders did pay--with his head, suffering not unjustly. But his

successors, though less incompetent, were scarcely on the whole more

fortunate than he.

In vain a new Kiuprili was found to head the Turkish armies and to

reform the Turkish State. A short gleam of success under his leadership

was ended by his death in battle. In vain a Sultan, Mustapha II., again

appeared himself at the head of his armies. The means of warfare of the

Ottomans were to a great extent expended and lost beyond repair in the

great disaster at Vienna. New enemies rose up against them in their

weakness. Russia in the Ukraine, Venice in the Morea and in Dalmatia,

began conquests at the expense of the Porte. The war indeed dragged on,

delayed by the renewed contest between France and the Augsburg league;

but the very weakness of Austria served merely to show more clearly the

fallen fortunes of the Turks, who could make no lasting stand against

her. Steadily upon the whole the fortunes of the Ottomans declined,

though it was not till the great victory of Eugene at Zenta, in 1697,

that they were driven reluctantly to treat. The peace signed at

Carlowitz, in 1699, illustrates the altered relations of Europe since

the beginning of the war, when the Turks had been a menace to Germany.

For the first time, an European conference considered the affairs of

Turkey. England and Holland were mediators of the peace, that the

Emperor might be more free to act with them in the coming war of the

Spanish Succession. Sobieski had nearly three years earlier become a

memory, with his victories, his schemes, and his disappointments, in the

grave; and with him ended the ever unstable greatness of Poland. Another

yet more notable northern sovereign, Peter the Czar, was a party to the

negotiations. Everywhere was territory rent from Turkey. To Austria, she

yielded nearly all of Hungary and Transylvania, with most of the

Sclavonian lands between the Save and the Drave; to Poland, she gave up

Podolia; to Russia, Azof; to Venice, the Morea and parts of Dalmatia.

One point she proudly refused to yield. The Hungarian Tekeli and his

friends, who had sought her hospitality, were retained by her, safe from

the vengeance of the Emperor; as in 1849 other Hungarian exiles were

shielded by the Turks, against the vengeance of Austria and of Russia

combined. This was the first peace which had permanently reduced the

frontiers of the Ottomans; it marked the termination of the last of the

great Mohammedan aggressions upon Christendom; it saw the end of the

secret understandings by which, since the days of Francis I., France

had endeavoured to use Turkey for the subversion of Austria and for the

ends of her own ambition. The complete reversal of the former positions

of the combatants, the disastrous termination of the war for Turkey, the

"rolling away of the stone of Tantalus that hung above _their_ heads,

the intolerable woe for the _Germans_",[27] the far-reaching results of

the struggle in the future history of Europe--all are traceable to the

day when the genius of Sobieski marked triumphantly, from the windy

heights of the Kahlenberg, that fatal incapacity which should open for

him the way, as victorious deliverer, to the foot of the ruined ramparts

of Vienna.

But naturally, before concluding our consideration of the subject, we

ask what gain did Poland, or the King of Poland, gather from the

enterprise in which he had played so glorious a part? For a few months

he was the centre of the admiring eyes of Christendom. "_L'empire du

monde vous serait du si le ciel l'eût réservé à un seul potentat_,"

wrote Christina of Sweden from Rome, not without a glance at the

pretensions of Louis XIV. to supremacy, and of Leopold to an imperial

primacy in Europe. Never before had Poland filled so great a place in

the eyes of the world. The cautious Venetians sought her special

alliance. In the language of diplomacy she was _Respublica Serenissima_;

but untroubled she never was, and her greatness was of short duration.

It is true that the frontiers of the State were relieved of a constant

fear. The Turks were for the time broken, the Tartars were crushed, the

Cossacks of the Ukraine again reduced to submission. But Sobieski had

fought and had conquered for others. His country was incapable of

gathering the fruits of victory; incapable of prolonged effort, and

therefore of lasting success. At the peace of Carlowitz, Podolia, with

the fortress of Kaminiec, was recovered; but Moldavia had been in vain

invaded by the Poles; and the Turks, it was soon seen, were beaten for

the benefit of Austria; the Tartars for the benefit of Russia.

The King of Poland, alive to the shortcomings of his countrymen, was

unable to correct them. A man who was at least the most eminent soldier,

general we may not say, of Europe; a man who above all others living

fulfilled the character of a hero; a king who had saved his country; a

husband who was devoted to his wife, found himself thwarted by his

subjects, and distracted by quarrels in his family. No doubt he laboured

to render the crown hereditary in his house, a service to his country it

would have been had he succeeded; but the jealousy of the Poles, still

more that of the neighbouring sovereigns, and to some extent the

misconduct of his wife, rendered this impossible. He found himself the

object of an empty respect, but the wielder of no authority; he saw his

country without order, without steadiness of purpose, unable to follow

any settled policy in conjunction either with France or with the enemies

of France. The factions of the Diet left him without soldiers and

without money. Not for the first, but nearly for the last time, the

Poles were victorious in battle, but were destined to fail woefully in

attaining the objects of war. The end was not far off. Sobieski was

followed by a foreigner upon the throne, and within ten years of his

death, Charles XII. of Sweden was disposing as a conqueror of the crown

of Poland. The prey to the ambition of her neighbours his country has

remained, now like her king a memory, to serve as a lesson of the

consequences of the disregard of those restraints and of that

self-control which alone can render freedom safe and liberty a blessing.

For want of these her place has vanished from the map of Europe, sooner

even than that of the foe whom she destroyed.

FOOTNOTES:

[26] A moderate estimate of the Christian loss is five thousand men, or

about one-fifteenth of those on the field; a loss in about the same

proportion as that of both sides at Sadowa. The Poles alone confessed to

the loss of one hundred officers killed, and they were neither so long

nor so hotly engaged as the left wing. The loss of the centre was

probably less. Thürheim and Schimmer give of the allies four thousand,

and twenty-five thousand Turks; but the latter figures are quite

uncertain, and the Christians made the least of their losses. As the

fight was so much hand-to-hand, with little artillery fire, it would

resemble ancient battles, where the loss of the vanquished was always

disproportionately large. The memoirs of the Duke of Lorraine simply

say, that "for about three hours the fighting was very bloody upon both

sides." Fighting, however, had began soon after daybreak, and the

pursuit lasted till nightfall.

[27]

[Greek: epeidê ton huper kephalas ge Tantalon lithon para tis etrepsen

ammi theos, atolmaton Elladi mochthon.]

PINDAR, Isth. viii. 10.

Written after the repulse of the great Persian invasion.

THE END.

PRINTED BY WILLIAM CLOWES AND SONS, LIMITED,

LONDON AND BECCLES.

[Illustration: Map

Archiducatus Austriae Inferioris Geographics et Noviter Emendata

Accuratissima Descriptio.

(1697.)]

Vienna 1683 The History and Consequences of the Defeat of the Turks before Vienna, September 12, 1683, by John Sobieski, King of Poland, and Charles Leopold, Duke of Lorraine · 第 8 / 8 章